Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

An improved instantaneous frequency estimation algorithm for rotating machines based on a kernel-based fuzzy C-means clustering (KFCM) algorithm used in association with a spectral centroid algorithm is proposed in this study. The clustering algorithm is used first to discriminate the time-frequency points from the sources of the reference axis and other points. The discrete time-frequency points related to the instantaneous rotation frequency of the reference axis are then located based on the values of the time-frequency matrix elements; on the basis of these elements, the instantaneous rotation frequency is then estimated using a spectral centroid algorithm. It is demonstrated that this method effectively reduces the effects of interference and noise while achieving higher estimation precision. To validate the proposed method, numerical simulations of multi-component signals and crossover signals are performed. The results of these simulations indicate that the method can realize instantaneous frequency estimation with high precision, even when the numerical responses are contaminated by Gaussian white noise. In addition, when this method is used to analyze the vibration signal of rotating machinery in the situation of a run-up procedure, remarkable speed estimation results are obtained.

Keywords

Instantaneous frequency estimation kernel-based fuzzy C-means clustering spectral centroid time-frequency analysis clustering algorithms rotating machine

Introduction

Vibration signal analysis is widely used in traditional condition monitoring and fault diagnosis applications. In early fault diagnosis, however, vibration signal analysis suffers from low signal strengths and environmental noise interference. Therefore, the feature information related to machine failure is embedded deeply within the vibration signals and is difficult to extract. Nevertheless, the features yielded by certain failures have shown a strong relationship with the rotation speed. During instantaneous varying workload situations, and particularly during the run-up and run-down procedures of the principal axes, it is relatively easy to locate the features of early machine failures. Therefore, condition monitoring of the vibration signals during speed-varying phases is extremely important.

Real-time acquisition of the rotation speed thus plays a critical role in fault diagnosis and monitoring of the characteristic frequencies of the system (e.g., mesh, shafts, bearings).¹ In practice, rotation speed measurement using a tachometer or a shaft encoder may be impossible in some mechanical systems because of the restrictions of disassembly requirements, huge machine sizes or environmental limitations.² Therefore, the extraction of precise rotation speeds from condition monitoring signals has been studied intensively in recent years.³ Time-frequency analysis is a commonly used approach to deal with nonstationary signals from rotating machinery. The vibration signals are mapped into the corresponding time-frequency domain using the time-frequency analysis method; in this domain, the features of the machinery structure, including the rotation speed, vary with respect to time.

The most widely used time-frequency analysis approaches include the short time Fourier transform (STFT),^4,5 the Hilbert-Huang transform,^6,7 the continuous wavelet transform,^8,9 and the chirplet transform.^10,11 The instantaneous frequency estimation is performed immediately after the time-frequency analysis so that the instantaneous frequency is determined, thus enabling calculation of the rotation speed.

Each time-frequency analysis method has its own specific features. However, time-frequency analysis is prone to interference from hidden noise components that will lead to reduced precision in both frequency and speed estimation. As a result, it is necessary to post-process the results of time-frequency analyses. A cost function was introduced for adaptive selection of the ridge after a continuous wavelet transform¹² and a low computational cost implementation of the cost function ridge detection algorithm was explored via dynamic programming optimization. An improved algorithm that combined the continuous wavelet transform (CWT) with the crazy climber algorithm was proposed for peak detection applications.^13,14 A new method based on a novel ridge extraction method that took the fact that the time-frequency (TF) representation is both discrete in time and frequency into account was proposed, to be followed by an STFT.¹⁵ An angular maximal distribution (AMAD) was constructed from a set of directionally smoothed pseudo-Wigner-Ville distributions to highlight the entire instantaneous frequency curve.¹⁶ Furthermore, the TF ridge of an observation can be estimated from its AMAD using a maxima position detector. Another proposed method called the synchroextracting transform (SET) comes from a post-processing procedure used for the STFT and the polynomial chirplet transform.^17,18 This method can generate a more energy-concentrated TF representation and thus allow signal reconstruction. The synchrosqueezing transform (SST)^19,20 and the multisynchrosqueezing transform²¹ can effectively provide high-resolution TF representation while retaining a reversible capability.

With the aim of compensating for the errors introduced by noise during estimation processes, we propose a novel rotation speed estimation approach composed of a kernel-based clustering algorithm with fuzzy C-means and a frequency spectrum centroid searching algorithm.

In this approach, the clustering algorithm is first used to determine the different energy distribution areas via the kernel-based fuzzy C-means algorithm. Second, noise and other interference signals are then ruled out using a different threshold that is determined during the clustering phase. Then, the spectrum centroid algorithm is used to find the discrete TF points for the reference and other axes. Finally, a fitting method is applied to obtain the continuous TF curve based on these discrete points. The proposed method is then tested using both simulated signals and experimental vibration data and it demonstrates a remarkable performance in both reducing interference and improving the precision of rotation speed estimation.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. The models for kernel-based fuzzy C-means clustering and the spectral centroid algorithm are established in Section 2. The implementation process for the method is also introduced in this section. In Section 3, numerical simulations are performed to demonstrate the proposed method and the results that are presented are compared with previous studies of the same topic. Detailed experimental data processing procedures and the results of analysis of the vibration signals are given in Section 4, thus demonstrating that high-precision results can be obtained using the proposed method. Finally, the conclusions drawn from the work are offered in Section 5.

Instantaneous frequency estimation using kernel-based fuzzy C-means (KFCM) and frequency centroid algorithm

KFCM clustering

The fuzzy C-means (FCM) algorithm, as a typical clustering algorithm, has been used in a wide range of engineering and scientific disciplines, including medical imaging, bioinformatics, pattern recognition, and data mining.²² The principle of the clustering algorithm proposed in this article is based on optimization and is intended to minimize the Euclidean distances from all data points to their clustering centers when weighted by the fuzzy membership degree.²³ This algorithm will continue to modify the clustering centers and the matrix until the termination conditions are attained.

For a given data set $X = {x_{1}, x_{2}, . . . x_{N}}$ , where $x_{i}$ denotes a feature vector, the KFCM clusters all the feature vectors into C categories with respect to a fuzzy partition matrix U, where $u_{ji}$ indicates the rationality that $x_{i}$ belongs to the category j. The algorithm addresses the clustering task by minimizing the following optimization objective:

$\begin{matrix} J_{Km} (X; U, V) = \sum_{j = 1}^{C} \sum_{i = 1}^{N} u_{ji}^{m} ‖ x_{i} - v_{j} ‖_{A}^{2}, 2 \\ \leq C < N, m \in (1, + \infty) \end{matrix}$ (1)

where $v_{j}$ is the center of the j category, and ‖x_i−v_j‖² denotes the norm operation used to represent the distance between $x_{i}$ and $v_{j}$ . For the $u_{ji}$ , because each $x_{i}$ should be grouped into a single cluster, we use the following constraint:

$\sum_{j = 1}^{C} u_{ji} = 1, \forall i, 0 < \sum_{i = 1}^{N} < N$ (2)

However, the FCM algorithm contains certain defects since it does not operate well with heavy environmental noise or asymmetric data structures.²⁴ Therefore, several modified fuzzy clustering algorithms have been developed to address these drawbacks. The kernel method, because of its successful performance in support vector machine (SVM) applications,²⁵ is also introduced into the clustering algorithm. Using the different kernel functions, the original features are mapped into higher dimensional spaces that will endow the feature data with more properties. The kernel function to be used is the Gaussian kernel, which has the following form:²⁶

$K (x, y) = \exp (\frac{- {‖ x - y ‖}^{2}}{σ^{2}})$ (3)

The Euclidean distance between two feature vectors $x_{i}$ and $x_{j}$ after application of the Gaussian kernel can be calculated as shown below:

$d_{K i j} = \sqrt{K (x_{i}, x_{i}) - 2 K (x_{i}, x_{j}) + K (x_{j}, x_{j})}$ (4)

The objective function can then be transformed as

$\begin{matrix} J_{Km} (X; U, V) = \sum_{j = 1}^{C} \sum_{i = 1}^{N} u_{ji}^{m} ‖ ϕ (x_{i}) - ϕ (v_{j}) ‖_{A}^{2} \\ = \sum_{j = 1}^{C} \sum_{i = 1}^{N} u_{ji}^{m} K (x_{i}, x_{i}) - 2 K (x_{i}, v_{j}) + K (v_{j}, v_{j}) \\ = \sum_{j = 1}^{C} \sum_{i = 1}^{N} u_{ji}^{m} d_{Kij}^{2} (x_{i}, v_{j}) \end{matrix}$ (5)

where $ϕ (v_{i})$ is the image of $v_{i}$ in the kernel space. To minimize the above function, the membership matrix should be consistent with the following equation:

$u_{ji} = \frac{{(1 / d_{Kji}^{2} (x_{i}, v_{j}))}^{1 / (m - 1)}}{\sum_{j = 1}^{C} {(1 / d_{Kji}^{2} (x_{i}, v_{j}))}^{1 / (m - 1)}}$ (6)

Therefore, the clustering centers in the kernel space should have the following form:

$ϕ (\overset{\land}{v_{j}}) = \frac{\sum_{i = 1}^{N} {(u_{ji})}^{m} ϕ (x_{i})}{\sum_{i = 1}^{N} {(u_{ji})}^{m}}, j = 1, 2, . . . C$ (7)

Thus, we obtain:

$K (x_{i}, \overset{\land}{v_{j}}) = ϕ (x_{i}) . ϕ (\overset{\land}{v_{j}}) = \frac{\sum_{k = 1}^{N} {(u_{ji})}^{m} K (x_{k}, x_{i})}{\sum_{k = 1}^{N} {(u_{ji})}^{m}}$ (8)

and

$\begin{matrix} K (\overset{\land}{v_{j}}, \overset{\land}{v_{j}}) = ϕ (\overset{\land}{v_{j}}) . ϕ (\overset{\land}{v_{j}}) \\ = \frac{\sum_{k = 1}^{N} \sum_{l = 1}^{N} {(u_{jk})}^{m} {(u_{jl})}^{m} K (x_{i}, x_{l}) / [\sum_{k = 1}^{N} {(u_{ji})}^{m}]^{2}}{\sum_{k = 1}^{N} {(u_{ji})}^{m}} \end{matrix}$ (9)

The new membership function is then given by

$\begin{matrix} \overset{\land}{u_{ji}} = \frac{{(1 / d_{Kji}^{2} (x_{i}, \overset{\land}{v_{j}}))}^{1 / (m - 1)}}{\sum_{j = 1}^{C} {(1 / d_{Kji}^{2} (x_{i}, \overset{\land}{v_{j}}))}^{1 / (m - 1)}} \\ = \frac{{(1 - (K (x_{i}, x_{i}) - 2 K (x_{i}, \overset{\land}{v_{j}}) + K (\overset{\land}{v_{j}}, \overset{\land}{v_{j}})))}^{1 / (m - 1)}}{\sum_{j = 1}^{C} {(1 - (K (x_{i}, x_{i}) - 2 K (x_{i}, \overset{\land}{v_{j}}) + K (\overset{\land}{v_{j}}, \overset{\land}{v_{j}})))}^{1 / (m - 1)}} \end{matrix}$ (10)

To implement clustering on incomplete data, we have derived the following algorithm based on KFCM:

(1) Fix C, T, m > 1 and ε > 0 for some positive constant;

(2) Initialize the memberships

u_{ji}^{0}

and the prototypes v_i;

(3) For t =1,2……T, do:

(a) Update all memberships

u_{ji}

with equation (6);

(b) Update all prototypes

v_{j}

with equation (7);

First, we initialize the precision $ε$ , the fuzzy index m, the maximum iteration number T and the cluster number C. The appropriate kernel function is selected in this phase, and the centers of each cluster are also initialized during this phase.

In the second phase, the objective value, the optimal fuzzy partition matrix U and the centers in kernel space $ϕ ({\hat{v}}_{j})$ are calculated repeatedly. If the maximum number of iterations or the required precision is reached, the algorithm then returns the center of each cluster.

Estimation of instantaneous frequency

The instantaneous rotating frequency is estimated through measurement of the vibration signals. To maintain the integrity of the signals, higher sampling frequencies are used in the implementation. However, use of the higher sampling frequency will inevitably lead to a large data set volume. In this case, we take advantage of the STFT, which allows the signal frequency contents of local sections to be determined as the signal changes over time and is thus a useful analysis tool for vibration signals.²⁷ The main inspirations for the proposed method and a flowchart for the KFCM technique are shown in Figure 1. Estimation of the instantaneous rotation speed using the KFCM method and the spectral centroid proceeds as follows:

Figure 1.

Main inspirations and algorithm flowchart for the proposed method.

(1) The TF distribution of the vibration signal is acquired using the STFT. For a signal x(t), the STFT is defined as:

$STF T_{x} (t, ω) = \int_{- \infty}^{+ \infty} [x (τ) g^{*} (τ - t)] e^{- i τ ω} d τ$ (11)

where the symbol * denotes the complex conjugate, and $g (τ)$ is the window function with $‖ g (τ) ‖ = 1$ . The power spectrum of the signals with respect to the STFT is denoted by

$P (t, f) = {| STF T_{x} (t, ω) |}^{2}$ (12)

where $P (i, j) (1 \leq i \leq M, 1 \leq j \leq N)$ .

(2) The Gaussian operator, $G (i, j)$ , is used as a smoothing filter for the power spectrum result $P (i, j)$ , where:

$G (i, j) = \frac{1}{2 π σ} \exp (\frac{- ‖ i - j ‖}{σ^{2}})$ (13)

(3) The filtered power spectrum is denoted by $Ω = {P_{G} (i, j) | 1 \leq i \leq M, 1 \leq j \leq N}$ . The clustering can be performed according to the different values of $Ω$ . The clustering process can be described in more detail as follows:

Initialize the cluster number C according to N.

Select the appropriate clustering algorithm.

After the clustering process, we obtain C clusters, e.g., $Ω_{1}$ , $Ω_{2}$ … $Ω_{C}$ . We denote the elements in cluster $Ω_{1}$ using ${P_{G}}^{k} (i, j)$ and the cluster center value using $P_{i}$ . The upper and lower boundaries of $Ω_{i}$ are ${Ω_{i}}_{m}$ and ${Ω_{i}}_{n}$ , respectively. Given that the energy of the signal concentrates around the instantaneous frequency curves in the TF plane,²⁸ we can simply focus on the clusters with the relatively high center values. We can determine the time and frequency labels for the remaining clusters for each element in $Ω$ .

(4) Ideally, for a time instant $t_{i}$ , the instantaneous rotation frequency should be consistent with the frequency with the maximum value in column $t_{i}$ of the TF matrix. However, with the presence of noise and other sources of interference, the maximum value in column $t_{i}$ may not match the instantaneous rotation frequency. The spectrum centroid algorithm is used to compensate for this deviation. This spectral centroid algorithm²⁹ is given by:

$SC = \frac{\sum_{f_{i} = f_{1}}^{f_{j}} f_{i} P_{G}^{k} (i, j)}{\sum_{f_{i} = f_{1}}^{f_{j}} P_{G}^{k} (i, j)}$ (14)

After filtering and clustering, the matrix that embodies the time and frequency information is as shown in Table 1. The rotation frequency corresponding to $t_{i}$ is $f_{j}$ . In addition, ${P_{G}}^{k} (i, j)$ is the value of the vibration signal that corresponds to time instant $t_{i}$ and frequency $f_{j}$ . To determine the frequency at time instant $t_{i}$ , we must first read through the ${P_{G}}^{k} (i, j)$ values shown in Table 1 in a column-first manner. The spectrum centroid algorithm is then used to rectify the instantaneous frequency $f_{j}$ at time instant $t_{i}$ .

Table 1.

Time-frequency matrix.

	$t_{1}$	…		$t_{i}$
$f_{1}$	${P_{G}}^{1} (1, 1)$	${P_{G}}^{1} (1, 2)$	${P_{G}}^{1} (1, 3)$	…
…	${P_{G}}^{1} (2, 1)$	${P_{G}}^{1} (2, 2)$	${P_{G}}^{1} (2, 3)$	…
	0	${P_{G}}^{1} (3, 2)$	${P_{G}}^{1} (3, 3)$	…
	0	0	${P_{G}}^{1} (4, 3)$	…
	0	0	0	…
	…	…	…
	${P_{G}}^{2} (1, 1)$	${P_{G}}^{2} (1, 2)$	${P_{G}}^{2} (1, 3)$	…
	0	${P_{G}}^{2} (2, 2)$	${P_{G}}^{2} (2, 3)$	…
	0	${P_{G}}^{2} (3, 2)$	${P_{G}}^{2} (3, 3)$	…
	0	0	${P_{G}}^{2} (4, 3)$	…
$f_{j}$	…	…	…	…

After all the instantaneous frequencies have been determined, the least squares method is used to fit the curve of the time instants and their corresponding frequencies. The instantaneous rotation speed can then be calculated using the relationship $n (t) = 60 f (t)$ .

Numerical simulations

Multi-component signal

To validate the proposed method, numerical examples are provided here. Consider a multi-component signal given by:

$x (t) = x_{1} (t) + x_{2} (t) + x_{3} (t) + n (t)$

for which the sampling frequency is 1024 Hz and the time length of the signal is 3 s. The components $x_{1} (t)$ and $x_{2} (t)$ are two quadratic chirps, while the component $x_{3} (t)$ is in the weak frequency-modulated mode. The instantaneous frequency for $x_{1} (t)$ at 0.4 s is 100 Hz. An instantaneous frequency of 200 Hz is achieved at 1.5 s. The instantaneous frequency for $x_{2} (t)$ at 1.5 s is 300 Hz. An instantaneous frequency of 400 Hz is achieved at 0.4 s. In addition, $x_{3} (t)$ is defined as $x_{3} (t) = \sin (2 π (250 t - \sin (2 π (t - 0.5))))$ , and $n (t)$ is a zero mean white noise term. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in this case is 0.3 and is given by

$SNR = 10 \lg \frac{{A_{s}}^{2}}{{A_{n}}^{2}} = 20 \lg \frac{A_{s}}{A_{n}} dB$ (15)

$A_{s}$ and $A_{n}$ are the root mean square values of the signal and the noise, respectively.

Here, we assume that $x_{1} (t)$ is the signal component to be extracted because it simulates the vibration signal generated by reference axis acceleration. The process used to extract this component is described in the following.

Figure 2 depicts the amplitude of a signal that has been corrupted by Gaussian noise. The STFT method is applied to the multi-component signal and the STFT spectrum results are given in Figure 3. As Figure 3 shows, there are three different signals with some additional noise signal frequencies around them.

Figure 2.

Time waveform.

Figure 3.

STFT spectrum of the multi-component signal.

The following explains how the proposed method based on the KFCM algorithm and the spectrum centroid algorithm is used to extract the instantaneous frequency given by the TF matrix from the STFT. First, we perform Gaussian smoothing on the matrix to eliminate noise. Next, the KFCM algorithm is applied to all elements of the processed matrix and clusters all elements into C classes. Then, the different categories that represent the powers of different signal components are extracted through the upper and lower thresholds of the various datasets. These datasets are obtained from the clustering results. Figure 4 shows the results of clustering. Here, three types of data sets are generated through clustering. We then use the simulated component $x_{1} (t)$ as an example and extract the instantaneous frequency. Figure 5 shows the result.

Figure 4.

Spectrum of the multi-component signal obtained after smoothing and clustering filtering.

Figure 5.

Analog rotational speed component extracted from the multi-component signal.

Finally, using the spectral centroid method, the instantaneous centroid is obtained at a specific time point. Figure 6 shows the process of instantaneous frequency extraction of the reference axis signal when using the fusion algorithm. As the figure shows, the result from the fusion method agrees well with the theoretical instantaneous frequency, demonstrating high accuracy.

Figure 6.

Instantaneous frequency of multi-component signal calculated using the proposed method.

For contrast, the dynamic optimization method¹² is also applied to perform the same calculation. As shown in Figure 7, when the dynamic optimization method algorithm is used to estimate the specific instantaneous frequency directly, the results will show some deviation and false instantaneous frequency information appears in some areas, particularly at the beginning and the end of the signal.

Figure 7.

Instantaneous frequency of multi-component signal calculated using the dynamic optimization method.

To quantify the accuracy of this identification of the instantaneous frequency, the root mean square (RMS) error is used as an accuracy index (Index of Accuracy) and is defined as follows:

$ξ = \frac{\sqrt{\sum_{n = 1}^{N} {(f (n) - \hat{f} (n))}^{2}}}{\sqrt{\sum_{n = 1}^{N} f^{2} (n)}}$ (19)

where $\hat{f} (n)$ is the estimated value of the instantaneous frequency $f (n)$ , and N is the number of points contained in the calculation. After the calculations, the RMS error for the dynamic optimization technique was found to be $3.84 %$ , while the RMS error for the novel algorithm was $0.71 %$ . Therefore, the novel algorithm shows a better result for extraction of the instantaneous frequency from the vibration signal in terms of deviation from the actual value and also maintains good estimation accuracy when compared with the dynamic optimization method.

Crossover signal

The proposed method also works well with crossover signals. Consider the following signal:

$y (t) = y_{1} (t) + y_{2} (t) + n (t)$ (20)

The signal is composed of one quadratic chirp component and one sinusoidal frequency component. The instantaneous frequency for $y_{1} (t)$ at 0.4 s is 100 Hz. An instantaneous frequency of 200 Hz is achieved at 1.5 s, thus simulating the vibration signal generated by the reference axis acceleration. In addition, $y_{2} (t)$ is defined as $y_{2} (t) = \sin (2 π (150 t))$ , thus simulating the crossover signal as an interference signal. Similarly, $n (t)$ represents a Gaussian white noise term. The waveform and the corresponding STFT spectrum are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively.

Figure 8.

Crossover signal.

Figure 9.

2D STFT spectrum of the crossover signal.

As shown above, the two frequency components of the signal are cross-aliased.

Similarly, Gaussian smoothing and KFCM clustering were performed on the TF matrix in turn. The results are shown in Figure 10. The different categories that represent the powers of the different signal components were then extracted using the thresholds of the various datasets. Here, we use the simulated component $y_{1} (t)$ as an example to extract the instantaneous frequency. The result is given in Figure 11.

Figure 10.

Spectrum of crossover signal after smoothing and clustering filtering.

Figure 11.

Analog rotational speed component extracted from the crossover signal.

As shown in Figure 12 and Figure 13, more false frequency values are estimated when using the dynamic optimization method. Additionally, when compared with the proposed method, the dynamic optimization method will also yield lower accuracy.

Figure 12.

Instantaneous frequency of crossover signal calculated using the dynamic optimization method.

Figure 13.

Instantaneous frequency of crossover signal calculated using the proposed method.

For the cross-signal, the RMS error of the dynamic optimization method was $1.34 %$ , while the RMS error for the novel algorithm was $0.69 %$ .

Based on the simulation results, the accuracy of instantaneous frequency estimation for the different signals is shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Index of Accuracy of instantaneous frequency identification of different signals using different methods.

	Dynamic optimization method	Proposed method
Multi-component signal	3.84%	0.71%
Crossover signal	1.34%	0.69%

When compared with the dynamic optimization method, the proposed method has greater precision, and the instantaneous frequency estimation results are better than those obtained using the traditional method.

Experimental validation

Experiments were performed on a rotor test bench to verify the correctness and the efficiency of the proposed algorithm. During the experiments, the rotational acceleration was constant. The vibration signals were acquired using an Integrated Electronics Piezo-Electric accelerometer. The experimental installation of this accelerometer is shown in Figure 14. We installed the accelerometer in the horizontal direction on the test bench to obtain the vibration acceleration signal. The sensitivity of this sensor is 100 mV/g.

Figure 14.

Acceleration sensor installation.

The rotational speed of the rotor is acquired from a torque and rotation speed meter with a reference pulse. The resolution of this meter is 1024 pulses per round. The device is mounted on the output shaft to measure the actual rotation speed, as shown in Figure 15.

Figure 15.

Rotation speed sensor.

Because the vibration signals do not remain stable over time and are thus vulnerable to modulation, the signal is pre-processed to alleviate noise interference, as shown in Figure 16. The STFT is then used to obtain the TF curve, which is shown in Figure 17. The rotation speed curve (the yellow curve) over time is indicated in figure. The other curves are caused by the internal mechanical structures. The actual rotation speed curve and the estimated rotation speed curve acquired using the KFCM and the spectrum centroid algorithm are shown in Figure 18.

Figure 16.

Vibration signal of motor acceleration.

Figure 17.

STFT spectrum of the vibration signal.

Figure 18.

Comparison of estimated speed with measured speed.

Figure 18 and Figure 19 show that these two curves are well matched and the deviation between the two curves is approximately 1.55%, which verifies the remarkable performance of our proposed algorithm.

Figure 19.

Partial magnification of the curves from Figure 18.

Conclusion

A new method to estimate rotation speed from an extracted instantaneous frequency has been proposed in this paper. The method combines KFCM clustering with the spectrum centroid algorithm. To mitigate noise effects, the KFCM clustering process is introduced to cluster the different instantaneous frequencies from the TF matrix based on the fact that the signal energy concentrates around the instantaneous frequency curves in the TF plane. To correct the required frequency, the spectrum centroid algorithm is implemented to perform instantaneous frequency extraction. Numerical examples demonstrate that the proposed method can identify the instantaneous frequencies of time-varying signals effectively with high accuracy when compared with other existing methods. An experimental analysis on a test bench indicated that, as an additional benefit of the proposed method, we can also determine the complex rotation speed with high precision. In future work, we intend to apply image processing methods to instantaneous frequency extraction to process signal components that have the same energy.

Footnotes

Handling Editor: Hui Ma

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research,authorship,and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research,authorship,and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61701162.

ORCID iD

MAO Hong-min

References

Combet

Zimroz

. A new method for the estimation of the instantaneous speed relative fluctuation in a vibration signal based on the short time scale transform. Mech Syst Signal Pr 2009; 23: 1382–1397.

Yang

, et al. Vibration signal analysis using parameterized time–frequency method for features extraction of varying-speed rotary machinery. J Sound Vib 2015; 335: 350–366.

Adams

. Rotating machinery vibration: from analysis to troubleshooting. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2009.

Cabal-Yepez

, et al. Reconfigurable monitoring system for time-frequency analysis on industrial equipment through STFT and DWT. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 2013; 9: 760–771.

Průša

Balazs

Søndergaard

. A noniterative method for reconstruction of phase from STFT magnitude. IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Language Process 2017; 25: 1154–1164.

Lin

Chu

. HHT-based AE characteristics of natural fatigue cracks in rotating shafts. Mech Syst Signal Pr 2012; 26: 181–189.

Baccigalupi

Liccardo

. The Huang Hilbert transform for evaluating the instantaneous frequency evolution of transient signals in non-linear systems. Measurement 2016; 86: 1–13.

Padovese

. Hybrid time–frequency methods for non-stationary mechanical signal analysis. Mech Syst Signal Pr 2004; 18: 1047–1064.

Komorowski

Pietraszek

. The use of continuous wavelet transform based on the fast Fourier transform in the analysis of multi-channel electrogastrography recordings. J Med Syst 2016; 40: 10.

10.

, et al. Instantaneous frequency estimation for nonlinear FM signal based on modified polynomial chirplet transform. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 2017; 66: 2898–2908.

11.

Taebi

Mansy

. Analysis of seismocardiographic signals using polynomial chirplet transform and smoothed pseudo Wigner-Ville distribution. In: 2017 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB), Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2017. New York: IEEE.

12.

Wang

Ren

Wang

, et al. Instantaneous frequency identification of time-varying structures by continuous wavelet transform [J]. Eng Struct 2013; 52: 17–25.

13.

Zheng

, et al. An improved algorithm for peak detection in mass spectra based on continuous wavelet transform. Int J Mass Spectrom 2016; 409: 53–58.

14.

Liu

, et al. An improved method based on a new wavelet transform for overlapped peak detection on spectrum obtained by portable Raman system. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 2018; 182: 1–8.

15.

Meignen

Pham

D-H

McLaughlin

. On demodulation, ridge detection, and synchrosqueezing for multicomponent signals. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2017; 65: 2093–2103.

16.

Shui

P-L

Bao

H-T

. Nonparametric detection of FM signals using time-frequency ridge energy. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2008; 56: 1749–1760.

17.

. Synchroextracting transform. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2017; 64: 8042–8054.

18.

, et al. A combined polynomial chirplet transform and synchroextracting technique for analyzing nonstationary signals of rotating machinery. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 2019; 69: 1505–1518.

19.

Oberlin

Meignen

Perrier

. Second-order synchrosqueezing transform or invertible reassignment? Towards ideal time-frequency representations. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2015; 63: 1335–1344.

20.

Behera

Meignen

Oberlin

. Theoretical analysis of the second-order synchrosqueezing transform. Appl Comput Harmon A 2018; 45: 379–404.

21.

Wang

Zhao

. Multisynchrosqueezing transform. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2018; 66: 5441–5455.

22.

Shui

P-L

Bao

H-T

. Nonparametric detection of FM signals using time-frequency ridge energy. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2008; 56: 1749–1760.

23.

Zhang

D-Q

Chen

S-C

. Clustering incomplete data using kernel-based fuzzy c-means algorithm. Neural Process Lett 2003; 18: 155–162.

24.

Bezdek

. Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.

25.

Yang

M-S

Tsai

H-S

. A Gaussian kernel-based fuzzy c-means algorithm with a spatial bias correction. Pattern Recognit Lett 2008; 29: 1713–1725.

26.

, et al. Large scale kernel learning using block coordinate descent. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1602.05310 (2016).

27.

Chen

Zhang

. Robust image segmentation using FCM with spatial constraints based on new kernel-induced distance measure. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B (Cybern) 2004; 34: 1907–1916.

28.

Meignen

Oberlin

H-T

. Time-frequency reassignment and synchrosqueezing. IEEE Signal Process Mag 2013; 30.6: 32–41.

29.

Carmona

Hwang

Torrésani

. Multiridge detection and time-frequency reconstruction. IEEE Trans Signal Process 1999; 47: 480–492.

A combined kernel-based fuzzy C-means clustering and spectral centroid for instantaneous frequency estimation

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Instantaneous frequency estimation using kernel-based fuzzy C-means (KFCM) and frequency centroid algorithm

KFCM clustering

Estimation of instantaneous frequency

Numerical simulations

Multi-component signal

Crossover signal

Experimental validation

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References