Abstract
Keywords
Gender-based violence (GBV) is an issue of epic proportion that reflects the unequal power dynamics created within the binary gender system and is often perpetrated by those with more physical, cultural, or social power and inflicted upon those without. The close association of violence with masculinity has created a dangerous and unjust power dynamic that manifests in forms of violent physical, verbal, or psychological aggression and affects an alarming proportion of the population. Though GBV includes anyone who experiences violence due to their gender, certain groups are more heavily affected. According to one study on GBV, “One in every three women in the world has been beaten, forced to have sex, or subjected to some other form of abuse” (Acosta et al., 2018, p. 2). Generally, it was found between all of these instances that determinants of violence lie in social relations, as violence derives from hegemonic social values, which naturalize inequalities between men and women and their roles, giving man greater power in relationships, which often justifies the oppression/submission of women. Therefore, this asymmetry of power in the relations present in society is one of the determinants of gender violence. (Costa et al., 2017) any act…that results in, or is likely to result in, physical, sexual or mental harm or suffering…including threats of such acts, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or in private life. (De Ferrante et al., 2009, p. 288). For the World Health Organization (WHO), intimate partner violence (IPV) is defined as behavior within an intimate relationship that causes physical, sexual or psychological harm, including acts of physical aggression, sexual coercion, psychological abuse, and controlling behavior, and this setting applies to both spouses and current or former partners. (Marques et al., 2017, p. 2).
Though some research has been conducted documenting the ways in which GBV is managed or not managed by health care providers, Latin America and the Caribbean in particular represent a gap in research on health care tools and their effectiveness in these situations. Experiences of gender violence and intimate partner violence in Latin America and the Caribbean represented in research to date demonstrate a visible need for better informed health care providers and policies as well as access to services and tolerance particularly for vulnerable groups such as sexual minorities, transgender people, rural women, pregnant people and those with mental health needs. From the data, it is evident that the creation of more specialized and comprehensive protocols for health care professionals is necessary to identify and manage GBV.
The promotion of research and tool creation for health care providers around gender violence in Latin America and the Caribbean will significantly augment an area in which research and resources are lacking and could potentially lead to an increase in trust between patients and providers while simultaneously providing health care professionals with resources to better manage and identify GBV.
Methodology
The original search conducted with the outlined key terms between the years of 2009 and 2019 yielded a total of 251 articles. Descendancy searches produced an additional two articles but neither met the inclusion criteria. After removing duplicate articles, 100 records remained and were title and abstract screened. The full text of 43 articles were analyzed by two authors, of which 26 met inclusion criteria. Only articles that met these criteria were included in the final pool of articles.
Four databases were utilized for the article compilation of this scope review including Pan American Health Organization, Scielo, Scopus, and PubMed. Each database was comprehensively searched for MeSH keyword combinations of gender violence (violence against women) or (gender-based violence) with the region of interest (Latin America and the Caribbean) in addition to a third word or phrase regarding health care (health care training, training, health care curricula, curricula, health care professionals). In the case of Scielo, Latin America was not included in the keyword search as individual countries were selected instead, including Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Mexico, and Venezuela.
Articles selected for the final review were empirical studies published in peer reviewed journals in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. Articles regarding GBV, violence against women, and health care professionals’ perception of GBV were all included. Articles that focused on GBV in regions outside of Latin America and the Caribbean were excluded to ensure a focused study. All articles were initially screened by reviewing title and abstract, and data were abstracted from the texts that met the inclusion criteria. Articles that did not discuss GBV but included data on other intrafamily violence (child abuse, elder abuse) were not included. Two authors reviewed the full text of each article. In the case of disagreement, a third author was brought in to provide input to reach a consensus.
Results and Discussion
Figure 1 summarizes study characteristics for the 26 articles included in this scoping review, and Table 1 gives a detailed description of all the included studies. The earliest study was conducted in 2009, and the most recent study was carried out in 2018. The majority of the studies were conducted in Brazil (

Summary of study characteristics.
Table of Studies.
Stigma
Of the 26 articles included in the review, eight discussed the stigma placed on victims of GBV (Acosta et al., 2017; Acosta et al., 2018; Almeida et al., 2014; Barros et al., 2015; Diez, 2012; Rodrigues et al., 2014; Schraiber et al., 2010; Signorelli et al., 2013). As a consequence of their stigmatization, it was common for victims of GBV to feel shame and guilt that impeded them from divulging their assaults to health care professionals.
Many authors noted that discussing one’s experience with domestic violence is similar to tracking into forbidden territory. Participants explained that discussing domestic violence engendered feelings of discomfort and intruded on personal matters (Acosta et al., 2018; Almeida et al., 2014; Marques et al., 2017; Rodrigues et al., 2014; Schraiber et al., 2010; Signorelli et al., 2013). Specifically, among pregnant women who have suffered abuse, Marques et al. (2017) included the idea of the woman’s financial and emotional dependency on their abusive partner. Pregnant women frequently hid their abuse out of fear of losing the support for their future child such as housing, finances, and an additional person to take part in parental care. This exploitative relationship allows the violence against the woman to continue and remain unknown to health care professionals.
Signorelli et al. (2013) described similar feelings of shame and guilt among patients and explained that this lack of communication between patients and care providers prohibits health professionals from administering proper care. Without honest conversation with patients, providers are only able to treat visible, physical wounds, merely addressing one dimension of the healing process. Additionally, Barros et al. (2015) reveals that health care professionals also contributed to the patients’ stigmatization, as multiple doctors would not make direct eye contact with their patients and behaved nervously when treating a person who had experienced GBV. Health care providers’ further victimization of patients suggests the presence of institutional violence in the health system.
Acosta et al.’s (2018) qualitative study including 100 nurses working at two hospitals in Rio Grande, Brazil indicates that some female victims perceive their violence as a chronic condition and thus naturalize their physical, sexual, and verbal abuse. This naturalization process permits the victim to remain in the perpetual cycle of violence without questioning its unhealthy effects. Furthermore, in some instances, health care professionals have not focused on empowering female victims of GBV, which further maintains the cycle of violence (Diez, 2012).
Trust and Distrust Between Professionals and Patients
Among the studies that analyzed distrust between patients and health care professionals, 11 were conducted in Brazil (Acosta et al., 2017; Acosta et al., 2018; Almeida et al., 2014; Barbosa et al., 2014; Barros et al., 2015; Costa et al., 2017; Marques et al., 2017; Osis et al., 2012; Pedrosa & Spink, 2011; Signorelli et al., 2013; Villela et al., 2011). After hearing the term “domestic violence against women,” 36 of the 100 nurses interviewed at two hospitals in Rio Grande, Brazil thought of “physical aggression,” 28 identified “fear,” and 18 mentioned “humiliation” (Acosta et al., 2018). Because these terms emphasize physical violence, it is evident that physical injuries dominate the health care professionals’ conceptualizations of GBV.
Although many patients communicated their distrust in their health care providers, others did note a welcoming and protected feeling once they interacted with medical professionals. In Barros et al.’s (2015) study, many patients revealed that when they received medications or injections, the health care providers communicated the procedures thoroughly to the patients. Costa and Lopes (2012) also found that communication between health care providers and patients encouraged proper treatment of GBV. Additionally, when groups of women suffering from GBV convene and express their needs in a safe space, this stimulates a sense of belonging and worth for victims.
Lack of Adequate Resources
Two studies emphasized that a lack of adequate resources contributed to the quality of care given to patients experiencing GBV (Barros et al., 2015; Costa et al., 2017). Barros et al.’s (2015) qualitative study including 11 female rape victims in Alagoas, Brazil found that a lack of transportation to health care facilities impeded victims’ abilities to access care. The women expressed that doctors had offered psychological examinations for follow-up visits but many were unable to return to the hospital due to distance and lack of access to transportation.
Health care centers also lacked adequate space to serve victims of GBV. Many times, patients overflowed into the hallways because of the lack of space in the waiting rooms and experienced long wait lines because of the hospitals’ overpopulation. Women recounted having to wait more than 3 hours for an examination (Barros et al., 2015). Spending extended periods of time waiting for care inflicted greater fatigue on the women who were already experiencing distress.
Along with long wait times and inadequate waiting space, numerous patients described the lack of privacy in examination rooms (Barros et al., 2015). Many patients communicated that their examination rooms included only a curtain for privacy, and they could hear the shuffling of other patients and health care professionals on the other side.
Lack of Adequate Preparation
Ten studies commented on health professionals’ lack of preparation to treat GBV (Barbosa et al., 2014; Hasse & Vieira, 2014; Marques et al., 2017; Osis et al., 2012; Pedrosa & Spink, 2011; Rodrigues et al., 2014; Signorelli et al., 2013; Vieira et al., 2009; Vieira et al., 2016; Villela et al., 2011). Hasse and Vieira (2014) found that only 27% of their sample of doctors and nurses had some type of GBV training. In some instances, it was common for health care professionals to only treat patients medically, without viewing them holistically (Signorelli et al., 2013). Although treating patients as medical subjects enables their physical wounds to heal, the mental anguish below the surface remains present for the victims of GBV. Barbosa et al. (2014) specifically emphasizes the lack of dialogue and training around victims with mental health disorders. Health care professionals must receive adequate training on how to actively listen and support patients emotionally in order to appropriately treat patients.
Additionally, doctors and nurses in Brazil explained that they only came into contact with the issue of GBV in their studies when they discussed care of children, adolescent victims of violence, and cases of sexual violence (Pedrosa & Spink, 2011). This narrow scope further emphasizes the need for more comprehensive preparation on these topics during their academic preparation. Vieira et al. (2016) elaborate on the problem of preparation by describing the restrictive protocols by which health care professionals need to abide. These protocols fail to recognize the context of care and do not recognize the importance of caring for the patient’s physical and mental health (Vieira et al., 2016). This fragmented approach to care may worsen the patient’s health and wellbeing.
Ignorance of Vulnerable Groups
Six articles examined inadequacies in care for vulnerable populations, such as transgender people, sexual minorities, pregnant people, and people with mental health issues (Barros et al., 2015; Cortes et al., 2015; Costa et al., 2017; Costa & Lopes et al., 2012; Lanham et al., 2019; Marques et al., 2017). In a sample of 74 transgender women, Lanham et al. (2019) found that 82.9% of them experienced GBV in a health care setting. Emotional GBV—specifically insults and refusing to call individuals by their chosen name—was the most common form of violence they experienced. This high prevalence of GBV in health care confirms the need for greater education on the treatment of vulnerable populations who experience GBV.
Women living in rural areas also experienced barriers to receiving care (Costa et al., 2017; Costa and Lopes, 2012). Due to a lack of transportation some women were unable to access timely care. Many women depended on their sometimes-abusive partners for transportation, making it difficult for them to travel to health centers without their partner discovering their efforts to seek medical care (Costa et al., 2017). Furthermore, because of the inaccessibility of frequent medical care in some rural areas, many women had little or no knowledge of their rights as patients or as individuals (Costa et al., 2017; Costa & Lopes, 2012). Costa et al. (2017) found that nurses in rural settings must be intentional in clearly communicating with the patient about their rights and the nature of the medical procedures.
A lack of protocol regarding people in situations of violence with mental health issues was also found (Barbosa et al., 2014). Care for all patients was the same from when they arrived to when they left, indicating the lack of personalized and contextual care among vulnerable groups. Health care professionals must attend to patients’ individual needs in order for them to fully heal, and a comprehensive mental health protocol will aid in this process.
Limitations
Within this scope review there were several barriers to full inclusivity of all information regarding tools for detection and confrontation of GBV for health care professionals. The 10-year range of the scope review neglects the fact that hegemonic cultural forces behind phenomena like GBV are rooted in long-term cultural norms and thus need to be evaluated over larger periods of time. The fact that most articles pertained to a single country within the purview of the region of interest significantly slanted results to be representative of health care tools and protocols within that country. The fact that only four databases were surveyed also resulted in a smaller pool of initial articles. Additionally, each database had individual search design parameters and thus the methods for generalization of search varied between databases. These variations included differentiations in search terms as certain databases divided results by country and others by region. With regard to search terms, the terms used for this search could have potentially yielded a smaller pool of articles due to specificity of the search.
Final Considerations
After completing this scope review, we have found a widespread call for more comprehensive preparation for health care professionals involved in identifying and addressing GBV. There is also a distinct need for context specific protocols for vulnerable and underrepresented groups. Stigma concerns made it clear that it would be immensely beneficial to enhance privacy measures. Placing greater emphasis on completion of multiple visits and ongoing care and support for victims is another important health care–based method for ensuring quality care.
These are all vital steps in the process of survivor rehabilitation; however, focusing on social determinants of violence may be more beneficial to overhauling GBV at large. To this end, a multipronged cultural approach addressing the positioning of men at the top of the social hierarchy and a realignment of health care professionals’ perceptions of underrepresented groups are imperative to the deconstruction of cultural perceptions and actions that force victims of GBV into greater danger.
Within the majority of articles included in this scope review, culture and the gender binary hierarchy, are used as explanations for the prevalence of GBV in Latin America and the Caribbean, and there are several cultural structures that currently act as supports for the privileging of masculine violence over the safety of women and other vulnerable groups. Machismo culture, or the culture of male dominance, exacerbates the acceptance of violence and allows men to feel secure in their decisions to pursue violence. In order to exact any effective change, cultural norms associated with machismo culture, particularly the normalization of this cultural attitude, must be confronted to reflect a more equitable division of gender and power.
Normalization of violence can be directly observed in the actions of health care professionals in this region. In many cases cited throughout this review, the patient’s concerns were trivialized by health care professionals as a result of the pervasiveness of GBV and intimate partner violence. This normalization plays a significant role in the quality of the health care these victims receive and the seriousness that both health care professionals and patients regard their situations with. The apparent and willful ignorance and negligence on the part of health care workers toward signs of abuse are equivalent to state and health care sponsored violence. Without the advocacy of health care workers, especially considering that health care professionals are often at the front lines of observation of the repercussions of violence, cultural norms as well as health care procedures and legal statutes will not change.
Culture within the realm of health care professions is as important in determining the reasons why victims do not experience acceptable care as cultural norms of violence. Attitudes of health care professionals are particularly relevant for underrepresented groups such as sexual minorities, people with mental health issues, pregnant people, transgender and nonbinary people, and those living in rural contexts. Inclusion and acceptance of these groups in health care systems is crucial for the elimination of GBV. Prejudice directed toward members of these groups is extremely harmful as these vulnerable groups are often disproportionately affected by violence. Due to diversity of patients in health care contexts there is a distinct need to alter how health care professionals view these groups, especially transgender people, nonheterosexual people, and those struggling with mental health. These groups face additional barriers to health care when professionals diminish their claims, discriminate based on opinion, and practice the continuation of hierarchical norms that privilege a binary heterosexual model. Without a transformation of these attitudes in health care professions, individuals in these vulnerable groups experiencing gender violence are left without crucial resources and support. In order to eradicate GBV and intimate partner violence, protocols specific to the contexts of each underrepresented group are necessary.
While empathetic care and follow-up visits are certainly necessary strategies for the restoration of GBV victims, the fact that all these studies focused on responses to a culturally created public health problem without primarily calling for cultural realignment of both larger society and health care systems makes this a problematic framework to base actions upon. While it is true that even with equitable cultural norms there would still need to be protocols to deal with violence, the fact that the vast majority of these articles are not considerate of prevention is concerning. The prevention of GBV is the responsibility of all members of society; however, health care professionals have a unique position of authority on this issue that should be utilized to readjust cultural norms of male dominance and the normalization of violence. As opposed to frantically attempting to repair damage done by men not only in Latin America and the Caribbean but worldwide, health care professionals should practice a comprehensive approach to GBV and intimate partner violence as part of an epidemic that presents an urgent threat to society and should be addressed with all resources available.
Accountability on the part of perpetrators, in which we include the state, those committing the violence, and a culture that allows for the continuation of these heinous crimes, is absolutely necessary to evaluate the most beneficial methods for the installation of adequate prevention and recuperation protocols within health care contexts when dealing with GBV. Until proper educational, cultural, and legal guidelines are enacted to protect the human right of basic safety for these vulnerable groups, no response from the health care field for this epidemic is enough. These studies place the onus on medical professionals and victims when this issue is societal and thus responsibility rests with every individual to contribute to the cultural prevention of violence. We must also educate the public in order to break the cycle of silence that fails to condemn perpetrators of GBV and intimate partner violence.
