This study investigates the impact of dental care satisfaction of the US and Turkish consumers. Adopting existing scales in the literature, study conceptualized that customer health sensitivity, involvement, and perceived dental problems would influence their satisfaction with dental care services. Study findings indicate that patient satisfaction is influenced mainly through the path of dental care involvement of personal health sensitivity. Contrary to our expectations, our results did not indicate any significant relationship between perceived dental problems and customer satisfaction with dental care. Managerial implications are discussed.
ReichheldFFSasserWE. Zero defections comes to services. Harvard Business Review1990; 68: 105–111.
2.
ReichheldFF. The Loyalty Effect, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996; 76–76.
3.
BarnesNGMowattD. An examination of patient attitudes and their implications for dental service marketing. Journal of Health Care Marketing1986; 6: 60–63.
4.
HillJCGarnerSJHannaME. What dental professionals should know about dental consumers. Health Marketing Quarterly1990; 8(1/2): 45–57.
5.
GopalakrishnaPMummalaneniV. Influencing satisfaction for dental services. Journal of Health Care Marketing1993; 3: 16–22.
UeltschyLCLarocheMEggertABindlU. Service quality and satisfaction: An international comparison of professional services perceptions. Journal of Services Marketing2007; 21(6): 410–423.
8.
AdayLAAndersenRMFlemingGV. Health Care in the U.S.: Equitable for Whom?, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980; 72–89.
9.
RouseRAHamiltonMA. Dentists' technical competence, communication, and personality as predictors of dental patient anxiety. Journal of Behavioral Medicine1990; 13(3): 307–319.
10.
KraftFBGoodellPW. Identifying the health conscious consumer. Journal of Health Care Marketing1993; 13: 16–25.
11.
NaylorRWDromsCMHawsKL. Eating with a purpose: Consumer response to functional food health claims in conflicting versus complementary information environments. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing2009; 28(2): 221–233.
12.
SanchezPM. Health care marketing at the crossroads. Journal of Health Care Marketing1984; 4(2): 37–43.
13.
BoscarinoJStelberSR. Hospital shopping and consumer choice. Journal of Health Care Marketing1982; 2(2): 15–23.
14.
RicardoSLeonF. The role of education in the uptake of preventative health care: The case of cervical screening in Britain. Social Science and Medicine2006; 62(12): 2998–3010.
15.
Basak CinarA. Preadolescents and their Mothers as Oral Health-promoting Actors: Non-biologic Determinants of Oral Health among Turkish and Finnish Preadolescents, Tekijä: Muu tekijä, 2008; 38–38.
16.
JayantiRK. Preventive maintenance. Marketing Health Services1997; 17(1): 36–45.
17.
TalhaHOrsayK. An examination of wellness orientation and dental care attitudes among dental patients: Conceptual model and empirical evidences for Turkey. The Business Review, Cambridge2010; 15(2): 26–32.
WashingtonG. Modification and psychometric testing of the reminiscence functions scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement2009; 17(2): 134–148.
23.
FerketichS. Focus on psychometric aspects of item analysis. Research in Nursing and Health1991; 14(2): 165–168.
24.
FloydFJWidamanKF. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment1995; 7: 286–299.
25.
KimJMuellerCW. Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series no. 07-014. Beverly Hills and London: Sage, 1978; 58–61.
26.
SteenkampJ-BEMvan TrijpHCM. The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs. International Journal of Research in Marketing1991; 8(4): 283–299.
27.
BravoRFrajEMartínezE. Intergenerational influences on the dimensions of young customer-based brand equity. Young Consumers2007; 8(1): 58–64.
28.
YingWShaojingS. Examining the role of belief and attitudes in online advertising: A comparison between the USA and Romania. International Marketing Review2010; 1: 87–107.
29.
BrowneMWCudeckR. BollenKLongJ. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing Structural Equation Models, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1993; 136–162.
30.
HuLBentlerPM. Cut off criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling1999; 6: 1–55.
31.
KlineRB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2010; 23–45.
32.
MarshHWBallaJRMacDonaldRP. Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin1988; 103: 391–410.
33.
BrownTA. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, New York: The Guilford Press, 2006; 32–32.
34.
ByrneBM. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2004; 1–25.
35.
Business Wire. Research and Markets: A Global Analysis on the Dental Industry: with a Market Share of 20%, Danaher Corporation is the Market Leader for Dental Equipment. New York, December 10, 2009.
