Limited research is available on the effectiveness of person-centered planning on the quality of life of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (ID/D) living in group homes. Our qualitative study sought the perspectives of five group home residents with ID/D, two external consultant coaches, and 14 key personnel in various roles including frontline staff, one manager, administrators, and an affiliated behavior consultant. Interviews, focus groups, resident records, and observation field notes shed light on the impact of person-centered planning on group home residents. Our findings point to an alternative way to respond to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) regulatory requirement to integrate person-centered planning through focusing on the way the intervention meets three needs that facilitate the Individual Program Plan and support the purposes of the CMS Home and Community-Based Services Settings Rule. Implications for policy, practice, and research are discussed.
BlessingC.Brendli BrownK. R.PandeyT.SimmonsH.O’BrienJ. (2025). Changing practices, procedures, and perceptions: A multi-year person-centered planning initiative in group homes for residents with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295241312808
ClaesC.Van HoveG.VandeveldeS.van LoonJ.SchalockR. L. (2010). Person-centered planning: Analysis of research and effectiveness. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48(6), 432–453. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-48.6.432
5.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.
6.
Final Rule. (2014, January16). Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 79 FR 2948. Vol. 79. No. 11.
7.
ForestM.LusthausE. (1999). Promoting educational equality for all students: Circles and MAPS. In StainbackS.StainbackW.ForestM. (Eds.), Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education (pp. 43–57). Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
8.
FreemanR.WalkerP.HewittA. (2016). Feature issue: Person-centered positive supports and people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (Impact. 29, 2, Summer 2016). Institute on Community Integration.
GosseL.GriffithsD.OwenF.FeldmanM. (2017). Impact of an individualized planning approach on personal outcomes and supports for persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy & Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 14(3), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12209
11.
GouldJ. (2023). Beggars can’t be choosers: The rhetoric and reality of person-centered disability services in the United States. Disability & Society, 39(9), 2303–2324. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2023.2209275
12.
HouseworthJ.PettingellS. L.BershadskyJ.TicháR.LemanowiczJ.FeinsteinC.ZhangA. (2023). Examining choice and control for people with IDD over time. American Journal on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 128(6), 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-128.6.449
13.
MaxwellJ. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Applied social research methods, 3rd ed.). Sage.
14.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.
15.
MountB. (2000). Person-centered planning: Finding directions for change using personal futures planning. Capacity Works.
16.
O’BrienJ. (1989). What’s worth working for? Leadership for quality in human services. In BradleyV.BersaniH. (Eds.), Quality assurance: New answers to old questions (pp. 1–26). Paul Brookes.
17.
O’BrienJ.BlessingC. (2011). Conversations on citizenship & person-centered work. Inclusion Press.
18.
O’BrienJ.MountB. (2015). Pathfinders: People with developmental disabilities and their allies building communities that work better for everybody. Inclusion Press.
19.
O’BrienJ.O’BrienC. L. (2022). A little book about person centered planning (2nd ed.). Inclusion Press.
20.
Office for Victims of Crime. (2012, September). Reasons to act: Risk factors for abuse. Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
PhillippiJ.LauderdaleJ. (2018). A guide to field notes for qualitative research: Context and conversation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317697102
23.
RattiV.HassiotisA.CrabtreeJ.DebS.GallagherP.UnwinG. (2016). The effectiveness of person-centered planning for people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 57, 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.06.015
24.
RobertsonJ.EmersonE.HattonC.ElliottJ.McIntoshB.SwiftP.Krinjen-KempE.TowersC.RomeoR.KnappM.SandersonH.RoutledgeM.OakesP.JoyceT. (2006). Longitudinal analysis of the impact and cost of person-centered planning for people with intellectual disabilities in England. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 111, 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[400:LAOTIA]2.0.CO;2
25.
SaldañaJ. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
26.
WehmeyerM. L. (1999). A functional model of self-determination: Describing development and implementing instruction. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/108835769901400107
