Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The differences between categories of play in English and spiel in German (or jeu in French and so on) are essential because any complex ludic category includes games that are organized and restricted by roles and rules. My choice to deal with Wittgensteinian views of spiel (which is translated by default as ‘play’) is influenced by the fact that his argument in German about the impossibility and futility of a philosophical definition of spiel embodies the quintessence of the problem: the linguistic obstacle that prevents correct interpretation of human play. Methodologically, I make the philosophical question of dependence a linguistic one. The article concludes by defending the position that game is only one of the diverse activities realizing human play, which is a basic existential phenomenon that can be considered philosophically through the category of ‘other being’.

Keywords

human play games gaming gameplay Wittgenstein

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bakhtin

(1984). Rabelais and his world. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Berlin

(1958). Two concepts of liberty. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

Brown

Vaugh

(2010). Play: How it shapes the brain, opens the imagination, and invigorates the soul. New York, NY: Penguin Books Pub.

Caillois

(1958). Les jeux et les hommes. Paris: Folio Essais, Gallimard.

Caillois

(1961). Man, play and games. New York: Macmillan.

Carlson

(2011). The “playing” field: Attitudes, activities, and the conflation of play and games. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 38, 74-87.

Carter

(2019). Positive and negative liberty. In Zalta

E. N.

(Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2019 ed.). Stanford: Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/liberty-positive-negative/

Chess

Paul

C. A.

(2019). The end of casual: Long live casual. Games and Culture, 14(2), 107-118.

Collingwood

R. G.

(1924). Speculum mentis or the map of knowledge. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

10.

Csikszentmihalyi

(1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pub.

11.

Derrida

(1967) [1978]. Structure, sign, and play in the discourse of the human sciences. In Writing and difference (Chap 10, pp. 278-294). Chicago: Chicago University Press.

12.

Eichberg

(2016). Questioning play: What play can tell us about social life. London: Routledge.

13.

Fink

(1960) [1995]. The ontology of play. In Morgan

W. J.

Meier

K. V.

(Eds.), Philosophic inquiry in sport (2nd ed., pp. 100-109). Champaign. IL: Human Kinetics.

14.

Frasca

(2003). Simulation versus narrative: Introduction to ludology. In Wolf

M. J. P.

Perron

(Eds.), Video game theory. London: Routledge.

15.

Frasca

(2013). Simulation versus narrative. In The video game theory reader, (Chap 10, pp. 243-258). London: Routledge.

16.

Gadamer

H-G.

(1960) [1982]. Truth and method. Transl. From German by G. Barden and J. Cumming. New York: Crossroad.

17.

Gebauer

Wulf

(1998). Spiel, Ritual, Geste. Mimetisches Handeln in der sozialen Welt [Play, ritual, gesture. Mimetic action in the social world]. Reinbek: Rowohlt.

18.

Handelman

(1990). Models and mirrors: Toward an anthropology of public events. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Harris

J. C.

Park

R. J.

(Eds.). (1983). Introduction. In Play, games, and sports in cultural contexts (pp. 1-37). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

20.

Hughes

(1857). Tom Brown’s school days. New York and London: Harper and Bro.

21.

Huizinga

(1938). Homo Ludens. Proeve eener bepaling van het spel-element der cultuur. Haarlem, Holland: H.D. Tjeenk Willink.

22.

Huizinga

(1949). Homo Ludens; A study of the play-element in culture. London, Boston and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

23.

Hyland

D. A.

(1980). The stance of play. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 7, 87-98.

24.

Järvinen

(2007). Introducing applied ludology: Hands-on methods for game studies. In Situated play, proceedings of DiGRA 2007 conference (pp. 134-144). Tokyo, Japan: Digital Games Research Association.

25.

Jenson

(1992) Fandom as pathology: The consciences of characterization. In Lewis

L. A.

(Ed.), The adoring audience: Fan culture and popular media (pp. 9-29). London: Routledge.

26.

Kaiser

(2009). The world in play: A portrait of a Victorian concept. New Literary History, 40(1), 105-129.

27.

Kendrick

(2009). Games medievalists play: How to make earnest of game and still enjoy it. New Literary History, 40(1), 43-61.

28.

Kolve

(1966). The play called “corpus christi”. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

29.

Kretchmar

R. S.

(1975). From test to contest: An analysis of two kinds of counterpoint in sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 2(1), 23-30. doi:10.1080/00948705.1975.10654094

30.

Laas

(2017). On game definitions. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 44(1), 81-94. doi:10.1080/00948705.2016.1255556

31.

Lebed

(2003). Sport globalization: The terminological “muddle” in the European cross-cultural process of sportization – the “Russian case”. The Annual of CESH (European Committee of Sport History), 4, 7-29.

32.

Lebed

(2019). On the philosophical definition of human play using the tools of qualitative content analysis. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 1-19. doi:10.1080/17511321.2019.1649300

33.

Lotman

(1972). Igrah. In Prokhorov

A. M.

(Ed.), Bolshaya Sovetskaya encyclopaedia. (Great Soviet encyclopaedia) (3rd ed., Vol. 10, p.31). Moscow: Sovetskaya Encyclopaedia Pub.

34.

Lucas

Sherry

J. L.

(2004). Sex differences in video game play: A communication based explanation. Communication Research, 31(5), 499-523.

35.

Meier

K. V.

(1988). Triad trickery: Playing with sport and games. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 15, 11-30.

36.

Osterhoudt

R. G.

(1996). ‘Physicality’: One among the internal goods of sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 23, 91-103.

37.

Phillipps-Wolley

(1881). Sport in the Crimea and Caucasus. London: Richard Bentley & Son.

38.

Phillipps-Wolley

(1888). A sportsman’s eden. London: Richard Bentley & Son.

39.

Piaget

(1945). La formation du symbole chez l’enfant; imitation, jeu et reve, image et representation. In Actualités Pédagogiques et Psychologiques. Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.

40.

Piaget

(1951). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. (trans. to English by G. Gattegno and F.M. Hodson). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.

41.

Rooshnik

D. L.

(1975). Play and sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 2, 36-44.

42.

Sartre

J. P.

(1956) [1995]. Play and sport. In Morgan

W. J.

Meier

K. V.

(Eds.), Philosophic inquiry in sport (2nd ed., pp. 110-113). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

43.

Schneider

A. J.

(2001). Fruits, apples, and category mistakes: On sport, games, and play. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 28, 151-159.

44.

Spariosu

M. I.

(1989). Dionysus reborn. Play and the aesthetic dimension in modern philosophical and scientific discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University press.

45.

Stenros

(2016). The game definition game: A review. Games and Culture, 12(6), 499-520, 2017. doi:10.1177/1555412016655679

46.

Sterndale

R. A.

(1884). Natural history of the Mammalia of India and Ceylon. Calcutta, Bombay, London: Thacker and C Pub. Lim.

47.

Strutt

(1801) [1903]. The sports and pastimes of the people of England. A new, enlarged and corrected ed. by J. C. Cox. London: Methuen & Co.

48.

Suits

(1978). The grasshopper: Games, life and utopia. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

49.

Suits

(1988). Tricky triad: Games, play, and sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 15, 1-9.

50.

Suits

(2004). Venn and the art of category maintenance. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 31, 1-14.

51.

Sutton-Smith

(1997). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.

52.

Tamboer

J. W. I.

(1993–1994). On the contingent relation between motor actions and sport: A reaction to Kretchmar. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 20, 82-90.

53.

Webster’s Third New International Dictionary (1993). Gamesman (p. 993). Cologne, Germany: Köneman.

54.

Wittgenstein

(1953a). Philosophische untersuchungen. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

55.

Wittgenstein

. (1953b). Philosophical investigations (pp. 31-36). Trans. to English by G.E.M. Anscombe. New York: Basil Blackwell.

56.

Yorke

C. C.

(2018). Bernard suits on capacities: Games, perfectionism, and utopia. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 45(2), 177-188. doi:10.1080/00948705.2018.1479855