We assess the importance of the public’s policy agreement with the Supreme Court on public approval of the court. Using survey data on a range of recent court cases, we measure respondents’ perceived ideological closeness to the court. Then, we test various theories of court approval (doctrinal, functional, attitudinal). People who believe the court has decided recent cases as they themselves would have done, or that judges share their partisanship, report higher court approval than those who perceive the court as ideologically distant from them. We compare these findings with similar effects of policy agreement on Congressional and Presidential approval.
AnsolabehereS.JonesP. E. (2010). Constituents’ responses to congressional roll-call voting. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 583-597.
2.
BairdV. A. (2001). Building institutional legitimacy: The role of procedural justice. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 333-354.
3.
BartelsB. L.JohnstonC. D. (2013). On the ideological foundations of Supreme Court legitimacy in the American public. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 184-199.
4.
CaldeiraG.GibsonJ. (1992). The etiology of public support for the Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 635-664.
5.
CasillasC. J.EnnsP. K.WohlfarthP. C. (2011). How public opinion constrains the U.S. Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 74-88. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00485.x
6.
ChristensonD. P.GlickD. M. (2015). Chief justice Roberts’s health care decision disrobed: The microfoundations of the Supreme Court’s legitimacy. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 403-418.
7.
ClarkT. S. (2010). The limits of judicial independence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
DahlR. A. (1957). Decision-making in a democracy: The Supreme Court as a national policy-maker. Journal of Public Law, 6, 279-295.
9.
DurrR. H.MartinA. D.WolbrechtC. (2000). Ideological divergence and public support for the Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 768-776.
10.
EpsteinL.SegalJ. A. (2005). Advice and consent: The politics of judicial appointments. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
EriksonR. S.MacKuenM. B.StimsonJ. A. (2002). The macro polity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
FranklinC. H.KosakiL. C. (1989). Republican schoolmaster: The US Supreme Court, public opinion, and abortion. The American Political Science Review, 83, 751-771.
13.
FranklinC. H.KosakiL. C.KritzerH. M. (1993, September). The salience of US Supreme Court decisions. Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
14.
FriedmanB. (2009). The will of the people: How public opinion has influenced the Supreme Court and shaped the meaning of the constitution. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
15.
GibsonJ. L.CaldeiraG. A. (2009). Knowing the Supreme Court? A reconsideration of public ignorance of the high court. The Journal of Politics, 71, 429-441.
16.
GibsonJ. L.CaldeiraG. A.SpenceL. K. (2003). Measuring attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 354-367.
17.
GibsonJ. L.NelsonM. (2015). Is the US Supreme Court’s legitimacy grounded in performance satisfaction and ideology?American Journal of Political Science, 59, 162-174.
18.
GreeneJ.AnsolabehereS.PersilyN. (2011). Profiling originalism. Columbia Law Review, 111(2), 356-418.
19.
GrosskopfA.MondakJ. J. (1998). Do attitudes toward specific Supreme Court decisions matter? The impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on public confidence in the Supreme Court. Political Research Quarterly, 51, 633-654.
20.
HetheringtonM. J.SmithJ. L. (2007). Issue preferences and evaluations of the U.S. Supreme Court. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 40-66.
21.
HibbingJ. R.Theiss-MorseE. (1995). Congress as public enemy: Public attitudes toward American political institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
HibbingJ. R.Theiss-MorseE. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
HoekstraV. J. (2000). The Supreme Court and local public opinion. American Political Science Review, 94, 89-100.
24.
JohnsonC. A.CanonB. C. (1984). Judicial policies: Implementation and impact. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
25.
JonesD. R.McDermottM. L. (2009). Americans, congress, and democratic responsiveness: Public evaluations of congress and electoral consequences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
26.
KeithB. E.MaglebyD. B.NelsonC. J.OrrE.WestlyeM. C. (1992). The myth of the independent voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
MalhotraN.JesseeS. A. (2014). Ideological proximity and support for the Supreme Court. Political Behavior, 36, 817-846.
28.
MarshallT. R. (1989). Public opinion and the Supreme Court. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
29.
MartinA. D.QuinnK. M. (2002). Dynamic ideal point estimation via Markov chain Monte Carlo for the US Supreme Court, 1953–1999. Political Analysis, 10, 134-153.
30.
McCloskeyH.ZallerJ. (1984). The American ethos: Public attitudes toward capitalism and democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
McGuireK. T.StimsonJ. A. (2004). The least dangerous branch revisited: New evidence on Supreme Court responsiveness to public preferences. Journal of Politics, 66, 1018-1035.
32.
MillerW. E.StokesD. E. (1963). Constituency influence in congress. American Political Science Review, 57, 45-56.
33.
MondakJ. J. (1991). Substantive and procedural aspects of Supreme Court decisions as determinants of institutional approval. American Politics Research, 19, 174-188.
34.
MondakJ. J.SmitheyS. I. (1997). The dynamics of public support for the Supreme Court. Journal of Politics, 59, 1114-1142.
35.
NicholsonS. P.HansfordT. G. (2014). Partisans in robes: Party cues and public acceptance of Supreme Court decisions. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 620-636.
36.
Pew Research Center. (2015). Negative views of Supreme Court at record high driven by republican dissatisfaction. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
37.
SegalJ. A.CameronC. M.CoverA. D. (1992). A spatial model of roll call voting: Senators, constituents, presidents, and interest groups in Supreme Court confirmations. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 96-121.
38.
SegalJ. A.WesterlandC.LindquistS. A. (2011). Congress, the Supreme Court, and judicial review: Testing a constitutional separation of powers model. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 89-104.
39.
StoutenboroughJ. W.Haider-MarkelD. P. (2008). Public confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court: A new look at the impact of court decisions. Social Science Journal, 45, 28-47.
40.
UraJ. D.WohlfarthP. C. (2010). “An appeal to the people”: Public opinion and congressional support for the Supreme Court. The Journal of Politics, 72, 939-956.
41.
UslanerE. M.WeberR. E. (1979). Public support for pro-choice abortion policies in the Nation and States: Changes and stability after the Roe and Doe decisions. Michigan Law Review, 77, 1772-1789.
