Seventy-four participants (aged 20–82 years) went through a continuous performance recognition memory task with multiple repetitions of words and non-words while ERPs were recorded from the scalp. The old/new ERP effect (the difference in activation to stimuli correctly recognized as old and stimuli correctly recognized as new) for words but not non-words declined with increasing age in a linear pattern, but the relationship between the old/new effect and age varied throughout the ERP time window. Differences in topography between age groups were manifested in a frontal shift in activation for older age groups. Further, the data point to differences in semantic versus non-semantic processing across the adult life span, and it is concluded that specific cognitive memory processes are differentially involved at different ages.
FriedmanD.Event-related potential investigations of cognitive development and aging. Ann NY Acad Sci1992;658:33–64.
2.
FriedmanD.Event-related brain potential investigations of memory and aging. Biol Psychol2000;54:175–206.
3.
JohnsonR.Event-related potential insights into the neurobiology of memory systems. In: BoilerFGrafmanJ, (eds). Handbook of Neuropsychology. New York: Elsevier; 1995;10:135–163.
4.
KutasM.Review of event-related potential studies of memory. In: GazzanigaMS, (ed). Perspectives in Memory Research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1988:181–218.
5.
RuggMD. Event-related potential studies of human memory. In: GazzanigaMS, (ed). The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1994: 789–801.
6.
RuggMDWildingEL. Retrieval processing and episodic memory. Trends Cogn Sci2000;4:108–115.
7.
FabianiMKarisDDonchinE.P300 and recall in an incidental memory paradigm. Psychophysiol1986;23:298–308.
8.
FabianiMKarisDDonchinE.Effects of mnemonis strategy manipulation in a Von Restorff paradigm. Electroenchephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1990;75:22–35.
9.
FriedmanD.Cognitive event-related potential components during continuous recognition memory for pictures. Psychophysiol1990;27:136–148.
10.
FriedmanD.ERPs during continuous recognition memory for words. Biol Psychol1990;3:61–87.
11.
PallerKAKutasMMayesAR. Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1987;67:360–371.
12.
HerronJEQualeAHRuggMD. Probability effects on event-related potential correlates of recognition memory. Cogn Brain Res2003;16:66–73.
13.
PallerKA. Recall and stem-completion priming have different electrophysiological correlates and are modified differentially by directed forgetting. J Exp Psychol: Learn, Mem, Cogn1990;16:1021–1032.
14.
RushbyJABarryRJJohnstonSJ. Event-related potential correlates of serial-position effects during an elaborative memory test. Int J Psychophysiol2003;46:13–27.
15.
RuggMD. The effects of semantic priming and word repetition on event-related potentials. Psychophysiol1985;22:642–647.
16.
RuggMD. Dissociation of semantic priming word and non-word repetition effects by event-related potentials. Q J Exp Psychol1987;39:123–148.
17.
BentinSPeledB.The contribution of task-related factors to the repetition effects at short and long lags. Mem Cogn1990;18:359–366.
18.
WildingELRuggMD. An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Brain1996;119:889–905.
19.
WildingEL. In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection?Int J Psychophysiol2000;35:81–87.
20.
CurranTSchachterDLJohnsonMKSpinksR.Brain potentials reflect behavioral differences in true and false recognition. J Cogn Neurosci2001;13:201–216.
21.
FriedmanD.JohnsonR.JrEvent-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review. Microscopy Res Techniques2000;51:6–28.
22.
MecklingerA.Interfacing mind and brain: A neurocognitive model of recognition memory. Psychophysiol2000;37:565–582.
23.
DywanJSegalowitzSArsenaultA.Electrophysiological response during source memory decision in older and younger adults. Brain Cogn2002;49:322–340.
24.
DywanJSegalowitzSJWebsterL.Source monitoring: ERP evidence for greater reactivity to nontarget information in older adults. Brain Cogn1998;36:390–430.
25.
FriedmanDBergmanSHambergerM.Recognition memory and ERPs: Age-related changes in young, middle-aged and elderly adults. J Psychophysiol1993;7:181–201.
26.
FriedmanDRitterWSnodgrassJG. ERPs during study as a function of subsequent direct and indirect memory testing in young and old adults. Cogn Brain Res1996;4:1–13.
27.
FriedmanDTrottC.An event-related potential study of encoding in young and older adults. Neuropsychol2000;38:542–557.
28.
Nielsen-BohlmanLKnightRT. Prefrontal alterations during memory processing in aging. Cerebral Cortex1995;5:541–549.
29.
RuggMDMarkREGilchristJRobertsRC. ERP repetition effects in indirect and direct tasks: Effects of age and inter-item lag. Psychophysiol1997;34:572–586.
30.
SwickDKnightRT. Event-related potentials differentiate the effects of aging on word and nonword repetition in explicit and implicit memory tasks. J Exp Psychol: Learn Mem Cogn1997;23:123–142.
31.
TrottCFriedmanDRitterWFabianiM.Episodic priming and memory for temporal source: Event-related potentials reveal age-related differences in prefrontal functioning. Psychol Aging1999;14:390–413.
32.
MarkRERuggMD. Age effects on brain activity associated with episodic memory retrieval: An electrophysiological study. Brain1998;121:861–873.
33.
WegesinDJFriedmanDVarugheseNSternY.Age-related changes in source memory retrieval: An ERP replication and extension. Cogn Brain Res2002;13:323–338.
34.
ParkinAJ. Memory. Phenomena, Experiment and Theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1993.
35.
KoutstaalWSchacterDL. Gist-based false recognition of pictures in older and younger adults. J Mem Language1997;37:555–583.
36.
CabezaRAndersonNDMangelsJANybergLHouleS.Age-related differences in neural activity during item and temporal-order memory retrieval: A positron emission tomography study. J Cogn Neurosci2000;12:197–206.
37.
CabezaRGradyCLNybergLMcIntoshARTulvingEKapurS. Age-related differences in neural activity during memory encoding and retrieval: A positron emission tomography study. J Neurosci1997;17:391–400.
38.
FjellAMWalhovdKB. P300 and neuropsychological tests as measures of aging: Scalp topography and cognitive changes. Brain Topogr2001;14:25–40.
39.
FjellAMWalhovdKB. Life-span changes in P3a. Psychophysiol2004;41:575–583.
40.
AndererPSemlitschHSaletuB.Multichannel auditory event-related brain potentials: Effects of normal aging on the scalp distribution of N1, P2, N2 and P300 latencies and amplitudes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1996;99:458–472.
41.
FriedmanDKazmerskiVFabianiM.An overview of age-related changes in scalp distribution of P3b. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1997;104:498–513.
42.
IraguiVJKutasMMitchinerMRHillyardSA. Effects of aging on event-related brain potentials and reaction times in an auditory oddball task. Psychophysiol1993;30:10–22.
43.
PfefferbaumAFordJMWenegratVGRothWTKopellBS. Clinical application of the P3 component of event-related potentials. 1. Normal aging. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1984;59:85–103.
44.
VescoKKBoneRCRyanJCPolichJ.P300 in young and elderly subjects: Auditory frequency and intensity effects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1993;88:302–308.
45.
WalhovdKBFjellAM. Two- and three-stimuli auditory oddball ERP tasks and neuropsychological measures in aging. NeuroReport2001;12:3149–3153.
46.
SchacterDL. Memory, amnesia, and frontal lobe dysfunction. Psychobiol1987;15:21–36.
47.
MilnerBCorsiPLeonardG.Frontal lobe contribution to recency judgements. Neuropsychologia1991;29:601–618.
48.
SquireLR. Declarative and nondeclarative memory: Multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. In: SchacterDLTulvingE, (eds). Memory Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1994: 203–231.
49.
MaddenDJLangleyLKDennyLLTurkingtonTGProvenzaleJMHawkTCColemanRE. Adult age differences in visual word identification: Functional neuroanatomy by positron emission tomography. Brain Cogn2002;49:297–321.
50.
MaddenDJTurkingtonTGColemanREProvenzaleJMDegradoTRHoffmanJH. Adult age differences in regional cerebral blood flow during visual word identification: Evidence from H2 150 PET. Neurolmage1996;3:127–142.
51.
WechslerD.Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1999.
52.
DelisDCKramerJHKaplanEOberBA. California Verbal Learning Test, 1th version, manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1987.
53.
PaoloAMTrösterAIRyanJJ. California Verbal Learning Test: Normative data for the elderly. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol1997;19:220–234.
BeckATSteerR.Beck Depression Inventory Scoring Manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation; 1987.
56.
WalhovdKBFjellAM. One-year test-retest reliability of auditory ERPs in young and old adults. Int J Psychophysiol2002;46:29–40.
57.
SemlitschHVAndererPSchusterPPresslichO. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiol1986;23:695–703.
58.
McCarthyGWoodCC. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1985;62:203–208.
FriedmanD.Cognition and aging: A highly selective overview of event-related potential (ERP) data. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol2003;25:702–720.
61.
De CarliCMurphyDGGiletteJAHaxbyJVTeichbergDSchapiroMBHorwitzB.Lack of age-related differences in temporal lobe volume of very healthy adults. AJNR1994;15:689–696.
62.
RazNGunningFMHeadDDupuisJHMcQuainJBriggsSD. Selective aging of the human cerebral cortex observed in vivo: Differential vulnerability of the prefrontal grey matter. Cereb Cortex1997;7:268–282.
63.
SalatDKayeJAJanowskyJS. Selective preservation and degeneration within the prefrontal cortex in aging and Alzheimer Disease. Arch Neurol2001;58:1403–1408.
