This article explores 12 female victim-survivors’ experiences of seeking protection from criminal justice agencies in Dyfed-Powys, an area in Wales. The discussion draws on rich qualitative data, from a series of narrative interviews held in 2015, which offers new insights into how coercive and controlling behaviours influence ‘help-seeking’. The findings suggest that for 12 women, deemed to be high-risk, the experience of actively engaging with criminal justice agencies, served to instil in them a sense that they were alone at the most dangerous period in their help-seeking journey, namely the juncture of leaving, without formal protection. Under-enforcement by justice agents resulted in what Stubbs terms ‘non-feasance’: a process whereby women are unable to access protection from the law, thus potentially increasing the propensity for lethal violence.
AbrahamsC (1994) Hidden Victims: Children and Domestic Violence. London: NCH Action for Children.
2.
AbrahamsH (2007) Supporting Women after Domestic Violence: Loss, Trauma and Recovery. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishing.
3.
AllenM (2013) Social Work and Intimate Partner Violence. London: Routledge.
4.
AndersonDKSaundersDG (2003) Leaving an abusive partner: An empirical review of predictors, the process of leaving, and psychological well-being. Trauma Violence & Abuse4(2): 163–191.
5.
BarlowCJohnsonKWalklateS, et al. (2019) Putting coercive control into practice: Problems and possibilities. The British Journal of Criminology60(1): 160–179.
6.
BettinsonVBishopC (2015) Is the creation of a discrete offence of coercive control necessary to combat domestic violence?Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly66(2): 179–197.
CampbellJC (ed.) (1995) Interpersonal Violence: The practice Series, Vol. 8. Assessing Dangerousness: Violence by Sexual Offenders, Batterers, and Child Abusers. London: SAGE.
9.
CattaneoLBGoodmanLA (2010) Through the lens of therapeutic jurisprudence: The relationship between empowerment in the court system and well-being for intimate partner violence victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence25(3): 481–502.
10.
CavanaghK (2003) Understanding women’s responses to domestic violence. Qualitative Social Work2(3): 229–249.
ChristieN (1986) The ideal victim. In: FattahEA (ed.) From Crime Policy to Victim Policy: Reorienting the Justice System. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 17–30.
ElliottIThomasSOgloffJ (2014) Procedural justice in victim-police interactions and victims’ recovery from victimisation experiences. Policing and Society (24)5: 588–601.
18.
FanslowJLRobinsonEM (2009) Help-seeking behaviours and reasons for help-seeking reported by a representative sample of women victims of intimate partner violence in New Zealand. Journal of Interpersonal Violence25(5): 929–951.
19.
FleuryRE (2000) Survivors’ satisfaction with the criminal legal system response to intimate partner violence. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University, Detroit, MI.
20.
GoodmanLDuttonMAWeinfurtK, et al. (2003) The intimate partner violence strategies index: Development and application. Violence Against Women9(2): 163–186.
21.
GrovesNThomasT (2013) Domestic Violence and the Criminal Justice System. Abingdon: Routledge.
22.
HanmerJGriffithsSJerwoodD (1999) Arresting Evidence: Domestic Violence and Repeat Victimisation. London: Home Office.
23.
Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) (2014) Everyone’s Business: Improving Police Response to Domestic Abuse. London: HMIC.
24.
Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) (2015) Increasingly Everyone’s Business: A Progress Report on the Police Response to Domestic Abuse. London: HMIC.
HolderRL (2001) Domestic and Family Violence: Criminal Justice Interventions (Issues Paper 3). Sydney, NSW, Australia: Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse.
28.
HolderRLDalyK (2017) Sequencing justice: A longitudinal study of justice goals of domestic violence victims. The British Journal of Criminology58(4): 787–804.
29.
Home Office (1990) Domestic Violence. London: Home Office.
30.
Home Office (1995) Inter-Agency Co-Ordination to Tackle Domestic Violence. London: Home Office.
31.
Home Office (1998) Domestic Violence: Break the Chain Multi-Agency Guidance for Addressing Domestic Violence. London: Home Office.
32.
Home Office (2007) Domestic Abuse Guidance: Supporting People & Multi-Agency Working. London: Home Office.
HoyleC (1998) Negotiating Domestic Violence: Police, Criminal Justice, and Victims. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
37.
HoyleCSandersA (2000) Police response to domestic violence: From victim choice to victim empowerment?British Journal of Criminology40(1): 14–36.
38.
JohnsonHHottonT (2003) Losing control: Homicide risk in estranged and intact intimate relationships. Homicide Studies7(1): 58–84.
39.
KellyL (1988) Surviving Sexual Violence (Feminist Perspectives). Oxford: Polity Press.
40.
KellyL (2003) The wrong debate: Reflections on why force is not the key issue with respect to trafficking in women for sexual exploitation. Feminist Review73(1): 139–144.
41.
KellyLSharpNKleinR (2014) Finding the Costs of Freedom: How Women and Children Rebuild Their Lives after Domestic Violence. London: Solace Women’s Aid.
42.
LaingL (2017) Secondary victimization: Domestic violence survivors navigating the family law system. Violence Against Women23(11): 1314–1335.
43.
LaingLCavanaghKHumphreysC (2013) Social Work and Domestic Violence: Developing Critical and Reflective Practice. London: SAGE.
44.
LehrnerAAllenN (2009) Still a movement after all these years? Current tensions in the domestic violence movement. Violence Against Women5(6): 1–22.
45.
LewisRDobashRPDobashRE, et al. (2000) Protection, prevention, rehabilitation or justice? Women’s use of the law to challenge domestic violence. International Review of Victimology7(1–3): 179–205.
46.
MeyerS (2016) Still blaming the victim of intimate partner violence? Women’s narratives of victim desistance and redemption when seeking support. Theoretical Criminology20(1): 75–90.
47.
Ministry of Justice (2015) Code of Practice for Victims of Crime. London: Crown.
48.
MoffatP (2017) Ending abuse against women and girls. Journal of Health Visiting5(2): 64–66.
49.
MyhillA (2015) Measuring coercive control: What can we learn from national population surveys?Violence Against Women21(3): 355–375.
50.
NatapoffA (2006) Under-enforcement. Fordham Law Review75(3): 1715–1776.
51.
NicholsAJ (2011) Gendered organisations: Challenges for domestic violence victim advocates and feminist advocacy. Feminist Criminology6(2): 111–131.
PitmanT (2017) Living with coercive control: Trapped within a complex web of double standard, double binds and boundary violations. British Journal of Social Work47(1): 143–161.
54.
RiessmanCK (1993) Narrative Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
55.
RobinsonALMyhillAWireJ, et al. (2016) Risk-Led Policing of Domestic Abuse and the DASH Risk Model. Cardiff: College of Policing, Cardiff University and UCL Department of Security and Crime Science.
56.
SafeLives (2014) Domestic Abuse, Stalking and Harassment and Honour-Based Violence Risk Identification Checklist. Bristol: SafeLives.
57.
SafeLives (2015) Insights Idva National Dataset 2013-14. Bristol: SafeLives.
58.
Serious Crimes Act2015, Section 76.
59.
SklanskyDA (2008) Democracy and the Police. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
60.
StarkE (2007) Coercive Control: How Men Entrap Women in Personal Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
61.
StewartCCLanganDHannemS (2013) Victim experiences and perspectives on police responses to verbal violence in domestic settings. Feminist Criminology8(4): 269–294.
62.
StubbsJ (2002) Domestic violence and women’s safety: Feminist challenges to restorative justice. In: StrangHBraithwaiteJ (eds) Restorative Justice and Family Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 42–61.
63.
StubbsJ (2016) Searching for integrity in domestic violence policing. In: HunterJRobertsPYoungS, et al. (eds) Integrity in the Criminal Process: From Theory into Practice. Oxford: Hart, pp. 53–74.
64.
TadrosV (2004) The distinctiveness of domestic abuse: A freedom based account. Louisiana Law Review65(1): 989–1014.
65.
Taylor-DunnH (2016) The impact of victim advocacy on the prosecution of domestic violence offences: Lessons from a realistic evaluation. Criminology and Criminal Justice16(1): 21–39.
66.
ThibautJ WWalkerL (1975) Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
67.
TownsAJAdamsPJ (2016) I didn’t know whether I was right or wrong or just bewildered: Ambiguity, responsibility, and silencing women’s talk of men’s domestic violence. Violence Against Women22(4): 495–520.
68.
TylerTR (2006) Restorative justice and procedural justice: Dealing with rule breaking. Journal of Social Issues62: 2307–2326.
69.
TylerTRHuoYJ (2002) Trust in the Law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: SAGE.
70.
UllrichCG (2004) Activating social policy and individual autonomy. Social World55(2): 145–158.
71.
WalgraveL (2011) Investigating the potentials of restorative justice practice. Washington University Journal of Law and Policy36(1): 91–140.
72.
WemmersJAM (1996) Victims in the Criminal Justice System. Amsterdam: Kugler publications.
73.
WienerC (2017) Seeing what is ‘invisible in plain sight’: Policing coercive control. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice56(4): 500–515.
