A total of 1,363 images from seven sets of facial stimuli were normed using the self-assessment manikin procedure. Each participant provided valence, arousal, and dominance ratings for 120-130 faces displaying various emotional expressions (e.g., happiness, sadness). The current work provides a large database of normed ratings for facial stimuli that complements the existing International Affective Picture System and the Affective Norms for English Words that were developed to provide a normative set of emotional ratings for photographs and words, respectively. This new database will increase experimental control in studies examining the perception, processing, and identification of emotional faces.
AdolphD.AlpersG. W. (2010). Valence and arousal: A comparison of two sets of emotional facial expressions. American Journal of Psychology, 123, 209-219. doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc123.2.0209
2.
BayerM.SchachtA. (2014). Event-related brain responses to emotional words, pictures, and faces—A cross-domain comparison. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1106. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01106
3.
BeallP. M.HerbertA. M. (2008). The face wins: Stronger automatic processing of affect in facial expressions than words in a modified Stroop task. Cognition & Emotion, 22, 1613-1642. doi:10.1080/02699930801940370
4.
BeaupreM. G.HessU. (2005). Cross-cultural emotion recognition among Canadian ethnic groups. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 36, 355-570.
5.
BiehlM.MatsumotoD.EkmanP.HearnV.HeiderK.KudohT.TonV. (1997). Matsumoto and Ekman’s Japanese and Caucasian facial expressions of emotion (JACFEE): Reliability data and cross-national differences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 3-21.
6.
BradleyM. M.LangP. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49-59.
7.
CalderA. J.YoungA. (2005). Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 641-651.
8.
EkmanP. (1976). Pictures of Facial Affect. Brochure accompanying the Pictures of Facial Affect developed by Drs. Paul Ekman and Wallace V. Friesen. San Francisco: Human Interaction Laboratory, UCLA Medical Center.
9.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V. (1975). Unmasking the Face. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V. (1976). Measuring facial movement. Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 1, 56-75.
11.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V.O’SullivanM.Diacoyanni-TarlatzisI.KrauseR.PitcairnT., . . . TzavarasA. (1987). Universals and cultural differences in judgments of facial expressions of emotion. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 712-717.
12.
EkmanP.SorensonR.FriesenW. V. (1969). Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotion. Science, 164, 86-88.
13.
ElfenbeinH. A.AmbadyN. (2002). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 203-235. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.230
14.
GoelevenE.De RaedtR.LeymanL.VerschuereB. (2008). The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces: A validation study. Cognition & Emotion, 22, 1094-1118. doi:10.1080/02699930701626582
15.
KeltnerD.TracyJ.SauterD. A.CordaroD. C.McNeilG. (2016). Expression of emotion. In L. F. Barrett, M. Lewis, & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions (pp. 467–482). New York,NY: The Guilford Press.
16.
KensingerE. A.SchacterD. L. (2006). Processing emotional pictures and words: Effects of valence and arousal. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 6, 110-126.
KooT. K.LiM. Y. (2016). A guideline for selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractice Medicine, 15, 155-163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
19.
LangP. J. (1980). Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: Computer applications. In
SidowskiJ. B.JohnsonJ. H.WillimasT. A. (Eds.), Technology in Mental Health Care Delivery Systems (pp. 119–137). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
20.
LangP. J.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-8. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
21.
LevensonR. W.CarstenseL. L.FriesenW. V.EkmanP. (1991). Emotion, physiology, and expression in old age. Psychology of Aging, 6, 28-35.
22.
LibkumanT. M.OtaniH.KernR.VigerS. G.NovakN. (2007). Multidimensional normative ratings for the International Affective Picture System. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 326-334. doi:10.3758/BF03193164
23.
LundqvistD.FlyktA.ÖhmanA. (1998). The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces—KDEF. CD ROM from Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology Section, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
24.
MeuwissenA. S.AndersonJ. E.ZelazoP. D. (2017). The creation and validation of the Developmental Emotional Faces Stimulus Set. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 960-966. doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0756-7
25.
MikelsJ. A.FredricksonB. L.LarkinG. R.LindbergC. M.MaglioS. J.Reuter-LorenzP. A. (2005). Emotional category data on images from the International Affective Picture System. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 626-630.
26.
MoggK.BradleyB. P. (1999). Orienting of attention to threatening facial expressions presented under condition of restricted awareness. Cognition & Emotion, 13, 713-740. doi:10.1080/026999399379050
27.
MoorsA.De HouwerJ.HermansD.WanmakerS.van SchieK.Van HarmelenA., . . . BrysbaertM. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, dominance, and age of acquisition for 4,300 Dutch words. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 169-177. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0243-8
28.
OlszanowskiM.PochwatkoG.KuklinskiK.Scibor-RylskiM.LewinskiP.OhmeR. K. (2015). Warsaw set of emotional facial expression pictures: A validation study of facial display photographs. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1516. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01516
29.
OosterhofN. N.TodorovA. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 11087-11092. doi:10.073/pnas.0805664105
30.
OvaysikiaS.TahirK. A.ChanJ. L.DeSouzaJ. F. X. (2010). Word wins over face: Emotional Stroop effect activates the frontal cortical network. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 234. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00234
31.
PhanK. L.WagerT.TaylorS. F.LibersonI. (2002). Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: A meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. NeuroImage, 16, 331-348. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1087
32.
RiegelM.WierzbaM.WypychM.ZurawskiL.JednorógK.GrabowskaA.MarchewkaA. (2015). Nencki Affective Word List (NAWL): The cultural adaptation of the Berlin Affective Word List—Reloaded (BAWL-R) for Polish. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1222-1236. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0552-1
RussellJ. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-1178.
35.
RussellJ. A.MehrabianA. (1977). Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, 273-294.
36.
ShroutP. E.FleissJ. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
37.
TottenhamN.TanakaJ. W.LeonA. C.McCarryT.NurseM.HareT. A., . . . NelsonC. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168, 242-249.
38.
TracyJ. L.RobinsR. W.SchriberR. A. (2009). Development of a FACS-verified set of basic and self-conscious emotion expressions. Emotion, 9, 554-559. doi:10.1037/a0015766
39.
VõL.-H.JacobsA. M.ConradM. (2006). Cross-validating the Berlin Affective Word List. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 606-609. doi:10.3758/BF03193892
40.
WarrinerA. B.KupermanV.BrysbaertM. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1191-1207. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-1314-x
41.
WilliamsM. A.McGloneF.AbbottD. F.MattinggleyJ. B. (2005). Differential amygdala responses to happy and fearful facial expressions depend on selective attention. NeuroImage, 24, 417-425. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.017
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
