Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2018-10
Why do I think and talk about it? Perceived functions and phenomenology of episodic counterfactual thinking compared with remembering and future thinking
People revisit situations from their past and imagine what could have happened had the situation played out differently. This form of hypothetical thinking is known as episodic counterfactual thinking. The reasons why people engage in episodic counterfactual thinking have not been examined in the same context with remembering the past and imagining the future. We addressed this gap, by focusing on the perceived functions and phenomenological characteristics of the most important episodic counterfactuals compared with episodic memories and future projections in younger adults. We base our analyses on four categories of functions previously identified for past events: reflective, social, generative, and ruminative. The reflective and social functions dominated across all events, with the reflective function being most pronounced for future projections, potentially suggesting a close connection between future projections and self-regulation and/or identity formation. Counter to predictions, the ruminative function was not rated higher for episodic counterfactuals than for other events; however, ratings of ruminative function showed unique correlations with the emotional intensity and involuntary remembering for episodic counterfactuals. Overall, these results suggest that episodic counterfactuals are used for self-reflection and social sharing more than they are used for rumination and generative concerns.
AlickeM. D.SedikidesC. (2009). Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 1–48. doi:10.1080/10463280802613866
2.
BerntsenD.BohnA. (2010). Remembering and forecasting: The relation between autobiographical memory and episodic future thinking. Memory & Cognition, 38, 265–278. doi:10.3758/MC.38.3.265
3.
BerntsenD.RubinD. C. (2002). Emotionally charged autobiographical memories across the life span: The recall of happy, sad, traumatic, and involuntary memories. Psychology and Aging, 17, 636–652.
4.
BerntsenD.RubinD. C. (2004). Cultural life scripts structure recall from autobiographical memory. Memory & Cognition, 32, 427–442. doi:10.3758/BF03195836
5.
BerntsenD.RubinD. C. (2006). The centrality of event scale: A measure of integrating a trauma into one’s identity and its relation to post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 219–231. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.01.009
6.
BlixI.KantenA. B.BirkelandM. S.SolbergØ.NissenA.HeirT. (2016). Thinking about what might have happened: Counterfactual thinking and post-traumatic stress in individuals directly and indirectly exposed to the 2011 Oslo bombing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 983–991. doi:10.1002/acp.3289
7.
BluckS.AleaN. (2011). Crafting the TALE: Construction of a measure to assess the functions of autobiographical remembering. Memory, 19, 470–486. doi:10.1080/09658211.2011.590500
8.
BluckS.AleaN.HabermasT.RubinD. C. (2005). A tale of three functions: The self–reported uses of autobiographical memory. Social Cognition, 23, 91–117. doi:10.1521/soco.23.1.91.59198
9.
BrassenS.GamerM.PetersJ.GluthS.BüchelC. (2012). Don’t look back in anger! Responsiveness to missed chances in successful and nonsuccessful aging. Science, 336, 612–614.
10.
ByrneR. M. (2016). Counterfactual thought. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 135–157. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033249
11.
CarstensenL. L.IsaacowitzD. M.CharlesS. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181.
12.
ConwayM. A.HolmesA. (2004). Psychosocial stages and the accessibility of autobiographical memories across the life cycle. Journal of Personality, 72, 461–480. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00269.x
13.
D’ArgembeauA.Van der LindenM. (2004). Phenomenal characteristics associated with projecting oneself back into the past and forward into the future: Influence of valence and temporal distance. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 844–858. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2004.07.007
De BrigardF. (2014). Is memory for remembering? Recollection as a form of episodic hypothetical thinking. Synthese, 191, 155–185. doi:10.1007/s11229-013-0247-7
16.
De BrigardF.GiovanelloK. S. (2012). Influence of outcome valence in the subjective experience of episodic past, future, and counterfactual thinking. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1085–1096. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.06.007
17.
De BrigardF.GiovanelloK. S.StewartG. W.LockrowA. W.O’BrienM. M.SprengR. N. (2016). Characterizing the subjective experience of episodic past, future, and counterfactual thinking in healthy younger and older adults. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 2358–2375. doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1115529
18.
De BrigardF.SzpunarK. K.SchacterD. L. (2013). Coming to grips with the past: Effect of repeated simulation on the perceived plausibility of episodic counterfactual thoughts. Psychological Science, 24, 1329–1334. doi:10.1177/0956797612468163
19.
DemirayB.JanssenS. M. (2015). The self-enhancement function of autobiographical memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29, 49–60. doi:10.1002/acp.3074
20.
El LeithyS.BrownG. P.RobbinsI. (2006). Counterfactual thinking and posttraumatic stress reactions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 629–635. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.115.3.629
21.
EpstudeK.PeetzJ. (2012). Mental time travel: A conceptual overview of social psychological perspectives on a fundamental human capacity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 269–275. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1867
22.
EpstudeK.RoeseN. J. (2008). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 168–192.
23.
ErdoğanA.BaranB.AvlarB.TaşA. Ç.TekcanA. I. (2008). On the persistence of positive events in life scripts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 95–111. doi:10.1002/acp.1363
24.
GrysmanA.PrabhakarJ.AnglinS. M.HudsonJ. A. (2013). The time travelling self: Comparing self and other in narratives of past and future events. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 742–755. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.010
25.
HabermasT.BluckS. (2000). Getting a life: The emergence of the life story in adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 748–769.
26.
HarrisC. B.RasmussenA. S.BerntsenD. (2014). The functions of autobiographical memory: An integrative approach. Memory, 22, 559–581. doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.806555
27.
HoyleR. H.SherrillM. R. (2006). Future orientation in the self-system: Possible selves, self-regulation, and behavior. Journal of Personality, 74, 1673–1696. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00424.x
KasimatisM.WellsG. L. (1995). Individual differences in counterfactual thinking. In RoeseN. J.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 81–101). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
31.
MarkmanK. D.McMullenM. N. (2003). A reflection and evaluation model of comparative thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 244–267.
32.
MarkmanK. D.McMullenM. N.ElizagaR. A. (2008). Counterfactual thinking, persistence, and performance: A test of the reflection and evaluation model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 421–428.
33.
MarkusH.NuriusP. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954
34.
MatherM.CarstensenL. L. (2005). Aging and motivated cognition: The positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 496–502. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005
35.
McAdamsD. P.de St. AubinE. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1003–1015.
36.
McAdamsD. P.deSt.AubinE. D.LoganR. L. (1993). Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 221–230.
37.
McGinnisD.RobertsP. (1996). Qualitative characteristics of vivid memories attributed to real and imagined experiences. The American Journal of Psychology, 109, 59–77.
38.
McLeanK. C. (2005). Late adolescent identity development: Narrative meaning making and memory telling. Developmental Psychology, 41, 683–691.
39.
MitchellM. A.ContractorA. A.DrangerP.SheaM. T. (2016). Unique relations between counterfactual thinking and DSM–5 PTSD symptom clusters. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 8, 293–300. doi:10.1037/tra0000089
40.
ÖzbekM.BohnA.BerntsenD. (2017). Imagining the personal past: Episodic counterfactuals compared to episodic memories and episodic future projections. Memory & Cognition, 45, 375–389. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0671-2
41.
PasupathiM. (2003). Emotion regulation during social remembering: Differences between emotions elicited during an event and emotions elicited when talking about it. Memory, 11, 151–163. doi:10.1080/741938212
42.
PillemerD. (2003). Directive functions of autobiographical memory: The guiding power of the specific episode. Memory, 11, 193–202.
43.
RasmussenA. S.BerntsenD. (2009). Emotional valence and the functions of autobiographical memories: Positive and negative memories serve different functions. Memory & Cognition, 37, 477–492. doi:10.3758/MC.37.4.477
44.
RasmussenA. S.BerntsenD. (2013). The reality of the past versus the ideality of the future: Emotional valence and functional differences between past and future mental time travel. Memory & Cognition, 41, 187–200. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0260-y
45.
RasmussenA. S.HabermasT. (2011). Factor structure of overall autobiographical memory usage: The directive, self and social functions revisited. Memory, 19, 597–605. doi:10.1080/09658211.2011.592499
46.
RathboneC. J.ConwayM. A.MoulinC. J. (2011). Remembering and imagining: The role of the self. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1175–1182. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.013
47.
RoeseN. J. (1994). The functional basis of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 805–818.
48.
RoeseN. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133–148.
49.
RoeseN. J.EpstudeK. (2017). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking: New evidence, new controversies, new insights. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 1–79.
50.
RoeseN. J.OlsonJ. M. (1995). Functions of counterfactual thinking. In RoeseN. J.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 169–197). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
51.
RoeseN. J.SummervilleA. (2005). What we regret most . . . and why. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1273–1285.
52.
RossM.WilsonA. E. (2002). It feels like yesterday: Self-esteem, valence of personal past experiences, and judgments of subjective distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 792–803. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.792
53.
RubinD. C.BerntsenD. (2003). Life scripts help to maintain autobiographical memories of highly positive, but not highly negative, events. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1–14. doi:10.3758/BF03196077
54.
SacksO. (2015). On the move: A life. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Alfred A. Knopf Canada.
55.
SchacterD. L.BenoitR. G.De BrigardF.SzpunarK. K. (2015). Episodic future thinking and episodic counterfactual thinking: Intersections between memory and decisions. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 117, 14–21. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2013.12.008
56.
SchlagmanS.SchulzJ.KvavilashviliL. (2006). A content analysis of involuntary autobiographical memories: Examining the positivity effect in old age. Memory, 14, 161–175.
57.
SchnellT. (2011). Individual differences in meaning-making: Considering the variety of sources of meaning, their density and diversity. Personality & Individual Differences, 51, 667–673. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.006
58.
SedikidesC.GreggA. P. (2008). Self-enhancement: Food for thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 102–116. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00068.x
SingerJ.RexhajB.BaddeleyJ. (2007). Older, wiser, and happier? Comparing older adults’ and college students’ self-defining memories. Memory, 15, 886–898. doi:10.1080/09658210701754351
61.
StanleyM. L.ParikhN.StewartG. W.De BrigardF. (2017). Emotional intensity in episodic autobiographical memory and counterfactual thinking. Consciousness and Cognition, 48, 283–291.
62.
SummervilleA.BuchananJ. (2014). Functions of personal experience and of expression of regret. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 463–475.
63.
SzpunarK. K.SchacterD. L. (2013). Get real: Effects of repeated simulation and emotion on the perceived plausibility of future experiences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 323–327. doi:10.1037/a0028877
64.
TaylorS. E.BrownJ. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193
65.
vanDellenM. R.HoyleR. H. (2008). Possible selves as behavioral standards in self-regulation. Self and Identity, 7, 295–304. doi:10.1080/15298860701641108
66.
WebsterJ. D. (1993). Construction and validation of the Reminiscence Functions Scale. Journal of Gerontology, 48, P256–P262. doi:10.1093/geronj/48.5.P256
67.
WebsterJ. D. (2003). The reminiscence circumplex and autobiographical memory functions. Memory, 11(2), 203–215. doi:10.1080/741938202
68.
WebsterJ. D.McCallM. E. (1999). Reminiscence functions across adulthood: A replication and extension. Journal of Adult Development, 6, 73–85. doi:10.1023/A:1021628525902
69.
WilsonA. E.RossM. (2000). The frequency of temporal-self and social comparisons in people’s personal appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 928–942. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.928
70.
WilsonA. E.RossM. (2001). From chump to champ: People’s appraisals of their earlier and present selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 572–584. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.572
71.
WilsonA. E.RossM. (2003). The identity function of autobiographical memory: Time is on our side. Memory, 11, 137–149. doi:10.1080/741938210
72.
WroschC.HeckhausenJ. (2002). Perceived control of life regrets: Good for young and bad for old adults. Psychology and Aging, 17, 340–350.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
