I present paran, an implementation of Horn's parallel analysis criteria for factor or component retention in common factor analysis or principal component analysis in Stata. The command permits classical parallel analysis and more recent extensions to it for the pca and factor commands. paran provides a needed extension to Stata's built-in factor- and component-retention criteria.
CattellR. B.1966. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research1: 245–276.
2.
CotaA. A., LongmanR. S., HoldenR. R., and FekkenG. C.1993. Comparing different methods for implementing parallel analysis: A practical index of accuracy. Educational and Psychological Measurement53: 865–876.
3.
DinnoA. Forthcoming. Exploring the sensitivity of Horn's parallel analysis to the distributional form of simulated data. Multivariate Behavioral Research.
4.
GlorfeldL. W.1995. An improvement on Horn's parallel analysis methodology for selecting the correct number of factors to retain. Educational and Psychological Measurement55: 377–393.
5.
GuttmanL.1954. Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika19: 149–161.
6.
HaytonJ. C., AllenD. G., and ScarpelloV.2004. Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods7: 191–205.
7.
HornJ. L.1965. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika30: 179–185.
8.
JacksonD. A.1993. Stopping rules in principal components analysis: A comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology74: 2204–2214.
9.
KaiserH. F.1960. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement20: 141–151.
10.
LanceC. E., ButtsM. M., and MichelsL. C.2006. The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say?Organizational Research Methods9: 202–220.
11.
MontanelliR. G., and HumphreysL. G.1976. Latent roots of random data correlation matrices with squared multiple correlations on the diagonal: A Monte Carlo study. Psychometrika41: 341–348.
12.
PreacherK. J., and MacCallumR. C.2003. Repairing Tom Swift's electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics2: 13–43.
13.
SilversteinA. B.1977. Comparison of two criteria for determining the number of factors. Psychological Reports41: 387–390.
14.
ThompsonB., and DanielL. G.1996. Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement56: 197–208.
15.
VelicerW. F., EatonC. A., and FavaJ. L.2000. Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In Problems and Solutions in Human Assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at Seventy, ed. GoffinR. D., and HelmesE., 41–71. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
16.
VelicerW. F., and JacksonD. N.1990. Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research25: 1–28.
17.
ZwickW. R., and VelicerW. F.1986. Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin99: 432–442.
