This study looks at news coverage of terrorist attacks on Twitter over a five-year period. It examines Twitter accounts of three US and three UK elite newspapers. This study found that terrorist attacks in core countries received more attention than attacks in non-core countries. Also, this study revealed that just three terrorist attacks: January and November 2015 Paris attacks and Brussels 2016 bombings, accounted for nearly a half of the overall US and UK tweets examined in this study.
AlkazemiMFFahmySWantaW (2018) The promise to the Arab World: Attributes of US President Obama in Arabic-language tweets. International Communication Gazette80(2): 119–134.
Cassa CA, Chunara R, Mandl K, et al. (2013) Twitter as a sentinel in emergency situations: Lessons from the Boston marathon explosions. PLOS Currents Disasters. Available at: http://currents.plos.org/disasters/index.html%3Fp=8687.html (accessed 17 January 2019).
7.
ChangTK (1998) All countries not created equal to be news: World system and international communication. Communication Research25(5): 528–563.
CrenshawM (2000) The psychology of terrorism: An agenda for the 21st century. Political Psychology21(2): 405–420.
10.
DimitrovaDVStrömbäckJ (2005) Mission accomplished? Framing of the Iraq War in the elite newspapers in Sweden and the United States. International Communication Gazette67(5): 399.
11.
FahmyS (2010) How could so much produce so little? Foreign affairs reporting in the wake of 9/11. In: GolanGJohnsonTJWantaW (eds) International Media in a Global Age, Philadelphia, PA: Routledge, pp. 147–159.
GaltungJRugeMH (1965) The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research2(1): 64–90.
14.
GerhardsJSchäferMS (2014) International terrorism, domestic coverage? How terrorist attacks are presented in the news of CNN, Al Jazeera, the BBC, and ARD. International Communication Gazette76(1): 3–26.
GolanG (2010) Determinants of International news coverage. In: GolanGJohnsonTWantaW (eds) International Media Communication in a Global Age, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 125–144.
17.
GolanGJHimelboimI (2016) Can World System theory predict news flow on Twitter? The case of government-sponsored broadcasting. Information, Communication & Society19(8): 1150–1170.
GreeneA (2017) Defining terrorism: One size fits all?International & Comparative Law Quarterly66(2): 411–440.
21.
GriffinM (2004) Picturing America's ‘war on terrorism’ in Afghanistan and Iraq: Photographic motifs as news frames. Journalism5(4): 381–402.
22.
GuidryJPCarlyleKELaRoseJG, et al. (2018) Framing and visual type: Effect on future Zika vaccine uptake intent. Journal of Public Health Research7(1): 35–42.
23.
HarcupTO'NeillD (2001) What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies2(2): 261–280.
24.
HermidaAFletcherFKurrellD, et al. (2012) Share, like, recommend. Decoding the social media news consumer. Journalism Studies13(5–6): 815–824.
25.
HimelboimIChangTMcCreeryS (2010) International network of foreign news coverage: Old global hierarchies in a new online world. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly87(2): 297–314.
26.
HoffmanAJengelleyDDuncanN, et al. (2010) How does the business of news influence terrorism coverage? Evidence from The Washington Post and USA Today. Terrorism and Political Violence22(4): 559–580.
HongS (2012) Online news on Twitter: Newspapers' social media adoption and their online readership. Information Economics and Policy24(1): 69–74.
30.
JensenMSNeumayerCRossiL (2018) ‘Brussels will land on its feet like a cat’: Motivations for memefying# Brusselslockdown. Information, Communication & Society39(8): 1122–1141.
JuAJeongSHChyiHI (2013) Will social media save newspapers? Examining the effectiveness of Facebook and Twitter as news platforms. Journalism Practice8(1): 1–17.
KimKBarnettG (1996) The determinants of international news flow: A network analysis. Communication Research23(3): 323–352.
35.
KwonKHChadhaMPellizzaroK (2017) Proximity and terrorism news in social media: A construal-level theoretical approach to networked framing of terrorism in Twitter. Mass Communication and Society20(6): 869–894.
36.
LeeJAgrawalMRaoHR (2015) Message diffusion through social network service: The case of rumor and non-rumor related tweets during Boston bombing 2013. Information Systems Frontiers17(5): 997–1005.
37.
LizardoO (2008) Defining and theorizing terrorism: A global actor-centered approach. Journal of World-Systems Research14(2): 91–118.
38.
McPhailTL (2010) Global Communication: Theories, Stakeholders, and Trends, 3rd ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
39.
OhOAgrawalMRaoHR (2013) Community intelligence and social media services: A rumor theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises. MIS Quarterly37(2): 407–426.
40.
PapacharissiZde Fatima OliveiraM (2008) News frames terrorism: A comparative analysis of frames employed in terrorism coverage in US and UK newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics13(1): 52–74.
41.
Parmelee JH, Roman N, Beasley B, Perkins SC (2019). Gender and generational differences in political reporters' interactivity on Twitter. Journalism Studies 20 (2): 232–247.
42.
ParryK (2010) A visual framing analysis of British press photography during the 2006 Israel–Lebanon conflict. Media, War & Conflict3(1): 67–85.
TufekciZ (2017) Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
49.
TumanJS (2010) The struggle to define terrorism. In: Communicating Terror: The Rhetorical Dimensions of Terrorism, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
50.
U.S. Department of State (n.d.) National Consortium for the study of terrorism and responses to terrorism: Annex of statistical Information. Available at: https://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2015/257526.htm (accessed 24 May 2018).
51.
WallersteinIM (1974) The Modern World System, New York, NY: Academic Press.
52.
WallersteinIM (2011) The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century, Berkeley: University of California Press.
53.
WantaWGolanG (2010) Coverage of foreign elections in the United States: A model of international news flow. In: GolanGJohnsonTWantaW (eds) International Media Communication in a Global Age, New York: Routledge, pp. 109–124.
WasikeBS (2013) Framing news in 140 Characters: How social media editors frame the news and interact with audiences via Twitter. Global Media Journal (Canadian Edition)6(1): 5–23.
56.
WeimannG (1987) Media events: The case of international terrorism. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media31(1): 21–39.
57.
WeimannGBrosiusHB (1991) The newsworthiness of international terrorism. Communication Research18(3): 333–354.
58.
WuD (2003) Homogeneity around the world: Comparing the systematic determinants of international new flow between developed and developing countries. International Communication Gazette65(1): 9–24.
59.
Zhao WX, Jiang J, Weng J, et al. (2011) Comparing Twitter and traditional media using topic models. In: Advances in information retrieval: 33rd European conference on IR research, ECIR 2011, Dublin, Ireland, 18–21 April 2011. Berlin: Springer Verlag.