In the current era of polarization, bipartisanship between a president and senators of the opposite party seems unlikely. Yet, we expect that given a senator’s desire to please his constituents and ensure reelection, if a president is popular with constituents in a senator’s home state, he can have an indirect influence on the senator’s votes. We test this relationship using state-level presidential approval data, which are a district level cue for senators. The results suggest that when a president is popular with a senator’s constituents, the senator becomes increasingly likely to cast a vote in support of the president’s agenda regardless of partisanship. In fact, as approval in an opposite party senator’s state increases, his agreement rate increases by a greater margin than it does for senators of the president’s party. We also test the effect of reelection and determine that it tempers the bipartisanship a popular president can incite.
ArnoldR. D. (1990). The logic of congressional action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
BeyleT.NiemiR. G.SigelmanL. (2002). Gubernatorial, senatorial, and state-level job approval rating: The U.S. officials job approval ratings (jar) collection. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 2, 215-229.
3.
BondJ. R.FleisherR. (1980). The limits of presidential popularity as a source of influence in the U.S. house. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 5, 69-78.
4.
BondJ. R.FleisherR. (1984). Presidential popularity and congressional voting: A reexamination of public opinion as a source of influence in congress. Western Political Quarterly, 37, 291-306.
5.
BondJ. R.FleisherR. (2001). “The polls”: Partisanship and presidential performance evaluations. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 31, 529-540.
6.
BorrelliS. A.SimmonsG. L. (1993). Congressional responsiveness to presidential popularity: The electoral context. Political Behavior, 15(2), 93-112.
7.
BovitzG. L.CarsonJ. L. (2006). Position taking and electoral accountability in the U.S. House Of Representatives. Political Research Quarterly, 59(2), 297-312.
8.
BradyD. W.CoganJ. F.GainesB. J.RiversD. (1996). The perils of presidential support: How the republicans took the house in the 1994 midterm elections. Political Behavior, 18, 345-367.
CampbellA.CoxG. W.McCubbinsM. D. (2002). Agenda power in the senate, 1877 to 1986. In BradyD.McCubbinsM. D. (Eds.), Party, process, and political change: New perspectives on the history of Congress (pp. 107-145). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
Canes-WroneB.BradyD.CoganJ. F. (2002). Out of step, out of office: Electoral accountability and house members’ voting. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 127-140.
12.
Canes-WroneB.de MarchiS. (2002). Presidential approval and legislative success. Journal of Politics, 64, 491-509.
13.
CarsonJ. L. (2005). Strategy, selection, and candidate competition in U.S. house and senate elections. Journal of Politics, 67(1), 1-28.
14.
CarsonJ. L. (2008). Electoral accountability, party loyalty, and roll-call voting in the senate. In MonroeN. W.RobertsJ. M.RohdeD. W. (Eds.), Why not parties? Party effects in the U.S. senate (pp. 23-38). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
15.
ClintonJ. D. (2006). Representation in congress: Constituents and roll calls in the 106th house. Journal of Politics, 68, 397-409.
16.
CohenJ. E.BondJ. R.FleisherR.HammanJ. A. (2000). State-level presidential approval and senatorial support. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25, 577-590.
17.
ConverseP. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In ApterD. E. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-261). New York, NY: Free Press.
18.
EdwardsG. C. (1977). Presidential influence in the senate: Presidential prestige as a source of presidential power. American Politics Quarterly, 5, 481-500.
19.
EdwardsG. C. (2007). Changing their minds? George W. Bush and the limits of presidential persuasion. 21st Century Society, 2(1), 25-48.
20.
EdwardsG. C. I. (1976). Presidential influence in the house: Presidential prestige as a source of presidential power. American Political Science Review, 70, 101-113.
21.
EdwardsG. C. I. (1980). Presidential influence in congress. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
22.
EdwardsG. C. I. (1997). Aligning tests with theory: Presidential approval and legislative success. Congress and the Presidency, 24, 113-130.
23.
FennoR. F. (1973). Congressmen in committees. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
24.
FiorinaM. P. (1974). Representatives, roll calls, and constituencies. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath.
25.
FriedrichR. J. (1982). In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 797-833.
26.
HightonB. (2008). Job approval and senate election outcomes in the United States. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 33, 245-261.
27.
JacobsonG. C. (2001). The politics of Congressional elections (5th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
28.
KernellS. (1997). Going public: New strategies of presidential leadership. Washington, DC: CQ.
29.
KingdonJ. W. (1989). Congressmen’s voting decisions. Boston, MA: Harper and Row.
30.
KrehbielK. (1993). Where’s the party?British Journal of Political Science, 23, 235-266.
31.
MayhewD. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
NeustadtR. E. (1960). Presidential power. New York, NY: Wiley.
33.
NeustadtR. E. (1990). Presidential power and the modern presidents: The politics of leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan. New York, NY: Free Press.
34.
OstromC. W.SimonD. M. (1985). Promise and performance: A dynamic model of presidential popularity. American Political Science Review, 79, 334-358.
35.
RiversD.RoseN. (1985). Passing the president’s program: Public opinion and presidential influence in congress. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 183-196.
36.
ShullS. A.VanderleeuwJ. M. (1987). What do key votes measure?Legislative Studies Quarterly, 12, 573-582.
37.
SmithS. S. (2007). Party influence in Congress. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
