Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-12
Ethical perspectives on pre-hospital triage mechanisms among Swiss healthcare stakeholders during times of medical resource scarcity: A qualitative study
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic placed Switzerland's healthcare system into an extraordinary situation, creating a profound ethical challenge of deciding which patients to treat. While in-hospital triage received much attention, little is known about pre-hospital triage and its ethical implications. The purpose of our study was to explore the perceptions of stakeholders involved in Swiss healthcare regarding pre-hospital triage during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland, with a particular focus on how it affected the treatment and care of older people during times of resource scarcity. We conducted 57 qualitative interviews with such stakeholders and analysed them with reflexive thematic analysis. We identified three main themes (1) ‘Tracing pre-hospital triage’ captures participants’ reflections on how hospital access may have been restricted before patient arrival; (2) ‘Exploring pre-hospital Silent Triage’ outlines, based on participants’ assumptions and explanations, the occurrence of Silent Triage; (3) In ‘Examining concrete mechanisms of pre-hospital triage’ we refer to explicit actions taken to avoid hospitalization. Although many participants believed urgent hospitalization was always available, our study highlights signs of Silent Triage. These were mainly based on our participants’ descriptions about the persistent concern over the potential to overload the healthcare system and their suspicions of self-triage among older adults. To prevent future Silent Triage, it is imperative to make real-time hospital data on capacity available and to ensure public communication that affirms equal access to care.
WirthBStuckiMJoergR, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on inpatient health care in Switzerland 2020–2021—A descriptive retrospective study using admission data of all Swiss hospitals. PLOS ONE2024; 19: e0306791.
4.
JaziriRAlnahdiS. Choosing which COVID-19 patient to save? The ethical triage and rationing dilemma. Ethics, Med Public Health2020; 15: 100570.
5.
GilbertAGhuysenA. Triage in the time of COVID-19. Lancet Digit Health2022; 4: e210–e211.
OrfaliK. What triage issues reveal: Ethics in the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy and France. Bioethical Inquiry2020; 17: 675–679.
9.
OrfaliK. Getting to the truth: Ethics, trust, and triage in the United States versus Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hastings Center Report2021; 51: 16–22.
VinayRBaumannHBiller-AndornoN. Ethics of ICU triage during COVID-19. Br Med Bull2021; 138: 5–15.
12.
GradwohlNNethHGieseH, et al. Explicit discrimination and ingroup favoritism, but no implicit biases in hypothetical triage decisions during COVID-19. Sci Rep2024; 14: 1213.
13.
JoebgesSBiller-AndornoN. Ethics guidelines on COVID-19 triage—an emerging international consensus. Crit Care2020; 24: 201.
NickelCHRueggMParggerH, et al. Age, comorbidity, frailty status: Effects on disposition and resource allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Swiss Med Wkly2020; 150: w20269–w20269.
ChanLSchaich BorgJConitzerV, et al. Which features of patients are morally relevant in ventilator triage? A survey of the UK public. BMC Med Ethics2022; 23: 33.
18.
RybergJ. COVID-19, triage decisions, and indirect ethics: A model for the re-evaluation of triage guidelines. Ethics Med Public Health2021; 17: 100639.
19.
KuhnEHenkeOEvangE, et al. Silent Triage: Public Health decision-making beyond prioritisation. BMJ Global Health2023; 8: 1–3.
20.
KimKOhB. Prehospital triage in emergency medical services system: A scoping review. Int Emerg Nurs2023; 69: 101293.
21.
KronesTSchüpbachRMonteverdeS. When preparing for the worst might be even worse - uncovering the dynamics of silent triage in Switzerland during the Corona pandemic [Internet]. 2022. (World Congress of Bioethics). Available from: https://arbor.bfh.ch/17245/.
TongASainsburyPCraigJ. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care: J Int Soc Qual Health Care2007; 19: 349–357.
30.
WildDGroveAMartinM, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health2005; 8: 94–104.
31.
HewittJCarterBVilches-MoragaA, et al. The effect of frailty on survival in patients with COVID-19 (COPE): A multicentre, European, observational cohort study. Lancet Public Health2020; 5: e444–e451.
32.
SimonNRJauslinASRueeggM, et al. Association of Frailty with Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Suspected COVID-19 Infection. J Clin Med2021; 10: 1–12.
33.
RuedaJ. Ageism in the COVID-19 pandemic: Age-based discrimination in triage decisions and beyond. Hist Philos Life Sci2021; 43: 91.
34.
GillSL. Qualitative sampling methods. J Hum Lact: Off J Int Lact Consultant Assoc2020; 36: 579–581.
35.
HenninkMMKaiserBNMarconiVC. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough?Qual Health Res2017; 27: 591–608.
36.
BraunVClarkeV. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health2019; 11: 589–597.
37.
BraunVClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2006; 3: 77–101.
D’cruzMBanerjeeD. An invisible human rights crisis”: The marginalization of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic - an advocacy review. Psychiatry Res2020; 292: 113369.
40.
Derrer-MerkEReyes-RodriguezMFSoulsbyLK, et al. Older adults’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative systematic literature review. BMC Geriatr2023; 23: 580.
41.
JeckerNS. Too old to save? COVID-19 and age-based allocation of lifesaving medical care. Bioethics2022; 36: 802–808.
42.
KneerMHannikainenIR. Trolleys, triage and COVID-19: The role of psychological realism in sacrificial dilemmas. Cognition Emotion2022; 36: 137–153.
43.
TyrrellCSBMyttonOTGentrySV, et al. Managing intensive care admissions when there are not enough beds during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Thorax2021; 76: 302–312.
44.
MerloFLeporiMMalacridaR, et al. Physicians’ acceptance of triage guidelines in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Front Public Health2021; 9: 695231.
45.
BeauchampTLChildressJF. Principles of biomedical ethics. Eighth edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2019, 496 p.
46.
NabMvan VehmendahlRSomersI, et al. Delayed emergency healthcare seeking behaviour by Dutch emergency department visitors during the first COVID-19 wave: A mixed methods retrospective observational study. BMC Emerg Med2021; 21: 56.
47.
Jimenez-SotomayorMRGomez-MorenoCSoto-Perez-de-CelisE. Coronavirus, ageism, and twitter: An evaluation of tweets about older adults and COVID-19. J Am Geriatr Soc2020; 68: 1661–1665.
48.
SilvaMFda SilvaDSMBacurauAdM, et al. Ageism against older adults in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: An integrative review. Revista de Saúde Pública2021; 55: 4.
49.
Morrow-HowellNGaluciaNSwinfordE. Recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic: A focus on older adults. J Aging Soc Policy2020; 32: 526–535.
50.
FraserSLagacéMBonguéB, et al. Ageism and COVID-19: What does our society’s response say about us?Age Ageing2020; 49: 692–695.
51.
RahmanAJahanY. Defining a ‘risk group’ and ageism in the era of COVID-19. J Loss Trauma2020; 25: 631–634.
52.
MoynihanRSandersSMichaleffZA, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: A systematic review. BMJ Open2021; 11: e045343.
53.
RachaminYMeyerMRRosemannT, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on elective and emergency inpatient procedure volumes in Switzerland – A retrospective study based on insurance claims data. Int J Health Policy Manag2023 Dec 1; 12: 1–9.
54.
MenonLKRichardVMestralC, et al. Forgoing healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic in Geneva, Switzerland - A cross-sectional population-based study. Prev Med2022; 156: 106987.
55.
BailKGossJDraperB, et al. The cost of hospital-acquired complications for older people with and without dementia; a retrospective cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res2015; 15: 91.
56.
FoggCGriffithsPMeredithP, et al. Hospital outcomes of older people with cognitive impairment: An integrative review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry2018; 33: 1177–1197.
57.
FongTGJonesRNMarcantonioER, et al. Adverse outcomes after hospitalization and delirium in persons with Alzheimer disease. Ann Intern Med2012; 156: 848–856. W296.
58.
Gilmore-BykovskyiACottonQMorganJ, et al. Diverse perspectives on hospitalisation events among people with dementia: Protocol for a multisite qualitative study. BMJ Open2021; 11: e043016.
59.
ReillyJCHoughtonC. The experiences and perceptions of care in acute settings for patients living with dementia: A qualitative evidence synthesis. Int J Nurs Stud2019; 96: 82–90.
60.
Steiermärkische Krankenanstalten. Patienten und Angehörige. 2025 [cited 2025 Feb 12]. Demenz und Delir. Available from: https://www.kages.at/demenz-und-delir.
61.
DesaiUKirsonNYYeW, et al. Trends in health service use and potentially avoidable hospitalizations before Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis: A matched, retrospective study of US Medicare beneficiaries. Alzheimers Dement (Amst)2019; 11: 125–135.
62.
PhelanEABorsonSGrothausL, et al. Association of incident dementia with hospitalizations. JAMA2012; 307: 165–172.
63.
PirainoEHeckmanGGlennyC, et al. Transitional care programs: Who is left behind? A systematic review. Int J Integr Care2012; 12: e132.
64.
StockENickelCHElgerBS, et al. The instrumental value of advance directives: Lesson learned from the COVID-19 pandemic for policymaking. Res Health Serv Reg2025; 4: 1.
65.
LoweySE. Withholding medical interventions and ageism during a pandemic: A model for resource allocation decision making. J Hosp Palliat Nurs2021; 23: 200–206.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
