This research focuses on analyzing the resonance behavior of a cracked multi-bay frame structure under the influence of moving oscillatory loads, specifically examining vibrations in both axial and vertical directions. To model the system, the finite element approach, integrated with Lagrange’s formulation, was applied, utilizing the Bernoulli-Euler beam assumptions to derive the in-plane motion equations. The dynamic structural response was calculated using the Newmark integration algorithm. For damaged elements, stiffness characteristics were formulated based on principles from fracture mechanics. A three-dimensional graph showing the interdependence of crack position, oscillator speed, and peak displacement was developed to visualize the effect of crack location. The findings revealed that the initial resonant frequency corresponds to the first vibrational mode, which is predominantly horizontal, while the second resonant condition aligns with vertical mode dominance.
FrybaL. Vibrations of solids and structures under moving loads. Thomas Telford Ltd., 1999.
2.
MalekzadehPMonajjemzadehSM. Dynamic response of functionally graded beams in a thermal environment under a moving load. Mech Adv Mat Struct2016; 23(3): 248–258.
3.
KiralZKiralBG. Dynamic analysis of a symmetric laminated composite beam subjected to a moving load with constant velocity. J Reinf Plast Compos2007; 27(1): 19–32.
4.
OzturkHKiralZKiralBG. Dynamic analysis of an elastically supported cracked beam subjected to a concentrated moving load. Lat Am J Solids Struct2016; 13: 175–200.
5.
Martínez-RodrigoMDLavadoJMuserosP. Dynamic performance of existing high-speed railway bridges under resonant conditions retrofitted with fluid viscous dampers. Eng Struct2010; 32(3): 808–828.
6.
WangJFLinCCChenBL. Vibration suppression for high-speed railway bridges using tuned mass dampers. Int J Solids Struct2003; 40(2): 465–491.
7.
ChengYSAuFTKCheungYK. Vibration of railway bridges under a moving train by using bridge-track-vehicle element. Eng Struct2001; 23(12): 1597–1606.
8.
LuJFMeiHZhongL. Dynamic response of a periodic viaduct to a moving loading with consideration of the pile–soil–structure interaction. Acta Mech2015; 226: 2013–2034.
9.
LouPYuZWAuFTK. Rail-bridge coupling element ofequal lengths for analysing train-track-bridge interaction systems. Appl Math Model2012; 36(4): 1395–1414.
10.
YoucefKSabihaTEl MostafaD, et al.Dynamic analysis of train-bridge system and riding comfort of trains with rail irregularities. J Mech Sci Technol2013; 27(4): 951–962.
11.
RomeroASolísMDomínguezJ, et al.Soil-structure interaction in resonant railway bridges. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng2013; 47: 108–116.
12.
LouP. Finite element analysis for train-track-bridge interaction system. Arch Appl Mech2007; 77(10): 707–728.
13.
LiuKReyndersEDe RoeckG, et al.Experimental and numerical analysis of a composite bridge for high-speed trains. J Sound Vib2009; 320(1-2): 201–220.
14.
EbrahimiMGholampourSKafshgarkolaeiHJ, et al.Dynamic behavior of a multispan continuous beam traversed by a moving oscillator. Acta Mech2015; 226: 4247–4257.
15.
SalcherPAdamC. Modeling of dynamic train–bridge interaction in high-speed railways. Acta Mech2015; 226: 2473–2495.
16.
NguyenTPPhamDT. A contact element for dynamic analysis of beams to a moving oscillator on tensionless elastic foundation. Int J Adv Struct2016; 8(4): 351–361.
17.
SongYKimTLeeU. Vibration of a beam subjected to a moving force: frequency-domain spectral element modeling and analysis. Int J Mech Sci2016; 113: 162–174.
18.
MaoLLuY. Critical speed and resonance criteria of railway bridge response to moving trains. J Bridge Eng2013; 18(2): 131–141.
19.
MuserosPAlarcónE. Influence of the second bending mode on the response of high-speed bridges at resonance. J Struct Eng2005; 131(3): 405–415.
XiaHZhangNGuoWW. Analysis of resonance mechanism and conditions of train-bridge system. J Sound Vib2006; 297(3-5): 810–822.
22.
ZrnićNDGašićVMBošnjakSM. Dynamic responses of a gantry crane system due to a moving body considered as moving oscillator. Arch Civ Mech Eng2015; 15(1): 243–250.
23.
YangYBLinCLYauJD, et al.Mechanism of resonance and cancellation for train-induced vibrations on bridges with elastic bearings. J Sound Vib2004; 269: 345–360.
24.
Ülker-KaustellMKaroumiRPacosteC. Simplified analysis of the dynamic of soil-structure interaction of a portal frame railway bridge. Eng Struct2010; 32(11): 3692–3698.
25.
OzturkHYasharASabuncuM. Dynamic stability of cracked multi-bay frame structures. Mech Adv Mat Struct2016; 23(6): 715–726.
26.
GönenliCDaşO. Effect of crack location on buckling and dynamic stability in plate frame structures. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2021; 43: 311.
27.
GhannadiaslAKhodapanahAS. Dynamic analysis of multiple cracked Timoshenko beam under moving load-analytical method. J Vib Control2020; 28(3-4): 379–395.
28.
SongMYaoGYuY. Dynamic response characteristics of axially moving plates subjected to moving load. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2024; 46: 365.
29.
ErduranEGonenSAlkananyA. Parametric analysis of the dynamic response of railway bridges due to vibrations induced by heavy-haul trains. Struct Infrastruct Eng2022; 18: 326–339.
30.
Sánchez-HaroJFernándezBCapellánG, et al.Simplified method to detect resonance effects in railway bridges: viaduct over Aragón River and Almonte bridge application. Eng Struct2024; 305: 117668.
31.
XiangPYanWJiangL, et al.Resonance analysis of a high-speed railway bridge using a stochastic finite element method. Earthq Eng Eng Vib2023; 22: 1015–1030.
32.
XueqiLYongCXiaoyongL, et al.Scanning vertical and flexural-torsional frequencies of thin-walled girder bridges using a two-axle vehicle and a signal enhancement approach. Thin-Walled Struct2025; 211: 113116.
33.
XueqiLYongCXiaoyongL, et al.Identification of bridge modal frequencies using a vehicle with stochastic velocities and initial vibrations. Struct2025; 73: 108411.
34.
ShokrzadehMRNateghi-AlahiF. Temporary seismic strengthening techniques for damaged RC columns: experimental and analytical investigation. Struct2025; 82: 110496.
35.
SharifiMShokrzadehMRGhoddousiP. Experimental investigation of the cyclic behavior of full-scale beam–column connections using high-strength self-consolidating concrete with and without fiber. Bridge Struct2025; 21(2–3): 93–107.
36.
ShokrzadehMRNateghi-AlahiF. Evaluation of hybrid NSM-CFRP technical bars and FRP sheets for seismic rehabilitation of a concrete bridge pier. Bridge Struct2023; 18(3-4): 75–88.
37.
DemirtaşS. Vibration analysis of complex structures subjected to moving loads. PhD Thesis. Dokuz Eylul University, 2020.
38.
DemirtasSOzturkHSabuncuM. Dynamic response of multi-bay frames subjected to successive moving forces. Int J Str Stab Dyn2019; 19(4): 1950042.
39.
BatheKJ. Finite element procedures. : Prentice Hall, 1996.
40.
NevesSGMAzevedoAFMCalçadaR. A direct method for analyzing the vertical vehicle-structure interaction. Eng Struct2012; 34: 414–420.
41.
QianGLGuSNJiangJS. The dynamic behaviour and crack detection of a beam with a crack. J Sound Vib1990; 138(2): 233–243.
42.
ShifrinERuotoloR. Natural frequencies of a beam with an arbitrary number of cracks. J Sound Vib1999; 222: 409–423.
43.
YangYBYauJDHsuLC. Vibration of simple beams due to trains moving at high speeds. Eng Struct1997; 19(11): 936–944.
44.
DemirtaşSOzturkH. Effects of the crack location on the dynamic response of multi-storey frame subjed to the passage of a high-speed train. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2021; 43: 80.
