This study analyses British and Turkish media conceptualizations of the Charlie Hebdo affair. Editorial decisions to republish or not to republish the Mohammed cartoon cover reflected the politico-cultural pressures on the journalistic fields in both countries. The controversy demonstrated that the editorial autonomy of the British media outlets enabled them to engage in ‘eclectic neutrality’, the right to decide to republish or not to republish the cartoons. Despite the severely constrained journalistic environment of Turkey, where expectations of respect for religion take precedence over freedom of expression, the Turkish media engaged in symbolic acts of resistance in furtherance of freedom of expression.
AkserM (2018) News media consolidation and censorship in Turkey: From liberal ideals to corporatist realities. Mediterranean Quarterly29(3): 78–97.
3.
AkserMBaybars-HawksB (2012) Media and democracy in Turkey: Toward a model of neoliberal media autocracy. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication5(3): 302–321.
ArsanE (2013) Killing me softly with his words: Censorship and self-censorship from the perspective of Turkish journalists. Turkish Studies14: 447–462.
9.
ArtanTSchickC (2013) Ottomanizing pornotopia: Changing visual codes in eighteenth-century Ottoman erotic miniatures. In: LeoniFNatifM (eds) Eros and Sexuality in Islamic Art. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp. 157–208.
ChristensenMChristensenC (2013) The Arab Spring as meta-event and communicative spaces. Television and New Media14(4): 351–364.
19.
CoskuntuncelA (2018) Privatization of governance, delegated censorship and hegemony in the digital era. Journalism Studies19(5): 690–708.
20.
EideERistoKPhilipsA (eds) (2008) Transnational Media Events: The Mohammed Cartoons and the Imagined Clash of Civilizations. Göteborg: Nordicom.
21.
EkoL (2012) New Media, Old Regimes: Case Studies in Comparative Communication Law and Policy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
22.
EkoL (2013) American Exceptionalism, the French Exception and Digital Media Law. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
23.
EkoLBerkowitzD (2009) Le Monde, French secular republicanism and ‘The Mohammed Cartoons Affair’: Journalistic ‘RePresentation’ of the sacred right to offend. International Communication Gazette71(3): 181–202.
24.
EkoLHellmuellerL (2018) To republish or not to republish: The “Je Suis Charlie” Mohammed cartoon and journalistic paradigms in a global context. International Communication Gazette80(3): 207–229.
25.
El IssawiFCammaertsB (2016) Shifting journalistic roles in democratic transitions: Lessons from Egypt. Journalism17(5): 549–566.
EsserFUmbrichtA (2014) The evolution of objective and interpretative journalism in the Western press: Comparing six news systems since the 1960s. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly91(2): 229–249.
28.
FacchiniF (2002) Religion, law and development: Islam and Christianity, why the institutions of freedom have not been discovered in the Orient but in the occident. European Journal of Law and Economics29: 103–110.
29.
FarmanfarmaianRSonayAAkserM (2018) The Turkish media structure in judicial and political context: An illustration of values and status negotiation. Middle East Critique27(2): 111–125.
FridrikssonL (2004) Western Europe. In: de BeerAMerrillJ (eds) Global Journalism: Topical Issues and Media Systems. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, pp. 181–211.
32.
GerringJ (2007) Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GordleyJ (2003) The universalist heritage. In: LegrandPMundayR (eds) Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–45.
HachtenWScottonJ (2016) World News Prism, 9th edn.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
37.
HallaqW (2003) Juristic Authority vs. State Power: The Legal Crises of Modern Islam. Journal of Law and Religion: 243–258.
38.
HallaqW (2012) The Impossible State: Islam, Politics, and Modernity’s Moral Predicament. New York: Columbia University Press.
39.
HallinDManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
HuntingtonS (1996) The Clash of Civilizations and the Making of the World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
41.
IgnatieffM (2005) Introduction: American exceptionalism and human rights. In: IgnatieffM (ed.) American Exceptionalism and Human Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 1–26.
42.
JonesM (2017) The right to a human in the loop: Political constructions of computer automation and personhood. Social Studies of Science47(2): 216–239.
KarppinenKMoeH (2016) What we talk about when talk about ‘media independence’. Javnost – The Public23(2): 105–119.
45.
KayaRÇakmurB (2010) Politics and the mass media in Turkey. Turkish Studies11(4): 521–537.
46.
KissingerH (2014) World Order. New York: Penguin Books.
47.
KlausenJ (2005) The Islamic Challenge: Politics and Religion in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
KlausenJ (2009) The Cartoons That Shook the World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
49.
KuneliusRNossekH (2008) Between the ritual and the rational: From media events to moments of global public sphere. In: EideEKuneliusRPhilipsA (eds) Transnational Media Events: The Mohammed Cartoons and the Imagined Clash of Civilizations. Göteborg: Nordicom, pp. 253–273.
50.
LapidusI (2014) A History of Islamic Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51.
LegrandP (2003) The same and the different. In: LegrandPMundayR (eds) Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 240–311.
52.
LevesonBH (2012) The Leveson Inquiry: Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press. London: The Stationary Office.
LindlofTTaylorB (2002) Qualitative Communication Research Methods, 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
MichaelsR (2006) The functional method of comparative law. In: ReimannMZimmermannR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 339–382.
56.
MinkGNeumayerL (2013) History, Memory and Politics in Central and Eastern Europe: Memory Games. Houndsmill, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
