This study focused on parent-initiated supported living schemes in the South of the Netherlands and the ability of these living schemes to enhance participation, choice, autonomy and self-advocacy for people with intellectual or developmental disabilities through personalized planning, support and care. Based on in-depth interviews with tenants, parents and caregivers, findings included that parent-initiated supported housing schemes made steps towards stimulating self-advocacy and autonomy for tenants. However, overprotective and paternalistic attitudes expressed by a significant number of parents, as well as structural constraints affecting the living schemes, created obstacles to tenants’ personal development. The study calls for consideration of interdependence as a model for the relationship of parents and adult offspring with disabilities. The benefits and tensions inherent within this relationship must be taken into consideration during inclusive community building.
AbbottSMcConkeyR (2006) Barriers to social inclusion as perceived by people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities10: 275–287.
2.
BrownIBrownR (2009) Choice as an aspect of quality of life for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities6: 11–18.
3.
College voor Zorgverzekering (2013) Gebruikersgids Verstandelijke Beperking. Diemen: CVZ.
4.
CarnabyS (1998) Reflections on social integration for people with intellectual disability: Does interdependence have a role?. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability23(3): 219–228.
5.
DaltonAJMcVillyKR (2004) Ethics guidelines for international multicenter research involving people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities1(2): 57–70. Available at: https://www.iassidd.org/uploads/legacy/pdf/ethics-guidelines.pdf (accessed 2 January 2016).
6.
Department of Health (2007) Putting People First Concordat: A Shared Vision and Commitment to the Transformation of Adult Social Care. London: Department of Health.
7.
DuffyS (2003) Keys to Citizenship: A Guide to Getting Good Support Services for People with Learning Difficulties. Birkenhead: Paradigm.
8.
Durbin-WestbyPCNe’emanATopperK. (2009) Keeping the Promise: Self-Advocates Defining the Meaning of Community Living. Report. Washington: Autistic Self-Advocacy Network/Self-Advocates Becoming Empowered/National Youth Leadership Network.
9.
De GeeterKIPoppesPVlaskampC (2002) Parents as experts: the position of parents of children with profound multiple disabilities. Child: Care, Health and Development28(6): 443–453.
10.
GoodleyD (1997) Locating self-advocacy in models of disability: understanding disability in the support of self-advocates with learning difficulties. Disability & Society12: 367–379.
11.
GoodleyD (2005) Empowerment, self-advocacy and resilience. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities9(4): 333–343.
12.
HallS (2013) Including people with intellectual disability in qualitative research. Journal of Ethnographic and Qualitative Research7: 128–142.
13.
LymberyM (2012) Social work and personalization. British Journal of Social Work42(4): 783–792.
14.
McConkeyRCollinsS (2010) The role of support staff in promoting the social inclusion of persons with an intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research54: 691–700.
15.
OliverM (1990) The Politics of Disablement. London: Macmillan.
16.
PartonN (2003) Rethinking professional practice: The contributions of social constructionism and the feminist ‘ethics of care’. British Journal of Social Work33(1): 1–16.
PowerA (2008) Caring for independent lives: geographies of caring for young adults with intellectual disabilities. Social Science and Medicine67: 834–843.
21.
RobertsonJEmersonEHattonC. (2001) Environmental opportunities and supports for exercising self-determination in community-based residential settings. Research in Developmental Disabilities22(6): 487–502.
22.
ShakespeareT (1996) Disability, identity and difference. In: BarnesCMercerG (eds) Exploring the Divide. Leeds: The Disability Press, pp. 94–113.
23.
ShakespeareTGillespie-SellsKDaviesD (1996) The Sexual Politics of Disability: Untold Desires. London: Burns & Oates.
24.
SolomonAHChungB (2012) Understanding autism: How family therapists can support parents of children with autism spectrum disorders. Family Process51: 250–264.
25.
StancliffeRJ (2001) Living with support in the community: predictors of choice and self-determination. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews7: 91–98.
TurnbullHR (2014). Quality of life: four under-considered intersections. In: BrownRIFaragherRM (eds) Quality of Life and Intellectual Disabilities. Knowledge Application to other Social and Educational Challenges. New York: Nova Publishers, pp. 287–298.
Van HaasterHJanssenMVan WijnenA (2012) De Betekenis Van Het Pgb Bij Zelfregie En Empowerment (The Significance of the Person Centered Budget for Self-direction and Empowerment). Amsterdam/Eexterveen: IGBP/AdSearch/Visie in Uitvoering.
WehmeyerMLBoldingN (2001) Enhanced self-determination of adults with intellectual disability as an outcome of moving to community-based work or living environments. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research45: 371–383.
33.
WhiteGWSimpsonJLGondaC. (2010) Moving from independence to interdependence: A conceptual model for better understanding community participation of Centres for Independent Living consumers. Journal of Disability Policy Studies20(4): 233–240.
34.
WilliamsVPorterSMarriottA (2014) Your life, your choice: support planning led by disabled people’s organisations. British Journal of Social Work44: 1197–1215.
35.
WorrellB (1988) People First: Advice for Advisors. Ontario: National People First Project.
