WITHDRAWN: Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with
examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100. DOI
10.1177/1558689806292430
Article withdrawn by publisher.
Due to an administrative error, this article was accidentally published OnlineFirst
and in Volume 1 Issue 1 of publishing year 2007 with different DOIs and different
page numbers.
The incorrect version of the article with DOI: 10.1177/2345678906292430 has been replaced with this correction
notice.
The correct and citable version of the article remains:
Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples.
Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100. DOI
10.1177/1558689806292430
Aaron, L. S. (2005). Responsibilities and leadership
styles of radiologic technology program directors: Implications for leadership
development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton
Rouge.
2.
Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Jiao,
Q. G. (2006, April). Prevalence of mixed methods sampling designs in social science
research and beyond. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational
Research Association, San Francisco.
3.
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M.,
& Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A.
Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social &
behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
4.
Curtis, S., Gesler, W., Smith, G., & Washburn,
S. (2000). Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative
research: Examples in the geography of health. Social Science and
Medicine, 50(2),
1001-1014.
5.
Flick, U. (1998). An introduction to
qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L.
(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative
research. Chicago: Aldine.
7.
Hancock, M., Calnan, M., & Manley, G.
(1999). Private or NHS dental service care in the United Kingdom? A
study of public perceptions and experiences. Journal of Public Health
Medicine, 21(4),
415-420.
8.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J.
(2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has
come. Educational Researcher, 33(7),
14-26.
9.
Kalafat, J., & Illback, R. J.
(1999). Evaluation of Kentucky’s school based family resource and youth
services centers: Part I. Louisville, KY: REACH of Louisville.
10.
Kemper, E., Stringfield. S., & Teddlie, C.
(2003). Mixed methods sampling strategies in social science research.
In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social &
behavioral research (pp. 273-296). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
11.
Kemper, E., & Teddlie, C. (2000)
Mandated site based management in Texas: Exploring implementation in urban high
schools. Teaching and Change, 7,
172-200.
12.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A.
(2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd
ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Kuzel, A. J. (1992). Sampling in
qualitative inquiry. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative
research (pp. 31-44). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Lasserre-Cortez, S. (2006). A mixed methods
examination of professional development through whole faculty study groups.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton
Rouge.
15.
LeCompte, M. D., & Preissle, J.
(1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research
(2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
16.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G.
(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative
researching (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
18.
Maxwell, J. (1997). Designing a
qualitative study. In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.) Handbook of applied social
research methods (pp. 69-100). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
19.
Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994).
Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
20.
Nieto, T., Mendez, F., & Carrasquilla, G.
(1999). Knowledge, beliefs and practices relevant for malaria control
in an endemic urban area of the Colombian Pacific. Social Science and
Medicine, 49, 601-609.
21.
Parasnis, I., Samar, V. J., & Fischer, S. D.
(2005). Deaf college students’ attitudes toward racial/ethnic
diversity, campus climate, and role models. American Annals of the
Deaf, 150(1), 47-58.
22.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative
research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Poorman, P. B. (2002). Perceptions of
thriving by women who have experienced abuse or status-related oppression.
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(1),
51-62.
24.
Reynolds, D., & Teddlie, C. (2000).
The processes of school effectiveness. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The
international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 134-159).
London: Falmer.
25.
Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R.
(1986) Teaching functions. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Third handbook of
research on teaching. New York: Macmillan.
26.
Shulha, L., & Wilson, R. (2003).
Collaborative mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.),
Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp.
639-670). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The
ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
28.
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant
observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
29.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case
study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998).
Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded
theory. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Tashakkori, A., and Teddlie, C. (1998).
Mixed methodology: Combining the qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.).
(2003a). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral
research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C.
(2003b). The past and future of mixed methods research: From data
triangulation to mixed model designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.),
Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp.
671-702). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Teddlie, C. (2005). Methodological
issues related to causal studies of leadership: A mixed methods perspective from the
USA. Educational Management Administration & Leadership,
33(2), 211-217.
35.
Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S.
(1993). Schools make a difference: Lessons learned from a 10-year
study of school effects. New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A.
(2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in
the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.),
Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp.
3-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Ward, M. (1986). Them children: A study
in language learning (Reprint ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
38.
Wunsch, D. R. (1986). Survey research:
Determining sample size and representative response. Business Education
Forum, 40(5), 31-34.
39.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research:
Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
