Few concepts are more noted in the leadership effects research than vision. It is a cardinal element in the school improvement equation as well. Yet, it remains one of the least well-specified components of that algorithm. Based on a comprehensive review of the research on effective leadership and school improvement from 1995 to 2012, we bring ‘concreteness’ to our understanding of vision. We identify its three essential dimensions. More importantly, we provide tangible scaffolding for each of these dimensions, scaffolding that should sharpen research in this area and guide the work of those who desire to bring this ethereal concept to life in schools.
AdamsC (2010) Social determinants of student trust in high poverty elementary schools. In: HoyWKDiPaolaM (eds) Analyzing School Contexts: Influences of Principals and Teachers in the Service of Students. Charlotte, NC: Information Age, pp. 255–280.
2.
AncessJ (2000) The reciprocal influence of teacher learning, teaching practice, school restructuring, and student learning outcomes. The Teachers College Record102(3): 590–619.
3.
AncessJ (2003) Beating the Odds: High Schools as Communities of Commitment. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
4.
AndersonSMooreSSunJ (2009) Positioning the principals in patterns of school leadership distribution. In: LeithwoodKMascallBStraussT (eds) Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. London: Routledge, pp. 111–136.
5.
AuerbachS (2007) Visioning parent engagement in urban schools. Journal of School Leadership17(6): 699–734.
6.
AuerbachS (2009) Walking the walk: Portraits in leadership for family engagement in urban schools. School Community Journal19(1): 9–32.
7.
AustinG (1978) Process evaluation: A comprehensive study of outliers. February. Baltimore, MD: Maryland State Department of Education and Center for Research and Development, University of Maryland.
8.
BarkerB (2001) Do leaders matter?Educational Review53(1): 65–76.
9.
BarnesCACamburnESandersBR (2010) Developing instructional leaders: Using mixed methods to explore the black box of planned change in principals’ professional practice. Educational Administration Quarterly46(2): 241–279.
10.
BarnettKMcCormickJ (2004) Leadership and individual principal–teacher relationships in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly40(3): 406–434.
11.
BarnettKMcCormickJConnersR (2001) Transformational leadership in schools: Panacea, placebo, or problem?Journal of Educational Administration39(1): 24–46.
12.
BattistichVSolomonDWatsonM (1997) Caring school communities. Educational Psychologist32(3): 137–151.
13.
BeckLMurphyJ (1996) The four imperatives of a successful school. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
14.
BerendsMBodillySKirbyS (2003) New American schools: District and school leadership for whole-school reform. In: MurphyJDatnowA (eds) Leadership Lessons from Comprehensive School Reforms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, pp. 109–131.
15.
BlairM (2002) Effective school leadership: The multi-ethnic context. British Journal of Sociology of Education23(2)179–191.
16.
BlancSChristmanJBLiuR (2010) Learning to learn from data: Benchmarks and instructional communities. Peabody Journal of Education85(2): 205–225.
17.
BlaseJBlaseJ (2004) Handbook of Instructional Leadership: How Really Good Principals Promote Teaching and Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
18.
BlaseJKirbyP (2009) Bringing Out the Best in Teachers: What Effective Principals Do. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
19.
BormanGD (2005) National efforts to bring reform to scale in high-poverty schools: Outcomes and implications. Review of Research in Education29(1): 1–27.
20.
BossertSDwyerDRowanB (1982) The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly18(3): 34–64.
21.
BrewerDJ (1993) Principals and student outcomes: Evidence from US high schools. Economics of Education Review12(4): 281–292.
22.
BrookoverWBLezotteLW (1977) Changes in School Characteristics Coincident with Changes in Student Achievement. East Lansing, MI: College of Urban Development, Michigan State University.
23.
BrookoverWBSchweitzerJJSchneiderJM (1978) Elementary school social climate and school achievement. American Educational Research Journal15(2): 301–318.
24.
BrookoverWBeadyCFloodP (1979) School Social Systems and Student Achievement: Schools Can Make a Difference. New York, NY: Praeger.
25.
BrooksJSScribnerJPEferakorhoJ (2004) Teacher leadership in the context of whole school reform. Journal of School Leadership14(3): 242–265.
26.
BruggencateGLuytenHScheerensJ (2012) Modeling the influence of school leaders on student achievement: How can school leaders make a difference?Educational Administration Quarterly48(4): 699–732.
27.
BrykASLeeVHollandPB (1993) Catholic Schools and the Common Good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
BrykASSebringPBAllensworthE (2010) Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
BrymanA (2004) Qualitative research on leadership: A critical but appreciative review. The Leadership Quarterly15(6): 729–769.
30.
CaldwellBJ (1998) Strategic leadership, resource management and effective school reform. Journal of Educational Administration36(5): 445–461.
31.
ChristleCAJolivetteKNelsonCM (2005) Breaking the school to prison pipeline: Identifying school risk and protective factors for youth delinquency. Exceptionality13(2): 69–88.
32.
ClarkDLLottoLSMcCarthyMM (1980) Why Do Some Urban Schools Succeed. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
33.
CohenMDMarchJGOlsenJP (1972) A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly17(1): 1–26.
34.
ColdrenAFSpillaneJP (2007) Making connections to teaching practice: The role of boundary practices in instructional leadership. Educational Policy21(2): 369–396.
35.
CollinsJValentineJ (2010) Testing the impact of student engagement on standardized achievement: An empirical study of the influence of classroom engagement on test scores across school types. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the University Council for Education Administration, New Orleans, LA, USA. Available at the ERIC database.
36.
CooperR (1996) Detracking reform in an urban California high school: Improving the schooling experiences of African American students. Journal of Negro Education65(2): 190–208.
37.
CottonK (2000) The Schooling Practices That Matter Most. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
38.
CottonK (2003) Principals and Student Achievement: What the Research Says. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
39.
CreemersBPMReezigtGJ (1996) School level conditions affecting the effectiveness of instruction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement7(3): 197–228.
40.
CrumKSShermanWH (2008) Facilitating high achievement: High school principals’ reflections on their successful leadership practices. Journal of Educational Administration46(5): 562–580.
41.
DatnowACastellanoME (2001) Managing and guiding school reform: Leadership in success for all schools. Educational Administration Quarterly37(2): 219–249.
42.
DatnowACastellanoME (2003) Success for all: District and school leadership. In: MurphyJDatnowA (eds) Leadership Lessons from Comprehensive School Reforms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, pp. 187–208.
43.
DatnowAParkVKennedyB (2008) Acting on Data: How Urban High Schools Use Data to Improve Instruction. Los Angeles, CA: Center on Educational Governance.
44.
DayC (2005) Sustaining success in challenging contexts: Leadership in English schools. Journal of Educational Administration43(6): 573–583.
45.
DayCHarrisAHadfieldM (2000) Leading Schools in Times of Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
46.
DedeCHonanaJ (2005) Scaling up success: A synthesis of themes and insights. In: DedeDCHonaJPPetersLC (eds) Scaling Up Success: Lessons Learned from Technology-Based Educational Improvement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 227–239.
47.
DesimoneL (2002) How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented?Review of Educational Research72(3): 433–479.
48.
DinhamS (2005) Principal leadership for outstanding educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration43(4): 338–356.
49.
EdmondsR (1979) Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational leadership37(1): 15–24.
50.
EdmondsRFrederiksenJR (1978) Search for Effective Schools: The Identification and Analysis of City Schools That Are Instructionally Effective for Poor Children. Cambridge, MA: Center for Urban Studies, Harvard University.
51.
EilersAMCamachoA (2007) School culture change in the making: Leadership factors that matter. Urban Education42(6): 616–637.
52.
ElletCBLoganC (1990) Analyses of school level learning environment: Organizational coupling, robustness and effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, Boston, MA, USA.
53.
FirestoneWAMartinezMC (2009) Districts, teacher leaders, and distributed leadership: Changing instructional practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools6(1): 3–35.
54.
FirestoneWAWilsonBL (1985) Using bureaucratic and cultural linkages to improve instruction: The principal’s contribution. Educational Administration Quarterly21(2): 7–30.
55.
FosterRSt.HilaireB (2003) Leadership for school improvement: Principals’ and teachers’ perspectives. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning7(3): 1–18.
56.
FullanM (1982) The Meaning of Educational Change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
57.
FullanM (1993) Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform. London: Falmer.
58.
FullanM (2002) Leadership and sustainability. Principal Leadership3(4): 13–17.
59.
FullanMHargreavesA (1996) What’s Worth Fighting for in Your School?New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
60.
GeijselFSleegersPLeithwoodK (2003) Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ commitment and effort toward school reform. Journal of Educational Administration41(3): 228–256.
61.
GerstenRCarnineD (1981) Administrative and Supervisory Support Functions for the Implementation of Effective Educational Programs for Low Income Students. September. Eugene, OR: Center for Educational Policy and Management, University of Oregon.
62.
GoldenbergCN (1996) Schools, children at risk, and successful interventions. In: BoothADunnJ (eds) Family–School Links: How Do They Affect Educational Outcomes?Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 115–124.
63.
GoldenbergCN (2004) Successful School Change: Creating Settings to Improve Teaching and Learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
64.
GoldringEBPasternackR (1994) Principals’ coordinating strategies and school effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement5(3): 239–253.
65.
GoldsteinJ (2004) Making sense of distributed leadership: The case of peer assistance and review. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis26(2): 173–197.
66.
GoodladJI (1984) A Place Called School: Prospects for the Future. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
67.
GrayJHopkinsDReynoldsD (1999) Improving Schools: Performance and Potential. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
68.
GreeneJCLeeJH (2006) Quieting educational reform…with educational reform. American Journal of Evaluation27(3): 337–352.
69.
GronnP (2009) Hybrid leadership. In LeithwoodK.MascallB.StraussT. (eds.), Distributed leadership according to the evidence (pp. 17–39).London: Routledge.
70.
GurrDDrysdaleLMulfordN (2005) Successful principal leadership: Australian case studies. Journal of Educational Administration43(6): 539–551.
71.
GurrDDrysdaleLMulfordB (2006) Models of successful principal leadership. School Leadership and Management26(4): 371–395.
72.
HallinanMT (2001) Sociological perspectives on black–white inequalities in American schooling. Sociology of Education74(0): 50–70.
73.
HallingerP (2013a) Reviewing reviews of research in educational leadership: A proposed conceptual framework and empirical assessment. Unpublished manuscript.
74.
HallingerP (2013b) A proposed conceptual framework for conducting systematic reviews of research in educational leadership. Unpublished manuscript.
75.
HallingerPHeckR (1996) Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly32(1): 5–44.
76.
HallingerPHeckR (1998) Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement9(2): 157–191.
77.
HallingerPMurphyJ (1986) The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94(3), 328 355.
78.
HallingerPMurphyJ (1989) Assessing and developing principal instructional leadership. In BrandtR. (ed) Readings from educational Leadership: effective schools and improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
79.
HallingerPBickmanLDavisK (1996) School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. The Elementary School Journal96(5): 527–549.
80.
HargreavesA (1997) From reform to renewal: A new deal for a new age. In: HargreavesAEvansR (eds) Beyond Educational Reform: Bringing Teachers Back In. Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 105–125.
81.
HargreavesAEarlLRyanJ (1996) Schooling for Change: Reinventing Education for Early Adolescents. London: Falmer.
82.
HargreavesD (1995) School culture, school effectiveness and school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice6(1): 23–46.
83.
HarrisA (2004) Distributed leadership and school improvement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership32(1): 11–24.
84.
HeckRHHallingerP (2010) Leadership: School improvement. In: PetersonPLBakerELMcGawB (eds) International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd edn). Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 135–142.
85.
HellerMFFirestoneWA (1995) Who’s in charge here? Sources of leadership for change in eight schools. The Elementary School Journal96(1): 65–86.
86.
HighRMAchillesCM (1986) Principal influence in instructionally effective schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, San Francisco, CA, USA.
87.
HoyWHannumJTschannen-MoranM (1998) Organizational climate and student achievement: A parsimonious and longitudinal view. Journal of School Leadership8(4): 336–359.
88.
HubermanMParrishTHannanS (2011) Turnaround Schools in California: Who Are They and What Strategies Do They Use?San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
89.
HughesS (2003) An early gap in black–white mathematics achievement: Holding school and home accountable in an affluent city school district. The Urban Review35(4): 297–322.
90.
HulpiaHDevosGRosseelY (2009) Development and validation of scores on the distributed leadership inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement69(6): 1013–1034.
91.
JacksonDS (2000) The school improvement journey: Perspectives on leadership. School Leadership and Management20(1): 61–78.
92.
JohnsonJFJrAseraR (1999) Hope for Urban Education: A Study of Nine High-Performing, High-Poverty, Urban Elementary Schools. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Planning and Evaluation Services.
93.
KochanekJR (2005) Building Trust for Better Schools: Research-Based Practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
94.
KruseSSeashore LouisKBrykA (1995) An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community. In: Seashore LouisKKruseS (eds) Professionalism and Community: Perspectives on Reforming Urban Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, pp. 23–44.
95.
LeithwoodK (2005) Understanding successful principal leadership: Progress on a broken front. Journal of Educational Administration43(6): 619–629.
96.
LeithwoodKJantziD (2000a) Principal and teacher leadership effects: A replication. School Leadership & Management20(4): 415–434.
97.
LeithwoodKJantziD (2000b) The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration38(2): 112–129.
98.
LeithwoodKJantziD (2005) A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools4(3): 177–199.
99.
LeithwoodKMontgomeryDJ (1982) The role of the elementary school principal in program improvement. Review of Educational Research52(3): 309–339.
100.
LeithwoodKJantziDSteinbachR (1999) Changing Leadership for Changing Times. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
101.
LeithwoodKLouisKSAndersonS (2004) Review of Research: How Leadership Influences Student Learning. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, University of Minnesota.
102.
LeithwoodKDayCSammonsP (2006) Successful School Leadership. What It Is and How It Influences Pupil Learning. London: Department of Education and Skills.
103.
LeithwoodKMascallBStraussT (2009) Distributing leadership to make schools smarter. In: LeithwoodKMascallBStraussT (eds) Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. London: Routledge, pp. 1–14.
104.
LeithwoodKPattenSJantziD (2010) Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly46(5): 671–706.
105.
LezotteLHathawayDVMillerSK (1980) School Learning Climate and Student Achievement: A Social System Approach to Increased Student Learning. Tallahassee, FL: The Site Specific Technical Assistance Center, Florida State University Foundation.
106.
LomoteyK (1989) African-American Principals: School Leadership and Success. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
107.
LouisKSCipolleneA (1987) Causal model of the change process. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, Washington, DC, USA.
108.
LouisKSMilesMB (1990) Improving the Urban High School: What Works and Why. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
109.
LouisKSMilesMB (1991) Managing reform: Lessons from urban high schools. School effectiveness and school improvement2(2): 75–96.
110.
LouisKSMarksHMKruseS (1996) Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal33(4): 757–798.
111.
LouisKSDretzkeBWahlstromK (2010) How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement21(3): 315–336.
112.
McDougallDSaundersWMGoldenbergC (2007) Inside the black box of school reform: Explaining the how and why of change at Getting Results schools. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education54(1): 51–89.
113.
McEvoyB (1987) Everyday acts: How principals influence development of their staffs. Educational Leadership44(3): 16–21.
114.
McLaughlinMWTalbertJE (2001) Professional Communities and the Work of High School Teaching. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
115.
MagnusonKADuncanGJ (2006) The role of family socioeconomic resources in the black–white test score gap among young children. Developmental Review26(4): 365–399.
116.
MayHSupovitzJA (2006) Capturing the cumulative effects of school reform: An 11-year study of the impacts of America’s choice on student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis28(3): 231–257.
117.
MayHSupovitzJA (2011) The scope of principal efforts to improve instruction. Educational Administration Quarterly47(2) 332–352.
118.
MayrowetzDWeinsteinCS (1999) Sources of leadership for inclusive education: Creating schools for all children. Educational Administration Quarterly35(3): 423–449.
119.
MeehanMLCowleyKSSchumacherD (2003) Classroom Environment, Instructional Resources, and Teaching Differences in High-Performing Kentucky Schools with Achievement Gaps. Charleston, WV: AEL, Inc.
120.
MeyerJWRowanB (1975) Notes on the structure of educational organizations: Revised version. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, CA, USA.
121.
MilesMB (1987) Practical guidelines for school administrators: How to get there. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, Washington, DC, USA.
122.
MillerLS (1995) An American Imperative: Accelerating Minority Educational Advancement. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
123.
MitchellCCastleJB (2005) The instructional role of elementary school principals. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue Canadienne de l’education28(3): 409–433.
124.
MitchellCSackneyL (2006) Building schools, building people: The school principal’s role in leading a learning community. Journal of School Leadership16(5): 627–640.
125.
MorrisseyMS (2000) Professional Learning Communities: An Ongoing Exploration. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
126.
MulfordBSilinsH (2003) Leadership for organisational learning and improved student outcomes—what do we know. Cambridge Journal of Education33(2): 175–195.
127.
MurphyJ (1988) Equity as student opportunity to learn: Findings and implications. Theory Into Practice27(2): 145–151.
128.
MurphyJ (1990) Principal instructional leadership. In: LottoLSThurstonPW (eds) Advances in Educational Administration: Changing Perspectives on the School (Vol 1, Part B).Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
129.
MurphyJ (1992) School effectiveness and school restructuring: Contributions to educational improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement3(2): 90–109.
130.
MurphyJ (2005) Connecting Teacher Leadership and School Improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
131.
MurphyJ (2010) The Educator’s Handbook for Understanding and Closing Achievement Gaps. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
132.
MurphyJ (2013) The Architecture of School Improvement: Lessons Learned. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
133.
MurphyJMeyersCV (2008) Turning Around Failing Schools: Leadership Lessons from the Organizational Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
134.
MurphyJWeilMHallingerP (1982) Academic press: Translating high expectations into school policies and classroom practices. Educational Leadership40(3): 22–26.
135.
MurphyJHallingerPWeilM (1983) Instructional leadership. A conceptual framework. Planning and Changing14(3): 137–149.
136.
MurphyJWeilMHallingerP (1985) School effectiveness: A conceptual framework. The Educational Forum49(3): 361–374.
137.
MurphyJHallingerPPetersonKD (1987) The administrative control of principals in effective school districts. Journal of Educational Administration25(2): 161–192.
138.
MurphyJYffJShipmanNJ (2000) Implementation of the Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium standards. The International Journal of Leadership in Education3(1): 17–39.
139.
MurphyJBeckLGCrawfordM (2001) The Productive High School: Creating Personalized Academic Communities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
140.
MurphyJElliottSNGoldringE (2007) Leadership for learning: A research-based model and taxonomy of behaviors. School Leadership & Management27(2): 179–201.
141.
MurphyJMeyersCV (2008) Turning Around Failing Schools: Leadership Lessons from the organizational Sciences. Thousand Oaks: CA. Corwin Press.
142.
NewmannFM (1992) Conclusion. In: NewmannFM (ed.) Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Record, pp. 182–217.
143.
NewmannFMSmithBAllensworthE (2001) Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis23(4): 297–321.
144.
NotmanRHenryD (2011) Building and sustaining successful school leadership in New Zealand. Leadership and Policy in Schools10(4): 373–394.
145.
NotmanRHenryALathamD (2009) Successful school principals: Factors that impact on their success. Paper presented at the CCEAM International Conference, Durban, South Africa.
146.
OakesJGuitonG (1995) Matchmaking: The dynamics of high school tracking decisions. American Educational Research Journal32(1): 3–33.
147.
OlivierDHippKK (2006) Leadership capacity and collective efficacy: Interacting to sustain student learning in a professional learning community. Journal of School Leadership16(5): 505–519.
148.
OrrMTBergBShoreR (2008) Putting the pieces together: Leadership for change in low-performing urban schools. Education and Urban Society40(6): 670–693.
149.
PenuelWRRielMJoshiA (2010) The alignment of the informal and formal organizational supports for reform: Implications for improving teaching in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly46(1): 57–95.
150.
PotterDReynoldsDChapmanC (2002) School improvement for schools facing challenging circumstances: A review of research and practice. School Leadership & Management22(3): 243–256.
151.
PurkeySDSmithMS (1983) Effective schools: A review. Elementary School Journal83(4): 427–452.
152.
RaywidM (1995) Professional community and its yield at Metro Academy. In: LouisKSKruseS (eds) Professionalism and Community: Perspectives on Reforming Urban Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin, pp. 43–75.
153.
RiehlCSippleJ (1996) Making the most of time and talent: Secondary school organizational climates, teaching task environments, and teacher commitment. American Educational research Journal33(4): 873–901.
154.
RiesterAFPurschVSkriaL (2002) Principals for social justice: Leaders of school success for children from low-income homes. Journal of School Leadership12(3): 281–304.
155.
RobinsonVMJ (2007) School Leadership and Student Outcomes: Identifying What Works and Why. Sydney, NSW: Australian Council for Educational Leaders.
156.
RobinsonVMJLloydCARoweKJ (2008) The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly44(5): 635–674.
157.
RodgersMSowdenAPetticrewM (2009) Testing methodological guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: Effectiveness of interventions to promote smoke alarm ownership and function. Evaluation15(1): 047–071.
158.
RutherfordWL (1985) School principals as effective leaders. Phi Delta Kappan67(1): 31–34.
159.
RutterMMaughanBMortimoreP (1979) Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary Schools and Their Effects on Children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
160.
ScanlanMLopezF (2012) Vamos! How school leaders promote equity and excellence for bilingual students. Educational Administration Quarterly48(4): 583–625.
161.
ScheerensJ (1997) Conceptual models and theory-embedded principles on effective schooling. School Effectiveness and School Improvement8(3): 269–310.
162.
ScheurichJJ (1998) Highly successful and loving, public elementary schools populated mainly by low-SES children of color. Urban Education33(4): 451–491.
163.
ShannonSGBylsmaP (2002) Addressing the Achievement Gap: A Challenge for Washington State Educators. ED 474 392, November. Olympia, WA: Washington Office of the State Superintendent of Public Instruction.
164.
SilinsHMulfordB (2004) Schools as learning organisations: Effects on teacher leadership and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement3(4): 443–466.
165.
SilinsHMulfordB (2010) Re-conceptualising school principalship that improves student outcomes. Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice25(2), 74–93.
166.
SindelarPShearerDYendol-HoppeyD (2006) The sustainability of inclusive school reform. Exceptional Children72(3): 317–331.
167.
SiuW (2008) Complexity theory and school reform. NASSP Bulletin92(2): 154–164.
168.
SouthworthG (2002) Instructional leadership in schools: Reflections and empirical evidence. School Leadership & Management22(1): 73–91.
169.
SpillaneJPDiamondJBWalkerLJ (2001a) Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching38(8): 918–940.
170.
SpillaneJPHalversonRDiamondJB (2001b) Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher30(3): 23–28.
171.
SteinMKCoburnCE (2008) Architectures for learning: A comparative analysis of two urban school districts. American Journal of Education114(4): 583–626.
172.
StollLBolamRMcMahonA (2006) Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change7(4): 221–258.
173.
StrahanD (2003) Promoting a collaborative professional culture in three elementary schools that have beaten the odds. The Elementary School Journal104(2): 127–146.
174.
SupovitzJAChristmanJB (2003) Developing Communities of Instructional Practice: Lessons from Cincinnati and Philadelphia. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
175.
SupovitzJAKleinV (2003) Mapping a Course for Improved Student Learning: How Innovative Schools Systematically Use Student Performance Data to Guide Improvement. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
176.
SupovitzJAPoglincoSM (2001) Instructional Leadership in a Standards-Based Reform. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
177.
SupovitzJSirinidesPMayH (2010) How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly46(1): 31–56.
178.
SweeneyJ (1982) Research synthesis on effective school leadership. Educational Leadership39(5): 346–352.
179.
TaylorBO (1986) Metasensemaking: How the effective elementary principal accomplishes school improvement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, San Francisco, CA, USA.
180.
TheoharisG (2007) Social justice educational leaders and resistance: Toward a theory of social justice leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly43(2): 221–258.
181.
TimperleyHS (2005) Distributed leadership: Developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies37(4): 395–420.
182.
TimperlyH (2009) Distributed leadership to improve outcomes for students. In: LeithwoodKMascallBStraussT (eds) Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. London: Routledge, pp. 197–222.
183.
ValentineJWPraterM (2011) Instructional, transformational, and managerial leadership and student achievement: High school principals make a difference. NASSP Bulletin95(1): 5–30.
184.
VenezkyRWinfieldL (1979) Schools That Succeed Beyond Expectations in Teaching Reading(Technical Report No. 1). Newark, DE: University of Delaware.
185.
VeronaGSYoungJW (2011) The influence of principal transformational leadership style on high school proficiency test results in New Jersey comprehensive and vocational-technical high schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA, USA. Available at the ERIC database.
186.
VescioVRossDAdamsA (2008) A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education24(1): 80–91.
187.
WalkerJSlearS (2011) The impact of principal leadership behaviors on the efficacy of new and experienced middle school teachers. NASSP Bulletin95(1): 46–64.
188.
WatersTMarzanoRJMcNultyB (2003) Balanced Leadership: What 30 Years of Research Tells Us about the Effect of Leadership on Student Achievement. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
189.
WebbR (2005) Leading teaching and learning in the primary school. Educational Management Administration & Leadership33(1): 69–91.
WilsonBLCorcoranTB (1988) Successful Secondary Schools: Visions of Excellence in American Public Education. New York, NY: Falmer.
192.
WimpelbergRK (1986) Bureaucratic and cultural images in the management of more and less effective schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, San Francisco, CA, USA.
193.
WitziersBBoskerRJKrügerML (2003) Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly39(3): 398–425.
194.
WohlstetterPDatnowAParkV (2008) Creating a system for data-driven decision-making: Applying the principal–agent framework. School Effectiveness and School Improvement19(3): 239–259.
195.
WynneE (1980) Looking at Schools: Good, Bad, and Indifferent. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
196.
YoungsPKingMB (2002) Principal leadership for professional development to build school capacity. Educational Administration Quarterly38(5): 643–670.
197.
YuHLeithwoodKJantziD (2002) The effects of transformational leadership on teachers’ commitment to change in Hong Kong. Journal of Educational Administration40(4): 368–389.
