In this paper, graphene, graphene/matrix, and graphene/fiber nanocomposites, including their synthesis process, fabrication, properties, and potential applications, were reviewed. It was found that several synthesis techniques for nanographene were developed, such as liquid-phase exfoliation and chemical vapor deposition. In addition, some fabrication processes of graphene/matrix and graphene/fiber-based nanocomposites were made, including in-situ polymerization, nanostitching in that single layer nano graphene plate could be interconnected by means of carbon nanotube stitching, resin transfer molding, and vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding. Several properties, including mechanical, thermal, and electrical, on the graphene nanoplatelets materials were summarized in this review paper. It was realized that graphene, graphene/matrix, and graphene/fiber nanocomposites have extraordinary mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties used in advanced engineering applications, including soft robotics, microelectronics, energy storage, biomedical and biosensors as well as textile industry.
Al MahmudHRadueMSChinkanjanarotS, et al. Multiscale modeling of carbon fiber-graphene nanoplatelet-epoxy hybrid composites using a reactive force field. Compos B Eng2019; 172: 628–635.
2.
KausarARafiqueIMuhammadB.Aerospace application of polymer nanocomposite with carbon nanotube, graphite, graphene oxide, and nanoclay. Polym Plast Technol Eng2017; 56: 1438–1456.
3.
CamargoPHCSatyanarayanaKGWypychF.Nanocomposites: synthesis, structure properties and new application opportunities. Mat Res2009; 12: 1–39.
4.
DunlopMJBissessurR.Nanocomposites based on graphene analogous materials and conducting polymers: a review. J Mater Sci2020; 55: 6721–6753.
YoungRJLiuMKinlochIA, et al. The mechanics of reinforcement of polymers by graphene nanoplatelets. Compos Sci Technol2018; 154: 110–116.
7.
PradhanSChattopadhyaySRatnaD.Graphene nanoplatelets in polychloroprene matrix: an insight to dispersion with a special emphasize to electro‐mechanical properties. Polym Compos2019; 40: E1871–E1883.
8.
YoungRJKinlochIAGongL, et al. The mechanics of graphene nanocomposites: a review. Compos Sci Technol2012; 72: 1459–1476.
9.
KingJAKlimekDRMiskiogluI, et al. Mechanical properties of graphene nanoplatelet/epoxy composites. J Appl Polym Sci2013; 128: 4217–4223.
10.
MohanVBLauK-tHuiD, et al. Graphene-based materials and their composites: a review on production, applications and product limitations. Compos B Eng2018; 142: 200–220.
11.
SrivastavaVKGriesTVeitD, et al. Effect of nanomaterial on mode I and mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of woven carbon fabric reinforced polymer composites. Eng Fract Mech2017; 180: 73–86.
12.
ZhangXFanXYanC, et al. Interfacial microstructure and properties of carbon fiber composites modified with graphene oxide. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2012; 4: 1543–1552.
13.
LiuLYanFLiM, et al. Improving interfacial properties of hierarchical reinforcement carbon fibers modified by graphene oxide with different bonding types. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2018; 107: 616–625.
14.
SabooriBAyatollahiMR.Experimental fracture study of MWCNT/epoxy nanocomposites under the combined out-of-plane shear and tensile loading. Polym Test2017; 59: 193–202.
15.
EskizeybekVYarAAvcıA.CNT-PAN hybrid nanofibrous mat interleaved carbon/epoxy laminates with improved mode I interlaminar fracture toughness. Compos Sci Technol2018; 157: 30–39.
16.
ThostensonETRenZChouT-W.Carbon nanotubes and their composites: a review. Compos Sci Technol2001; 61: 1899–1912.
17.
TangBHuGGaoH, et al. Application of graphene as filler to improve thermal transport property of epoxy resin for thermal interface materials. Int J Heat Mass Transf2015; 85: 420–429.
18.
BortzDRHerasEGMartin-GullonI.Impressive fatigue life and fracture toughness improvements in graphene oxide/epoxy composites. Macromolecules2012; 45: 238–245.
19.
LawalAT.Graphene-based nano composites and their applications. A review. Biosens Bioelectron2019; 141: 111384.
20.
CataldiPAthanassiouABayerI.Graphene nanoplatelets-based advanced materials and recent progress in sustainable applications. Appl Sci2018; 8: 1438.
21.
GeimAKNovoselovKS.The rise of graphene. Nat Mater2007; 6: 183–191.
22.
GeimAK.Graphene: status and prospects. Science2009; 324: 1530–1534.
23.
OzkanC.Handbook of graphene, volume 4: composites. USA: Scrivener Publishing, 2019.
24.
JarosinskiLRybakAGaskaK, et al. Enhanced thermal conductivity of graphene nanoplatelets epoxy composites. Mater Sci-Poland2017; 35: 382–389.
FalkovskyLA.Optical properties of graphene. J Phys: Conf Ser2008; 129: 012004.
27.
Vargas-BernalR. State-of-the-art electronic devices based on graphene. In: Kar A (ed.) Nanoelectronics and materials development. London: Intech Open 2016, pp. 1–21.
28.
YaoXGaoXJiangJ, et al. Comparison of carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide coated carbon fiber for improving the interfacial properties of carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Compos B Eng2018; 132: 170–177.
29.
KarimNAfrojSTanS, et al. All inkjet-printed graphene-silver composite ink on textiles for highly conductive wearable electronics applications. Sci Rep2019; 9: 8035.
30.
BonaccorsoFLombardoAHasanT, et al. Production and processing of graphene and 2D crystals. Mater Today2012; 15: 564–589.
31.
NovoselovKSGeimAKMorozovSV.Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science2004; 306: 666–669.
32.
ParkSRuoffRS.Chemical methods for the production of graphenes. Nat Nanotechnol2009; 4: 217–224.
33.
RamachandranRFelixSJoshiGM, et al. Synthesis of graphene platelets by chemical and electrochemical route. Mater Res Bull2013; 48: 3834–3842.
34.
AllenMJTungVCKanerRB.Honeycomb carbon: a review of graphene. Chem Rev2010; 110: 132–145.
35.
AparnaRSivakumarNBalakrishnanA, et al. An effective route to produce few-layer graphene using combinatorial ball milling and strong aqueous exfoliants. J Renew Sust Energ Rev2013; 5: 033123.
36.
RollingsEGweonG-HZhouSY, et al. Synthesis and characterization of atomically thin graphite films on a silicon carbide substrate. J Phys Chem Solids2006; 67: 2172–2177.
37.
PradeepkumarAAmjadipourMMishraN, et al. p-Type epitaxial graphene on cubic silicon carbide on silicon for integrated silicon technologies. ACS Appl Nano Mater2020; 3: 830–841.
38.
BergerCSongZLiX, et al. Electronic confinement and coherence in patterned epitaxial graphene. Science2006; 312: 1191–1196.
39.
QingFHouYStehleR, et al. Chemical vapor deposition synthesis of graphene films. APL Mater2019; 7: 020903.
40.
LevchenkoIVolotskovaOShashurinA, et al. The large-scale production of graphene flakes using magnetically-enhanced arc discharge between carbon electrodes. Carbon2010; 48: 4570–4574.
41.
YanYLiHWangQ, et al. Controllable ionic liquid-assisted electrochemical exfoliation of carbon fibers for the green and large-scale preparation of functionalized graphene quantum dots endowed with multicolor emission and size tunability. J Mater Chem C2017; 5: 6092–6100.
42.
DasSGhoshCKSarkarCK, et al. Facile synthesis of multi-layer graphene by electrochemical exfoliation using organic solvent. Nanotechnol Rev2018; 7: 497–508.
43.
XinGHwangWKimN, et al. A graphene sheet exfoliated with microwave irradiation and interlinked by carbon nanotubes for high-performance transparent flexible electrodes. Nanotechnology2010; 21: 405201.
44.
XieXZhouYHuangK.Advances in microwave-assisted production of reduced graphene oxide. Front Chem2019; 7: 355.
45.
DatoARadmilovicVLeeZ, et al. Substrate-free gas-phase synthesis of graphene sheets. Nano Lett2008; 8: 2012–2016.
46.
MünzerAXiaoLSehlleierYH, et al. All gas-phase synthesis of graphene: characterization and its utilization for silicon-based lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta2018; 272: 52–59.
47.
KoehlerFMStarkWJ.Organic synthesis on graphene. Acc Chem Res2013; 46: 2297–2306.
48.
EbajoVDJrSantosCRLAleaGV, et al. Regenerable acidity of graphene oxide in promoting multicomponent organic synthesis. Sci Rep2019; 9: 15579.
49.
ChoucairMThordarsonPStrideJA.Gram-scale production of graphene based on solvothermal synthesis and sonication. Nat Nanotechnol2009; 4: 30–33.
50.
ZhouDChengQ-YHanB-H.Solvothermal synthesis of homogeneous graphene dispersion with high concentration. Carbon2011; 49: 3920–3927.
51.
KosynkinDVHigginbothamALSinitskiiA, et al. Longitudinal unzipping of carbon nanotubes to form graphene nanoribbons. Nature2009; 458: 872–876.
52.
JiaoLZhangLWangX, et al. Narrow graphene nanoribbons from carbon nanotubes. Nature2009; 458: 877–880.
LiuCHuGGaoH.Preparation of few-layer and single-layer graphene by exfoliation of expandable graphite in supercritical N,N-dimethylformamide. J Supercrit Fluids2012; 63: 99–104.
60.
QuintanaMGrzelczakMSpyrouK, et al. Production of large graphene sheets by exfoliation of graphite under high power ultrasound in the presence of tiopronin. Chem Commun2012; 48: 12159–12161.
61.
XuHSuslickKS.Sonochemical preparation of functionalized graphenes. J Am Chem Soc2011; 133: 9148–9151.
BordesEMorcosBBourgogneD, et al. Dispersion and stabilization of exfoliated graphene in ionic liquids. Front Chem2019; 7: 223.
64.
Campos-DelgadoJBotello-MéndezARAlgara-SillerG, et al. CVD synthesis of mono- and few-layer graphene using alcohols at low hydrogen concentration and atmospheric pressure. Chem Phys Lett2013; 584: 142–146.
65.
LiXCaiWColomboL, et al. Evolution of graphene growth on Ni and Cu by carbon isotope labeling. Nano Lett2009; 9: 4268–4272.
66.
KimM-SWooJ-MGeumD-M, et al. Effect of copper surface pre-treatment on the properties of CVD grown graphene. AIP Adv2014; 4: 127107.
67.
VinogradovNAZakharovAAKocevskiV, et al. Formation and structure of graphene waves on Fe(110). Phys Rev Lett2012; 109: 026101.
68.
SutterPSadowskiJTSutterE.Graphene on Pt(111): growth and substrate interaction. Phys Rev B2009; 80: 245411.
69.
WuTZhangXYuanQ, et al. Fast growth of inch-sized single-crystalline graphene from a controlled single nucleus on Cu-Ni alloys. Nat Mater2016; 15: 43–47.
70.
KimYSongWLeeSY, et al. Low-temperature synthesis of graphene on nickel foil by microwave plasma chemical vapor deposition. Appl Phys Lett2011; 98: 263105.
71.
LiXMagnusonCWVenugopalA, et al. Graphene films with large domain size by a two-step chemical vapor deposition process. Nano Lett2010; 10: 4328–4334.
72.
PlutnarJPumeraMSoferZ.The chemistry of CVD graphene.J Mater Chem C2018; 6: 6082–6101.
73.
KalitaGMatsushimaMUchidaH, et al. Graphene constructed carbon thin films as transparent electrodes for solar cell applications. J Mater Chem2010; 20: 9713–9717.
74.
ShiQTokarskaKTaHQ, et al. Substrate developments for the chemical vapor deposition synthesis of graphene. Adv Mater Interfaces2020; 7: 1902024.
75.
MuñozRGómez-AleixandreC.Review of CVD synthesis of graphene. Chem Vap Deposition2013; 19: 297–322.
76.
GaoZZhangYFuY, et al. Thermal chemical vapor deposition grown graphene heat spreader for thermal management of hot spots. Carbon2013; 61: 342–348.
77.
TanHWangDGuoY.Thermal growth of graphene: a review. Coatings2018; 8: 40.
78.
MalesevicAVitchevRSchoutedenK, et al. Synthesis of few-layer graphene via microwave plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition. Nanotechnology 2008; 19: 305604.
79.
AhmedMKishiNSugitaR, et al. Graphene synthesis by thermal chemical vapor deposition using solid precursor. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron2013; 24: 2151–2155.
80.
RockettA.Chemical vapor deposition. The materials science of semiconductors. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2008, pp.573–609.
81.
KalitaGWakitaKUmenoM.Low temperature growth of graphene film by microwave assisted surface wave plasma CVD for transparent electrode application. RSC Adv2012; 2: 2815–2820. [CrossRef][10.1039/c2ra00648k]
82.
BhuyanMSAUddinMNIslamMM, et al. Synthesis of graphene. Int Nano Lett2016; 6: 65–83.
83.
MullinJB. Single crystal growth II: epitaxial growth. In: Miller LS and Mullin JB (eds) Electronic materials: from silicon to organics. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1991, pp.127–142.
84.
BergerCSongZLiT, et al. Ultrathin epitaxial graphite: 2D electron gas properties and a route toward graphene-based nanoelectronics. J Phys Chem B2004; 108: 19912–19916.
85.
MishraNBoecklJMottaN, et al. Graphene growth on silicon carbide: a review. Phys Status Solidi A2016; 213: 2277–2289.
86.
EdwardsRSColemanKS.Graphene synthesis: relationship to applications. Nanoscale2013; 5: 38–51.
87.
GuptaBPlacidiEHoganC, et al. The transition from 3C SiC(111) to graphene captured by ultra high vacuum scanning tunneling microscopy. Carbon2015; 91: 378–385.
88.
Ahmadi-MoghadamBSharafimasoolehMShadlouS, et al. Effect of functionalization of graphene nanoplatelets on the mechanical response of graphene/epoxy composites. Mater Des2015; 66: 142–149.
89.
YouXFengQYangJ, et al. Preparation of high concentration graphene dispersion with low boiling point solvents. J Nanopart Res2019; 21: 19.
90.
TangL-CWanY-JYanD, et al. The effect of graphene dispersion on the mechanical properties of graphene/epoxy composites. Carbon2013; 60: 16–27.
91.
KausarA.Technical viewpoint on polystyrene/graphene nanocomposite. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. Epub ahead of print 24 February 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0892705720907653.
92.
LiYLKuanCFChenCH, et al. Preparation, thermal stability and electrical properties of PMMA/functionalized graphene oxide nanosheets composites. Mater Chem Phys2012; 134: 677–685.
93.
KuilaTKhanraPMishraAK, et al. Functionalized-graphene/ethylene vinyl acetate co-polymer composites for improved mechanical and thermal properties. Polym Test2012; 31: 282–289.
94.
DuMWangWChenL, et al. Enhancing dielectric properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride)-based hybrid nanocomposites by synergic employment of hydroxylated BaTiO3 and silanized graphene. Polym Plast Technol Eng2016; 55: 1595–1603.
95.
DuanTLvYXuH, et al. Structural effects of residual groups of graphene oxide on poly(ε-Caprolactone)/graphene oxide nanocomposite. Crystals2018; 8: 270.
96.
YunYSBaeYHKimDH, et al. Reinforcing effects of adding alkylated graphene oxide to polypropylene. Carbon2011; 49: 3553–3559.
97.
TangL-CZhaoLGuanL-Z. Graphene/polymer composite materials: processing, properties and applications. In: Bafekrpour E (ed) Advanced composite materials: properties and applications Warsaw, Poland: De Gruyter Open Poland, 2017, pp.349–419.
98.
PhiriJGanePMaloneyTC.General overview of graphene: production, properties and application in polymer composites. Mater Sci Eng B2017; 215: 9–28.
99.
ChenG-HWuD-JWengW-G, et al. Preparation of polystyrene–graphite conducting nanocomposites via intercalation polymerization. Polym Int2001; 50: 980–985.
100.
WangD-WLiFZhaoJ, et al. Fabrication of graphene/polyaniline composite paper via in situ anodic electropolymerization for high-performance flexible electrode. ACS Nano2009; 3: 1745–1752.
101.
GuoYBaoCSongL, et al. Situ polymerization of graphene, graphite oxide, and functionalized graphite oxide into epoxy resin and comparison study of on-the-flame behavior. Ind Eng Chem Res2011; 50: 7772–7783.
102.
RenFZhuGRenP, et al. In situ polymerization of graphene oxide and cyanate ester-epoxy with enhanced mechanical and thermal properties. Appl Surf Sci2014; 316: 549–557.
103.
YinLWangJLinF, et al. Polyacrylonitrile/graphene composite as a precursor to a sulfur-based cathode material for high-rate rechargeable Li–S batteries. Energy Environ Sci2012; 5: 6966–6972.
104.
WangZTongXYangJ-C, et al. Improved strength and toughness of semi-aromatic polyamide 6T-co-6(PA6T/6)/GO composites via in situ polymerization. Compos Sci Technol2019; 175: 6–17.
105.
CheeWKLimHNHuangNM, et al. Nanocomposites of graphene/polymers: a review. RSC Adv2015; 5: 68014–68051.
106.
KimHMiuraYMacoskoCW.Graphene/polyurethane nanocomposites for improved gas barrier and electrical conductivity. Chem Mater2010; 22: 3441–3450.
107.
LiRShiKYeL, et al. Polyamide 6/graphene oxide-g-hindered phenol antioxidant nano-composites: intercalation structure and synergistic thermal oxidative stabilization effect. Compos B Eng2019; 162: 11–20.
108.
HsiaoMCLiaoSHLinYF, et al. Preparation and characterization of polypropylene-graft-thermally reduced graphite oxide with an improved compatibility with polypropylene-based nanocomposite. Nanoscale2011; 3: 1516–1522.
109.
ZhangH-BZhengW-GYanQ, et al. Electrically conductive polyethylene terephthalate/graphene nanocomposites prepared by melt compounding. Polymer2010; 51: 1191–1196.
110.
SuYLuanGShenH, et al. Encouraging mechanical reinforcement in polycarbonate nanocomposite films via incorporation of melt blending-prepared polycarbonate-graft-graphene oxide. Appl Phys A2019; 125: 1–7.
111.
LyuJ-YChenSHeW, et al. Fabrication of high-performance graphene oxide doped PVDF/CuO/Al nanocomposites via electrospinning. Chem Eng J2019; 368: 129–137.
112.
DiasMLDipRMMSouzaDHS, et al. Electrospun nanofibers of poly(lactic acid)/graphene nanocomposites. J Nanosci Nanotechnol2017; 17: 2531–2540.
113.
ThenmozhiSDharmarajNKadirveluK, et al. Electrospun nanofibers: new generation materials for advanced applications. Mater Sci Eng B2017; 217: 36–48.
114.
WahabIFRazakSIAAzmiNS, et al. Electrospun graphene oxide-based nanofibres. In: Silva A and Carabineiro S (eds) Advances in carbon nanostructures. London: Intech Open, 2016, pp. 101–120.
115.
ParkHLeeSJKimS, et al. Conducting polymer nanofiber mats via combination of electrospinning and oxidative polymerization. Polymer2013; 54: 4155–4160.
116.
GargKBowlinGL.Electrospinning jets and nanofibrous structures. Biomicrofluidics2011; 5: 13403.
117.
BhardwajNKunduSC.Electrospinning: a fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol Adv2010; 28: 325–347.
118.
AbdaliHAjjiA.Preparation of electrospun nanocomposite nanofibers of polyaniline/poly(methyl methacrylate) with amino-functionalized graphene. Polymers (Basel)2017; 9: 453.
119.
Albañil-SanchezLRomo-UribeAFloresA, et al. Electrospun nylon-graphene nanocomposites synthesis and microstructure. MRS Proc2012; 1453: 1–8.
120.
BagheriMMahmoodzadehA.Graphene nanocomposites: synthesis, characterization and mechanical properties of electrospun nanofibers. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater2020; 30: 1566–1577.
121.
EhteshamiSFeizbakhshAMohsen SarrafiAH, et al. An electrospun polyamide/graphene oxide nanocomposite as a novel fiber coating. Anal Meth2018; 10: 2123–2128.
122.
RuanKGuoYTangY, et al. Improved thermal conductivities in polystyrene nanocomposites by incorporating thermal reduced graphene oxide via electrospinning-hot press technique. Compos Commun2018; 10: 68–72.
123.
RajakDKPagarDDMenezesPL, et al. Fiber-reinforced polymer composites: manufacturing, properties, and applications. Polymers (Basel)2019; 11: 1667.
124.
BilisikK.Multiaxis 3D weaving: comparison of developed two weaving methods (tube-rapier weaving versus tube-carrier weaving) and effects of bias yarn path to the preform properties. Fibers Polym2010; 11: 104–114.
125.
BilisikKSapanciE.Experimental determination of fracture toughness properties of nanostitched and nanoprepreg carbon/epoxy composites. Eng Fract Mech2018; 189: 293–306.
126.
BilisikKErdoganGSapancıE.Flexural behavior of 3D para-aramid/phenolic/nano (MWCNT) composites. RSC Adv2018; 8: 7213–7224.
127.
AkovaliG.Handbook of composite fabrication. Shorpshire, UK: Rapra Publishing, 2001, p.196.
128.
HollawayL.Handbook of polymer composites for engineers. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Woodhead Publishing Limited, 1994, p.336.
129.
CrutchlowR.Changing from open to closed moulding. Reinf Plast2004; 48: 40–41.
130.
MazumdarSK.Composites manufacturing materials, product, and process engineering. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2002, p.396.
131.
MiddletonB. Composites: manufacture and application. In: Goodship V (ed) Design and manufacture of plastic components for multifunctionality 2016, pp.53–101. Cambridge, UK: Elsevier.
132.
SongX.Vacuum assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM): model development and verification. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2003.
133.
SunZXiaoJTaoL, et al. Preparation of high-performance carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites by compression resin transfer molding. Materials (Basel)2018; 12: 13.
134.
MallickPK.Processing of polymer matrix composites. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2018, p.356.
135.
HsiaoKTHeiderD. Vacuum assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) in polymer matrix composites. In: Advani S and Hsiao K-T (eds) Manufacturing techniques for polymer matrix composites (PMCs) 2012, pp.310–347. Cambridge, UK: Elsevier.
136.
BilisikKKaradumanNSSapanciE.Tensile properties of nanoprepreg/nanostitched 3D carbon/epoxy MWCNTs composites. Mech Mater2019; 128: 11–23.
137.
BilisikKKaradumanNSSapanciE.Flexural characterization of 3D prepreg/stitched carbon/epoxy/multiwalled carbon nanotube preforms and composites. J Compos Mater2019; 53: 563–577.
138.
LeeSKKimHShimBS.Graphene: an emerging material for biological tissue engineering. Carbon Lett2013; 14: 63–75.
139.
LeeCWeiXKysarJW, et al. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science2008; 321: 385–388.
140.
ZandiatashbarALeeGHAnSJ, et al. Effect of defects on the intrinsic strength and stiffness of graphene. Nat Commun2014; 5: 3186.
141.
TsoukleriGPartheniosJPapagelisK, et al. Subjecting a graphene monolayer to tension and compression. Small2009; 5: 2397–2402.
142.
LeeCWeiXLiQ, et al. Elastic and frictional properties of graphene. Phys Status Solidi B2009; 246: 2562–2567.
143.
WangMYanC and Li M. Graphene nanocomposites. In: Hu N (ed) Composites and their properties. London: Intech Open, 2012, pp. 17–36.
144.
EbrahimiFHeidariE.A review on modeling, synthesis, and properties of graphene. Graphene – new trends and developments. London: Intech Open, 2015.
145.
GhoseSWorkingDCConnellJW, et al. Thermal conductivity of Ultem™/carbon nanofiller blends. High Perform Polym2006; 18: 961–977.
146.
GhoshSNikaDLPokatilovEP, et al. Heat conduction in graphene: experimental study and theoretical interpretation. New J Phys2009; 11: 095012.
BalandinAAGhoshSBaoW, et al. Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett2008; 8: 902–907.
149.
GhoshSBaoWNikaDL, et al. Dimensional crossover of thermal transport in few-layer graphene. Nat Mater2010; 9: 555–558.
150.
MillerDLKubistaKDRutterGM, et al. Observing the quantization of zero mass carriers in graphene. Science2009; 324: 924–927.
151.
NovoselovKSGeimAKMorozovSV, et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless dirac fermions in graphene. Nature2005; 438: 197–200.
152.
ZhangYTanYWStormerHL, et al. Experimental observation of the quantum hall effect and Berry's phase in graphene. Nature2005; 438: 201–204.
153.
XiongS-JXiongY.Anderson localization of electron states in graphene in different types of disorder. Phys Rev B2007; 76: 214204.
154.
ChangHWuH.Graphene-based nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, and optical and optoelectronic applications. Adv Funct Mater2013; 23: 1984–1997.
155.
ShinYJKwonJHKalonG, et al. Ambipolar bistable switching effect of graphene. Appl Phys Lett2010; 97: 262105.
156.
BaringhausJRuanMEdlerF, et al. Exceptional ballistic transport in epitaxial graphene nanoribbons. Nature2014; 506: 349–354.
157.
KatsnelsonMINovoselovKSGeimAK.Chiral tunnelling and the Klein paradox in graphene. Nature Phys2006; 2: 620–625.
158.
BolotinKI.Electronic transport in graphene: towards high mobility. In: Skákalová V and Kaiser AB (eds), Graphene 2014, pp. 199–227. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing.
159.
HilkeMMassicotteMWhitewayE, et al. Weak localization in graphene: theory, simulations, and experiments. Scientific World J2014; 2014: 737296.
160.
BasuJBasuJKBhattacharyyaTK.The evolution of graphene-based electronic devices. Int J Smart Nano Mater2010; 1: 201–223.
161.
SharmaPSinghSGuptaS, et al. Enhancing linearity in I–V characteristics by B/N doping in graphene for communication devices. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron2017; 28: 7668–7676.
162.
GoumriMVenturiniJWBakourA, et al. Tuning the luminescence and optical properties of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide functionnalized with PVA. Appl Phys A2016; 122: Article 212.
163.
BadhulikaSTerse-ThakoorTVillarrealC, et al. Graphene hybrids: synthesis strategies and applications in sensors and sensitized solar cells. Front Chem2015; 3: 38.
164.
WangJMaFLiangW, et al. Optical, photonic and optoelectronic properties of graphene, h-BN and their hybrid materials. Nanophotonics2017; 6: 943–976.
165.
NairRRBlakePGrigorenkoAN, et al. Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene. Science2008; 320: 1308.
166.
EdaGLinYYMatteviC, et al. Blue photoluminescence from chemically derived graphene oxide. Adv Mater2010; 22: 505–509.
167.
WuXXingYZengK, et al. Study of fluorescence quenching ability of graphene oxide with a layer of rigid and tunable silica spacer. Langmuir2018; 34: 603–611.
168.
MakKFShanJHeinzTF.Electronic structure of few-layer graphene: experimental demonstration of strong dependence on stacking sequence. Phys Rev Lett2010; 104: 176404.
169.
FerrariACMeyerJCScardaciV, et al. Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys Rev Lett2006; 97: 187401.
170.
ZhangRDingZ.Recent advances in graphene quantum dots as bioimaging probes. J Anal Test2018; 2: 45–60.
171.
SkulasonHSGaskellPESzkopekT.Optical reflection and transmission properties of exfoliated graphite from a graphene monolayer to several hundred graphene layers. Nanotechnology2010; 21: 295709.
172.
DuJChengH-M.The fabrication, properties, and uses of graphene/polymer composites. Macromol Chem Phys2012; 213: 1060–1077.
173.
WangFDrzalLTQinY, et al. Mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of graphene nanoplatelet/epoxy composites. J Mater Sci2015; 50: 1082–1093.
174.
BhanuprakashLParasuramSVargheseS.Experimental investigation on graphene oxides coated carbon fibre/epoxy hybrid composites: mechanical and electrical properties. Compos Sci Technol2019; 179: 134–144.
175.
RafieeMARafieeJWangZ, et al. Enhanced mechanical properties of nanocomposites at low graphene content. ACS Nano2009; 3: 3884–3890.
176.
ShenM-YChangT-YHsiehT-H, et al. Mechanical properties and tensile fatigue of graphene nanoplatelets reinforced polymer nanocomposites. J Nanomater2013; 2013: 1–9.
177.
KumariNKumarK.Mechanical behaviour of graphene and carbon fibre reinforced epoxy based hybrid nanocomposites for orthotic callipers. J Exp Nanosci2018; 13: S14–S23.
178.
QinWVautardFDrzalLT, et al. Mechanical and electrical properties of carbon fiber composites with incorporation of graphene nanoplatelets at the fiber–matrix interphase. Compos B Eng2015; 69: 335–341.
179.
KriegASKingJAJaszczakDC, et al. Tensile and conductivity properties of epoxy composites containing carbon black and graphene nanoplatelets. J Compos Mater2018; 52: 3909–3918.
180.
XuZChenLZhouB, et al. Nano-structure and property transformations of carbon systems under γ-ray irradiation: a review. RSC Adv2013; 3: 10579–10597.
181.
LiuSChevaliVSXuZ, et al. A review of extending performance of epoxy resins using carbon nanomaterials. Compos B Eng2018; 136: 197–214.
182.
AdakNCChhetriSKimNH, et al. Static and dynamic mechanical properties of graphene oxide-incorporated woven carbon fiber/epoxy composite. J Mater Eng Perform2018; 27: 1138–1147.
183.
BhasinMWuSLadaniRB, et al. Increasing the fatigue resistance of epoxy nanocomposites by aligning graphene nanoplatelets. Int J Fatigue2018; 113: 88–97.
184.
JiangTKuilaTKimNH, et al. Enhanced mechanical properties of silanized silica nanoparticle attached graphene oxide/epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol2013; 79: 115–125.
185.
WanY-JGongL-XTangL-C, et al. Mechanical properties of epoxy composites filled with silane-functionalized graphene oxide. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2014; 64: 79–89.
186.
KingJAKlimekDRMiskiogluI, et al. Mechanical properties of graphene nanoplatelet/epoxy composites. J Compos Mater2015; 49: 659–668.
187.
TangGJiangZ-GLiX, et al. Electrically conductive rubbery epoxy/diamine-functionalized graphene nanocomposites with improved mechanical properties. Compos B Eng2014; 67: 564–570.
188.
YasminADanielIM.Mechanical and thermal properties of graphite platelet/epoxy composites. Polymer2004; 45: 8211–8219.
189.
ZakariaMRAbdul KudusMHMd. AkilH, et al. Comparative study of graphene nanoparticle and multiwall carbon nanotube filled epoxy nanocomposites based on mechanical, thermal and dielectric properties. Compos B Eng2017; 119: 57–66.
190.
ProlongoMGSalomCArribasC, et al. Influence of graphene nanoplatelets on curing and mechanical properties of graphene/epoxy nanocomposites. J Therm Anal Calorim2016; 125: 629–636.
191.
MengQJinJWangR, et al. Processable 3-nm thick graphene platelets of high electrical conductivity and their epoxy composites. Nanotechnology2014; 25: 125707.
192.
WanY-JTangL-CYanD, et al. Improved dispersion and interface in the graphene/epoxy composites via a facile surfactant-assisted process. Compos Sci Technol2013; 82: 60–68.
193.
LiuWKohKLLuJ, et al. Simultaneous catalyzing and reinforcing effects of imidazole-functionalized graphene in anhydride-cured epoxies. J Mater Chem2012; 22: 18395.
194.
NadivRShteinMBuzagloM, et al. Graphene nanoribbon – polymer composites: the critical role of edge functionalization. Carbon2016; 99: 444–450.
195.
ImranKAShivakumarKN.Enhancement of electrical conductivity of epoxy using graphene and determination of their thermo-mechanical properties. J Reinf Plast Compos2018; 37: 118–133.
196.
Ramos-GaliciaLMendezLNMartínez-HernándezAL, et al. Improved performance of an epoxy matrix as a result of combining graphene oxide and reduced graphene. Int J Polym Sci2013; 2013: 1–7.
197.
ChenLJinHXuZ, et al. A design of gradient interphase reinforced by silanized graphene oxide and its effect on carbon fiber/epoxy interface. Mater Chem Phys2014; 145: 186–196.
198.
HsuC-HHsuM-HChangK-C, et al. Physical study of room-temperature-cured epoxy/thermally reduced graphene oxides with various contents of oxygen-containing groups. Polym Int2014; 63: 1765–1770.
LeeM-WWangT-YTsaiJ-L.Mechanical properties of nanocomposites with functionalized graphene. J Compos Mater2016; 50: 3779–3789.
201.
KalaitzidouKFukushimaHDrzalLT.Multifunctional polypropylene composites produced by incorporation of exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets. Carbon2007; 45: 1446–1452.
202.
KimSDrzalLT.Comparison of exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets (xGnP) and CNTs for reinforcement of EVA nanocomposites fabricated by solution compounding method and three screw rotating systems. J Adhes Sci Technol2009; 23: 1623–1638.
203.
ChatterjeeSNafezarefiFTaiNH, et al. Size and synergy effects of nanofiller hybrids including graphene nanoplatelets and carbon nanotubes in mechanical properties of epoxy composites. Carbon2012; 50: 5380–5386.
204.
NaebeMWangJAminiA, et al. Mechanical property and structure of covalent functionalised graphene/epoxy nanocomposites. Sci Rep2014; 4: 4375.
205.
PathakAKBorahMGuptaA, et al. Improved mechanical properties of carbon fiber/graphene oxide-epoxy hybrid composites. Compos Sci Technol2016; 135: 28–38.
206.
WangFDrzalLTQinY, et al. Effects of functionalized graphene nanoplatelets on the morphology and properties of epoxy resins. High Perform Polym2016; 28: 525–536.
207.
LiYZhangHHuangZ, et al. Graphite nanoplatelet modified epoxy resin for carbon fibre reinforced plastics with enhanced properties. J Nanomater2017; 2017: 1–10.
208.
ShenX-JDangC-YTangB-L, et al. The reinforcing effect of oriented graphene on the interlaminar shear strength of carbon fabric/epoxy composites. Mater Des2020; 185: 108257.
209.
FengZLiYXinC, et al. Fabrication of graphene-reinforced nanocomposites with improved fracture toughness in net shape for complex 3D structures via digital light processing. J Carbon Res2019; 5: 25.
210.
ChengXYokozekiTWuL, et al. Electrical conductivity and interlaminar shear strength enhancement of carbon fiber reinforced polymers through synergetic effect between graphene oxide and polyaniline. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2016; 90: 243–249.
211.
HanXZhaoYSunJ-m, et al. Effect of graphene oxide addition on the interlaminar shear property of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites. New Carbon Mater2017; 32: 48–55.
212.
QiGQiaoKWangT, et al. Comparison of rigid and flexible structural daimines grafted carbon fiber for enhancing the interfacial and mechanical properties of carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Compos Interfaces2019; 26: 905–920.
213.
ChenLJinHXuZ, et al. Role of a gradient interface layer in interfacial enhancement of carbon fiber/epoxy hierarchical composites. J Mater Sci2015; 50: 112–121.
214.
SongBWangTWangL, et al. Interfacially reinforced carbon fiber/epoxy composite laminates via in-situ synthesized graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4). Compos B Eng2019; 158: 259–268.
215.
JangH-KKimH-IDodgeT, et al. Interfacial shear strength of reduced graphene oxide polymer composites. Carbon2014; 77: 390–397.
216.
LeeM-WWangT-YTsaiJ-L.Characterizing the interfacial shear strength of graphite/epoxy composites containing functionalized graphene. Compos B Eng2016; 98: 308–313.
217.
BeggsKMServinisLGengenbachTR, et al. A systematic study of carbon fibre surface grafting via in situ diazonium generation for improved interfacial shear strength in epoxy matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol2015; 118: 31–38.
218.
YuanXZhuBCaiX, et al. Influence of different surface treatments on the interfacial adhesion of graphene oxide/carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Appl Surf Sci2018; 458: 996–1005.
219.
ShrivastavaRSinghKK.Interlaminar fracture toughness characterization of laminated composites: a review. Polym Rev2020; 60: 542–593.
220.
FennerJSDanielIM.Hybrid nanoreinforced carbon/epoxy composites for enhanced damage tolerance and fatigue life. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2014; 65: 47–56.
221.
ShadlouSAlishahiEAyatollahiMR.Fracture behavior of epoxy nanocomposites reinforced with different carbon nano-reinforcements. Compos Struct2013; 95: 577–581.
222.
BhasinMWuSRajBL, et al. Improvements to the mode I fatigue resistance of epoxy nanocomposites using aligned graphene nanoplatelets. In: 21st international conference on composite materials, Xi'an, China, 20–25 April 2017.
223.
GalpayaDWangMGeorgeG, et al. Preparation of graphene oxide/epoxy nanocomposites with significantly improved mechanical properties. J Appl Phys2014; 116: 053518.
224.
ShokriehMMGhoreishiSMEsmkhaniM, et al. Effects of graphene nanoplatelets and graphene nanosheets on fracture toughness of epoxy nanocomposites. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2014; 37: 1116–1123.
225.
DengSYeL.Influence of fiber-matrix adhesion on mechanical properties of graphite/epoxy composites: II. Interlaminar fracture and inplane shear behavior. J Reinf Plast Compos1999; 18: 1041–1057.
226.
WuSLadaniRBZhangJ, et al. Aligning multilayer graphene flakes with an external electric field to improve multifunctional properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Carbon2015; 94: 607–618.
227.
LiuXSunXWangZ, et al. Planar porous graphene woven fabric/epoxy composites with exceptional electrical, mechanical properties, and fracture toughness. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2015; 7: 21455–21464.
228.
DomunNHadaviniaHZhangT, et al. Improving the fracture toughness properties of epoxy using graphene nanoplatelets at low filler content. Nanocomposites2017; 3: 85–96.
229.
JiaZFengXZouY.An investigation on mode II fracture toughness enhancement of epoxy adhesive using graphene nanoplatelets. Compos B Eng2018; 155: 452–456.
230.
WangYYangCPeiQX, et al. Some aspects of thermal transport across the interface between graphene and epoxy in nanocomposites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2016; 8: 8272–8279.
231.
AtifRShyhaIInamF.Mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties of graphene-epoxy nanocomposites – a review. Polymers (Basel)2016; 8: 281.
232.
BusteroIGaztelumendiIObietaI, et al. Free-standing graphene films embedded in epoxy resin with enhanced thermal properties. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater2020; 3: 31–40.
233.
LiYZhangHLiuY, et al. Synergistic effects of spray-coated hybrid carbon nanoparticles for enhanced electrical and thermal surface conductivity of CFRP laminates. Compos. A Appl Sci Manuf2018; 105: 9–18.
234.
ShenXWangZWuY, et al. Effect of functionalization on thermal conductivities of graphene/epoxy composites. Carbon2016; 108: 412–422.
WangZQiRWangJ, et al. Thermal conductivity improvement of epoxy composite filled with expanded graphite. Ceramics Int2015; 41: 13541–13546.
237.
LuoFWuKGuoH, et al. Simultaneous reduction and surface functionalization of graphene oxide for enhancing flame retardancy and thermal conductivity of mesogenic epoxy composites. Polym Int2017; 66: 98–107.
238.
TengC-CMaC-CMLuC-H, et al. Thermal conductivity and structure of non-covalent functionalized graphene/epoxy composites. Carbon2011; 49: 5107–5116.
239.
ZhouTKogaHNogiM, et al. Targeted kinetic strategy for improving the thermal conductivity of epoxy composite containing percolating multi-layer graphene oxide chains. Express Polym Lett2015; 9: 608–623.
240.
WangYYuJDaiW, et al. Enhanced thermal and electrical properties of epoxy composites reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Polym Compos2015; 36: 556–565.
241.
MinCYuDCaoJ, et al. A graphite nanoplatelet/epoxy composite with high dielectric constant and high thermal conductivity. Carbon2013; 55: 116–125.
242.
TienDHParkJHanSA, et al. Electrical and thermal conductivities of stycast 1266 epoxy/graphite composites. J Korean Phy Soc2011; 59: 2760–2764.
243.
WangMYanC and Ma L. Graphene nanocomposites. In: Hu N (ed) Composites and their properties. London: Intech Open, 2012, pp. 17–36.
244.
StankovichSDikinDADommettGH, et al. Graphene-based composite materials. Nature2006; 442: 282–286.
245.
LiSLiYHanX, et al. High-efficiency enhancement on thermal and electrical properties of epoxy nanocomposites with core-shell carbon foam template-coated graphene. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2019; 120: 95–105.
246.
FanZZhengCWeiT, et al. Effect of carbon black on electrical property of graphite nanoplatelets/epoxy resin composites. Polym Eng Sci2009; 49: 2041–2045.
247.
JiangYSunRZhangH-B, et al. Graphene-coated ZnO tetrapod whiskers for thermally and electrically conductive epoxy composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2017; 94: 104–112.
248.
GhosalKSarkarK.Biomedical applications of graphene nanomaterials and beyond. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2018; 4: 2653–2703.
249.
ZhengWLuXWongS-C.Electrical and mechanical properties of expanded graphite-reinforced high-density polyethylene. J Appl Polym Sci2004; 91: 2781–2788.
250.
ElmarakbiAAzotiWMartoranaG, et al. Graphene-based composite materials for automotives. In: 20th international conference on composite materials, Copenhagen, 19–24 July 2015.
251.
ValorosiFDe MeoEBlanco-VarelaT, et al. Graphene and related materials in hierarchical fiber composites: production techniques and key industrial benefits. Compos Sci Technol2020; 185: 107848.
252.
LuGYuKWenZ, et al. Semiconducting graphene: converting graphene from semimetal to semiconductor. Nanoscale2013; 5: 1353–1368.
253.
HuangYLiangJChenY.An overview of the applications of graphene-based materials in supercapacitors. Small2012; 8: 1805–1834.
254.
PonnammaDSadasivuniKK. Graphene/polymer nanocomposites: role in electronics. In: Sadasivuni KK, Ponnamma D, Kim J and Sabu Th (eds), Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites in electronics. Berlin: Springer, 2015, pp.1–24.
255.
ObradovicBKotlyarRHeinzF, et al. Analysis of graphene nanoribbons as a channel material for field-effect transistors. Appl Phys Lett2006; 88: 142102.
256.
LiuZLiuQHuangY, et al. Organic photovoltaic devices based on a novel acceptor material: graphene. Adv Mater2008; 20: 3924–3930.
257.
LuCCLinYCYehCH, et al. High mobility flexible graphene field-effect transistors with self-healing gate dielectrics. ACS Nano2012; 6: 4469–4474.
258.
ZhengJWangLQuheR, et al. Sub-10 nm gate length graphene transistors: operating at terahertz frequencies with current saturation. Sci Rep2013; 3: 1314.
259.
MahmoudiTWangYHahnY-B.Graphene and its derivatives for solar cells application. Nano Energy2018; 47: 51–65.
260.
AlgamiliASKhirMHMDennisJO, et al. A review of actuation and sensing mechanisms in MEMS-based sensor devices. Nanoscale Res Lett2021; 16: 16.
261.
JinXFengCPonnammaD, et al. Review on exploration of graphene in the design and engineering of smart sensors, actuators and soft robotics. Chem Eng J Adv2020; 4: 100034.
262.
WangXJiaoNTungS, et al. Photoresponsive graphene composite bilayer actuator for soft robots. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2019; 11: 30290–30299.
263.
PumeraM.Graphene-based nanomaterials for energy storage. Energy Environ Sci2011; 4: 668–674.
264.
AsenbauerJEisenmannTKuenzelM, et al. The success story of graphite as a lithium-ion anode material – fundamentals, remaining challenges, and recent developments including silicon (oxide) composites. Sustainable Energy Fuels2020; 4: 5387–5416.
265.
SinghEMeyyappanMNalwaHS.Flexible graphene-based wearable gas and chemical sensors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2017; 9: 34544–34586.
266.
KhanSAliSBermakA.Recent developments in printing flexible and wearable sensing electronics for healthcare applications. Sensors (Basel)2019; 19: 1230.
267.
BoroujerdiRAbdelkaderAPaulR.State of the art in alcohol sensing with 2D materials. Nano-Micro Lett2020; 12: 33.
268.
KrishnanSTadiboyinaRChavaliM, et al. Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites for sensor applications. In: Pal K (ed) Hybrid nanocomposites. Singapore: Pan Stanford Publishing, 2019, pp.1–62.
269.
LiuJTaoLYangW, et al. Synthesis, characterization, and multilayer assembly of pH sensitive graphene−polymer nanocomposites. Langmuir2010; 26: 10068–10075.
270.
DasTKPrustyS.Graphene-based polymer composites and their applications. Polym Plast Technol Eng2013; 52: 319–331.
271.
LuYLyuHRichardsonAG, et al. Flexible neural electrode array based-on porous graphene for cortical microstimulation and sensing. Sci Rep2016; 6: 33526.
SayyarSMurrayEThompsonBC, et al. Covalently linked biocompatible graphene/polycaprolactone composites for tissue engineering. Carbon2013; 52: 296–304.
274.
SarkarKMadrasGChatterjeeK.Dendron conjugation to graphene oxide using click chemistry for efficient gene delivery. RSC Adv2015; 5: 50196–50211.
275.
EskiizmirGBaskınYYapıcıK.Graphene-based nanomaterials in cancer treatment and diagnosis. In: GrumezescuAM (ed.) Fullerens, graphenes and nanotubes. Norwich, NY: William Andrew Publishing, 2018, pp.331–374.
276.
ShengYTangXPengE, et al. Graphene oxide based fluorescent nanocomposites for cellular imaging. J Mater Chem B2013; 1: 512–521.
277.
KireevDOffenhäusserA.Graphene & two-dimensional devices for bioelectronics and neuroprosthetics. 2D Mater2018; 5: 042004.
AboutalebiSHJaliliREsrafilzadehD, et al. High-performance multifunctional graphene yarns: toward wearable All-carbon energy storage textiles. ACS Nano2014; 8: 2456–2466.
280.
NineMJColeMATranDNH, et al. Graphene: a multipurpose material for protective coatings. J Mater Chem A2015; 3: 12580–12602.
281.
AfrojSTanSAbdelkaderAM, et al. Highly conductive, scalable, and machine washable graphene‐based E‐textiles for multifunctional wearable electronic applications. Adv Funct Mater2020; 30: 2000293.
282.
GaoZSongNZhangY, et al. Cotton-textile-enabled, flexible lithium-ion batteries with enhanced capacity and extended lifespan. Nano Lett2015; 15: 8194–8203.
283.
LuZMaoCZhangH.Highly conductive graphene-coated silk fabricated via a repeated coating-reduction approach. J Mater Chem C2015; 3: 4265–4268.
284.
Shateri-KhalilabadMYazdanshenasME.Fabricating electroconductive cotton textiles using graphene. Carbohydr Polym2013; 96: 190–195.
285.
TangXTianMQuL, et al. Functionalization of cotton fabric with graphene oxide nanosheet and polyaniline for conductive and UV blocking properties. Synthetic Metals2015; 202: 82–88.
