Using data from a sample of 606 nonexecutives sitting on boards of a Canadian credit union, this study tests the relationship between chairs’ authentic leadership on boards and nonexecutives’ motivation and commitment. Hypothesis validation indicates that chairs with an authentic leadership style favor motivation and commitment through the emergence of a participative safety climate based on transparency and idea sharing. This relationship is stronger when executives perceive a high-quality relationship between the chair and the CEO. By integrating the literature on leadership with that on corporate boards, our study offers a deeper understanding of how, and under which circumstances, chairs contribute to nonexecutives’ motivation and commitment on the board.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
AndersonN. R.WestM. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235–258.
3.
AvolioB. J.GardnerW. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315–338.
4.
AvolioB. J.GardnerW. L.WalumbwaF. O.LuthansF.MayD. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 801–823.
5.
BickslerJ. (2008). The subprime mortgage debacle and its linkages to corporate governance. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 5, 295–300.
6.
BlochS. (2005). What makes a great board chair?Corporate Board, 26, 6–12.
7.
BowenD. E.LawlerE. E. (1992). Total quality-oriented human resources management. Organizational Dynamics, 20, 29–41.
8.
CarrJ. Z.SchmidtA. M.FordJ. K.DeShonR. P. (2003). Climate perceptions matter: A meta-analytic path analysis relating molar climate, cognitive and affective states, and individual level work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 605–619.
9.
ChampouxJ. E.PetersW. S. (1987). Form, effect size and power in moderated regression analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60, 243–255.
10.
ChiaburuD. S.DiazI.PittsV. E. (2011). Social and economic exchanges with the organization: Do leader behaviors matter?Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32, 442–461.
11.
Clapp-SmithR.VogelgesangG. R.AveyJ. B. (2009). Authentic leadership and positive psychological capital: The mediating role of trust at the group level of analysis. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15, 227–240.
12.
DailyC. M.DaltonD. R. (1994). Bankruptcy and corporate governance: The impact of board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1603–1617.
13.
DailyC. M.DaltonD. R.CannellaA. A. (2003). Introduction to special topic forum: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28, 371–382
14.
DaltonD. R.DaltonC. M. (2011). Integration of micro- and macro-studies in governance research: CEO duality, board composition, and financial performance. Journal of Management, 37, 404–411.
15.
DaltonD. R.HittM. A.CertoS. T.DaltonC. M. (2008). The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation: Independence, equity, and the market for corporate control. In WalshJ. P.BriefA. P. (Eds.), Annals of the Academy of Management (pp. 1–64). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
DavisJ. H.SchoormanD. F.DonaldsonL. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22, 20–47.
17.
DeciE. L.EghrariH.PatrickB. C.LeoneD. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119–142.
18.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
19.
DirksK. T.FerrinD. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611–628.
20.
DulewiczV.GayK.TaylorB. (2007). What makes an outstanding chairman? Findings from the UK non-executive director of the year awards, 2006. Corporate Governance, 15, 1056–1069.
21.
EdwardsJ. R.LambertL. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22.
22.
EisenbeissS. A.Van KnippenbergD.BoernerS. (2008). Transformational leadership and team innovation: Integrating team environment principles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1438–1446.
23.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 57–74.
24.
ErbenG.GüneserA. (2008). The relationship between paternalistic leadership and organizational commitment: Investigating the role of climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 955–968.
25.
ForbesD. P.MillikenF. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24, 489–505.
26.
GabrielssonJ.HuseM.MinichilliA. (2007). Understanding the leadership role of the board chairperson through a team production approach. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 3, 21–39.
27.
GagnéM.DeciE. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.
28.
GardnerW. L.AvolioB. J.LuthansF.MayD. R.WalumbwaF. (2005). Can you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leadership and follower development. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 343–372.
29.
GardnerW. L.FischerD.HuntJ. G. J. (2009). Emotional labor and leadership: A threat to authenticity?Leadership Quarterly, 20, 466–482.
30.
GrantA. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 48–58.
31.
GrantA. M.SumanthJ. J. (2009). Mission possible? The performance of prosocially motivated employees depends on manager trustworthiness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 927–944.
32.
HamstreetC. A. (2006). Board and cooperative leadership that invites investment. Journal of Private Equity, 9, 131–137.
33.
HannahS. T.LesterP.VogelgesangG. (2005). Moral leadership: Explicating the moral component of authentic leadership. In GardnerW. L.AvolioB. J.WalumbwaF. O. (Eds.), Authentic leadership and practice: Origins, effects, and development (pp. 43–82). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
34.
HannahS. T.WalumbwaF. O.FryL. W. (2011). Leadership in action teams: Team leader and members’ authenticity, authenticiy strenght, and team outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 64, 771–802.
35.
HossackR. (2006, January–February). Together at the top: The critical relationship between the chairman and the CEO. Ivey Business Journal, 1–4.
36.
IliesR.MorgesonF. P.NahrgangJ. D. (2005). Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader-follower outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 373–394.
37.
KakabadseN.KakabadseA.BarrattR. (2006). Chairman and chief executive officer (CEO): That sacred and secret relationship. Journal of Management Development, 25, 134–150.
38.
KakabadseA.KakabadseN.KnyghtR. (2010). The “chemistry factor” in the chairman/CEO relationship. European Management Journal, 28, 285–296.
39.
KanterE. (1983). The change masters. New York, NY: Touchstone.
40.
KivimäkiM.ElovainioM. (1999). A short version of the team environment inventory: Development and psychometric properties. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 241–246.
41.
KorekS.FelfeJ.Zaepernick-RotheU. (2010). Transformational leadership and commitment: A multilevel analysis of group-level influences and mediating processes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19, 364–387.
LindellM. K.WhitneyD. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 114–121.
44.
McMurrayA. J.Pirola-MerloA.SarrosJ. C.IslamM. M. (2010). Leadership, climate, psychological capital, commitment, and wellbeing in a non-profit organization. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31, 436–457.
45.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.
46.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
MeyerJ. P.StanleyD. J.HerscovitchL.TopolnytskyL. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52.
48.
MinichilliA.ZattoniA.ZonaF. (2009). Making boards effective: An empirical examination of board task performance. British Journal of Management, 20, 55–74.
49.
NeillD.DulewiczV. (2010). Inside the “black box”: The performance of boards of directors of unlisted companies. Corporate Governance, 10, 293–306.
50.
NijstadB. A.Berger-SelmanF.De DreuC. K. W. (2012, October16). Innovation in top management teams: Minority dissent, transformational leadership, and radical innovations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.734038
51.
PayneG. T.BensonG. S.FinegoldD. L. (2009). Corporate board attributes, team effectiveness and financial performance. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 704–731.
52.
PearceJ. A.ZahraS. A. (1991). The relative power of CEOs and boards of directors: Associations with corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 135–153.
53.
PettigrewA.McNultyT. (1995). Power and influence in and around the boardroom. Human Relations, 48, 845–873.
54.
PettigrewA.McNultyT. (1998). Control and creativity in the boardroom. In HambrickD.NadlerD.TushmanM. (Eds.), Navigating change : How CEOs, top teams and boards steer transformation (pp. 226–255). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
55.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
56.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731.
57.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
58.
PreacherK. J.KelleyK. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative and graphical strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16, 93–115.
59.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42,185–227.
60.
RobertsJ.McNultyT.StilesP. (2005). Beyond agency conceptions of the work of non-executive director: Creating accountability in the boardroom. British Journal of Management, 16, S5–S26.
61.
RobertsJ.StilesP. (1999). The relationship between chairmen and chief executives: Competitive or complementary roles?Long Range Planning, 32, 36–48.
62.
SalancikG.PfefferJ. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224–253.
63.
SarrosJ. C.CooperB. K.SantoraJ. C. (2008). Building a climate for innovation through transformational leadership and organizational culture. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15, 145–158.
64.
SchneiderB.BartlettC. J. (1970). Individual differences and organizational climate II: Measurement of organizational climate by the multi-trait, multi-rater matrix. Personnel Psychology, 23, 493–512.
65.
SchneiderB.ReichersA. E. (1983). On the etiology of climates. Personnel Psychology, 36, 19–39.
66.
SpahnJ. J.FlanaganK. M. (2003). The leading of leaders in the boardroom. Directors and Boards, 27, 47–79.
67.
SpreitzerG. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442–1465.
68.
ThomasK. W.VelthouseB. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666–681.
69.
VafeasN. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53, 113–142.
70.
WalumbwaF.AvolioB.GardnerW.WernsingT.PetersonS. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34, 89–126.
71.
WalumbwaF.HartnellC.A.OkeA. (2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 517–529.
72.
WalumbwaF.LuthansF.AveyJ.OkeA. (2011). Authentically leading groups: The mediating role of collective psychological capital and trust. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 4–24.
73.
WestM. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In WestM. A.FarrJ. L. (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work (pp. 309–333). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
74.
WestM. A.FarrJ. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In WestM. A.FarrJ. L. (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work (pp. 3–13). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
75.
YammarinoF. J.DionneS. D.SchriesheimC. A.DansereauF. (2008). Authentic leadership and positive organizational behavior: A meso, multi-level perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 693–707.
76.
YangJ.MossholderK. W. (2010). Examining the effects of trust in leaders: A bases-and-foci approach. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 50–63.
77.
ZajacE. J.WestphalJ. D. (1996). Who shall succeed? How CEO/board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 64–90.
78.
ZattoniA.CuomoF. (2010). How independent, competent and incentivized should non-executive directors be? An empirical investigation of good governance codes. British Journal of Management, 21, 63–79.
