Plastic strain energy dissipation and thermodynamic entropy generation are explored as means of estimating the likelihood of fatigue crack initiation in reliability assessment of structures. A set of experimental data for aluminum alloy 7075-T651 used in airframe structures are presented to determine the correlation between plastic strain energy dissipation and the thermodynamic entropy generation versus fatigue crack initiation. Cumulative plastic strain energy and thermodynamic entropy generation measured from hysteresis energy and temperature rise proved to be valid physical indices for estimation of the probability of crack initiation. Crack initiation is considered as evidence of fatigue damage and loss of structural integrity. A Bayesian estimation and validation approach is used to determine systematic errors in the developed models as well as other model uncertainties. It was shown that the results from both methods are good predictors of crack initiation and comparable, but the entropy generation method was associated with fewer uncertainties than the plastic strain energy method. Comparisons of the energy-based and entropy-based models are presented and advantages of using one over the other are discussed.
HoffmanPModarresM. A Bayesian approach to P-3 structural integrity management. In: Proceedings of the 23 ICAF Symposium International Committee on Aeronautical Fatigue (ICAF), Hamburg, Germany, 8–10 June 2005, pp. 137–147. Hamburg, Germany: EADS.
2.
IyyerNSarkarSMerrillR. Aircraft life management using crack initiation and crack growth models-P-3C Aircraft experience. Int J Fatig2007; 29: 1584–1607.
3.
IyyerNSarkarSMerrillR. Risk assessment of P-3C aircraft. In: 9th Joint DoD/FAA/NASA conference on aging aircraft, Atlanta, GA, 6-9 March 2006. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration; Department of Defense; National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
4.
MorrowJ.Cyclic plastic strain energy and fatigue of metals. ASTM Stand News1965; 378: 45–87.
5.
HalfordGR.The energy required for fatigue (plastic strain hysteresis energy required for fatigue in ferrous and nonferrous metals). J Mater1966; 1: 3–18.
6.
TchankovDSVesselinovKV.Fatigue life prediction under random loading using total hysteresis energy. Int J Pres Ves Pip1998; 75: 955–960.
7.
Scott-EmuakporOEGeorgeTCrossC. Analysis of strain energy behavior throughout a fatigue process. Exp Mech2011; 51(8): 1317–1323.
8.
Scott-EmuakporOEShenHGeorgeT. An energy-based uniaxial fatigue life prediction method for commonly used gas turbine engine materials. J Eng Gas Turb Power2008; 130(6): 062504.
9.
Scott-EmuakporOEShenHGeorgeT. Development of an improved high cycle fatigue criterion. J Eng Gas Turb Power2007; 129(1): 162–169.
10.
GolosKEllyinF.A total strain energy density theory for cumulative fatigue damage. J Press Vess T ASME1988; 110(1): 36–41.
11.
GolosKM.A total strain energy density model of metal fatigue. Strength Mater1995; 27(1–2): 32–41.
12.
ParkJNelsonD.Evaluation of an energy-based approach and a critical plane approach for predicting constant amplitude multiaxial fatigue life. Int J Fatigue2000; 22(1): 23–39.
13.
DengelDHarigH.Estimation of the fatigue limit by progressively-increasing load tests. Fatigue Fract Eng M1980; 3: 113–128.
14.
HarigHWeberM. Estimation of crack initiation in plain carbon steels by thermometric methods. In: SihGCProvanJW (eds) Defects, fracture and fatigue. Proceedings of the second international symposium, held at Mont Gabriel, Canada, May 30-June 5 1982. Netherlands: Springer.
15.
MiddelfordKHarigH. Thermometric investigation of the fatigue behavior of power-forged specimen. In: Horizons of powder metallurgy: proceedings of the 1986 international powder metallurgy conference and exhibition “The Future of Powder Metallurgy”, P/M ‘86, Düsseldorf, 7–11 July 1986. Freiburg: Verlag Schmid.
16.
La RosaGRisitanoA. Thermographic methodology for rapid determination of the fatigue limit of materials and mechanical components. Int J Fatig2000; 22(1): 65–73.
17.
YangB.Thermographic detection of fatigue damage of reactor pressure vessel (RPV) steels. J Mater Eng Perform2003; 12(3): 345–353.
18.
MeneghettiG.Analysis of the fatigue strength of a stainless steel based on the energy dissipation. Int J Fatigue2007; 29(1): 81–94.
19.
AmiriMKhonsariMM.Rapid determination of fatigue failure based on temperature evolution: fully reversed bending load. Int J Fatigue2010; 32: 382–389.
20.
NaderiMAmiriMKhonsariMM.On the thermodynamic entropy of fatigue fracture. Proc R Soc Lon Ser: A2010; 466: 423–438.
21.
NaderiMKhonsariMM.Thermodynamic analysis of fatigue failure in a composite laminate. Mech Mater2012; 46: 113–122.
22.
WhaleyPW. A thermodynamic approach to metal fatigue. In: Proceedings of ASME international conference on advances in life prediction methods (eds WoodfordDAWhiteheadJR), Albany, NY, 16–18 April 1983, pp. 18–21. New York: ASME.
23.
Ital’yantsevYF. Thermodynamic state of deformed solids. Report 1. Determination of local function of state. Strength Mater1984; 16: 238–241.
24.
HansenNRSchreyerHL.A thermodynamically consistent framework for theories of elastoplasticity coupled with damage. Int J Solids Struct1994; 31(3): 359–389.
25.
BhattacharyaBEllingwoodB.Continuum damage mechanics analysis of fatigue crack initiation. Int J Fatigue1998; 20: 631–639.
26.
BasaranCYanCY.A thermodynamic framework for damage mechanics of solder joints. J Electron Packaging1998; 120: 379–384.
27.
VoyiadjisG.Advances in damage mechanics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1999.
IzumiYFineMEMuraT.Energy considerations in fatigue crack propagation. Int J Fract1981; 17(1): 15–25.
30.
MuraT.Micromechanics of defects in solids. 2nd ed.Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987.
31.
AmiriMNaderiMKhonsariMM.An experimental approach to evaluate the critical damage. Int J Damage Mech2011; 20: 89–112.
32.
LemaitreJChabocheJL.Mechanics of solid materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
33.
OntiverosV. Strain energy and thermodynamic entropy as prognostic measures of crack initiation in aluminum. PhD Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 2014.
34.
MRC Biostatistics Unit. The WinBUGS project. Cambridge: MRC Biostatistics Unit, 1989.
35.
AzarkhailMModarresM. A novel Bayesian framework for uncertainty management in physics-based reliability models. In: ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Seattle, WA, 11–15 November 2007, pp. 41–49. New York: ASME.
36.
OntiverosVCartillierAModarresM.An integrated methodology for assessing fire simulation code uncertainty. Nucl Sci Eng2010; 166: 179–201.
37.
AzarkhailMOntiverosVModarresM. A Bayesian framework for model uncertainty consideration in fire simulation codes. In: 17th international conference on nuclear engineering, Brussels, 12–16 July 2009, pp. 649–656. New York: ASME.
38.
Pourgol-MohamadM.Integrated methodology for thermal-hydraulics uncertainty analysis (IMTHUA). PhD Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 2007.
39.
Cowles MK. Review of WinBUGS 1.4. Am Stat2004; 58(4):330–336.
40.
Instron. Certificate of calibration. Norwood, MA: Instron Calibration Laboratory, 2012.
