This research analyses the demand-side of politics in Southern European countries, investigating how three relevant voting determinants have changed throughout time. The focus is on Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain, and the examined variables are the European Union, immigration and state intervention in the economy. The period of analysis is 2009–2019 and we identify the structure of political conflicts from the point of view of voters. We find that the electoral support of parties has been increasingly influenced by party positions on immigration (with the partial exception of Portugal), but not on the European Union. Moreover, the issue of ‘state control and regulation of the economy’ is boosting its explanatory power in all the countries investigated in this study. Thus, new issue determinants have gradually reshaped the system of voting preferences across Southern Europe, with voter demands becoming more likely to match party supply on immigration and economic interventionism.
AdamsJEzrowLSomer-TopcuZ (2011) Is Anybody Listening? Evidence That Voters Do Not Respond to European Parties’ Policy Statements During Elections. American Journal of Political Science55: 370–382.
2.
AlonsoSRuiz-RufinoR (2018) The Costs of Responsibility for the Political Establishment of the Eurozone (1999–2015). Party Politics26 (3): 317–333.
3.
BakkerRJollySPolkJ (2012) Complexity in the European Party Space: Exploring Dimensionality with Experts. European Union Politics13 (2): 219–245.
BiermannFGuérinNJagdhuberS, et al. (2019) Political in the Euro Crisis and the Refugee Crisis: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Explanation. Journal of European Public Policy26 (2): 246–266.
6.
BisgaardMSlothuusR (2018) Partisan Elites as Culprits? How Party Cues Shape Partisan Perceptual Gaps. American Journal of Political Science62: 456–469.
7.
BoscoAVerneyS (2018) Crisis Elections, New Contenders and Government Formation: Breaking the Mould in Southern Europe. London: Routledge.
8.
BremerBHutterSKriesiH-P (2020) Dynamics of Protest and Electoral Politics in the Great Recession. European Journal of Political Research59 (4): 842–866.
9.
CarminesEGStimsonJA (1980) The Two Faces of Issue Voting. American Political Science Review74 (1): 78–91.
10.
CarrieriL (2020) The Impact of European Integration on West European Politics: Committed Pro-Europeans Strike Back. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
CarrieriLVittoriD (2021) Defying Europe? The Euroscepticism of Radical Right and Radical Left Voters in Western Europe. Journal of European Integration43 (8): 955–971.
12.
CharalambousGContiNPedrazzaniA (2021) Issue Salience and Party Competition in Southern Europe Before and After the Euro Crisis: The Primacy of the Economy Holding Back Cultural Issues. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties. Epub ahead of print 9April. DOI: 10.1080/17457289.2021.1908312.
13.
ContiNCottaMTavaresP (2010) Southern Europe: A Distinctive and More Region in the EU?South European Society and Politics15 (1): 121–142.
14.
De SioLWeberT (2014) Issue Yield: A Model of Party Strategy in Multidimensional Space. American Political Science Review108 (4): 870–885.
15.
De SioLFranklinMNWeberT (2016) The Risks and Opportunities of Europe: How Issue Yield Explains to the Financial Crisis. Electoral Studies44: 483–491.
16.
De VriesCMarksG (2012) The Struggle Over Dimensionality: A Note on Theory and Empirics. European Union Politics13 (2): 185–193.
17.
De VriesCE (2018) The Divide: Changing Patterns of Party and Electoral Competition in the Netherlands and Beyond. Journal of European Public Policy25 (11): 1541–1565.
18.
De WildePLeupoldASchmidtkeH (2016) Introduction: The Differentiated Politicisation of European Governance. West European Politics39 (1): 3–22.
19.
DelisAMatakosKXefterisD (2020) Electoral Spillovers in an Intertwined World: Brexit Effects on the 2016 Spanish Vote. British Journal of Political Science50 (3): 1169–1174.
20.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
21.
EgmondMBrugWHoboltS, et al. (2013) European Parliament Election Study 2009, Voter Study. ZA5055 Data file Version 1.1.0. Cologne: GESIS Data Archive.
22.
FernandesJMMagalhãesPC (2020) The 2019 Portuguese General Elections. West European Politics43 (4): 1038–1050.
23.
Green-PedersenC (2007) The Growing Importance of Issue Competition: The Changing Nature of Party Competition in Western Europe. Political Studies55: 607–628.
24.
GrittersováJIndridasonIHGregoryCC, et al. (2016) Austerity and Niche Parties: The Electoral Consequences of Fiscal Reforms. Electoral Studies42: 276–289.
25.
HenjakA (2010) Political Cleavages and Context: How Welfare Regimes and Historical Divisions Shape Political Cleavages. West European Politics33 (3): 474–504.
26.
HixSNouryARolandG (2006) Dimensions of Politics in the European Parliament. American Journal of Political Science50 (2): 494–520.
27.
HoboltSBLeblondP (2014) Economic Insecurity and Public Support for the Euro before and during the Financial Crisis. In: BermeoNBartelsL (eds) Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinion Votes and Protest in the Great Recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.128–147.
28.
HoogheLMarksG (2018) Cleavage Theory Meets Europe’s Crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy25 (1): 109–135.
29.
HutterSKriesiH-P (2019) Politicizing Europe in Times of Crisis. Journal of European Public Policy26 (7): 996–1017.
30.
HutterSBraunDKerscherA (2016) Constitutive Issues as Driving Forces of Politicisation. In: HutterSGrandeEKriesiH-P (eds) Politicising Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.137–155.
31.
HutterSKriesiH-PVidalG (2018) Old Versus New Politics: The Political Spaces in Southern Europe in Times of Crises. Party Politics24 (1): 10–22.
32.
JollySBakkerRHoogheL, et al. (2021) Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–2019. Electoral Studies75: 102420.
33.
KriesiH-P (2016) The Politicization of European Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies54 (1): 32–47.
34.
KriesiH-PGrandeEDolezalM, et al. (2012) Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
KriesiH-PGrandeELachatR, et al. (2008) West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
LefkofridiZWagnerMWillmannJE (2014) Left Authoritarians and Policy Representation in Western Europe: Electoral Choice Across Ideological Dimensions. West European Politics37 (1): 65–90.
37.
Lewis-BeckMS (1986) Comparative Economic Voting: Britain, France, Germany, Italy. American Journal of Political Science30 (2): 315–346.
38.
LipsetSMRokkanS (1967) Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. New York: Free Press.
39.
LisiMQuarantaMReal-DatoJ, et al. (2021) Assessing the Impact of Age, Cohort and Period Effects on Partisanship and Support for Mainstream Parties: Evidence from Southern Europe. South European Society and Politics26 (2): 239–270.
40.
MagalhãesPC (2017) A Tale of Two Elections: Information, Motivated Reasoning, and the Economy in the 2011 and 2015 Portuguese Elections. Analise Social52 (225): 736–758.
41.
MedranoJD (2010) Framing Europe: Attitudes to European Integration in Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
MorlinoLRanioloF (2017) The Impact of Economic Crisis on South European Democracies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
43.
Pardos-PradoSSagarzazuI (2019) Economic Performance and Conflicts in Party Competition. Party Politics25 (1): 50–62.
44.
PauwelsT (2014) Populism in Western Europe: Comparing Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. Abingdon: Routledge.
45.
PirroALPTaggartPKesselS (2018) The Populist Politics of Euroscepticism in Times of Crisis: Comparative Conclusions. Politics38 (3): 378–390.
46.
RamiroLGomezR (2017) Populism During the Great Recession: Podemos and Its Competition with the Established Radical Left. Political Studies65 (1): 108–126.
47.
ReifKSchmittH (1980) Nine National Elections – A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results. European Journal of Political Research8: 3–44.
48.
RogowskiJC (2014) Electoral Choice, Ideological Conflict, and Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science58 (2): 479–494.
49.
SchäferCPopaSABraunD, et al. (2020) The Reshaping of Political Conflict Over Europe: From to Crisis. West European Politics44 (3): 431–557.
50.
SchmittHHoboltSBPopaSA, et al. (2016) European Parliament Election Study 2014, Voter Study, First Post-Election Survey. ZA5160 Data file Version 4.0.0. Cologne: GESIS Data Archive. DOI: 10.4232/1.12628.
51.
SchmittHHoboltSBvan der BrugW, et al. (2020) European Parliament Election Study 2019, Voter Study. ZA7581 Data File Version 1.0.0. Cologne: GESIS Data Archive. DOI: 10.4232/1.13473.
52.
StathamPTrenzH-J (2015) Understanding the Mechanisms of EU Politicization: Lessons from the Eurozone Crisis. Comparative European Politics13 (3): 287–306.
53.
StollH (2010) Conflict Salience and Dimensionality in Western Europe: Concepts and Empirical Findings. West European Politics33 (3): 445–473.
54.
TraberDGigerNHäusermannS (2018) How Economic Crises Affect Political Representation: Declining Congruence in Times of Constrained Government. West European Politics41 (5): 1100–1124.
55.
TreibO (2020) Euroscepticism Is Here to Stay: What Cleavage Theory Can Teach Us About the 2019 European Parliament Elections. Journal of European Public Policy28: 174–189.
56.
TsatsanisELisiMFreireA (2021) The ‘Lost Generation’ and Its Political Discontents: Divides in Southern Europe after the Crisis. South European Society and Politics26 (2): 133–151.
57.
Van der BrugWVan der EjikCFranklinM (2007) The Economy and the Vote. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
Van der EijkCVan der BrugWKroh FranklinMN (2006) Rethinking the Dependent Variable in Voting Behavior: On the Measurement and Analysis of Electoral Utilities. Electoral Studies25: 424–447.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
