Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this article, the author discusses the animated documentary in relation to the use of staged reenactments in works that are generally understood as documentaries. His conceptual foundation draws especially on recent work by Bill Nichols on documentary reenactments, which he argues have specific ‘fantasmatic’ and reflexive qualities. These qualities clearly dovetail with key attributes of animation, with the animated documentary standing as a significant and interestingly hybrid creative form. Key ideas are applied to a case study of Chris Landreth’s Ryan (2004), in which Landreth deploys fantasmatic visual flourishes partly in order to destabilize the documentary’s conventional discourse of sobriety, pushing it in the direction of its mirroring discourse of delirium, and partly to explore the current status of animation (and animation tools) in the realm of visual simulation.

Keywords

animated documentary Chris Landreth fantasmatic reenactment Ryan Ryan Larkin

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chen

(nd) Where Great Minds Meet: Chris Landreth. Available at: http://www.animationtrip.com/item.php?id=537 (consulted June 2011).

DelGaudio

(1997) If truth be told, can ‘toons tell it? Documentary and animation. Film History 9: 189–199.

Fore

(2007a) Making do and making meaning: cultural and technological hybridity in recent Asian animation. In: Walls

. (eds) East-West Identities: Globalization, Localization, and Hybridization. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 315–328.

Fore

(2007) Romancing the rotoscope: self-reflexivity and the reality effect in the animations of Jeff Scher. Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2(2): 111–127.

Furniss

(1998) Art in Motion: Animation Aesthetics. London: John Libbey.

Hight

(2008) Primetime digital documentary animation: the photographic and graphic within play. Studies in Documentary Film 2(1): 9–31.

Metz

(1982) The Imaginary Signifier. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Nichols

(1991) Representing Reality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Nichols

(2008) Documentary reenactment and the fantasmatic subject. Critical Inquiry 35,Autumn: 72–89.

10.

Plantinga

(1997) Rhetoric and Representation in Nonfiction Film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Renov

(2004) Charged vision: the place of desire in documentary film theory. In: The Subject of Documentary. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 93–103.

12.

Robertson

(2004) Psychorealism. Computer Graphics World 27(7). Available at: http://www.cgw.com/Publications/CGW/2004/Volume-27-Issue-7-July-2004-/Psychorealism.aspx

13.

Robinson

(2008) The Ballad of a Thin Man: In Search of Ryan Larkin. Florence, KY: Course Technology PTR.

14.

Robinson

(2010) Animators Unearthed. New York: Continuum.

15.

Sobchack

(2006) Final fantasies: computer graphic animation and the [dis]illusion of life. In: Buchan

(ed.) Animated ‘Worlds’. Eastleigh: John Libbey, 171–182.

16.

Ward

(2004) Rotoshop in context: computer rotoscoping and animation aesthetics. Animation Journal 12: 32–52.

17.

Ward

(2006) Animated interaction: animation aesthetics and the world of the ‘interactive’ documentary. In: Buchan

(ed.) Animated ‘Worlds’. Eastleigh: John Libbey, 113–129.

18.

Ward

(2008) Animated realities: the animated film, documentary, realism. Reconstruction (8)2. Available at: http://reconstruction.eserver.org/082/ward.shtml

19.

Wells

(1997) A consideration of animation and the documentary aesthetic. Art and Animation: Art and Design Profile 12(3–4): 40–45.

20.

Wells

(1998) Understanding Animation. London: Routledge.

21.

Wells

(2002) Animation: Genre and Authorship. London: Wallflower.