Extant findings show that voter fraud is extremely rare and difficult to prove in the United States. Voter’s knowledge about voter fraud allegations likely comes through the media, who tend to sensationalize the issue. In this study, we argue that the more voters are exposed to media coverage of voter fraud allegations, the more likely that they will perceive that voter fraud is a frequent problem. We merge the 2012 Survey of Performance of American Elections with state-level media coverage of voter fraud leading up to the 2012 election. Our results show that media coverage of voter fraud is associated with public beliefs about voter fraud. In states where fraud was more frequently featured in local media outlets, public concerns about voter fraud were heightened. In particular, we find that press attention to voter fraud has a larger influence on Republicans than Democrats and Independents. We further find that media coverage of voter fraud does not further polarize partisan perceptions of voter fraud. Rather, political interest moderates state media coverage on voter fraud beliefs only among Republicans. Last, our results provide no support that demographic changes, approval of election administration, or information concerning actual reported voting irregularities have any discernable effects on partisan perceptions.
AbrajanoMarisaHajnalZoltan L.2015. White Backlash. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2.
AhlquistJohn S.MayerKenneth R.JackmanSimon. 2014. “Alien Abduction and Voter Impersonation in the 2012 U.S. General Election: Evidence from a Survey List Experiment.” Election Law Journal13:460–75.
3.
AlbertsonBethanyGadarianShana K.2012. “Who’s Afraid of Immigration? The Effects of Pro- and Anti-immigrant Threatening Ads among Latinos, African Americans and Whites.” In Immigration and Public Opinion in Liberal Democracies, eds. FreemanGary P.HansenRandallLealDavid L.286–306. New York: Routledge.
4.
AlexseevMikhail Al. 2006. “Ballot-Box Vigilantism? Ethnic Population Shifts and Xenophobic Voting in Post-Soviet Russia.” Political Behavior28 (3): 211–40.
5.
AlvarezR. MichaelHallThad E.LlewellynMorgan H.2008. “Are Americans Confident Their Ballots Are Counted?”The Journal of Politics70:754–66.
6.
AndersonChristopher J.BlaisAndreBowlerShaunDonovanToddListhaugOla. 2005. Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
AnsolabehereStephenLuksSamanthaSchaffnerBrian F.2015. “The Perils of Cherry Picking Low Frequency Events in Large Sample Surveys.” Electoral Studies40:409–10.
8.
AnsolabehereStephenPersilyNathaniel. 2008. “Vote Fraud in the Eye of the Beholder: The Role of Public Opinion in the Challenge to Voter Identification Requirements.” Harvard Law Review121:1737–74.
9.
AtkesonLonna Rae. 2014. “Voter Confidence in 2010: Local, State, and National Factors.” In Election Administration in the United States, eds. AlvarezR. MichaelGrofmanBernard 102–19. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
AtkesonLonna RaeSaundersKyle L.2007. “Voter Confidence: A Local Matter?”PS: Political Science & Politics40:655–60.
11.
BeaulieuEmily. 2014. “From Voter ID to Party ID: How Political Parties Affect Perceptions of Election Fraud in the U.S.” Electoral Studies35:24–32.
12.
BenteleKeith G.O’BrienErin E.2013. “Jim Crow 2.0? Why States Consider and Adopt Restrictive Voter Access Policies.” Perspectives on Politics11:1088–1116.
13.
BowlerShaunBrunellThomasDonovanToddGronkePaul. 2015. “Election Administration and Perceptions of Fair Elections.” Electoral Studies38:1–9.
14.
BowlerShaunDonovanTodd. 2016. “A Partisan Model of Electoral Reform: Voter Identification Laws and Confidence in State Elections.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly16 (3): 340–61.
15.
BraderTedValentinoNicholas A.SuhayElizabeth. 2008. “What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat.” American Journal of Political Science52:959–78.
16.
BradyHenry E.VerbaSidneySchlozmanKay Lehman. 1995. “Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation.” American Political Science Review89 (2): 271–94.
17.
BrantonReginaCasseseErin C.JonesBradford S.WesterlandChad. 2011. “All along the Watchtower: Acculturation Fear, Anti-Latino Affect, and Immigration.” The Journal of Politics73 (3): 664–79.
18.
CallaghanKarenSchnellFrauke. 2001. “Assessing the Democratic Debate: How the News Media Frame Elite Policy Discourse.” Political Communication18:183–213.
19.
ChavezLeo. 2013. The Latino Threat: Constructing Immigrants, Citizens, and the Nation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
20.
CookTimothy E.1998. Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
CraigStephen C.MartinezMichael D.GainousJasonKaneJames G.2006. “Winners, Losers, and Election Context: Voter Responses to the 2000 Presidential Election.” Political Research Quarterly59 (4): 579–92.
22.
DanceyLoganSheagleyGeoffrey. 2013. “Heuristics Behaving Badly: Party Cues and Voter Knowledge.” American Journal of Political Science57 (2): 312–25.
23.
DreierPeterMartinChristopher R.2010. “How ACORN Was Framed: Political Controversy and Media Agenda Setting.” Perspectives on Politics8:761–92.
24.
EllisAtiba. 2014. “The Meme of Voter Fraud.” Catholic University Law Review63:879–915.
25.
FogartyBrianCurtisJessicaGouzienP. FrancesKimballDavid C.VorstEric. 2015. “News Attention to Voter Fraud in the 2008 and 2012 US Elections.” Research & Politics2 (2): 1–8.
26.
FrymerPaul. 2010. Uneasy Alliances: Race and Party Competition in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27.
FrymerPaulSkrentnyJohn David. 1998. “Coalition-Building and the Politics of Electoral Capture during the Nixon Administration: African Americans, Labor, Latinos.” Studies in American Political Development12 (1): 131–61.
28.
GreenDonald P.StrolovitchDara Z.WongJanelle S.1998. “Defended Neighborhoods, Integration, and Racially Motivated Crime.” American Journal of Sociology104 (2): 372–403.
29.
GronkePaul. 2014. “Voter Confidence as a Metric of Election Performance.” In The Measure of American Elections, eds. BurdenBarry C.StewartCharlesIII. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
HainmuellerJensHopkinsDaniel J.2014. “Public Attitudes toward Immigration.” Annual Review of Political Science17:225–49.
31.
HallThad E.MonsonJ. QuinPattersonKelly D.2009. “The Human Dimension of Elections: How Poll Workers Shape Public Confidence in Elections.” Political Research Quarterly62 (3): 507–22.
32.
HamiltonJames T.2004. All the News that’s Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
33.
HasenRichard. 2012. The Voting Wars. New Haven: Yale University Press.
34.
HaynesChrisMerollaJenniferRamakrishnanS. Karthick. 2016. Framing Immigrants: News Coverage, Public Opinion, and Policy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
35.
HetheringtonMarc J.2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review95 (3): 619–31.
36.
HicksWilliam D.McKeeSeth C.SellersMitchell D.SmithDaniel A.2015. “A Principle or a Strategy? Voter Identification Laws and Partisan Competition in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly68:18–33.
37.
HopkinsDaniel J.2010. “Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition.” American Political Science Review104 (1): 40–60.
38.
HopkinsDaniel J.2014. “One Language, Two Meanings: Partisanship and Responses to Spanish.” Political Communication31:421–45.
NadeauRichardBlaisAndre. 1993. “Accepting the Election Outcome: The Effect of Participation on Losers’ Consent.” British Journal of Political Science23 (4): 553–63.
49.
NadeauRichardNiemiRichard G.1995. “Educated Guesses: The Process of Answering Factual Knowledge Questions in Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly59 (3): 323–46.
50.
NewmanBenjamin J.JohnstonChristopher D.StricklandApril A.CitrinJack. 2012. “Immigration Crackdown in the American Workplace: Explaining Variation in E-Verify Policy Adoption Across the US States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly12 (2): 160–82.
51.
NorrisPippa, ed. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
PriorMarkus. 2010. “You’ve Either Got it or You Don’t? The Stability of Political Interest Over the Life Cycle.” The Journal of Politics72 (3): 747–766.
54.
PriorMarkusLupiaArthur. 2008. “Money, Time, and Political Knowledge: Distinguishing Quick Recall and Political Learning Skills.” American Journal of Political Science52 (1): 169–83.
55.
RaudenbushStephen W.BrykAnthony S.2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Vol. 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
56.
SancesMichael W.StewartCharlesIII. 2015. “Partisanship and Confidence in the Vote Count: Evidence from U.S. National Elections since 2000.” Electoral Studies40:176–88.
57.
SchildkrautDeborah J.2011. Americanism in the Twenty-First Century: Public Opinion in the Age of Immigration. New York: Cambridge University Press.
58.
SingerAudrey. 2004. The Rise of New Immigrant Gateways. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
59.
SteenbergenMarco R.JonesBradford S.2002. “Modeling Multilevel Data Structures.” American Journal of Political Science46 (1): 218–37.
UdaniAdrianoKimballDavid C.2017. “Immigrant Resentment and Voter Fraud Beliefs in the U.S. Electorate.” American Politics Research. Prepublished 7, August, 2017, DOI: 10.1177/1532673X17722988.
63.
UscinskiJoseph E.ParentJoseph M.2014. American Conspiracy Theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64.
WarrenRobertWarrenJohn Robert. 2013. “Unauthorized Immigration to the United States: Annual Estimates and Components of Change, by State, 1990 to 2010.” International Migration Review47 (2): 296–329.
65.
WilsonDavid C.BrewerPaul R.2013. “The Foundations of Public Opinion on Voter ID Laws: Political Predispositions, Racial Resentment, and Information Effects.” Public Opinion Quarterly77:962–84.
66.
WolakJennifer. 2014. “How Campaigns Promote the Legitimacy of Elections.” Electoral Studies34:205–15.
67.
ZallerJohn. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
