Video games can be dynamic sovereign spaces for Indigenous representation and expression when the self-determination of Indigenous people is supported. Where games are concerned, self-determination involves the autonomy and right of Indigenous people to make key decisions regarding the process of how a game is developed as well as what that game entails. A game is sovereign when self-determination is a respected practice throughout all phases of development from conceptualization to distribution. In what ways can games be sovereign and what challenges may be faced? Utilizing comparative case studies of the self-determined games Lost Memories, Terra Nova, and When Rivers Were Trails, this research identifies possible approaches and challenges for sovereign games looking at development as well as the resulting designs.
AtteberyS. (2020). Oil, water, lightning: indigenous posthumanism and energy futures in Elizabeth LaPensée’s thunderbird strike. American Quarterly, 72(3), 697-717.
2.
BarwickJ.DearnleyJ.MuirA. (2011). Playing games with cultural heritage: A comparative case study analysis of the current status of digital game preservation. Games and Culture, 6(4), 373-390.
3.
BishopM. (2020). ‘Don’t tell me what to do’: Encountering colonialism in the academy and pushing back with Indigenous autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 34, 1-12.
4.
BrownB. J. (2017). Never alone: (Re) coding the comic holotrope of survivance. Transmotion, 3(1), 22.
5.
ByrdJ. A. (2016). ‘Do they not have rational souls?’: Consolidation and sovereignty in digital new worlds. Settler Colonial Studies, 6(4), 423-437.
6.
ByrneS. (2020). Unsullied by others’ hands: Indigenous video games as immutable sacred spaces. In ByrneM.LaPenséeE. (Eds.). Night of the indigenous devs proceedings 2019 (pp. 23-105). Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
7.
ColeA.ZammitJ. (2020). Cooperative gaming: Diversity in the games industry and how to cultivate inclusion. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
8.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S.SmithL. T. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
DillonG. L. (2012). Walking the clouds: An anthology of Indigenous science fiction. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
10.
DillonG. L. (2016). Introduction: Indigenous futurisms, bimaashi biidaas mose, flying and walking towards you. Extrapolation, 57(1-2), 1-6. doi:10.3828/extr.2016.2.
11.
EtrewA. A. (2020). Development through the Indigenous lens–An analysis of First Nations legal frameworks in Canada — and — gaming and Indigenous sovereignty discourse —textual analysis of Invaders by Elizabeth LaPensée. [master’s thesis]. Simon Fraser University.
12.
HarrerS. (2019, March). Radical jamming: Sketching radical design principles for game creation workshops. In: Proceedings of the international conference on game jams, hackathons and game creation events 2019, San Francisco CA USA, 17 March 2019 (pp. 1-5).
13.
HortonL. (2019). Collaborative game development with Indigenous communities; A theoretical model for ethnocultural empathy. [master’s thesis]. Aalto University.
14.
HoustonJ. (2007). Indigenous autoethnography: Formulating our knowledge, our way. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 36(S1), 45-50.
15.
HughesG. (2017). Tradigital knowledge? Indigenous video games, copyright, and the protection of traditional knowledge. In A. A. A. Mol, C. E. Ariese-Vandemeulebroucke, K. H. J. Boom, & A. Politopoulos (Eds.), The interactive past: Archaeology, heritage, and video games (pp. 33-52). the Netherlands: Sidestone Press.
KhaledR.LessardJ.BarrP. (2018, August). Documenting trajectories in design space: A methodology for applied game design research. In: Proceedings of the 13th International conference on the foundations of digital games, Malmö Sweden, 7–10 August 2018 (pp. 1-10).
18.
KoskinenI.ZimmermanJ.BinderT.RedstromJ.WensveenS. (2011). Design research through practice: From the lab, field, and showroom. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
19.
KovachM. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
20.
KultimaA.LaitiO. (2019). Sami game jam–Learning, exploring, reflecting and sharing Indigenous culture through game jamming. In: DiGRA ‘19 - Proceedings of the 2019 DiGRA international conference: Game, play and the emerging ludo-mix, Kyoto JAPAN, 6–10 August 2019. http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/DiGRA_2019_paper_367.pdf
21.
LachoD. D.LeonA. (2017). “Please mom? Can you please download it at home?”: Video games as a symbol of linguistic survivance. Transmotion, 3(1), 70.
22.
LagaceN. (2018). Indigenous representations and the impacts of video games media on Indigenous identity. [master’s thesis]. University of Manitoba.
LaitiO. (2021). Old ways of knowing, new ways of playing—the potential of collaborative game design to empower Indigenous Sámi. [dissertation thesis]. University of Lapland.
25.
LaitiO. K.FrangouS.-M. (2019). Social aspects of learning: Sámi people in the circumpolar north. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 21(1), 5-21.
26.
LaitiO.HarrerS.UusiauttiS.KultimaA. (2020). Sustaining intangible heritage through video game storytelling-the case of the Sami Game Jam. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 27(3), 1-16.
27.
LandJ (2020). Indigenous video games. In LopezL. K. (Ed.). Race and media: Critical approaches (Vol. 92). New York, NY: NYU Press.
28.
LapenséeE. (2014). Survivance as an Indigenously determined game. AlterNative. An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 10(3), 263-275.
29.
LaPenséeE. (2017). Transformations and remembrances in the digital game We Sing for Healing. Transmotion, 3(1), 89.
30.
LaPenséeE. (2018a). Self-determination in Indigenous games. The routledge companion to media studies and digital Humanities (pp. 128-137). Abingdon: Routledge.
31.
LaPenséeE. (2018b). Thunderbird Strike: Survivance in/of an Indigenous video game. Video Game Art Reader, 2(1), 28-37.
32.
LaPenséeE. (2020). When Rivers Were Trails: Cultural expression in an Indigenous video game. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 27(3), 1-15.
33.
LaPenseeE. (2020). SPEAR: A framework for Indigenous cultural games. ANTARES: Letras e Humanidades, 12(28), 4-22.
34.
LaPenséeE.EmmonsN. (2019). Indigenizing education with the game When Rivers Were Trails. Amerikastudien, 64, 75-93.
35.
LaPenséeE.JaakolaL.DayS.NoodinM. (2018). Honour Water: Gameplay as a pathway to Anishinaabe water teachings. Decolonization: Indigeneity Education & Society, 7(1), 115-130.
36.
LaurelB. (2003). Design research: Methods and perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
LobanR.ApperleyT. (2019). Eurocentric values at play: Modding the colonial from the Indigenous perspective. In Penix-TadsenP. (Ed.). Video games and the global south (pp. 87-99). Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
38.
LongboatM. (2017). Reset and redefine: Never Alone (Kisima Ingitchuna) and the rise of Indigenous games. Transmotion, 3(1), 170.
39.
LongboatM. (2019a). Terra Nova: Enacting videogame development through Indigenous-led creation. [master’s thesis]. Concordia University.
LongboatM. (2020). A scifi video game about first contact. In ByrneM.LaPenséeE. (Eds.). Night of the indigenous devs proceedings 2019 (pp. 23-29). Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
42.
LovelessN (2019). How to make art at the end of the world: A manifesto for research-creation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
43.
MadsenD. L. (2017). The mechanics of survivance in Indigenously-determined video-games: Invaders and Never Alone. Transmotion, 3(2), 79-104.
44.
MadsenD. L. (2018a). Playing with form: Elizabeth LaPensée’s Indigenously-determined video-games. In: Proceedings of the SANAS biennial conference 2018: “the genres of genre: A conference on form, format, and cultural formations, Geneva, Switzerland.
45.
MadsenD. L. (2018b). “Like oil and water”: Extractive industry, water rights, and aesthetic activism in Native American interactive digital narrative. Pour des humanités environnementales, Journée d’étude facultaire, Faculté des lettres. Lausanne, Switzerland: Université de Lausanne.
46.
ManciniH. (2017). Mapping new terrain: Self-determined Indigenous app and game development. [master’s thesis]. The University of Auckland.
47.
MartinezC. C. (2015). Tecno-sovereignty: An Indigenous theory and praxis of media articulated through art, technology, and learning. [doctoral dissertation]. Arizona State University.
48.
MäyräF. (2008). An introduction to game studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
MäyräF.SotamaaO. (2017). Need for perspective: Introducing the special issue “Reflecting and evaluating game studies. Games and Culture, 12(6), 495-498.
50.
MinerJ. D. (2020). Monitoring simulated worlds in Indigenous strategy games. The Computer Games Journal, 9(3), 311-329.
51.
NadjiwonC. A. (1992). Egalitarianism: A perspective from North American tribal society. [master’s thesis]. University of Arizona.
52.
Navarro-RemesalV. (2019). Pixelated nature: Ecocriticism, animals, moral consideration, and degrowth in videogames. Logos, 26(2), 13-26.
53.
NormanD. A.VergantiR. (2014). Incremental and radical innovation: Design research vs. technology and meaning change. Design Issues, 30(1), 78-96.
54.
O’LearyS. R. (2017). LifeStory: The educational rationale behind the design of an Indigenous video game framework. [master’s thesis]. University of Washington.
SimonsR. N. (2019). May). Collaborative video game design work and diversity. In: Extended abstracts of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 4–9 May 2019 (pp. 1-4).
59.
SmithL.T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London, United Kingdom: Zed Books Ltd.
60.
StoneK. (2018). Time and reparative game design: Queerness, disability, and affect. Game Studies, 18(3).
61.
VasalouA.KhaledR.GoochD.BentonL. (2014, October). Problematizing cultural appropriation. In: Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play, Toronto Ontario Canada, 19–21 October 2014 (pp. 267-276).
62.
VizenorG. R. (1999). Manifest manners: Narratives on postindian survivance. Lincoln, NE: U of Nebraska Press.
63.
WestecottE. (2020). Game sketching: Exploring approaches to research-creation for games. Virtual Creativity, 10(1), 11-26.
64.
WhitinuiP. (2014). Indigenous autoethnography: Exploring, engaging, and experiencing “self” as a Native method of inquiry. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43(4), 456-487.
ZimmermanJ.ForlizziJ.EvensonS. (2007, April). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Montréal Québec Canada, 22–27 April, 2006 (pp. 493-502). ACM.
