Assessing the resources and functioning of research ethics committees (RECs) in low-resource settings poses many challenges. We conducted a case study of two medical college RECs (A and B) in Western India utilizing the Research Ethics Committee Quality Assurance Self-Assessment Tool (RECQASAT) as well as in-depth interviews with representative members to evaluate REC effectiveness. REC A and B obtained 62% and 67% of allowable points on the RECQASAT. These scores together with findings from the in-depth interviews suggest the need for significant improvement in REC effectiveness particularly in the areas of membership and educational training, organizational aspects, recording minutes, communicating decisions, and REC resources. Developing evidence-based best practices and strengthening infrastructure are essential to enhancing REC efficacy in low-resource countries.
AbbottL.GradyC. (2011). A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: What we know and what we still need to learn. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6, 3-19.
2.
AdamsP.KaewkingwalJ.LimphattharacharoenC.PrakobthamS.PengsaaK.KhusmithS. (2014). Is your ethics committee efficient? Using “IRB Metrics” as a self-assessment tool for continuous improvement at the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand. PLoS ONE, 9(11), e113356.
3.
ChennevilleT.MenezesL.BylsmaL.MannA.KosambiyaJ.BaxiR. (2014). Assessing institutional ethics committees in India using the IRB-RAT. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(4), 50-59. doi:10.1177/1556264614544101
DentN. J.KrishanA. (2007). RECs in India. Quality Assurance Journal, 11, 143-150. doi:10.1002/qaj.414
6.
EmanuelE. J.WendlerD.GradyC. (2000). What makes clinical research ethical?Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 2701-2711.
7.
EmanuelE. J.WendlerD.KillenJ.GradyC. (2004). What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 189, 930-937.
8.
EmanuelE. J.WoodA.FleischmanA.BowenA.GetzK. A.GradyC.. . . MuseC. T. (2004). Oversight of human participants research: Identifying problems to evaluate reform proposals. Annals of Internal Medicine, 141, 282-291.
Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (Common Rule), 45 C.F.R. part 46 (1991).
11.
GeorgeB. (2012). CTRI—Clicking to greater transparency and accountability. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 3(4), 122-124.
12.
GilesJ. (2005). Researchers break the rules in frustration at review boards. Nature, 438(7065), 136-137.
13.
GlickmanS. W.McHutchisonJ. G.PetersonE. D.CairnsC. B.HarringtonR. A.CaliffR. M.SchulmanK. A. (2009). Ethical and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 816-823.
14.
GradyC. (2010). Do IRBs protect human research participants?Journal of the American Medical Association, 304, 1122-1123.
15.
Indian Council of Medical Research. (2006). Ethical guidelines for biomedical research on human participants. New Delhi: Author. Retrieved from http://icmr.nic.in/ethical_guidelines.pdf
16.
KadamR.KarandikarS. (2012). Ethics committees in India: Facing the challenges!. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 3(2), 50.
17.
KassN.DawsonL.Loyo-BerriosN. I. (2003). Ethical oversight of research in developing countries. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 25(2), 1-10.
18.
KassN. E.HyderA.AjuwonA.Appiah-PokuJ.BarsdorfN.ElsayedD. E.. . . SikateyoB. (2007). The structure and function of research RECs in Africa: A case study. PLoS Medicine, 4(1), Article 26.
19.
Keith-SpiegelP.KoocherG. P. (2005). The IRB paradox: Could the protectors also encourage deceit?Ethics & Behavior, 15, 339-349.
20.
Keith-SpiegelP.KoocherG. P.TabachnickB. (2006). What scientists want from their research ethics committee. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, 1, 67-82.
21.
KumarN.RavindranG. D.BhanA.SrivastavaJ. S.NairV. M. (2008). The India experience. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6, 295-303.
22.
MakhoulJ.El-AltiL.QutteinaY.NasrallahC.SakrC.NakkashR.AlaliK. (2014). “Protecting” or “policing”: Academic researchers’ view of IRBs in an Arab context. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(25), 25-35.
23.
MatarA.SilvermanH. (2013). Perspectives of Egyptian research RECs regarding their effective functioning. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8(1), 32-44.
24.
MuthuswamyV. (2005). Status of ethical review and challenges in India. Indian Pediatrics, 42, 1189-1190.
25.
NdebeleP.WassenaarD.BenatarS.FleischerT.KrugerM.AdebamowoC.. . . MeslinE. M. (2014). Research ethics capacity building in sub-Saharan Africa: A review of NIH Fogarty-funded programs 2000–2012. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(2), 24-40.
26.
SchuppliC. A.FraserD. (2007). Factors influencing the effectiveness of research ethics committees. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 294-301.
27.
ShawD. M. (2011). The ethics committee as ghost author. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37, 706-706.
28.
SilaigwanaB.WassenaarD. (2015). Biomedical research ethics committees in sub-Saharan Africa: A collective review of their structure, functioning, and outcomes. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 10(2), 169-184.
29.
SilvermanH.EdwardsH.ShamooA.MatarA. (2013). Enhancing research ethics capacity in the Middle East: Experience and challenges of a Fogarty-sponsored training program. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8(5), 40-51.
30.
SilvermanH.SleemH. (2014). A self-assessment tool to assess operational characteristics of research Research Ethics Committees in developing countries. In KrugerM.NdebeleP.HornL. (Eds), Research ethics in Africa: A resource for research RECs (pp. 175-185). Stellenbosch, South Africa: AFRICAN SUN MeDIA.
31.
SilvermanH.SleemH.MoodleyK.KumarN.NaidooS.SubramanianT.. . . MoniM. (2015). Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research RECs in low-and middle-income countries. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41, 332-337.
32.
SinghJ. A. (2013). India’s regulatory reforms on compensation for clinical trial injuries and deaths: Urgent need for revisiting. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 10, 195-197.
33.
SleemH.AbdelhaiR. A.Al-AbdallatI.GabrH. M.KehilE.SadiqB. B.. . . SilvermanH. (2010). Development of an accessible self-assessment tool for research RECs in developing countries. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(3), 85-98.
34.
SleemH.El-KamaryS. S.SilvermanH. J. (2010). Identifying structures, processes, resources and needs or research RECs in Egypt. BMC Medical Ethics, 11, Article 12.
