Psycholinguistic information plays an important role in verbal short-term memory (vSTM). One such linguistic feature is neighbourhood density (ND)—the number of words that can be derived from a given word by changing a single phoneme or single letter—with vSTM performance typically better when word sequences are from dense rather than sparse neighbourhoods. This effect has been attributed to higher levels of supportive activation among dense neighbourhood words. Generally, it has been assumed that lexical variables influence item memory but not order memory, and we show that the typical vSTM advantage for dense neighbourhood words in serial recall is eliminated when using serial recognition. However, we also show that the usual effect of ND is reversed—for both serial recall and serial recognition—when using a subset of those same words. The findings call into question the way in which ND has been incorporated into accounts of vSTM that invoke mutual support from long-term representations on either encoding or retrieval.
AllenR.HulmeC. (2006). Speech and language processing mechanisms in verbal serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 64–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.02.002
2.
Audacity Team. (2012). Audacity (Version 2.0.1-beta) [Computer software]. http://audacityteam.org/
3.
BaayenR. H.PipenbrockR.van RijnH. (1993). The CELEX lexical database [Computer software]. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
4.
BaddeleyA.LewisV.VallarG. (1984). Exploring the articulatory loop. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 36(2), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748408402157
5.
BaddeleyA. D. (2000). Short-term and working memory. In TulvingE.CraikF. I. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 77–92). Oxford University Press.
6.
BaddeleyA. D.ChincottaD.StaffordL.TurkD. (2002). Is the word length effect in STM entirely attributable to output delay? Evidence from serial recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980143000523
7.
BarrouilletP.BernardinS.PortratS.VergauweE.CamosV. (2007). Time and cognitive load in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.570
8.
BeamanC. P.JonesD. M. (2016). The item versus the object in memory: On the implausibility of overwriting as a mechanism for forgetting in short-term memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 341. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00341
9.
BirdH.FranklinS.HowardD. (2001). Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33, 73–79. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195349
BurgessN.HitchG. J. (1999). Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing. Psychological Review, 106, 551–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.551
12.
BurgessN.HitchG. J. (2006). A revised model of short-term memory and long-term learning of verbal sequences. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 627–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.005
13.
CampoyG.CastellàJ.ProvencioV.HitchG. J.BaddeleyA. D. (2015). Automatic semantic encoding in verbal short-term memory: Evidence from the concreteness effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 759–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.966248
14.
CaplanD.RochonE.WatersG. S. (1992). Articulatory and phonological determinants of word length effects in span tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749208401323
15.
ChenQ.MirmanD. (2012). Competition and cooperation among similar representations: Toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. Psychological Review, 119(2), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027175
16.
ClarksonL.RoodenrysS.MillerL. M.HulmeC. (2017). The phonological neighborhood effect on short-term memory for order. Memory, 25, 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1179330
17.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
ColtheartM.DavelaarE.JonassonJ. F.BesnerD. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In DornicS. (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). Lawrence Erlbaum.
CowanN. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922
22.
CowanN. (2019). Short-term memory based on activated long-term memory: A review in response to Norris (2017). Psychological Bulletin, 145(8), 822–847. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000199
23.
DavisC. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behaviour Research Methods, 37, 65–70. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206399
24.
DeLoshE. L.McDanielM. A. (1996). The role of order information in free recall: Application to the word-frequency effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1136–1146. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1136
25.
DerraughL. S.NeathI.SurprenantA. M.BeaudryO.Saint-AubinJ. (2017). The effect of lexical factors on recall from working memory: Generalizing the neighborhood size effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000098
26.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
27.
GahlS.YaoY.JohnsonK. (2012). Why reduce? Phonological ND and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 789–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.006
28.
GathercoleS. E.FrankishC. R.PickeringS. J.PeakerS. (1999). Phonotactic influences on short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.84
29.
GathercoleS. E.PickeringS. J.HallM.PeakerS. M. (2001). Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980042000002
30.
GohW. D.PisoniD. B. (2003). Effects of lexical competition on immediate memory span for spoken words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 929–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980244000710
31.
GraingerJ.MuneauxM.FarioliF.ZieglerJ. C. (2005). Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 981–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000386
32.
GreenoD. J. (2019). The (questionable) role of neighbourhood density in verbal short-term memory [Doctoral dissertation]. Cardiff University. http://orca.cf.ac.uk/131463/
33.
GuitardD.GabelA. J.Saint-AubinJ.SurprenantA. M.NeathI. (2018). Word length, set size, and lexical factors: Re-examining what causes the word length effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 1824–1844. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000551
34.
GuitardD.MillerL. M.NeathI.RoodenrysS. (2019). Does contextual diversity affect serial recall?Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31(4), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1626401
35.
GuitardD.Saint-AubinJ.TehanG.TolanA. (2018). Does neighborhood size really cause the word length effect?Memory & Cognition, 46, 244–260. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0761-9
36.
GuptaP.LipinskiJ.AktuncE. (2005). Reexamining the phonological similarity effect in immediate serial recall: The roles of type of similarity, category cuing, and item recall. Memory & Cognition, 33(6), 1001–1016. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193208
37.
HautusM. J. (1995). Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values of d.’Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 46–51. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203619
38.
HulmeC.NeathI.StuartG.ShostakL.SurprenantA. M.BrownG. D. A. (2006). The distinctiveness of the word-length effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(3), 586–594. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.586
39.
HulmeC.RoodenrysS.SchweickertR.BrownG. D.MartinS.StuartG. (1997). Word-frequency effects on short-term memory tasks: Evidence for a redintegration process in immediate serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1217–1232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1217
40.
HulmeC.ThomsonN.MuirC.LawrenceA. (1984). Speech rate and the development of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(84)90124-3
41.
JalbertA.NeathI.BiretaT. J.SurprenantA. M. (2011). When does length cause the word length effect?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021804
42.
JalbertA.NeathI.SurprenantA. M. (2011). Does length or neighborhood size cause the word length effect?Memory & Cognition, 39, 1198–1210. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0094-z
43.
JonesD. M.MackenB. (2018). In the beginning was the deed: Verbal short-term memory as object-oriented action. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 351–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418765796
44.
KowialiewskiB.MajerusS. (2019). Verbal working memory and linguistic long-term memory: Exploring the lexical cohort effect. Memory & Cognition, 47(5), 997–1011. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00898-5
LovattP.AvonsS. E.MastersonJ. (2000). The word-length effect and disyllabic words. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 53(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755877
MackenB.TaylorJ. C.JonesD. M. (2014). Language and short-term memory: The role of perceptual-motor affordance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1257–1270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036845
49.
MackenB.TaylorJ. C.JonesD. M. (2015). Limitless capacity: A dynamic object-oriented approach to short-term memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 293. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00293
50.
MackenB.TaylorJ. C.KozlovM. D.HughesR. W.JonesD. M. (2016). Memory as embodiment: The case of modality and serial short-term memory. Cognition, 155, 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.06.013
51.
MoreyR. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(2), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061
52.
MulattiC.BesnerD.JobR. (2003, November19–22). Reading aloud: Evidence for a phonologically based neighborhood effect [Conference session]. 44th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
53.
MurdockB. B. (1976). Item and order information in short-term serial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105(2), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.105.2.191
54.
MurrayA.JonesD. M. (2002). Articulatory complexity at item boundaries in serial recall: The case of Welsh and English digit span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 594–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.594
NeathI.BiretaT. J.SurprenantA. M. (2003). The time-based word length effect and stimulus set specificity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(2), 430–434. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196502
57.
NeathI.SurprenantA. M. (2019). Set size and long-term memory/lexical effects in immediate serial recall: Testing the impurity principle. Memory & Cognition, 47(3), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0883-8
58.
OberauerK.LewandowskyS.FarrellS.JarroldC.GreavesM. (2012). Modeling working memory: An interference model of complex span. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 779–819. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0272-4
PeirceJ. W. (2007). PsychoPy: Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162, 8–13.
61.
PoirierM.Saint-AubinJ. (1996). Immediate serial recall, word frequency, item identity and item position. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 408–412. https://doi.org/10.1037/1196-1961.50.4.408
RomaniC.McalpineS.MartinR. C. (2008). Concreteness effects in different tasks: Implications for models of short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 292–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210601147747
64.
RoodenrysS. (2009). Explaining phonological neighbourhood effects in short-term memory. In ThornA. S. C.PageM. P. A. (Eds.), Interactions between short-term and long-term memory in the verbal domain (p. 177–197). Psychology Press.
65.
RoodenrysS.HulmeC.LethbridgeA.HintonM.NimmoL. M. (2002). Word-frequency and phonological-neighborhood effects on verbal short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1019–1034. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.6.1019
66.
Saint-AubinJ.PoirierM. (1999). The influence of long-term memory factors on immediate serial recall: An item and order analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 347–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075999399675
67.
SchweickertR. (1993). A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall. Memory & Cognition, 21, 168–175. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202729
68.
SchweringS. C.MacDonaldM. C. (2020). Verbal working memory as emergent from language comprehension and production. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, Article 68. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00068
StuartG.HulmeC. (2000). The effects of word co-occurrence on short-term memory: Associative links in long-term memory affect short-term memory performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 796–802. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.796
71.
VitevitchM. S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 735–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.735
72.
VitevitchM. S.ChanK. Y.RoodenrysS. (2012). Complex network structure influences processing in long-term and short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.02.008
73.
WatkinsO. C.WatkinsM. J. (1977). Serial recall and the modality effect: Effects of word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 712–718. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.3.6.712
74.
WoodwardA. J.MackenW. J.JonesD. M. (2008). Linguistic familiarity in short-term memory: A role for (co-) articulatory fluency?Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.002
75.
YatesM.LockerL.SimpsonG. B. (2004). The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 452–457. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196594
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
