We recently reported on a co-occurrence-based method for texture analysis. This paper uses this texture analysis method to examine the development of the texture during hydroentangling as a function process conditions. We report on the development of texture as a function of hydroentangling energy. Energy was varied by controlling the pressure and number of passes. All fabrics were produced using the same web on the same forming belt substrate. Our preliminary data indicate that the degree of texture definition increases as a function of pressure up to a point and then begins to deteriorate.
ConnollyT. J., and ParentL. R., Influence of Specific Energy on the Properties of Hydroentangled Nonwoven Fabrics, Tappi Journal76, No. 8, 135–141, 1993.
2.
TimbleN. B., GilmoreT. F., and MortonG. P., Spunlaced Fabric Performance for Unbleached, Bleached and Low Micronaire Unbleached Cotton at Different Specific Energy Levels of Water, The Proceedings of Inda-Tech, 1996.
3.
TimbleN. B., and AllenC., Hydroentangled Fabric Performance for Polyester/Unbleached Cotton Blends at Various Levels of Specific Energy Levels, The Proceedings of Inda-Tech, 1997.
4.
VuillameA.M., Spunlace Nonwovens: The Bridge Between Nonwovens and Textiles, The Proceedings of Inda-Tech, 1993.
5.
MedeirosF.J., Spunlace/Hydroentanglement Methods & Products, The Proceedings of Inda-Tech, 1996.
6.
KimJ. O., and SlatenB. L., Objective Evaluation of Fabric Hand, Textile Res. J., 69(1), 56–67, 1999.
7.
WilsonA., Blurring the Boundaries, Nonwovens Report International, 30–38, April 2000.
8.
WidenC. B., Forming Fabrics for Spunlace Applications, Tappi Journal, 149–153, May 1991.
9.
SonkaM., HlavacV., and RogerB., Image Processing and Machine Vision, Second Edition, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, 1999.
10.
WoodE. J., and HodgsonM. R., Carpet Texture Measurement using Image Analysis, Textile Res. J., (59), 1–11, 1989.
11.
WoodE. J., Applying Fourier and associated Transforms to Pattern Characterization in Textiles, Textile Res. J., 60, 212–220, 1990.
12.
WuY., PourdeyhimiB., and SpivakS. M., Texture Evaluation of Carpets Using Image Analysis, Textile Res. J., 61 (7), 407–419, 1991.
13.
SobusJ., PourdeyhimiB., GerdeJ., and UlcayY., Assessing Changes in Texture Periodicity Due to Appearance Loss in Carpets: Gray Level Co-Occurrence Analysis, Textile Res. J., 61(10), 557–567, 1991.
14.
SobusJ., PourdeyhimiB., XuB., and UlcayY., Evaluating Loss of Texture Definition in Carpets Using Mathematical Morphology: Covariance, Textile Res. J., 62(1), 26–39, 1992.
15.
PourdeyhimiB., and SobusJ., Evaluating Carpet Appearance Loss: Surface Intensity and Roughness, Textile Res. J., 63(9), 523–535, 1993.
16.
PourdeyhimiB., XuB., and WehrleL., Evaluating Carpet Appearance Loss: Periodicity and Tuft Placement, Textile Res. J., 64(1), 21–32, 1994.
