Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The U.S. criminal-justice system has consequentialist and retributivist goals: It considers what is best for society as well as how to punish people in a manner proportional to their crimes. In deciding on the degree of retribution that is called for, the system attempts to determine the blameworthiness—or culpability—of the people involved, weighing factors such as their ability to think rationality, their freedom from coercion, and whether their actions were out of character. These determinations hinge on social-scientific research that is not strong enough to justify such decisions. In this article, I challenge the social-scientific basis for determining culpability on three grounds: replicability, generalizability, and inferential strength. In light of the limitations of this research, I argue that the criminal-justice system should abandon its retributive goals and pursue a more consequentialist—and more reparative—form of justice.

Keywords

retribution replicability generalizability culpability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Bar Association. (2006). Mental illness resolution (2006). https://www.americanbar.org/groups/committees/death_penalty_representation/resources/dp-policy/mental-illness-2006

Asch

S. E.

(1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093718

Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304. (2002). https://www.oyez.org/cases/2001/00-8452

Baker

(2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature, 533, 452–454. https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a6

Bakker

Van Dijk

Wicherts

J. M.

(2012). The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459060

Bentham

(1982). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Methuen.

Berndt

(1979). Developmental changes in conformity to peers and parents. Developmental Psychology, 15, 608–616. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.15.6.608

Bolger

Zee

K. S.

Rossignac-Milon

Hassin

R. R.

(2019). Causal processes in psychology are heterogeneous. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(4), 601–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000558

Camerer

C. F.

Dreber

Forsell

T. H.

Huber

Johannesson

Kirchler

Almenberg

Altmejd

Chan

Heikensten

Holzmeister

Imai

Isaksson

Nave

Pfeiffer

Razen

(2016). Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics. Science, 351(6280), 1433–1436. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf0918

10.

Camerer

C. F.

Dreber

Holzmeister

T. H.

Huber

Johannesson

Kirchler

Nave

Nosek

B. A.

Pfeiffer

Altmejd

Buttrick

Chan

Chen

Forsell

Gampa

Heikensten

Hummer

Imai

. . . Wu

(2018). Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z

11.

Chambers

C. D.

Feredoes

Muthukumaraswamy

S. D.

Etchells

(2014). Instead of “playing the game” it is time to change the rules: Registered Reports at AIMS Neuroscience and beyond. AIMS Neuroscience, 1(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2014.1.4

12.

Davis

A. Y.

(2003). Are prisons obsolete? Seven Stories Press.

13.

DeMatteo

Hart

S. D.

Heilbrun

Boccaccini

M. T.

Cunningham

M. D.

Douglas

K. S.

Dvoskin

J. A.

Edens

J. F.

Guy

L. S.

Murrie

D. C.

Otto

R. K.

Packer

I. K.

Reidy

T. J.

(2020). Statement of concerned experts on the use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised in capital sentencing to assess risk for institutional violence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26(2), 133–144.

14.

Denno

D. W.

(2006). The scientific shortcomings of Roper v. Simmons. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 3(2), 379–396. http://hdl.handle.net/1811/73008

15.

Duvendack

Palmer-Jones

R. W.

Reed

W. R.

(2015). Replications in economics: A progress report. Econ Journal Watch, 12(2), 164–191. https://econjwatch.org/File+download/866/DuvendackEtAlMay2015.pdf?mimetype=pdf

16.

Ebersole

C. R.

Atherton

O. E.

Belanger

A. L.

Skulborstad

H. M.

Allen

J. M.

Banks

J. B.

Baranski

Bernstein

M. J.

Bonfiglio

D. B. V.

Boucher

Brown

E. R.

Budiman

N. I.

Cairo

A. H.

Capaldi

C. A.

Chartier

C. R.

Chung

J. M.

Cicero

D. C.

Coleman

J. A.

Conway

J. G.

. . . Nosek

B. A.

(2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012

17.

Ebersole

C. R.

Mathur

M. B.

Baranski

Bart-Plange

D.-J.

Buttrick

N. R.

Chartier

C. R.

Corker

K. S.

Corley

Hartshorne

J. K.

IJzerman

Lazarević

L. B.

Rabagliati

Ropovik

Aczel

Aeschbach

L. F.

Andrighetto

Arnal

J. D.

Arrow

Babincak

. . . Nosek

B. A.

(2020). Many Labs 5: Testing pre-data collection peer review as an intervention to increase replicability. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(3), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920958687

18.

Faigman

D. L.

Monahan

Slobogin

(2014). Group to individual (G2i) inference in scientific expert testimony. The University of Chicago Law Review, 81, 417–480. http://uchicagolawjournalsmshaytiubv.devcloud.acquia-sites.com/sites/lawreview.uchicago.edu/files/FaigmanMonahanSlobogin_ART.pdf

19.

Fanelli

(2010a). “Positive” results increase down the hierarchy of the sciences. PLOS ONE, 5(4), Article e10068. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010068

20.

Fanelli

(2010b). Do pressures to publish increase scientists’ bias? An empirical support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), Article e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271

21.

Fanelli

(2012). Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics, 90(3), 891–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0494-7

22.

Fiedler

Schwarz

(2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150

23.

Fisher

A. J.

Medaglia

J. D.

Jeronimus

B. F.

(2018). Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115(27), E6106–E6115. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711978115

24.

Forsell

Viganola

Pfeiffer

Almenberg

Wilson

Chen

Nosek

B. A.

Johannesson

Dreber

(2019). Predicting replication outcomes in the Many Labs 2 study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 75, Article 102117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2018.10.009

25.

Franco

Malhotra

Simonovits

(2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484

26.

Gelman

Loken

(2013). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Department of Statistics, Columbia University. http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/unpublished/p_hacking.pdf

27.

Glenn

A. L.

Raine

Yaralian

P. S.

Yang

(2010). Increased volume of the striatum in psychopathic individuals. Biological Psychiatry, 67, 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.06.018

28.

Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010). https://www.oyez.org/cases/2009/08-7412

29.

Greene

(1986). Future-time perspective in adolescence: The present of things future revisited. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 15, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02141732

30.

Greene

Cohen

(2004). For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359(1451), 1775–1785. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1546

31.

Hare

R. D.

(1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised manual. Multi-Health Systems.

32.

Hare

R. D.

(2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised manual (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems.

33.

Hart

S. D.

Michie

Cooke

D. J.

(2007). Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: Evaluating the ‘margins of error’ of group v. individual predictions of violence. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(S49), S60–S65. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.190.5.s60

34.

Henrich

Heine

S. J.

Norenzayan

(2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X

35.

IJzerman

Lewis

N. A.

Przybylski

A. K.

Weinstein

DeBruine

Ritchie

S. J.

Anvari

(2020). Use caution when applying behavioural science to policy. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1092–1094. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00990-w

36.

Institute for Crime & Justice Policy Research. (2021). Highest to lowest – Prison population total [Data set]. World Prison Brief. https://www.prisonstudies.org/highest-to-lowest/prison-population-total

37.

Ioannidis

J. P.

(2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Medicine, 2(8), Article e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

38.

Ioannidis

J. P.

(2012). Why science is not necessarily self-correcting. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 645–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612464056

39.

John

L. K.

Loewenstein

Prelec

(2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953

40.

Jones

(2007). Persons with intellectual disabilities in the criminal justice system: Review of issues. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51(6), 723–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X07299343

41.

Kant

(1887). The philosophy of law: An exposition of the fundamental principles of jurisprudence as the science of right ( Hastie

, Trans.). T. & T. Clark. (Original work published 1797) https://archive.org/details/thephilosophyofl00kantuoft

42.

Kidwell

M. C.

Lazarević

L. B.

Baranski

Hardwicke

T. E.

Piechowski

Falkenberg

L. S.

Nosek

B. A.

(2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLOS Biology, 14(5), Article e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456

43.

Klein

R. A.

Vianello

Hasselman

Adams

B. G.

Adams

R. B.

Alper

Aveyard

Axt

J. R.

Babalola

M. T.

Bahník

Š.

Batra

Berkics

Bernstein

M. J.

Berry

D. R.

Bialobrzeska

Binan

E. D.

Bocian

Brandt

M. J.

Busching

. . . Sowden

(2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225

44.

Kushner

(2019, April 17). Is prison necessary? Ruth Wilson Gilmore might change your mind. The New York Times Magazine. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/17/magazine/prison-abolition-ruth-wilson-gilmore.html

45.

LaPrade

Worrall

J. L.

(2020). Determining intellectual disability in death penalty cases: A state-by-state analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice and Law, 3(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.21428/b6e95092.42571576

46.

Lewis

Lockwood

(2019, December 17). The hidden cost of incarceration. The Marshall Project. https://www.themarshallproject.org/2019/12/17/the-hidden-cost-of-incarceration

47.

Makel

M. C.

Plucker

J. A.

Hegarty

(2012). Replications in psychology research: How often do they really occur? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 537–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460688

48.

Matthes

Marquart

Naderer

Arendt

Schmuck

Adam

(2015). Questionable research practices in experimental communication research: A systematic analysis from 1980 to 2013. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(4), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1096334

49.

McLeod

A. M.

(2015). Prison abolition and grounded justice. UCLA Law Review, 62(5), 1156–1239. https://www.uclalawreview.org/prison-abolition-grounded-justice/

50.

Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012). https://www.oyez.org/cases/2011/10-9646

51.

Miranda

J. F.

Whitt

C. M.

McDiarmid

Stephens

J. E.

Purdue

Hall

Tullett

A. M.

(2021). How do psychologists perceive the field? The prevalence of critiques and defenses [Manuscript submitted for publication].

52.

Molenaar

P. C.

(2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2(4), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1

53.

Monahan

Walker

(2011). Twenty-five years of Social Science in Law. Law and Human Behavior, 35(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9214-8

54.

Morse

S. J.

(2006). Brain overclaim syndrome and criminal responsibility: Diagnostic note. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 3(2), 397–412. http://hdl.handle.net/1811/73009

55.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2021). Digest of education statistics, 2019. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=76

56.

Olver

M. E.

Stockdale

K. C.

Neumann

C. S.

Hare

R. D.

Mokros

Baskin-Sommers

Brand

Folino

Gacono

Gray

N. S.

Kiehl

Knight

Leon-Mayer

Logan

Meloy

J. R.

Roy

Salekin

R. T.

Snowden

Thomson

. . . Yoon

(2020). Reliability and validity of the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised in the assessment of risk for institutional violence: A cautionary note on DeMatteo et al. (2020). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26(4), 490–510. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000256

57.

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), Article aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

58.

Pashler

Harris

C. R.

(2012). Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 531–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463401

59.

Roberts

D. E.

(2019). Abolition constitutionalism. Harvard Law Review, 133(1), 1–122. https://harvardlawreview.org/2019/11/abolition-constitutionalism/

60.

Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551. (2005). https://www.oyez.org/cases/2004/03-633

61.

Scheel

A. M.

Schijen

Lakens

(2021). An excess of positive results: Comparing the standard psychology literature with registered reports. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211007467

62.

Simmons

J. P.

Nelson

L. D.

Simonsohn

(2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632

63.

Simmons

J. P.

Nelson

L. D.

Simonsohn

(2020). Pre-registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208

64.

Steinberg

(2013). The influence of neuroscience on US Supreme Court decisions about adolescents’ criminal culpability. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(7), 513–518. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3509

65.

Steinberg

Scott

E. S.

(2003). Less guilty by reason of adolescence: Developmental immaturity, diminished responsibility, and the juvenile death penalty. American Psychologist, 58(12), 1009–1018. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.12.1009

66.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2020). Consumer expenditures report, 2019. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/consumer-expenditures/2019/pdf/home.pdf

67.

van Elk

Matzke

Gronau

Guan

Vandekerckhove

Wagenmakers

E. J.

(2015). Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: A skeptical perspective on religious priming. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01365

68.

van Rooij

Blokpoel

(2020). Formalizing verbal theories: A tutorial by dialogue. Social Psychology, 51(5), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000428

69.

Wagner

Rabuy

(2017, January 25). Following the money of mass incarceration. Prison Policy Initiative. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/money.html

70.

Waterman

(1982). Identity development from adolescence to adulthood: An extension of theory and a review of research. Developmental Psychology, 18, 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.3.341

71.

Waterman

Goldman

J. A.

(1976). A longitudinal study of ego identity development at a liberal arts college. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 5(4), 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01577249

72.

Yarkoni

(2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685