Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Spanish

This study employs an instrumental case study design to explore the environmental context of Latinx postdoctoral scholars in relation to their STEM identity and intended STEM career pathway. Interviews were conducted using an interactionist approach to STEM identity development. Deductive data analysis techniques reveal the impact of supervisor relationships on the work environment, the importance of fostering a mentoring atmosphere for others, and the value of seeking and creating safe and supportive spaces.

Keywords

Latinx postdoctoral scholar STEM identity environmental context case study deductive analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agbenyega

E. T.

(2018). “We are fighters:” Exploring how Latinas use various forms of capital as they strive for success in STEM (Publication No. 10750179) (Doctoral dissertation, Temple University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Allen-Ramdial

S.-A. A.

Campbell

A. G.

(2014). Reimagining the pipeline: Advancing STEM diversity, persistence, and success. BioScience, 64(7), 612–618. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu076

Alonso

R. A. R.

(2015). Engineering familia: The role of a professional organization in the development of engineering identities of Latina/o undergraduates (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/78420

Andalib

M. A.

Ghaffarzadegan

Larson

R. C.

(2018). The postdoc queue: A labour force in waiting. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 35(6), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2510

Anfara

V. A.

Mertz

N. T.

(Eds.). (2014). Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Bancroft

S. F.

(2018). Toward a critical theory of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics doctoral persistence: Critical capital theory. Science Education Policy, 102, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21474

Butz

A. R.

Spencer

Thayer-Hart

Cabrera

I. E.

Byars-Winston

(2019). Mentors’ motivation to address race/ethnicity in research mentoring relationships. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 12(3), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000096

Castellanos

Gloria

A. M.

Kamimura

(2006). The Latina/o pathway to the PhD: Abriendo caminos. Stylus Publishing.

L. D.

Quijada Cerecer

P. D.

Alanis

Rodriguez

M. A.

(2010). “I don’t belong here”: Chicanas/Latinas at a Hispanic Serving Institution creating community through Muxerista mentoring. Equity and Excellence in Education, 43(4), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2010.510069

10.

Espino

M. M.

Muñoz

S. M.

Kiyama

J. M.

(2010). Transitioning from doctoral study in the academy: Theorizing trenzas of identity for Latina sister scholars. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 804–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383123

11.

Gibbs

K. D.

Griffin

K. A.

(2013). What do I want to be with my PhD? The roles of personal values and structural dynamics in shaping the career interests of recent biomedical science PhD graduates. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12, 711–723. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-02-0021

12.

Hayes

(Ed.). (1997). Doing qualitative analysis in psychology. Psychology Press.

13.

Hudson

T. D.

Haley

K. J.

Jaeger

A. J.

Mitchall

Dinin

Dunstan

S. B.

(2018). Becoming a legitimate scientist: Science identity of postdocs in STEM fields. The Review of Higher Education, 41(4), 607–639. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2018.0027

14.

Kamimura-Jimenez

M. K.

Gonzalez

(2018). Understanding PhD Latinx career outcomes: A case study. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 17(2), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192717753037

15.

Kim

A. Y.

Sinatra

G. M.

(2018). Science identity development: An interactionist approach. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(51), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0149-9

16.

Levy

(2014). Postdoc mentorship can launch careers. American Scientist, 102, 418–421. https://doi.org/10.1511/2014.111.418

17.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

18.

López

E. J.

Basile

Landa-Poses

Ortega

Ramirez

(2019). Latinx students’ sense of familismo in undergraduate science and engineering. The Review of Higher Education, 43(1), 85–111. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0091

19.

Luna

Prieto

(2009). Mentoring affirmations and interventions: A bridge to graduate school for Latina/o students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 8(2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192709331972

20.

Malone

K. R.

Barabino

(2009). Narrations of race in STEM research settings: Identity formation and its discontents. Science Education, 93(3), 485–510. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20307

21.

McGee

Bentley

(2017). The ethnic ethic: Black and Latinx college students reengineering their STEM careers toward justice. American Journal of Education, 124, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1086/693954

22.

McGee

E. O.

Naphan-Kingery

Mustafaa

F. H.

Houston

Botchway

Lynch

(2019). Turned off from an academic career: Engineering and computing doctoral students and the reasons for their dissuasion. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 277–305. https://doi.org/10.28945/4250

23.

Mein

Esquinca

Monarrez

Saldaña

(2020). Building a pathway to engineering: The influence of family and teachers among Mexican-origin undergraduate engineering students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 19(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192718772082

24.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldaña

(2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

25.

Muñoz

J. A.

Villanueva

(2019). Latino STEM scholars, barriers, and mental health: A review of the literature. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192719892148

26.

National Science Foundation. (2019a). Science and engineering indicators 2020: State of US S&E labor force. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20198/

27.

National Science Foundation. (2019b). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (WMPD) report. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/

28.

Noe-Bustamante

Lopez

M. H.

Krogstad

J. M.

(2020, July 7). U.S. Hispanic population surpassed 60 million in 2019, but growth has slowed. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/07/07/u-s-hispanic-population-surpassed-60-million-in-2019-but-growth-has-slowed/

29.

Patton

M. Q.

(2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

30.

Perez

R. J.

Robbins

C. K.

Harris

L. W.

Jr. Montgomery

(2020). Exploring graduate students’ socialization to equity, diversity, and inclusion. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 13(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000115

31.

Ramirez

(2017). Unequal socialization: Interrogating the Chicano/Latino(a) doctoral education experience. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 10(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000028

32.

Revelo

R. A.

Loui

(2016). A developmental model of research mentoring. College Teaching, 64(3), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2015.1125839

33.

Rodriguez

Cunningham

Jordan

(2019). STEM identity development for Latinas: The role of self- and outside recognition. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 18(3), 254–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192717739958

34.

Rodriguez

Pilcher

Garcia-Tellez

(2017). The influence of familismo on Latina student STEM identity development. Journal of Latinos and Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2019.1588734

35.

Rodriguez

S. L.

Doran

E. E.

Sissel

Estes

(2019). Becoming la ingeniera: Examining the engineering identity development of undergraduate Latina students. Journal of Latinos and Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2019.1648269

36.

Rodriguez

S. L.

Friedensen

Marron

Bartlett

(2019). Latina undergraduate students in STEM: The role of religious beliefs and STEM identity. Journal of College and Character, 20(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/2194587X.2018.1559198

37.

Roy

(2019). Engineering by the numbers. American Society for Engineering Education. https://ira.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2018-Engineering-by-Numbers-Engineering-Statistics-UPDATED-15-July-2019.pdf

38.

Russell

M. L.

Escobar

Russell

J. A.

Robertson

B. K.

Thomas

(2018). Promoting pathways to STEM careers for traditionally underrepresented graduate students. Negro Educational Review, 69(1–4), 5–32, 142–143.

39.

Shueths

A. M.

Carranza

M. A.

(2012). Navigating around educational roadblocks: Mentoring for pre-k to 20+ Latino/a students. Latino Studies, 10(4), 566–586. https://doi.org/10.1057/lst.2012.43

40.

Stake

R. E.

(1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.

41.

Talaflan

Moy

M. K.

Woodard

M. A.

Foster

A. N.

(2019). STEM identity exploration through an immersive learning environment. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2, 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00018-7

42.

Watt

(2007). On becoming a qualitative researcher: The value of reflexivity. The Qualitative Report, 12(1), 82–101.

43.

Wilson

(2020). Databytes: 20-year engineering postdoc trends. Prism, 29(8), 14–15.

44.

Yadav

Seals

C. D.

Soto Sullivan

C. M.

Lachney

Clark

Dixon

K. G.

Smith

M. J. T.

(2020). The forgotten scholar: Underrepresented minority postdoc experiences in STEM fields. Educational Studies, 56(2), 160–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2019.1702552

45.

Yang

Webber

K. L.

(2015). A decade beyond the doctorate: The influence of a US postdoctoral appointment on faculty career, productivity, and salary. Higher Education, 70(4), 667–687. https://doi.org/10.1007//s10734-015-9860-3