The study suggests investigating the mediating role of teacher's professional commitment in the relationship between directive leadership and participative leadership to the school outcomes of teachers’ absenteeism and academic emphasis. The data were collected from two sources: senior management team members and teachers to avoid the same source and common method bias. Overall, 426 participants from 71 high schools in the Israeli Arab educational system answered validated questionnaires. The results from the structural equation model indicated that teacher professional commitment mediates the relationship between directive leadership and participative leadership to teachers’ absenteeism and academic emphasis. Teachers’ professional commitment facilitates school principals’ leadership styles, building leadership capacity, and promoting a positive and safe school learning environment. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
AbubakarRAChauhanAKuraKM (2015) Relationship between human resource management practices and employee's turnover intention among registered nurses in Nigerian public hospitals: The mediating role of organisational trust. Sains Humanika5(2): 95–98.
2.
AkramMMalikMISarwarM, et al. (2015) Relationship of teacher competence with professional commitment and job satisfaction at secondary level. The AYER4(2015): 58–70.
3.
AndersonJCGerbingDW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin103(3): 411.
4.
ArarKOplatkaI (2013) Gender debate and teachers’ constructions of masculinity vs. femininity of school principals: The case of Muslim teachers in Israel. School Leadership and Management33(1): 97–112.
5.
BarthABenolielP (2019) School religious-cultural attributes and school principals’ leadership styles in Israel. Religious Education114(4): 470–485.
6.
BassBMBassR (2008) The Bass Handbook of Leadership. Theory, Research and Managerial Applications. New York, NY: Free Press.
7.
BenolielP (2021) A team-based perspective for school improvement: The mediating role of school management teams. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness14(2): 442–470.
8.
BerkovichIBoglerR (2021) Conceptualizing the mediating paths linking effective school leadership to teachers’ organizational commitment. Educational Management Administration and Leadership49(3): 410–429.
9.
BlieseP (2016) Multilevel: Multilevel functions. R package version 2.6.
10.
BoglerR (2005) The power of empowerment: Mediating the relationship between teachers’ participation in decision making and their professional commitment. Journal of School Leadership15(1): 76–98.
11.
BristolTJ (2017) Why teachers and students stay home: A mixed-methods analysis of teacher and student absenteeism across nine schools in Guyana. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development19(4): 134–149.
12.
BrownMAltrichterHShiyanI, et al. (2022) Challenges and opportunities for culturally responsive leadership in schools: Evidence from four European countries. Policy Futures in Education20(5): 580–607.
13.
BrowneMWCudekR (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: BollenKALongJS (eds) Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 136–162.
14.
BuchbinderEBarakatR (2014) Between the empowered self and the social costs: Arab abused women’s perceptions of their relationship with social workers in community health clinics in Israel. Social Work in Health Care53(4): 398–413.
15.
Cohen-AzariaYZamirS (2021) “It’s not hard, only challenging”: Difficulties and coping strategies of Arab students at a Jewish college in Israel. SN Social Sciences1(5): 108.
16.
CohenS (2011) Teachers’ Responsiveness to Change: Factors Affecting Teachers Reform Join “New Horizon” in Israel. The Hebrew University Jerusalem [In Hebrew].
17.
CortinaKSArelSSmith-DardenJP (2017) School belonging in different cultures: The effects of individualism and power distance. Frontiers in Education2: 56.
18.
CruzMGHenningsenDDSmithBA (1999) The impact of directive leadership on group information sampling, decisions, and perceptions of the leader. Communication Research26(3): 349–369.
ĐorđevićB (2016) Impact of national culture on international human resource management. Economic Themes54(2): 281–300.
21.
EisenhardtKMTabriziBN (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly40: 84–110.
22.
EuwemaMCWendtHVan EmmerikH (2007) Leadership styles and group organizational citizenship behavior across cultures. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior28(8): 1035–1057.
23.
Fearn-BanksK (2016) Crisis Communications: A Casebook Approach. New York: Routledge.
24.
FirestoneWAPennellJR (1993) Teacher commitment, working conditions, and differential incentive policies. Review of Educational Research63(4): 489–525.
25.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
26.
GoddardRGoddardYSook KimE, et al. (2015) A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education121(4): 501–530.
27.
Hadad Haj-YahyaNSaifAKasirN, et al (2021) Education in the Arab Society: Disparities and signs of change. In: A master plan for promoting employment in Arab society Policy Research (Vol. 159). Israel: Democracy Institute, The Portland Trust [in Hebrew].
28.
HairJFAndersonRETathamRL, et al. (1998) Multivariate Date Analysis. NJ: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
29.
HallingerP (2018) Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration and Leadership46(1): 5–24.
30.
HallingerPTruongDT (2014) Exploring the contours of context and leadership effectiveness in Vietnam. Leading and Managing20(2): 43–59.
31.
HarrisonDAJohnsGMartocchioJJ (2000) Changes in technology, teamwork, and diversity: New directions for a new century of absenteeism research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management18: 43–92.
32.
HayesAF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
33.
HofstedeGHofstedeGJMinkovM (2010) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
34.
HouseRJDorfmanPWJavidanM, et al. (2013) Strategic Leadership across Cultures: GLOBE study of CEO Leadership Behavior and Effectiveness in 24 Countries. Sage Publications.
35.
HoyWKMiskelCG (2013) Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. 9th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
36.
HoyWKTarterCJHoyAW (2006) Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement. American Educational Research Journal43(3): 425–446.
37.
HoyWKTarterCJKottkampRB (1991) Open Schools, Healthy Schools: Measuring Organizational Climate. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38.
JamesLRDemareeRGWolfG (1993) rWG: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology78(2): 306.
39.
JamesLRMulaikSABrettJM (2006) A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods9(2): 233–244.
40.
JehnKAChadwickCThatcherSM (1997) To agree or not to agree: The effects of value congruence, individual demographic dissimilarity, and conflict on workgroup outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management8(4): 287–305.
41.
JöreskogKSörbomD (1996) LISREL VI: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood and Least Square Methods. Mooresville, IN: Scientific International.
42.
KhanINawazAQureshiQA, et al. (2016) The impacts of burnout, absenteeism and commitment on intention to leave. Journal of Education and Practice7(1): 5–9.
43.
KoopmanPLWierdsmaAFM (1998) Participative management. In: DoentuPJDThierryHde-WolfCJ (eds) Personnel Psychology: Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology (2nd ed., Vol. III). Hove, UK: Psychology Press, 297–324.
44.
LavieAElranMHiluN, et al. (2016) Arab-Palestinian Society in the State of Israel: A Time for Strategic Change in the Processes of Integration and Equality. Tel Aviv, Israel: Institute for National Security Studies, Shalom Tami Steinmetz Center for Peace Studies, Tel Aviv University.
45.
LeBretonJMSenterJL (2008) Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods11(4): 815–852.
46.
LeithwoodKSunJSchumackerR (2020) How school leadership influences student learning: A test of “the four paths model”. Educational Administration Quarterly56(4): 570–599.
47.
LiuSHallingerP (2018) Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model. Educational Administration Quarterly54(4): 501–528.
48.
LodahlTMKejnarM (1965) The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology49(1): 24.
49.
LordRMaherK (1991) Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perceptions and Processes. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
50.
MacKinnonDPLockwoodCMHoffmanJM, et al. (2002) A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods7(1): 83.
51.
McDonoughEFIIIBarczakG (1991) Speeding up new product development: The effects of leadership style and source of technology. Journal of Product Innovation Management8(3): 203–211.
52.
MuthénBAsparouhovT (2013) BSEM Measurement invariance analysis. Mplus Web Notes17(17): 1–48.
53.
NassirMBenolielP (2022) Principal-teacher gender (dis)similarity as a moderator in the relationship between paternalistic leadership and organisational citizenship behaviour in the Arab minority in Israel. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. DOI: 101177/17411432221127655.
54.
Nassir M and Benoliel P (2023a) The differences in the implications of participative decision-making and paternalistic leadership for teachers' perceived stress in the education system of the Israeli Arab minority. Journal of Educational Administration 61(6): 623–645.
55.
Nassir M and Benoliel P (2023b) Promoting school effectiveness: Examining the mediating role of teachers' organizational commitment and the moderating role of a school cultural sector. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 17411432231167715. DOI: 101177/17411432231167715.
56.
NassirMBenolielP (2024) Participative decision-making in the Arab educational system in Israel: The implications for teachers’ organizational commitment and school violence. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 17411432241273748.
57.
OffermannLRKennedy JrJKWirtzPW (1994) Implicit leadership theories: Content, structure, and generalizability. The Leadership Quarterly5(1): 43–58.
58.
OplatkaIArarK (2016) The field of educational administration as an arena of knowledge production: Some implications for Turkish field members. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership1(2): 161–168.
59.
OrMHBerkovichI (2023) Participative decision making in schools in individualist and collectivist cultures: The micro-politics behind distributed leadership. Educational Management Administration and Leadership51(3): 533–553.
60.
ParkJHCoocNLeeKH (2023) Relationships between teacher influence in managerial and instruction-related decision-making, job satisfaction, and professional commitment: A multivariate multilevel model. Educational Management Administration and Leadership51(1): 116–137.
61.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods40(3): 879–891.
62.
ReichelN (2008) The Story of the Israeli Education System: Between Centralization and Decentralization, between Overt and Covert, between Imitation and Uniqueness. Tel Aviv: Mofet Institute, and Jerusalem: Magnes, The Hebrew University (In Hebrew).
63.
RousseauDM (1985) Issues of level in organizational research: Multilevel and cross level perspectives. In: Cummings LL and Staw BM (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 7).JAI Press, 1–37.
64.
SagieA (1997) Leader direction and employee participation in decision making: Contradictory or compatible practices?Applied Psychology: An International Review46: 387–452.
65.
SagieAZaidmanNAmichai-HamburgerY, et al. (2002) An empirical assessment of the loose–tight leadership model: Quantitative and qualitative analyses. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior23(3): 303–320.
Seashore LouisKLeeM (2016) Teachers’ capacity for organizational learning: The effects of school culture and context. School Effectiveness and School Improvement27(4): 534–556.
68.
ShakedH (2022) Israeli principals’ considerations regarding the actions they take to prevent student absenteeism. Leadership and Policy in Schools21(4): 891–900.
69.
ShakedH (2023) Perceptions of Israeli school principals regarding the knowledge needed for instructional leadership. Educational Management Administration and Leadership51(3): 655–672.
70.
ShakedH (2024) How principals’ instructional leadership impacts schools’ middle leadership. Educational Management Administration and Leadership17411432241238888. DOI: 101177/17411432241238888.
71.
Shapira-LishchinskyOIshanG (2013) Teachers’ acceptance of absenteeism: Towards developing a specific scale. Journal of Educational Administration51(5): 594–617.
72.
Shapira-LishchinskyORaftar-OzeryT (2018) Leadership, absenteeism acceptance, and ethical climate as predictors of teachers’ absence and citizenship behaviors. Educational Management Administration and Leadership46(3): 491–510.
73.
SiddiqueMSiddiqueAKhanEA (2023) Academic optimism and teachers’ commitment: An associational study of Pakistani teachers. Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences Review (JERSSR)3(1): 178–188.
74.
SomechA (2002) Explicating the complexity of participative management: An investigation of multiple dimensions. Educational Administration Quarterly38(3): 341–371.
75.
SomechA (2005) Directive versus participative leadership: Two complementary approaches to managing school effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly41(5): 777–800.
76.
SomechABoglerR (2002) Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and professional commitment. Educational Administration Quarterly38(4): 555–577.
77.
SomechADrach-ZahavyA (2013) Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: The role of team composition and climate for innovation. Journal of Management39(3): 684–708.
78.
SoubaWWSoubaMH (2018) Challenging your implicit leadership theory. Journal of Leadership Education17(4): 195–207.
79.
SukmaswatiILianBWardiahD (2020) The influence of principal’s leadership and teacher’s performance on student’ achievement. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT)20(1): 247–254.
80.
TuytensMMoolenaarNDalyA, et al. (2019) Teachers’ informal feedback seeking towards the school leadership team. A social network analysis in secondary schools. Research Papers in Education34(4): 405–424.
81.
VelardeJM (2023) Leading in Multicultural Schools: Cultural Intelligence and Leadership Styles for Better Organisations. Taylor & Francis.
82.
WangR (2024) Are teachers absent more? Examining differences in absence between K-12 teachers and other college-educated workers. Educational Review: 1–20.
83.
Wen-YanCHui-LingWP (2019) The effect of principal leadership on teacher leadership for learning: How trust and academic emphasis moderate?Journal of Research in Education Sciences64(1): 119.
84.
WheelwrightSCClarkKB (1992) Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality. New York: Simon and Schuster, Free Press.
85.
XieCMaY (2019) The mediating role of cultural capital in the relationship between socioeconomic status and student achievement in 14 economies. British Educational Research Journal45(4): 838–855.
86.
ZeigerA. (2018). Leadership in crisis: the relationship between directive and participative leadership styles, individualism, perceived charisma and leadership preference. Doctoral dissertation, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.
