This cross-cultural experiment (N = 620) tested the impact of the use of anonymous sources on perceived news story credibility in America and China, two countries with assumed different journalistic standards. Both Americans and Chinese rated news stories with only anonymous sources as less credible than stories with identified sources. The attitude of Americans towards news stories was found to be more positive. The study represents the first comparative research on the topic with rigorously established cross-cultural equivalences.
AdamsJB (1962) The relative credibility of 20 unnamed sources. Journalism Quarterly39: 79–82.
2.
Associated Press (2013) AP news values and practices. Available at: www.ap.org/company/news-values (accessed 20 January 2013).
3.
BartlettMS (1954) A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of Royal Statistical Society16(Series B): 296–298.
4.
BerloDKLemertJBMertzRJ (1970) Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly33: 563–576.
5.
BerryJW (1979) On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology4: 119–128.
6.
BlankenburgWB (1992) The utility of anonymous attribution. Newspaper Research Journal13(1/2): 10–23.
7.
BrackenCC (2006) Perceived credibility of local television news: The impact of television form and presence. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media50: 723–741.
8.
ByrneBM (2008) Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema20: 872–882.
9.
ChanJMLeeFLFPanZ (2006) Online news meets established journalism: How China's journalists evaluate the credibility of news websites. New Media and Society8: 925–947. .
10.
ChangC (2009) (Analysis of internet credibility in China). Today's Mass Media11: 95–96. .
11.
ChenCSLeeSYStevensonH (1995) Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asians and North American students. Psychological Science6: 170–175.
DuffyMJFreemanCP (2011) Unnamed sources: A utilitarian exploration of their justification and guidelines for limited use. Journal of Mass Media Ethics26(4): 297–315.
19.
DuffyMJWilliamsAE (2011) Use of unnamed sources drops from peak in 1960s and 1970s. Newspaper Research Journal32(4): 6–21.
20.
FedlerFCountsT (1981) Variations in attribution affect readers' evaluations of stories. Newspaper Research Journal2(3): 25–34.
21.
FicoFRichardsonJDEdwardsSM (2004) Influence of story structure on perceived story bias and news organization credibility. Mass Communication and Society7: 301–318.
22.
FlanaginAJMetzgerMJ (2000) Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly77: 515–540.
23.
Fuzhou GRT Market Information Analysis (2011) Analysis of media credibility. Available at: www.blog.cntv.cn/13665226-1574859.html (accessed 20 January 2013).
24.
GazianoCMcGrathK (1986) Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly63: 451–462.
25.
GolanGJ (2010) New perspectives on media credibility research. American Behavioral Scientist54(1): 3–7.
26.
GudykunstWB (2002) Issues in cross-cultural communication research. In: GudykunstWBModyB (eds) International and Intercultural Communication, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 165–182.
27.
GuntherACSnyderLB (1992) Reading international news in a censored press environment. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly69: 591–599.
28.
GuoJTianR (2007) Analysis of sources and quoting verbs in news stories. Contemporary Communications6: 142–144.
29.
Haiman RJ (1998) Hey, editors: Just stop the nonsense. Newspaper Research Journal 19: 2–9.
30.
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ and Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
31.
HaleFD (1984) Unnamed sources: Their impact on the perceptions of stories. Newspaper Research Journal5(2): 49.
32.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33.
HarknessJA (2010) Survey Methods in Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural Contexts, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
34.
HazelbarthT (1997) The Chinese Media: More Autonomous and Diverse-within Limits: An Intelligence Monograph. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency. .
35.
HeB (2006) A survey study on voting behavior and political participation in Zhejiang. Japanese Journal of Political Science7: 225–250.
36.
HovlandCIJanisILKelleyHH (1953) Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37.
HuiCHTriandisHC (1985) Measurements in cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology16(2): 131–152.
38.
HusselBP (1996) Before Watergate, beyond Jimmy's world. In: The annual convention of the association for education in journalism and mass communication, Anaheim, CA17 December 1996.
JacobsonHK (1969) Mass media believability: A study of receiver judgments. Journalism Quarterly46: 20–28.
43.
KaiserH (1970) A second generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika35: 401–415.
44.
KaiserH (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika39: 31–36.
45.
KiousisS (2001) Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication and Society4: 381–403.
46.
LevineTParkHSKimRK (2007) Some conceptual and theoretical challenges for cross-cultural communication research in the 21st century. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research36: 205–221.
47.
LiaoSLiXZhangG (2007) Analysis of news credibility in China. Chinese Journalism Quarterly4: 66–73. .
48.
LinkP (2005) China wiping out the truth. New York Review of Books52(3): 36–39. .
49.
LiuQ (2011) Credibility Analysis of Internet News in China, Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology.
50.
LiuTBatesBJ (2009) What's behind public trust in news media: A comparative study of America and China. Chinese Journal of Communication2(3): 307–329.
51.
LonnerW (1979) Issues in cross-cultural psychology. In: MarsellaATharpACibrowskiT (eds) Perspectives in Cross-Cultural Psychology, New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 17–45.
MarkhamD (1968) The dimensions of source credibility of television newscasters. Journal of Communication18: 57–64.
54.
Martin-KratzerRThorsonE (2007) Use of anonymous sources declines in U.S. newspapers. Newspaper Research Journal28(2): 56–70.
55.
MarxGT (1999) What is in a name? Some reflections on the sociology of anonymity. The Information Society15: 99–112.
56.
MastsumotoDvan de VijverFJR (2011) Cross-Cultural Research Methods in Psychology, New York: Cambridge University Press.
57.
McCroskeyJC (1992) An Introduction to Communication in the Classroom, Edina, MN: Burgess International.
58.
McCroskeyJCHamiltonPRWeinerAN (1974) The effect of interaction behavior on source credibility, homophily, and interpersonal attraction. Human Communication Research1: 42–52.
59.
MetzgerMJFlanaginAJEyalK (2003) Credibility for the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. In: KalbfleischPJ (ed.) Communication Yearbook 27, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 293–335.
60.
MeyerP (1988) Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly65: 567–588.
61.
PengKNisbettRWongN (1997) Validity problems comparing values across cultures and possible solutions. Psychological Methods2: 329–344.
62.
PettyRECacioppoJT (1981) Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches, Dubuque, IA: William C Brown.
63.
Petty RE and Cacioppo JT (1988) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19: 123–203.
64.
Pew Research Center (2011) Press widely criticized, but trusted more than other information sources. Available at: people-press.org (accessed 20 January 2013).
PornpitakpanC (2004) The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades' evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology32(2): 243–281.
67.
Rains SA and Scott CR (2007) To identify or not to identify: A theoretical model of receiver responses to anonymous communication. Communication Theory 17: 61–91.
68.
ShenFLuYGuoS (2011) News media use, credibility, and efficacy: An analysis of media participation intention in China. Chinese Journal of Communication4(4): 475–495.
69.
ShepardAC (1994) Anonymous sources. American Journalism Review, 19–25. .
70.
SmithRF (2007) Impact of unnamed sources on credibility not certain. Newspaper Research Journal28(3): 8–19.
71.
SmithPBFischerRVignolesVL (2013) Understanding Social Psychology across Cultures: Engaging with other in a Changing World, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
72.
SternadoriMMThorsonE (2009) Anonymous sources harm credibility of all stories. Newspaper Research Journal30(4): 54–66.
73.
StruppJ (2005) Everyone favors more careful use of anonymous sources-but is the current crackdown going too far? Losing confidence. Editor and Publisher138(7): 32–39.
74.
WestelyBHSeverinWJ (1964) Some correlates of media credibility. Journalism Quarterly41: 325–335.
75.
WhiteheadJL (1968) Factors of source credibility. Quarterly Journal of Speech54: 59–63.
76.
WulfemeyerKT (1985) How and why anonymous attribution is used by Time and Newsweek. Journalism Quarterly62(1): 81–86.
77.
XieL (2004) Belief consistency: Exploring a balance among trust in government, perceived news media credibility and media use. Master's Thesis, Washington State University, USA.
78.
XuJ (2012) Trust in Chinese state media: The influence of education, Internet, and government. Journal of International Communication18: 1–16.
(Analysis of internet credibility in China)
(Analysis of abuse of anonymous sources by media)