Turning an object upside-down disrupts our ability to perceive it accurately, and this inversion effect is disproportionately larger for faces and whole bodies than most other objects. This disproportionate inversion effect is taken as an indicator of holistic processing for these stimuli. Large inversion effects are also found when viewing motion-only information from faces and bodies; however, these have not been compared to other moving objects in an identity task so it is unclear whether inversion effects remain disproportionately larger for faces and bodies when they are engaged in motion. The current study investigated the effect of inversion on static and moving unfamiliar faces, human bodies, and German Shepherd dogs in an old-new recognition memory task. Sensitivity and baseline corrected reaction time (RT) results revealed that inversion effects for faces and whole-bodies remained disproportionately larger than those for German Shepherd dogs, regardless of presentation type, suggesting that both static and moving faces and bodies are processed holistically.
AmbadarZ.SchoolerJ. W.CohnJ. F. (2005). Deciphering the enigmatic face—The importance of facial dynamics in interpreting subtle facial expressions. Psychological Science, 16(5), 403–410.
2.
AxelssonE. L.RobbinsR. A.CopelandH. F.CovellH. W. (2019). Body inversion effects with photographic images of body postures: Is it about faces?Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2686. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02686
3.
BennettsR. J.KimJ.BurkeD.BrooksK. R.LuceyS.SaragihJ.RobbinsR. A. (2013). The movement advantage in famous and unfamiliar faces: A comparison of point-light displays and shape-normalised avatar stimuli. Perception, 42, 950–970.
4.
BiedermanI. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94(2), 115–147.
ChangD. H. F.TrojeN. F. (2008). Perception of animacy and direction from local biological motion signals. Journal of Vision, 8(5), 3. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.5.3
7.
CohenJ.MacWhinneyB.FlattM.ProvostJ. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 25, 257–271.
HuskJ. S.BennettP. J.SekulerA. B. (2007). Inverting houses and textures: Investigating the characteristics of learned inversion effects. Vision Research, 47(27), 3350–3359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2007.09.017
16.
KnappmeyerB.ThorntonI. M.BülthoffH. H. (2003). The use of facial motion and facial form during the processing of identity. Vision Research, 43(18), 1921–1936. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00236-0
17.
KnightB.JohnstonA. (1997). The role of movement in face recognition. Visual Cognition, 4, 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/713756764
18.
LanderK.ChristieF.BruceV. (1999). The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces. Memory and Cognition, 27, 974–985. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201228
19.
LoulaF.PrasadS.HarberK.ShiffrarM. (2005). Recognizing people from their movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 210–220.
20.
MaurerD.Le GrandR.MondlochC. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 255–260.
21.
McKoneE.RobbinsR. (2011). Are faces special? In CalderA.RhodesG.JohnsonM.HaxbyJ (Eds.), Oxford handbook of face perception (pp. 149–176). Oxford University Press.
22.
McKoneE.WanL.PidcockM.CrookesK.ReynoldsK.DawelA.KiddE.FiorentiniC. (2019). A critical period for faces: Other-race face recognition is improved by childhood but not adult social contact. Scientific Reports, 9, 12820. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49202-0
23.
McLarenI. P. (1997). Categorization and perceptual learning: An analogue of the face inversion effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: A Human Experimental Psychology, 50(2), 257–273.
24.
MeissnerC. A.BrighamJ. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own- race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8971.7.1.3
25.
MinnebuschD. A.SuchanB.DaumI. (2009). Losing your head: Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of body inversion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 865–874. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21074
26.
O’TooleA.HarmsJ.SnowS. L.HurstD. R.PappasM. R.AyyadJ. H.AbdiH. (2005). A video database of moving faces and people. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27(5), 812–816.
ReidV. M.DunnK.YoungR. J.AmuJ.DonovanT.ReisslandN. (2017). The human fetus preferentially engages with face-like visual stimuli. Current Biology, 27(12), 1825–1828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.044
RobbinsR. A.ColtheartM. (2012a). The effects of inversion and familiarity on face versus body cues to person recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1098–1104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028584
32.
RobbinsR. A.ColtheartM. (2012b). Left-right holistic integration of human bodies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1962–1974. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.674145
33.
RobbinsR. A.ColtheartM. (2015). The relative importance of heads, bodies, and movement to person recognition across development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 138, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.04.006
34.
SeitzK. (2002). Parts and wholes in person recognition: Developmental trends. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82(4), 367–381.
35.
Soria BauserD. A.SuchanB.DaumI. (2011). Differences between perception of human faces and body shapes: Evidence from the composite illusion. Vision Research, 51(1), 195–202.
36.
StanislawH.TodorovN. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03207704
37.
SteedeL. L.HoleG. J. (2006). Repetition priming and recognition of dynamic and static chimeras. Perception, 35(10), 1367–1382. https://doi.org/10.1068/P5515
38.
TanakaJ. W.FarahM. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 46(2), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749308401045
39.
ThorntonI. M.MullinsE.BanahanK. (2011). Motion can amplify the face-inversion effect. Psihologija, 44(1), 5–22.
40.
TobinA.FavelleS.PalermoR. (2016). Dynamic facial expressions are processed holistically, but not more holistically than static facial expressions. Cognition and Emotion, 30(6), 1208–1221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1049936
41.
TrojeN. F.WesthoffC. (2006). The inversion effect in biological motion perception: Evidence for a “life detector”?Current Biology, 16(8), 821–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.022
42.
WatsonT. L.JohnstonA.HillH.TrojeN. (2005). Motion as a cue for viewpoint invariance. Visual Cognition, 12(7), 1291–1308. http://doi.org/10.1080/13506280444000526
43.
WatsonT. L.RobbinsR. A.BestC. T. (2014). Infant perceptual development for faces and spoken words: An integrated approach. Developmental Psychobiology, 56, 1454–1481. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21243
XiaoN. G.QuinnP. C.GeL.LeeK. (2012). Rigid facial motion influences featural, but not holistic, face processing. Vision Research, 57, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.01.015
46.
XiaoN. G.QuinnP. C.GeL.LeeK. (2013). Elastic facial movement influences part-based but not holistic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1457–1467. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031631
47.
YinR. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 141–145.
48.
YoungA. W.HellawellD.HayD. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16(6), 747–759. https://doi.org/10.1068/p160747n
49.
ZhaoM.BülthoffI. (2017). Holistic processing of static and moving faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(7), 1020–1035. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000368
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
