Research finds that voters benchmark the state’s unemployment level to the nation’s when holding state policy makers accountable. Yet benchmarking requires some voter knowledge if the standard is to be applied correctly as an accountability rule. This article leverages the fact that voters have more knowledge about their state governors than legislatures assess how much knowledge is necessary for holding these policy makers accountable. Using pooled Cooperative Congressional Election Study data from 2006 to 2016, results find that knowledge has stronger mediating effects for the state legislature than governor. Furthermore, despite the low knowledge levels among voters about the state legislature, collectively there appears to be enough knowledge to hold that policymaking body accountable. The conclusion offers directions for future research.
AlthausScott L.CizmarAnne M.GimpelJames G. 2009. “Media Supply, Audience Demand, and the Geography of News Consumption in the United States.” Political Communication26 (3): 249–77.
2.
AndersonCameron D.2006. “Economic Voting and Multilevel Governance: A comparative Individual-level Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science50 (2): 449–63.
3.
AnsolabehereStephenMeredithMarcSnowbergErik. 2012. “Sociotropic Voting and the Media.” In Improving Public Opinion Surveys: Interdisciplinary Innovation and the American National Election Studies, ed. AldrichJ. H.McGrawK. M. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 175–89.
4.
ArceneauxKevin. 2005. “Does Federalism Weaken Democratic Representation in the United States?” Publius: The Journal of Federalism35 (2): 297–311.
5.
ArceneauxKevin. 2006. “The Federal Face of Voting: Are Elected Officials Held Accountable for the Functions Relevant to Their Office?” Political Psychology27 (5): 731–54.
6.
ArnoldR. DouglasCarnesNicholas. 2012. “Holding Mayors Accountable: New York’s Executives from Koch to Bloomberg.” American Journal of Political Science56 (4): 949–63.
7.
AtkesonLonna RaePartinRandall W. 1995. “Economic and Referendum Voting: A Comparison of Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” American Political Science Review89 (1): 99–107.
8.
AytaçSelim Erdem. 2018. “Relative Economic Performance and the Incumbent Vote: A Reference Point Theory.” The Journal of Politics80 (1): 16–29.
9.
BernickE. Lee. 2016. “Studying Governors over Five Decades: What We Know and Where We Need to Go?” State and Local Government Review48 (2): 132–46.
10.
BesleyTimothyCaseAnne. 1995. “Incumbent Behavior: Vote Seeking, Tax Setting and Yardstick Competition.” American Economic Review85 (1): 25–45.
11.
BracePaul. 1993. State Government and Economic Performance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12.
BrownAdam R.2010. “Are Governors Responsible for the State Economy? Partisanship, Blame, and Divided Federalism.” The Journal of Politics72 (3): 605–15.
13.
Delli CarpiniMichael X.KeeterScott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
14.
Delli CarpiniMichael X.KeeterScottKennamerJ. David. 1994. “Effects of the News Media Environment on Citizen Knowledge of State Politics and Government.” Journalism Quarterly71 (2): 443–56.
15.
CarseyThomas M.WrightGerald C. 1998. “State and National Factors in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” American Journal of Political Science42 (3): 994–1002.
16.
ChubbJohn E.1988. “Institutions, the Economy, and the Dynamics of State Elections.” American Political Science Review82 (1): 133–54.
17.
CoffeyDaniel. 2005. “Measuring Gubernatorial Ideology: A Content Analysis of State of the State Speeches.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly5 (1): 88–103.
18.
CohenJeffrey E.1983. “Gubernatorial Popularity in Nine States.” American Politics Quarterly11 (2): 219–35.
19.
CohenJeffrey E.2018. “From Antisemitism to Philosemitism? Trends in American Attitudes toward Jews from 1964 to 2016.” Religions9 (4): 107–28.
20.
CohenJeffrey E.KingJames D. 2004. “Relative Unemployment and Gubernatorial Popularity.” Journal of Politics66 (4): 1267–82.
21.
CrewRobert E.Jr.BranhamDavidWeiherGregory R.BernickEthan. 2002. “Political Events in a Model of Gubernatorial Approval.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly2 (3): 283–97.
22.
CrewRobert E.Jr.WeiherGregory R. 1996. “Gubernatorial Popularity in Three States: A Preliminary Model.” The Social Science Journal33 (1): 39–54.
23.
DiLeoDaniel. 2001. “To Develop or to Redistribute? An Analysis of the Content of Governors’ Agendas.” State and Local Government Review33 (1): 52–59.
24.
EbeidMichaelRoddenJonathan. 2006. “Economic Geography and Economic Voting: Evidence from the US States.” British Journal of Political Science36 (3): 527–47.
25.
EriksonRobert S.MacKuenMichael B.StimsonJames A. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
EvansGeoffreyPickupMark. 2010. “Reversing the Causal Arrow: The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions in the 2000–2004 US Presidential Election Cycle.” The Journal of Politics72 (4): 1236–51.
27.
FergusonMargaret. 2014. “State Executives.” In The Oxford Handbook of State and Local Government, ed. Haider-MarkelD. P. (pp. 319–342). New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
FordingRichard CPattonDana J. 2019. “Medicaid Expansion and the Political Fate of the Governors Who Support It.” Policy Studies Journal47:274–99.
29.
GerberAlan S.HuberGregory A. 2009. “Partisanship and Economic Behavior: Do Partisan Differences in Economic Forecasts Predict Real Economic Behavior?” American Political Science Review103 (3): 407–26.
30.
GradyDennis O.1989. “Governors and Economic Development Policy: The Perception of their Role and the Reality of their Influence.” Policy Studies Journal17 (4): 879–94.
31.
HammanJohn A.2004. “Career Experience and Performing Effectively as Governor.” The American Review of Public Administration34 (2): 151–63.
32.
HansenSusan B.1999a. “Governors’ Job Performance Ratings and State Unemployment: The Case of California.” State and Local Government Review31 (1): 7–17.
33.
HansenSusan B.1999b. “‘Life Is Not Fair’: Governors’ Job Performance Ratings and State Economies.” Political Research Quarterly52 (1): 167–88.
34.
HayesDannyLawlessJennifer L. 2015. “As Local News Goes, so goes Citizen Engagement: Media, Knowledge, and Participation in US House Elections.” The Journal of Politics77 (2): 447–62.
35.
HerzikEric B.1991. “Policy Agendas and Gubernatorial Leadership.” In Gubernatorial Leadership and State Policy, ed. HerzikE. B.BrownB. W. (pp. 25–37). New York: Greenwood.
36.
HopkinsDaniel J.2018. The Increasingly United States: How and Why American Political Behavior Nationalized. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
HopkinsDaniel J.PettingillLindsay M. 2017. “Retrospective Voting in Big-city US Mayoral Elections.” Political Science Research and Methods6:697–714.
38.
HowellSusan E.VanderleeuwJames M. 1990. “Economic Effects on State Governors.” American Politics Quarterly18 (2): 158–68.
39.
HummelPatrickRothschildDavid. 2014. “Fundamental Models for Forecasting Elections at the State Level.” Electoral Studies35 (1): 123–39.
40.
JacobsNicholas. 2017. “An Experimental Test of How Americans Think about Federalism.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism47 (4): 572–98.
41.
JacobsonGary C.2006. “The Polls: Polarized Opinion in the States: Partisan Differences in Approval Ratings of Governors, Senators, and George W. Bush.” Presidential Studies Quarterly36 (4): 732–57.
42.
KayserMark AndreasPeressMichael. 2012. “Benchmarking across Borders: Electoral Accountability and the Necessity of Comparison.” American Political Science Review106 (3): 661–84.
43.
KelleherChristine A.WolakJennifer. 2007. “Explaining Public Confidence in the Branches of State Government.” Political Research Quarterly60 (4): 707–21.
44.
KenneyPatrick J.RiceTom W. 1983. “Popularity and the Vote: The Gubernatorial Case.” American Politics Quarterly11 (2): 237–41.
45.
KincaidJohnColeRichard L. 2010. “Citizen Attitudes toward Issues of Federalism in Canada, Mexico, and the United States.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism41 (1): 53–75.
46.
KingJames D.CohenJeffrey E. 2005. “What Determines a Governor’s Popularity?” State Politics & Policy Quarterly5 (3): 225–47.
47.
KrauseGeorge A.MeluskyBenjamin F. 2014. “Retrospective Economic Voting and the Intertemporal Dynamics of Electoral Accountability in the American States.” The Journal of Politics76 (4): 1102–15.
48.
LangehennigStefaniZamadicsJosephWolakJennifer. 2019. “State Policy Outcomes and State Legislative Approval.” Political Research Quarterly72:929–43.
49.
LaytonCharlesDorrohJennifer. 2002. “Sad State: Newspaper Budget-cutting has Triggered a Sharp Drop in the Number of Reporters Assigned to Cover the Nation’s Increasingly Important Statehouses.” American Journalism Review24 (5): 19–35.
50.
LeighleyJan E.NaglerJonathan. 2013. Who Votes Now? Demographics, Issues, Inequality, and Turnout in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
51.
LeydenKevin M.BorrelliStephen A. 1995. “The Effect of State Economic Conditions on Gubernatorial Elections: Does Unified Government Make a Difference?” Political Research Quarterly48 (2): 275–90.
52.
LowryRobert C.AltJames E.FerreeKaren E. 1998. “Fiscal Policy Outcomes and Electoral Accountability in American States.” American Political Science Review92 (4): 759–74.
53.
LyonsJeffreyJaegerWilliam P.WolakJennifer. 2013. “The Roots of Citizens’ Knowledge of State Politics.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly13 (2): 183–202.
54.
MacDonaldJason A.SigelmanLee. 1999. “Public Assessments of Gubernatorial Performance: A Comparative State Analysis.” American Politics Quarterly27 (2): 201–15.
55.
NewmanBenjamin J.JohnsonJoshua. 2012. “Ethnic Change, Concern over Immigration, and Approval of State Government.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly12 (4): 415–37.
56.
NiemiRichard G.BremerJohnHeelMichael. 1999. “Determinants of State Economic Perceptions.” Political Behavior21 (2): 175–93.
57.
NiemiRichard G.StanleyHarold W.VogelRonald J. 1995. “State Economies and State Taxes: Do Voters Hold Governors Accountable?” American Journal of Political Science39 (4): 936–57.
58.
OrthDeborah A.2001. “Accountability in a Federal System: The Governor, the President, and Economic Expectations.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly1 (4): 412–32.
59.
OwenAndrew. 2011. The Negativity Effect in Retrospective Voting. PhD dissertation, Department of Politics, Princeton University, Princeton.
60.
PageBenjamin I.ShapiroRobert Y. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61.
PartinRandall W.1995. “Economic Conditions and Gubernatorial Elections: Is the State Executive Held Accountable?” American Politics Quarterly23 (1): 81–95.
62.
PeltzmanSam. 1987. “Economic Conditions and Gubernatorial Elections.” The American Economic Review77 (2): 293–97.
63.
PowellG. BinghamJr.2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
64.
PowellG. BinghamJr.WhittenGuy D. 1993. “A Cross-national Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science37 (2): 391–414.
65.
RichardsonLilliard E.Jr.KoniskyDavid M.MilyoJeffrey. 2012. “Public Approval of U. S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly37 (1): 99–116.
66.
RichardsonLilliard E.MilyoJeffrey. 2016. “Giving the People What They Want? Legislative Polarization and Public Approval of State Legislatures.” State and Local Government Review48 (4): 270–81.
67.
RoddenJonathanWibbelsErik. 2011. “Dual Accountability and the Nationalization of Party Competition: Evidence from Four Federations.” Party Politics17 (5): 629–53.
68.
RogersJonathan. 2016. “Tea Party Support and Perceptions of Local Economic Conditions.” Electoral Studies42 (1): 91–98.
69.
RogersSteven. 2017. “Electoral Accountability for State Legislative Roll Calls and Ideological Representation.” American Political Science Review111 (3): 555–71.
70.
RozinPaulRoyzmanEdward B. 2001. “Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion.” Personality and Social Psychology Review5 (4): 296–320.
71.
ShakerLee. 2009. “Citizens’ Local Political Knowledge and the Role of Media Access.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly86 (4): 809–26.
72.
SorokaStuart N.2014. Negativity in Democratic Politics: Causes and Consequences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
73.
SteinRobert M.1990. “Economic Voting for Governor and US Senator: The Electoral Consequences of Federalism.” The Journal of Politics52 (1): 29–53.
74.
SvobodaCraig J.1995. “Retrospective Voting in Gubernatorial Elections: 1982 and 1986.” Political Research Quarterly48 (1): 135–50.
75.
TaylorCharles D.2012. “Governors as Economic Problem Solvers: A Research Commentary.” Economic Development Quarterly26 (3): 267–76.
76.
TverskyAmosKahnemanDaniel. 1991. “Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-dependent Model.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics106 (4): 1039–61.
77.
ViningRichard L.WilhelmTeenaHiersSara E.MarcinPhil. 2010. “Patterns of Newspaper Reporting on State Supreme Courts.” Justice System Journal31 (3): 273–89.
78.
WeinbergMicah. 2010. “Measuring Governors’ Political Orientations Using Words as Data.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly10 (1): 96–109.
79.
WolfersJustin. 2002. Are Voters Rational? Evidence from Gubernatorial Elections. Stanford: Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
80.
WrightJohn R.2012. “Unemployment and the Democratic Electoral Advantage.” American Political Science Review106 (4): 685–702.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
