This study examines links between principals’ instructional leadership and secondary teachers’ intentions to leave in Chile, Argentina (ACBA), Colombia, and Mexico using TALIS 2018. Applying single-level structural equation models, we find instructional leadership consistently associates with lower exit intentions. Mediation analyses, however, reveal mixed patterns: job satisfaction transmits much of the relationship in several settings, whereas teacher collaboration and self-efficacy show weaker or context-dependent pathways. Taken together, the results underscore that instructional leadership supports retention, but its effects operate through multiple mechanisms across Latin-American systems, requiring tailored implementation and design.
AdelmanMLemosR (2021) Managing for Learning: Measuring and Strengthening Education Management in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
2.
AinleyJCarstensR (2018) Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) 2018 conceptual framework. OECD Education Working Papers187: 1–108.
3.
AjayiSOOlatunjiOA (2019) Turnover causation amongst high school teachers in Nigeria. Africa Education Review16(2): 1–15.
BergkvistLRossiterJR (2007) The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research44(2): 175–184.
6.
BillingsleyBBettiniEMathewsHM, et al. (2020) Improving working conditions to support special Educators’ effectiveness: A call for leadership. Teacher Education and Special Education43(1): 7–27.
7.
BollenKA (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
8.
BrownTA (2006) Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
9.
CaiYTangR (2021) School support for teacher innovation: Mediating effects of teacher self-efficacy and moderating effects of trust. Thinking Skills and Creativity41: 100854.
10.
CaroDHSchulzW (2012) Ten hypotheses about tolerance toward minorities among Latin American adolescents. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education11(3): 213–234.
11.
ChesnutSRBurleyH (2015) Self-efficacy as a predictor of commitment to the teaching profession: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review15: 1–16.
12.
CravensXDrakeT (2017) From Shanghai to Tennessee: Developing instructional leadership through teacher peer excellence groups. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies6(4): 348–364.
13.
DanielJ (2014) Sampling Essentials: Practical Guidelines for Making Sampling Choices. Los Angeles, LA: Sage publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452272047.
14.
Díaz SaccoALópez GonzálezDSalas AguayoM, et al. (2021) Movilidad de profesores chilenos. Influencia de variables demográficas, características del establecimiento escolar y condiciones laborales. Perfiles Educativos43(172): 42–59.
15.
Díaz SaccoAPobleteGZ (2023) A study of motivations for leaving the teaching profession in Chile. Educação & Sociedade44: 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1590/ES.259709.
16.
ErdemliÖ (2015) Teachers’ withdrawal behaviors and their relationship with work ethic. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research15(60): 201–220.
17.
FarahmandpourZVoelkelR (2025) Teacher turnover factors and school-level influences: A meta-analysis of the literature. Education Sciences15(2): 219.
FlessaJBramwellDFernandezM, et al. (2018) School leadership in Latin America 2000–2016. Educational Management Administration & Leadership46(2): 182–206.
20.
FlessaJWeinsteinJ (2018) School leadership in Latin America: New research from an emerging field of study. Educational Management Administration & Leadership46(2): 179–181.
21.
FordTGOlsenJKhojastehJ, et al. (2019) The effects of leader support for teacher psychological needs on teacher burnout, commitment, and intent to leave. Journal of Educational Administration57(6): 615–634.
22.
GardnerDGCummingsLLDunhamRBPierceJL (1998) Single-Item Versus Multiple-Item Measurement Scales: An Empirical Comparison. Educational and Psychological Measurement58(6): 898–915. 10.1177/0013164498058006003.
23.
GoddardYLGoddardRDTschannen-MoranM (2007) A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record109(4): 877–896.
24.
Gonzalez-EscobarMSilva-PeñaIPrecht GandarillasA, et al. (2020) Teacher turnover in Latin America: A literature review. Cadernos de Pesquisa50(176): 592–604.
25.
GrissomJABartanenB (2019) Strategic retention: Principal effectiveness and teacher turnover in multiple-measure teacher evaluation systems. American Educational Research Journal56(2): 514–555.
26.
HallingerP (2015) The evolution of instructional leadership. In: Assessing Instructional Leadership with the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale, pp. 1–23. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15533-3_1.
27.
HallingerPGümüşSBellibaşMŞ (2020) Are principals instructional leaders yet?'A science map of the knowledge base on instructional leadership, 1940–2018. Scientometrics122(3): 1629–1650.
28.
HallingerPMurphyJ (1985) Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal86(2): 217–247.
29.
HancockCBScherffL (2010) Who will stay and who will leave? Predicting secondary English teacher attrition risk. Journal of Teacher Education61(4): 328–338.
30.
HargreavesAO’ConnorVL (2019) Collaborative Professionalism: When Teaching Together Means Learning for All. London: Sage.
31.
HarrisonMGKingRBWangH (2023) Satisfied teachers are good teachers: The association between teacher job satisfaction and instructional quality. British Educational Research Journal49(3): 476–498.
HinkinTR (1995) A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management21(5): 967–988.
34.
HolguínEC (2019) Vocación frustrada: aproximaciones a la deserción docente en México. Convergencias. Revista de educación2(3): 73–94.
35.
HooperDCoughlanJMullenMR (2008) Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods6(1): 53–60.
36.
Iveth Salazar-LópezTPeñalozaG (2023) Professional development of science teachers in Latin America: A systematic review. International Journal of Science Education46(10): 961–977.
37.
JerrimJ (2025) The link between school leadership, staff job satisfaction and retention. Longitudinal evidence from England. British Educational Research Journal51: 1582–1603. 10.1002/berj.4134.
38.
KlassenRMAldhafriSMansfieldCF, et al. (2012) Teachers engagement at work: An international validation study. Journal of Experimental Education80(4): 317–337.
39.
KlassenRMChiuMM (2010) Effects on Teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology102(3): 741–756.
40.
KlineRB (2016) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
41.
LazcanoCGuerreroPVolanteP (2022) Influence of instructional leadership on teacher retention. International Journal of Leadership in Education: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2022.2066187.
42.
LiuYBellibaşMŞGümüşS (2021) The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration and Leadership49(3): 430–453.
43.
MaderoC (2019) Secondary teacher’s dissatisfaction with the teaching profession in Latin America: The case of Brazil, Chile, and Mexico. Teachers and Teaching25(3): 358–378.
44.
MareadyBChengQBunchD (2021) Exploring mentoring practices contributing to new teacher retention: An analysis of the beginning teacher longitudinal study. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring19(2): 88–99.
45.
Martinez-GarciaCSlateJR (2009) Teacher turnover : A conceptual analysis. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation4(1): 1–11.
46.
McCarthyCJLambertRGCroweEW, et al. (2010) Coping, stress, and job satisfaction as predictors of advanced placement statistics teachers’ intention to leave the field. NASSP Bulletin94(4): 306–326.
47.
MillerJMYoungsPPerroneF, et al. (2020) Using measures of fit to predict beginning teacher retention. Elementary School Journal120(3): 399–421.
48.
MuijsDReynoldsD (2002) Teachers’ beliefs and behaviors: What really matters?The Journal of Classroom Interaction37(2): 3–15. https://about.jstor.org/terms.
49.
MuthénBO (2002) Beyond SEM: General latent Variable modeling. Behaviormetrika29(1): 81–117.
50.
OECD (2019) TALIS 2018 Results (Volume II): Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners: Vol. II. Paris: OECD Publishing.
51.
OECD (2021) Education at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
52.
OpdenakkerMCVan DammeJ (2006) Teacher characteristics and teaching styles as effectiveness enhancing factors of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education22(1): 1–21.
53.
ÖzdemirNGümüşSKılınçAÇ, et al. (2022) A systematic review of research on the relationship between school leadership and student achievement: An updated framework and future direction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership52(5): 1020–1046. Original work published 2024.
54.
ÖzdemirNKılınçAÇPolatcanM, et al. (2023) Exploring Teachers’ instructional practice profiles: Do distributed leadership and teacher collaboration make a difference?Educational Administration Quarterly59(2): 255–305.
55.
PhillipsDStewart-FoxTPhillipsS, et al. (2023) Distributed leadership in education: A systematic review of its role in fostering innovative practices and enhancing school performance. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)12(11): 2083–2089.
56.
QadachMSchechterCDa’asR (2019) Instructional leadership and teacher’s intent to leave: The mediating role of collective teacher efficacy and shared vision. Educational Management Administration and Leadership48(4): 617–634.
57.
RamanAThannimalaiRJalapangIA (2022) An empirical study on instructional leadership, school climate and teacher efficacy. Journal of Pedagogy and Education Science1(02): 47–62.
58.
ReevesPMPunWHChungKS (2017) Influence of teacher collaboration on job satisfaction and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education67: 227–236.
59.
RonfeldtMLoebSWyckoffJ (2013) How teacher turnover Harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal50(1): 4–36.
60.
RossiterJR (2002) The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing: A comment. International Journal of Research in Marketing22(1): 305–335.
61.
Schermelleh-EngelKMoosbruggerHMüllerH (2003) Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. MPR-Online8(2): 23–74.
SchunkDHMeeceJL (2006) Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (F. Pajares).
64.
ShahzadKNaureenS (2017) Impact of teacher self-efficacy on secondary school students’ academic achievement. Journal of Education and Educational Development4(1): 48.
65.
SkaalvikC (2020) Self-efficacy for instructional leadership: Relations with perceived job demands and job resources, emotional exhaustion, job satisfaction, and motivation to quit. Social Psychology of Education23: 1343–1366.
66.
SkaalvikEMSkaalvikS (2014) Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports114(1): 68–77.
67.
TabachnickBGFidellLS (2013) Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.
68.
TallmanTO (2019) How middle grades teachers experience a collaborative culture: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. RMLE Online42(8): 1–16.
69.
TiplicDBrandmoCElstadE (2015) Antecedents of Norwegian beginning teachers’ turnover intentions. Cambridge Journal of Education45(4): 451–474.
70.
Tschannen-MoranMHoyAW (2001) Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education17(7): 783–805.
71.
VeletićJOlsenRV (2021) Developing a shared cluster construct of instructional leadership in TALIS. Studies in Educational Evaluation68: 100942.
72.
YouSConleyS (2015) Workplace predictors of secondary school teachers’ intention to leave. Educational Management Administration & Leadership43(4): 561–581. 10.1177/1741143214535741.
