Do rural Americans trust the government less than non-rural Americans? In an era of declining trust in government and mounting geographic polarization, this research examines the relationship between geography, identity, and attitudes of political trust in the United States. Using national survey data from the 2016 and 2020 American National Election Studies time series surveys, this quantitative analysis tests hypotheses that rurality in the context of place and place-based identity is associated with lower trust in the federal government. Overall, the results show that both living in and identifying with more rural areas corresponds with decreased government trust, regardless of the political party of the incumbent president. These findings contribute to the understanding of America’s urban-rural political divide and suggest significant implications for both partisan leaders and policymakers.
American National Election Studies. (2019). ANES 2016 Time Series Study Full Release [dataset and documentation]. September 4, 2019 version. American National Election Studies. www.electionstudies.org.
2.
American National Election Studies. (2021). ANES 2020 Time Series Study Full Release [dataset and documentation]. July 19, 2021 version. American National Election Studies. www.electionstudies.org.
3.
BerelsonB. R.LazarsfeldP. F.McPheeW. N. (1954). Voting. University of Chicago Press.
4.
BergbowerM. L.AllenL. G. (2021). Trust in the American political parties and support for public policy: Why Republicans benefit from political distrust. Journal of Trust Research, 11(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2021.2014336
5.
CampbellA.ConverseP. E.MillerW.StokesD. E. (1960). The American voter. University of Michigan Press.
6.
CitrinJ. (1974). Comment: The political relevance of trust in government. American Political Science Review, 68(3), 973–988. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959141
Cramer WalshK. (2012). Putting inequality in its place: Rural consciousness and the power of perspective. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 517–532. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000305
10.
CramerK. J. (2016). The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press.
11.
DiamondE. P. (2023). Understanding rural identities and environmental policy attitudes in America. Perspectives on Politics, 21(2), 502–518. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721002231
GarcíaA. S.SchmalzbauerL. (2017). Placing assimilation theory: Mexican immigrants in urban and rural America. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 672(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217708565
15.
GimpelJ. G.KarnesK. A. (2006). The rural side of the urban-rural gap. PS: Political Science and Politics, 39(03), 467–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096506060859
16.
GimpelJ. G.LovinN.MoyB.ReevesA. (2020). The urban–rural gulf in American political behavior. Political Behavior, 42(4), 1343–1368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09601-w
HetheringtonM. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92(4), 791–808. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586304
19.
HetheringtonM. J. (1999). The effect of political trust on the presidential vote, 1968- 96. American Political Science Review, 93(2), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585398
20.
HetheringtonM. J.HusserJ. A. (2012). How trust matters: The changing political relevance of political trust. American Journal of Political Science, 56(2), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00548.x
21.
HetheringtonM. J.RudolphT. J. (2008). Priming, performance, and the dynamics of political trust. The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 498–512. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080468
22.
HochschildA. R. (2016). Strangers in their own land : Anger and mourning on the American right. New Press.
JacobsN.MunisB. K. (2023). Place-based resentment in contemporary U.S. Elections: The individual sources of America’s urban-rural divide. Political Research Quarterly, 76(3), 1102–1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129221124864
KeyV. O. (1949). Southern politics in state and nation. A.A. Knopf.
30.
KoniskyD. M.MilyoJ.RichardsonL. E. (2008). Environmental policy attitudes: Issues, geographical scale, and political trust. Social Science Quarterly, 89(5), 1066–1085. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00574.x
LeeB. A.SharpG. (2017). Ethnoracial diversity across the rural-urban continuum. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 672(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217708560
33.
LipsetS. M. (1960). Political man: The social bases of politics. Anchor Books.
34.
LipsetS. M.RokkanS. (1967). Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives. Free Press. [Contributors: Robert R. Alford and Others].
35.
Lunz TrujilloK.CrowleyZ. (2022). Symbolic versus material concerns of rural consciousness in the United States. Political Geography, 96(1), Article 102658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102658
36.
Lunz TrujilloK. (2022). Rural identity as a contributing factor to anti-intellectualism in the U.S. Political Behavior, 44(3), 1509–1532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09770-w
37.
LyonsJ.UtychS. M. (2021). You’re not from here!: The consequences of urban and rural identities. Political Behavior, 45(1), 75–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09680-3
38.
McKayL.JenningsW.StokerG. (2021). Political trust in the “Places that don’t matter”. Frontiers in Political Science, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.642236
39.
MillerA. H. (1974). Political issues and trust in government: 1964-1970. American Political Science Review, 68(3), 951–972. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959140
40.
MitschF.LeeN.Ralph MorrowE. (2021). Faith no more? The divergence of political trust between urban and rural Europe. Political Geography, 89(4), Article 102426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102426
41.
MunisB. K. (2022). Us over here versus them over There…Literally: Measuring place resentment in American politics. Political Behavior, 44(3), 1057–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09641-2
NemereverZ.RogersM. (2021). Measuring the rural continuum in political science. Political Analysis, 29(3), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2020.47
44.
SaeleeR.ZellE.MurthyB. P.Castro-RomanP.FastH.MengL.ShawL.Gibbs-ScharfL.ChorbaT.HarrisL. Q.MurthyN. (2022). Disparities in COVID-19 vaccination coverage between urban and rural counties — United States, december 14, 2020–anuary 31, 2022. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 71(9), 335–340. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7109a2externalicon
45.
ScalaD. J.JohnsonK. M. (2017). Political polarization along the rural-urban continuum? The geography of the presidential vote, 2000–2016. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 672(1), 162–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217712696
46.
ScalaD. J.JohnsonK. M.RogersL. T. (2015). Red rural, blue rural? Presidential voting patterns in a changing rural America. Political Geography, 48(2), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.02.003
47.
ThompsonJ. (2021). Watching together: Local media and rural civic engagement. Rural Sociology, 86(4), 938–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12383
48.
ViskupičF.WiltseD. L. (2023). Political partisanship and trust in government predict popular support for COVID-19 vaccine mandates for various professions and demographic groups: A research note. American Politics Research, 51(2), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X221118888
WroeA. (2016). Economic insecurity and political trust in the United States. American Politics Research, 44(1), 131–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X15597745
51.
York CornwellE.HallM. (2017). Neighborhood problems across the rural-urban continuum: Geographic trends and racial and ethnic disparities. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 672(1), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217713171
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
