Does the presence of descriptive representation have symbolic consequences for women’s engagement in politics? Given mixed results from prior survey-based studies, I use experiments to investigate whether there is a direct psychological effect of candidate gender on voters’ interest in political engagement. By holding the features of the campaign and attributes of the candidates constant, I investigate the specific effects of candidate gender on people’s perceptions of the candidates and their desire to engage in politics. I find that women’s interest and engagement with the campaign is insensitive to the gender of the candidates, while men are less interested in participating in the election when the congressional candidate from their party is female. The mere presence of women candidates does not animate women’s engagement in campaigns.
AtkesonL. R. (2003). Not all cues are created equal: The conditional impact of female candidates on political engagement. Journal of Politics, 65, 1040-1061.
2.
AtkesonL. R.CarrilloN. (2007). More is better: The influence of collective female descriptive representation on external efficacy. Politics & Gender, 3, 79-101.
3.
BennettL. L. M.BennettS. E. (1989). Enduring gender differences in political interest: The impact of socialization and political dispositions. American Politics Research, 17, 105-122.
4.
BroockmanD. E. (2014). Do female politicians empower women to vote or run for office? A regression discontinuity approach. Electoral Studies, 34, 190-204.
5.
BrooksD. J. (2013). He runs, she runs: Why gender stereotypes do not harm women candidates. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BurnsN.SchlozmanK. L.VerbaS. (2001). The private roots of public action: Gender, equality, and political participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
CampbellD. E.WolbrechtC. (2006). See Jane run: Women politicians as role models for adolescents. Journal of Politics, 68, 233-247.
8.
CarrollS. (1994). Women as candidates in American politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9.
ColemanJ. J.MannaP. F. (2000). Congressional campaign spending and the quality of democracy. Journal of Politics, 62, 757-789.
10.
Delli CarpiniM. X.KeeterS. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11.
DjupeP. A.SokheyA. E.GilbertC. P. (2007). Present but not accounted for? Gender differences in civic resource acquisition. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 906-920.
12.
DolanK. (2006). Symbolic mobilization? The impact of candidate sex in American elections. American Politics Research, 34, 687-704.
13.
FoxR. L. (2007). Gender dynamics in congressional elections. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
FranzM. M.FreedmanP. B.GoldsteinK. M.RidoutT. N. (2008). Campaign advertising and American democracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
15.
GidengilE.GilesJ.ThomasM. (2008). The gender gap in self-perceived understanding of politics in Canada and the United States. Politics & Gender, 4, 535-561.
16.
GimpelJ. G.KaufmannK. M.Pearson-MerkowitzS. (2007). Battleground states versus blackout states: The behavioral implications of modern presidential campaigns. Journal of Politics, 69, 786-797.
17.
HansenS. B. (1997). Talking about politics: Gender and contextual effects on political proselytizing. Journal of Politics, 59, 73-103.
18.
HayesD.LawlessJ. L. (2013). A non-gendered lens: The absence of stereotyping in contemporary congressional elections. Presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Orlando, FL.
19.
HerrnsonP. S.LucasJ. C. (2006). The fairer sex?: Gender and negative campaigning in U.S. elections. American Politics Research, 34, 69-94.
20.
HoganR. E. (2001). The influence of state and district conditions on the representation of women in U.S. state legislatures. American Politics Research, 29, 4-24.
21.
HopkinsD. J. (2009). No more Wilder effect, never a Whitman effect: When and why polls mislead about black and female candidates. Journal of Politics, 71, 769-781.
22.
HuddyL.TerkildsenN. (1993). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 119-147.
23.
JenningsM. K. (1983). Gender roles and inequalities in political participation: Results from an eight-nation study. Western Political Quarterly, 36, 364-385.
24.
KahnK. F. (1993). Gender differences in campaign messages: The political advertisements of men and women candidates for U.S. Senate. Political Research Quarterly, 46, 481-502.
25.
KahnK. F. (1994). The distorted mirror: Press coverage of women candidates for statewide office. Journal of Politics, 56, 154-173.
26.
KarpJ. A.BanducciS. A. (2008). When politics is not just a man’s game: Women’s representation and political engagement. Electoral Studies, 27, 105-115.
27.
KochJ. (1997). Candidate gender and women’s psychological engagement in politics. American Politics Quarterly, 25, 118-133.
28.
KochJ. (2002). Gender stereotypes and citizens’ impression of house candidates’ ideological orientations. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 453-462.
29.
LawlessJ. L. (2004). Politics of presence? Congresswomen and symbolic representation. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 81-99.
30.
LawlessJ. L.FoxR. L. (2010). It still takes a candidate: Why women don’t run for office. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
31.
MansbridgeJ. (1999). Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent “yes.”Journal of Politics, 61, 628-657.
32.
McDermottM. L. (1997). Voting cues in low-information elections: Candidate gender as a social information variable in contemporary United States elections. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 270-283.
33.
OxleyZ. M.FoxR. L. (2004). Women in executive office: Variation across American states. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 113-120.
34.
PhillipsA. (1995). The politics of presence. New York, NY: Clarendon Press.
35.
ReingoldB.HarrellJ. (2010). The impact of descriptive representation on women’s political engagement: Does party matter?Political Research Quarterly, 63, 280-294.
36.
RosenstoneS. J.HansenJ. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York, NY: Macmillan.
37.
SanbonmatsuK. (2002). Gender stereotypes and vote choice. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 20-34.
38.
SanbonmatsuK. (2006). Where women run: Gender and party in the American states. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
39.
SanbonmatsuK.DolanK. (2009). Do gender stereotypes transcend party?Political Research Quarterly, 62, 485-494.
40.
SapiroV. (1981). When are interests interesting? The problem of political representation of women. American Political Science Review, 75, 701-716.
41.
SapiroV.ConoverP. J. (1997). The variable gender basis of electoral politics: Gender and context in the 1992 election. British Journal of Political Science, 27, 497-523.
42.
SapiroV.Cramer WalshK.StrachP.HenningsV. (2011). Gender, context, and television advertising: A comprehensive analysis of 2000 and 2002 House races. Political Research Quarterly, 64, 107-119.
43.
Schwindt-BayerL. A.MishlerW. (2005). An integrated model of women’s representation. Journal of Politics, 67, 407-428.
44.
StoutC. T.KlineR. (2011). I’m not voting for her: Polling discrepancies and female candidates. Political Behavior, 33, 479-503.
45.
StrebM. J.BurrellB.FrederickB.GenoveseM. A. (2008). Social desirability effects and support for a female American president. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 76-89.
46.
VerbaS.BurnsN.SchlozmanK. L. (1997). Knowing and caring about politics: Gender and political engagement. Journal of Politics, 59, 1051-1072.
47.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
WelchS. (1977). Women as political animals? A test of some explanations for male-female political participation differences. American Journal of Political Science, 21, 711-730.
49.
WindettJ. H. (2011). State effects and the emergence and success of female gubernatorial candidates. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 11, 460-482.
50.
WolakJ. (2006). The consequences of presidential battleground strategies for citizen engagement. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 353-361.
51.
WolakJ.McDevittM. (2011). The roots of the gender gap in political knowledge in adolescence. Political Behavior, 33, 505-533.
52.
WolbrechtC.CampbellD. E. (2007). Leading by example: Female members of Parliament as political role models. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 921-939.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
