Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this article, we ask about the contribution of fMRI data to our understanding of theories of cognition and about the contribution of theories of cognition to our understanding of fMRI data. Experiments using fMRI can contribute to our understanding of cognition when they are designed to test the predictions of a particular cognitive theory. Although not all cognitive theories make clear predictions about patterns of activity in the brain fMRI experiments are often well suited to testing the predictions of those that do. However, many fMRI studies that are concerned with cognitive functional neuroanatomy are not designed to test predictions of cognitive theories but are instead designed to investigate the role played by different regions of the brain in cognitive activity. These fMRI studies do not shed light on cognitive theories but instead depend on cognitive theories to interpret the data—an interpretation that is only as valid as the cognitive theory on which it is based. These considerations suggest that the relationship between fMRI and theories of cognition is a two-way street.

Keywords

fMRI cognition functional neuroanatomy dual-process theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atkinson

R. C.

Juola

J. F.

(1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In Krantz

D. H.

Atkinson

R. C.

Suppes

(Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (pp. 243–290). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.

Brunel

Labeye

Lesourd

Versace

(2009). The sensory nature of episodic memory: Sensory priming effects due to memory trace activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1081–1088.

Dunn

J. C.

(2004). Remember-know: A matter of confidence. Psychological Review, 111, 524–542.

Eldridge

L. L.

Knowlton

B. J.

Furmanski

C. S.

Bookheimer

S. Y.

Engel

S. A.

(2000). Remembering episodes: A selective role for the hippocampus during retrieval. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1149–1152.

Fortin

N. J.

Wright

S. P.

Eichenbaum

(2004). Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus. Nature, 431, 188–191.

Gottfried

J. A.

Smith

A. P. R.

Rugg

M. D.

Dolan

R. J.

(2004). Remembrance of odors past: Human olfactory cortex in cross-modal recognition memory. Neuron, 42, 687–695.

Johnson

J. D.

McDuff

S. G.

Rugg

M. D.

Norman

K. A.

(2009). Recollection, familiarity, and cortical reinstatement: A multivoxel pattern analysis. Neuron, 63, 697–708.

Mandler

(1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252–271.

Sauvage

M. M.

Fortin

N. J.

Owens

C. B.

Yonelinas

A. P.

Eichenbaum

(2008). Recognition memory: Opposite effects of hippocampal damage on recollection and familiarity. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 16–18.

10.

Smith

C. N.

Wixted

J. T.

Squire

L. R.

(2011). The hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity when memories are strong. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 15693–15702.

11.

Song

Jeneson

Squire

L. R.

(2011). Medial temporal lobe function and recognition memory: A novel approach to separating the contribution of recollection and familiarity. Journal of Neuroscience, 2, 16026–16032.

12.

Squire

L. R.

Wixted

J. T.

(2011). The cognitive neuroscience of human memory since H.M. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34, 259–288.

13.

Squire

L. R.

Wixted

J. T.

Clark

R. E.

(2007). Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: A new perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 872–883.

14.

Wais

Mickes

Wixted

J. T.

(2008). Remember/know judgments probe degrees of recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 400–405.

15.

Wheeler

M. E.

Petersen

S. E.

Buckner

R. L.

(2000). Memory’s echo: Vivid remembering activates sensory-specific cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97, 11125–11129.

16.

Wilson

(2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625–636.

17.

Wixted

J. T.

(2007). Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 114, 152–176.

18.

Wixted

J. T.

Mickes

(2010). A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments. Psychological Review, 117, 1025–1054.

19.

Wixted

J. T.

Stretch

(2004). In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 616–641.

20.

Yonelinas

A. P.

(1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341–1354.

21.

Yonelinas

A. P.

Otten

L. J.

Shaw

K. N.

Rugg

M. D.

(2005). Separating the brain regions involved in recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 3002–3008.