Conversations around criminal legal reform often center around prosecutorial discretion. Yet, we know little about how the demographic characteristics of prosecutors influence case outcomes and race- and sex-based carceral disparities. I investigate this question using an original dataset of all county prosecutors in the US in 2001 and 2007 and find some differences between non-white and female prosecutors and white and male prosecutors. Black prosecutors are associated with fewer felony closures and convictions, Latinx prosecutors are associated with lower Latinx jail populations, and female prosecutors are associated with lower female and Black jail populations, lower Black prison admissions, and lower jail admissions rates. These findings suggest prosecutorial discretion is an important plank of criminal legal reform, and increasing the diversity of those offices may act as an important and initial step to limit the negative effects of the carceral state on particular communities.
AlbonettiC. A. (1986). Criminality, prosecutorial screening, and uncertainty: Toward a theory of discretionary decision making in felony case processings. Criminology, 24(4), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1986.tb01505.x
2.
AlbonettiC. A.HepburnJ. R. (1996). Prosecutorial discretion to defer criminalization: The effects of defendant’s ascribed and achieved status characteristics. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 12(1), 63-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02354471
BakerD. B.HassanS (2020). Gender and prosecutorial discretion: An empirical assessment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa017
5.
BandyopadhyaySMcCannonB. C. (2014). The effect of the election of prosecutors on criminal trials. Public Choice, 161(1-2), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-013-0144-0
BoldtE. D.BoydC. L. (2018). The political responsiveness of violent crime prosecution. Political Research Quarterly, 71(4), 936–948. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918772676
9.
BoydC. L.NelsonM. J. (2017). The effects of trial judge gender and public opinion on criminal sentencing decisions. Vanderbilt Law Review, 70(6), 1819–1844
10.
BrattonK. A.HaynieK. L. (1999). Agenda setting and legislative success in state legislatures: the effects of gender and race. The Journal of Politics, 61(3), 658–679. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647822
11.
BrowningR. P.MarshallD. R.TabbD. H. (1984). Protest is not enough: The struggle of Blacks and Hispanics for equality in urban politics. University of California Press.
12.
ButlerP. (2009). Let’s get free: A hip-hop theory of justice. The New Press.
13.
DavisA. J. (2007). Arbitrary justice: The power of the American prosecutor. Oxford University Press.
14.
DavisA. J. (2019). Reimagining prosecution: A growing progressive movement. University of California Los Angeles Criminal Justice Law Review, 3(1), 1-27.
15.
DavisK. C. (1969). Discretionary justice: A preliminary inquiry. Louisiana State University Press.
16.
DavisB. C.LivermoreM.LimY. (2011). The extended reach of minority political power: the interaction of descriptive representation, managerial networking, and race. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 494-507. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381611000077.
FarrellA.WardG.RousseauD. (2009). Race effects of representation among federal court workers: Does Black workforce representation reduce sentencing disparities?The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 623(1), 121-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716208331128.
19.
FeeleyM. M (1979). The process is the punishment. Russell Sage Foundation.
20.
FlemmingR. B. (1990). The political styles and organizational strategies of American prosecutors: Examples from nine courthouse communities. Law & Policy, 12(1), 25-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1990.tb00040.x
21.
FlemmingR. B.NardulliP. FEisensteinJ. (1992). The craft of justice. University of Pennsylvania Press.
22.
FrederickB.DonS. (2012). Anatomy of discretion: An analysis of prosecutorial decision making. National Institute of Justice.
23.
FrohmannL. (1997). Convictability and discordant locales: Reproducing race, class, and gender ideologies in prosecutorial decisionmaking. Law and Society Review, 31(3), 531–556. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054045
24.
FunkK. D.SilvaT.Escobar-LemmonM. C. (2017). Leading toward equality: The effect of women mayors on gender equality in local bureaucracies. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7(3), 554–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2017.1403932
GilbertJ. (2018). Prosecutors under persecution: A phenomenological study of Black women prosecutors. Georgia State University.
27.
GoelzhauserG (2013). Prosecutorial discretion under resource constraints. Judicature, 96(4), 161168
28.
GordonS. C.HuberG. A. (2002). Citizen oversight and the electoral incentives of criminal prosecutors. American Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 334–351. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088380
29.
GundersonA. (2020). Representation, incorporation, and corrections spending: the counterbalancing effect of Black political incorporation. Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 5(3), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2020.15
HolmanM. R. (2014). Sex and the city: Female leaders and spending on social welfare programs in U.S. municipalities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(4), 701–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12066
35.
IacusS. M.KingG.PorroG. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr013.
36.
ImaiK.KhannaK. (2016). Improving ecological inference by predicting individual ethnicity from voter registration records. Political Analysis, 24(2), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpw001
37.
JohnsonB. D. (2014). Judges on trial: A reexamination of judicial race and gender effects across modes of conviction. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25(2), 159–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403412463933
38.
KaplanJ. (2021). Jacob Kaplan’s Concatenated Files: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest (Return A), 1960-2020. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research[distributor]. https://doi.org/10.3886/E100707V17
KingR. D.JohnsonK. R.McGeeverK. (2010). Demography of the legal profession and racial disparities in sentencing. Law & Society Review, 44(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2010.00394.x
41.
KritzerH. M.UhlmanT. M. (1977). Sisterhood in the courtroom: Sex of judge and defendant in criminal case disposition. Social Science Journal, 14(2), 77–88.
KutateladzeB. L.AndiloroN. R.JohnsonB. D.SpohnC. C. (2014). Cumulative disadvantage: Examining racial and ethnic disparity in prosecution and sentencing. Criminology, 52(3), 514-551. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12047.
44.
LevineK. L.WrightR. F. (2012). Prosecution in 3-D. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(4), 1119–1180.
45.
LevinsonS. (2003). Identifying the Jewish lawyer: Reflections on the construction of professional identity. In Wrestling with Diversity (pp. 124-162). Duke University Press.
McCannonB. C.BryanC. (2013). Prosecutor elections, mistakes, and appeals. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 10(4), 696–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12024
48.
McCannonB. C.PruittJ. (2018). Taking on the boss: Informative contests in prosecutor elections. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 20(5), 657–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12291
49.
McPhailB. A.DiNittoD. M. (2005). Prosecutorial perspectives on gender-bias hate crimes. Violence Against Women, 11(9), 1162-1185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801205277086
50.
MeierK. J.StewartJ.Jr. (1992). The impact of representative bureaucracies: Educational systems and public policies. The American Review of Public Administration, 22(3), 157-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409202200301
51.
MillerB.CurryB. (2018). U.S. Attorneys, political control, and career ambition. Oxford University Press.
52.
MillerM. L.WrightR. F. (2008). The black box. Iowa Law Review, 94, 125–196.
NelsonM. J. (2014). Responsive justice? Retention elections, prosecutors, and public opinion. Journal of Law and Courts, 2(1), 117-152. https://doi.org/10.1086/674527.
55.
NelsonM. J.OstranderI. (2016). Keeping appointments: the politics of confirming United States Attorneys. Justice System Journal, 37(3), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2015.1125820
56.
Nugent-BorakoveM. E.BudzilowiczL. M.RainvilleG. (2009). Exploring the feasibility and efficacy of performance measures in prosecution and their application to community prosecution. United States Department of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/227668.pdf.
57.
NunnK. B. (1999). The Darden dilemma: Should African Americans prosecute crimes. Fordham Law Review, 68(1), 1473.
PfaffJ. (2017). Locked in: The true causes of mass incarceration - and how to achieve real reform. Basic Books.
60.
PitkinHannaF. (1967). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
61.
PreuhsR. R. (2006). “The conditional effects of minority descriptive representation: Black legislators, influence, policy, & the American states”. The Journal of Politics, 68(3), 585–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2031443
62.
RamseyC. B. (2002). The discretionary power of “public” prosecutors in historical perspective. American Criminal Law Review, 39(4), 1310-1393.
63.
RasmusenE.RaghavM.RamseyerM. (2009). Convictions versus conviction rates: The prosecutor’s choice. American Law and Economics Review, 11(1), 47–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahp007
RehaviM. M.StarrS. B. (2014). Racial disparity in federal criminal sentences. Journal of Political Economy, 122(6), 1320–1354. https://doi.org/10.1086/677255.
66.
ReingoldB. (2003). Representing women: Sex, gender, and legislative behavior in Arizona and California. University of North Carolina Press.
67.
ReingoldB.HaynieK. LWidnerK. (2020). Race, gender, and political representation: Toward a more intersectional approach. Oxford University Press.
68.
ReynosoC. (2004) A survey of Latino lawyers in Los Angeles county - their professional lives and opinions (38, pp. 1563–1642). University of California Davis Law Review
69.
RobertsonC.BaughmanS. B.WrightM. S. (2019). Race and class: A randomized experiment with prosecutors. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 16(4), 807–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12235
70.
RussellM. M. (1997). Beyond “sellouts” and “race cards”: Black attorneys and the straightjacket of legal practice. Michigan Law Review, 95(4), 766-794. https://doi.org/10.2307/1290046
71.
SancesM. W. (2021). Do district attorneys represent their voters? Evidence from California’s era of criminal justice reform. Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy, 2(2), 169-197. https://doi.org/10.1561/113.00000034
72.
SancesM. W.YouH. Y.You. (2017). Who pays for government? Descriptive representation and exploitative revenue sources. The Journal of Politics, 79(3), 1090-1094. https://doi.org/10.1086/691354
SorensenJ.WallaceD. H. (1999). Prosecutorial discretion in seeking death: An analysis of racial disparity in the pretrial stages of case processing in a midwestern county. Justice Quarterly, 16(3), 559-578. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829900094261
75.
SteffensmeierD.BrittC. L. (2001). Judges’ race and judicial decision making: do Black judges sentence differently?Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 749-764. https://doi.org/10.1111/0038-4941.00057
76.
StemenD.EscobarG. (2018). Whither the prosecutor? Prosecutor and county effects on guilty plea outcomes in Wisconsin. Justice Quarterly, 35(7), 1166-1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1548637
77.
SwersM. L (2002). The difference women make: The policy impact of women in Congress. University of Chicago Press.
ThompsonD. M. (2020). How partisan is local law enforcement? Evidence from sheriff cooperation with immigration authorities. American Political Science Review, 114(1), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055419000613
80.
TonryM. (2012). Prosecutors and politics in comparative perspective. Crime and Justice, 41(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1086/666975
81.
TuttleC. (2019). Racial disparities in federal sentencing: Evidence from drug mandatory minimums. SSRN Electronic Journal.
82.
UlmerJ. T.KurlychekM. C.KramerJ. H. (2007). Prosecutorial discretion and the imposition of mandatory minimum sentences. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44(4), 427–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427807305853
83.
UnahIsaac. "Empirical analysis of race and the process of capital punishment in North Carolina." Michigan State Law Review (2011): 609.
84.
Van CleveG. N. (2016). Crook county: Racism and injustice in America’s largest criminal court. Stanford University Press.
85.
Vera Institute of Justice (2020). Incarceration trends dataset.
86.
WardG. K. (2006). Race and the justice workforce. In LaurenJ. K.RuthD.P.JohnH. (eds), The many colors of crime: Inequalities of race, ethnicity, and crime in America (pp. 67–87). New York University Press chapter 4.
87.
WardG.FarrellA.RousseauD. (2009). Does racial balance in workforce representation yield equal justice? Race relations of sentencing in federal court organizations. Law and Society Review, 43(4), 757-806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00388.x
88.
WelchS.CombsM.GruhlJ. (1988). Do Black judges make a difference?American Journal of Political Science, 32(1), 126-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111313
89.
WilkinsD. B. (1998). Identities and roles: Race, recognition, and professional responsibility (57, p. 1502). Michigan State Law Review.
90.
WorrallJ. L.RossJ. W.McCordE. S. (2006). Modeling prosecutors’ charging decisions in domestic violence cases. Crime and Delinquency, 52(3), 472–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128705282496
91.
WrighR. F. (2008). How prosecutor elections fail us. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6(1), 581-610.
92.
WrightR. F. (2014). Beyond prosecutor elections. Southern Methodist Law Review, 67(3), 593–616.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
