Abstract
On 4 January 1937, the BBC’s Controller of Administration, Basil Nicolls, added a note to the bottom of a memo about the radio Talks Assistant Mary Adams. It read, ‘Agreed that Mrs Adams should go to Television’ (BBC WAC L2/5/1, 1937). The BBC had launched its ‘high definition’ television service on 2 November 1936, to great national excitement, from its new studios at Alexandra Palace in North London. Although transmissions only reached a few thousand viewers in the surrounding area, the notion of broadcasting pictures as well as sound had captured the public imagination. For the BBC, it also meant the staffing of a whole new department. Adams had joined the BBC in 1930, to work on its ‘spoken word’ radio output, firstly in Adult Education and then in the Talks Department. Her new job as a Television Producer would build on her broad experience of making radio programmes but it would also create many fresh challenges as she grappled with unfamiliar technologies, a more dynamic work-culture and a visual element that she was unaccustomed to.
This working paper is about the role of women in the very early BBC television service, 1932-39, prior to a 7-year closure necessitated by the Second World War. One of its contentions is that, while there was certainly much that was novel in Television, in terms of employment practices, the experiences of those who worked at Alexandra Palace continued to be very similar to those who worked in the wider BBC. As well as briefly charting the role of Mary Adams, the first - and only - woman in pre-war British television with the title ‘Producer’, it will reflect on the staff of the newly established Make-up and Wardrobe Department, headed by Mary Allan; the two widely publicised hostess-announcers, Jasmine Bligh and Elizabeth Cowell and the programme
Until very recently, apart from mentions of Bligh and Cowell, little has been published about women in the pre-Second World War BBC television service. The many books that consider the history of early BBC TV might reference Mary Adams, such as Briggs (1965: 621), but beyond that, it is very much a history of men. This has now been rectified with Sarah Arnold’s
As with many studies of early television, Arnold begins her analysis of BBC women’s roles in 1936, the year of the first transmissions from Alexandra Palace. In fact, women were involved in BBC television from the very start of its experimental service, in 1932. The complexities of the development of British television, dating back to the early 1920s, have been widely explored by the likes of Swift (1950), Norman (1984), Burns (1986) Aldridge (2012) and Medhurst (2021). The BBC had broadcast its first demonstration television programmes in 1929 and by August 1932 was ready to start an experimental 30-line service, using the Baird system. The producer appointed to oversee this was Eustace Robb, who joined as an ‘Assistant’ on 14 July 1932 (the term ‘Producer’ was rarely used by the BBC at this time.) Two months later, on 19 September, Robb was joined by Jean Bartlett.
The first woman BBC television ‘producer’ – Jean Bartlett
Bartlett had arrived at the BBC in October 1928 as a shorthand typist. Like many women she had begun her BBC career in the General Office, in a temporary capacity, and once her capabilities were assessed, was quickly moved to more a more permanent secretarial position; in her case this was with the Publications Department. There is no staff file for Bartlett, the only known BBC record of her is the Salary Information files (BBC WAC R62/100/1-3, Salary Information Records, 1923-1939), which show her gaining above average wage rises, an indication of a high level of competence (she started in a waged capacity). It seems likely that she had been to university; according to her future husband Tony Bridgewater, his own scholarship came from his ‘association with a well-educated wife’ (Miall, 1997). When Bartlett moved to Television in January 1933, her title was still Shorthand Typist. However, within 4 months she was promoted to a salaried role as an Assistant - so the same designation as Robb. This was a position she would hold until her contract was ‘terminated’ in November 1934. The reason for her leaving the BBC was her marriage to Bridgewater, one of the Senior Maintenance Engineers for the experimental television service. Bridgewater would go on to have a significant career in television, at Alexandra Palace and beyond.
The only references to Jean Bartlett’s work that have so far been uncovered are from the periodical
After her departure, Bartlett evidently remained a keen supporter of television and someone whose knowledge and experience was respected. In August 1935 she contributed a full-page piece to
Shorthand typists/clerks as ‘producers’ and ‘administrators’
Jean Bartlett was not the only woman to work on the experimental service from 1932; a shorthand typist had also been allocated to Eustace Robb, a Miss Peacock. Eveline Peacock is another elusive BBC woman. The few glimpses of her that we have suggest that, as with many of those with the designation ‘shorthand typist’, she acted in a much wider capacity, in this case as a production assistant and even, at times, as a producer. Norman (1984: 84) included an extract from Robb’s personal notebooks from around 1934 which described a rehearsal for a Russian Ballet for which there were issues with costumes. He wrote ‘Miss Peacock rushes out between office hours for gloves and bonnet’.
In 1935, Peacock moved to Alexandra Palace as secretary to the Television Productions Manager, Donald Munro and she remained with the television service until its closedown in September 1939. She was amongst the earliest BBC staff to move to the North London studios, a transfer which had caused her some anxiety. In an August 1935 memo to Miss Freeman, the Women’s Staff Administrator (Freeman and her team had responsibility for all the female waged secretarial and clerical staff), Peacock described the tortuous journey from Dollis Hill which could take up to 2 hours each way (BBC WAC3 R13/436/1a, 1936). As the chief carer of an aging mother, she was unable to move closer to Alexandra Palace, she explained, however she was reluctant to forfeit the opportunity to work in Television, because she enjoyed it so much: I have been with Television for three and a half years now, and when the time came to decide whether or not I would like to continue, I agreed to transfer to Alexandra Palace, although you gave me the option of remaining at Broadcasting House. While realising that the journey would be a very arduous one, I preferred not to ask to transfer to another Department, as I was extremely interested in my job.
Frustratingly, there is scant indication as to what Peacock’s job at Alexandra Palace involved. The only hint is a reference in the staff journal
A shorthand typist who did go on to hold a significant role in BBC TV, was Joan Gilbert. In early 1938, she joined the team who made the television programme Miss Gilbert was an invaluable member of the “In Town Tonight” staff, and in my view would be of great assistance to us on our topical and “Picture Page” programmes. I think she ought to be given a job attached to Mr Madden to specialise in this work. Her experience and talents lend themselves particularly to this form of activity.
Although designated as a ‘clerk’, Gilbert’s new role in Television was predominantly as a ‘scout’. If she proves adaptable to vision problems, and creative, I would frankly like the option of using her as a Staff scout to investigate, go outside and carry through individual items emanating from this office, which I now have to farm out to outside scouts. This would prove an immediate saving of money for the Corporation on each programme and ultimately would possibly also relieve me by sub-editorial work.
Even though Gilbert would quickly be referred to as the ‘sub-editor’/assistant editor of the programme, she remained a clerk. This lack of recognition for a substantial role was also applicable to Eve Moir, Madden’s secretary. A memo from October 1937 reveals his desperation for a second shorthand typist (this was Moir’s actual designation) because of the immense workload that was already on Moir’s shoulders. Questioning the usefulness of the new Assistant Producer in Television, Royston Morley, Madden stressed that, in terms of ‘an assistant to help me with programme building and coordination generally, Morley is not really suited to this which is being most adequately handled by Miss Moir’. His praise for Moir continued (BBC WAC R13/426/2, 1937): she assists me in programme building, knows all my views and plans for programme balance, orchestral hours, her training being invaluable in this respect. Suggests ideas and artists to producers based on our knowledge of what is available, coordinates and fixes changes generally in contact with producers and Television Production Manager’s office, issues all programme details and corrections … The general telephone calls alone are sufficient to keep an average Secretary fully occupied.
In October 1938 there was a suggestion by Miss Freeman that, in recognition of their responsibilities, both Joan Gilbert and Eve Moir should be called ‘Junior Assistants’, something that, apparently, was already in place for ‘one or two weekly-paid men and women’ (BBC WAC L1/166/4 (c), 1938b). This was declined, however, because several other clerks at Alexandra Palace were ‘doing equally responsible work’ and so would necessitate a change in designation for them as well (BBC WAC L1/166/4 (d), 1938). Clearly, many of the secretarial and clerical women who worked for the early service were carrying out production roles and so, potentially, could have reached more senior television grades.
Intriguingly, it seems that Una Marson, the first black woman radio producer at the BBC, might also have had a more prominent role on
A final example of a woman employed in a secretarial/clerical capacity at Alexandra Palace, who may well have moved on to a more significant role, is Joan Vickery. Vickery had joined the BBC in June 1929, as a shorthand typist in Outside Broadcasts, being promoted to a ‘clerk’ in the Executive section of the Department in April 1933 (the ‘Executive’ was the interface between programme makers and administrators). In May 1935, she arranged to meet with Miss Freeman to discuss the possibility of a transfer to Television; her manager Leonard Schuster was being moved to Alexandra Palace and she was keen to accompany him. In her report of the meeting (BBC WACR13/426/1a (a), 1935a), Freeman outlined Vickery’s acknowledgment that, to begin with, there might not be a job similar to her present one. She was quite prepared, however ‘to start as Mr Schuster’s secretary in the hope that an opportunity will occur at a later date for her to be given a more executive post’. Freeman conceded that ‘Miss Vickery’s going would be a great loss to O.B. Department’, however she could not help feeling that, ‘it will only be a comparatively short time before Television will need girls of her calibre and I feel it only fair that she should be in “on the ground floor”’.
Miss Freeman was right; Joan Vickery’s transfer was delayed by several months because, ‘She
Vickery, Moir, Gilbert and Peacock and are all good examples of those in clerk/secretary roles at the BBC whose actual job was far more creative and responsible than the designated title would suggest. What was the situation for women coming into a completely new department, Television Makeup and Wardrobe?
The new ‘profession’ of makeup and wardrobe
Amongst the staffing issues that Vickery is likely to have been involved with while at Alexandra Palace were the conditions of service for three new wardrobe women. They were part of a small but busy team under the management of Mary Allan, the Television Makeup and Wardrobe Assistant (later Manager). A series of memos from April and May 1938 between Freeman, Douglas Clarke (the General Executive Officer) and Schuster, the Television Executive, reveal them to be grappling with the novelty of the situation. It was the first time that the BBC had employed wardrobe staff, so how much should Mrs Hearnshaw, Mrs Goodship and Miss Edwards be paid? Mrs Hearnshaw was the most experienced, a well-trained needlewoman who was able to cut and fit and who had previously worked at ‘Dickins and Jones, Worth’s, and Mary Grey of Brook Street’ (BBC WACR13/426/2, 1938). Mrs Goodship had no dress-making experience, but was a competent machinist, her knowledge of sewing and machine work learnt while making gas masks and grenades in the First World War. Miss Edwards, by far the youngest of the three, was a skilled needlewoman and at the point that the memos were written, her work at Alexandra Palace was as a dresser. After discussions that involved the Great Marlborough Street Labour Exchange, and in consultation with Mary Allan, it was ultimately agreed that Mrs Hearnshaw would receive £3 a week and Mrs Goodship and Miss Edwards, £2.5s. These would have been reasonably good rates of pay for the time.
The negotiations over the wardrobe women throw a spotlight on the establishment of a new section at the BBC. Makeup and Wardrobe were crucial aspects of television because people’s faces and general appearance were vital to the success of any show. As Sarah Arnold (2021: 85) has noted, although there were similarities with film and stage, ‘television necessitated a new set of practices’. As we have seen from the descriptions of the experimental service, Jean Bartlett had been praised for her familiarity with costume and makeup while Eveline Peacock had been despatched in search of hat and gloves. Who applied the cosmetics in those very early years is not known, but images exist of actors sporting heavy-lined eyes and lips in green or blue, to ensure that their features were prominent. Allan, however, who had previously worked as a makeup artist in film production, dismissed this necessity as no longer true (Radio Times, 1937). At Alexandra Palace, Allan’s team would ultimately consist of the three needlewomen/dressers along with at least four Assistants: Pamela Hide, Jeanne Bradnock, Isabel Winthrope and Elsie Lambert - although it is not certain if these appointments were concurrent. And there was promotion within the team. By April 1939, Bradnock was Assistant Makeup Manager while Winthrope was Assistant Manager for Wardrobe.
Female-staffed departments headed by a woman were not uncommon at the BBC (Murphy, 2016b: 53–68). At Broadcasting House, these included the Telephone Exchange, the Duplicating Office, the Registry and the General Office, all areas that employed clerical/secretarial staff. Likewise, Makeup and Wardrobe was considered to be a female area of work, however the high status of the new Television Department was noticeably different - and at odds with the film industry which saw Makeup, in particular, as the domain of men (Bell, 2021). As Arnold has observed, Mary Allan was presented as a highly skilled professional and there were frequent articles about her in the technical press. One of the examples that Arnold uses (2021: 86) is a 1936 edition of
These technical aspects of the role were confirmed by Isabel Winthrope, who joined Allan’s team in November 1937. Winthrope was one of those interviewed by Bruce Norman for his book
For Winthrope, the main joys of working in Television were the people that you met and the importance of the job. She too described the process of rehearsals (Norman, 1984: 186): We had to sit in front of a little monitoring screen in the studio – in the most cluttered studios you’ve ever seen. And we made notes about what changes we might need to make in the dresses and what shades of make-up to use. The actors weren’t usually made-up during rehearsal. Mr Campbell, the lighting expert, would often come over and tell us that such and such an artist and such and such a camera would have to be especially dark or especially light.
The buzz and excitement of the Makeup and Wardrobe section at Alexandra Palace was regularly celebrated in the press, Mary Allan’s role being particularly highlighted. What happened following the outbreak of war is uncertain. Of the team, only two would be re-employed in the post-war television service. In the 1947 staff list, Jeanne Bradnock - who was deployed during the war to the BBC Monitoring Service at Wood Norton– is listed as Makeup and Wardrobe Manager. Mrs EM Hearnshaw is also included in the staff list, as Wardrobe Mistress.
Women as television announcers
In her 1937
As Arnold shows, the selection criteria for the two female posts, for which more than 700 applications were received, were very different to that of the lone male announcer. Whereas he was required to have a cheerful voice, to be well-proportioned and to have no prominent features, they were to have good looks, personality and be perfectly pitched (2021: 73). He was to act as ‘a point of identification’ for the audience; they were to be ‘largely ornamental’ (2021: 74). Arnold exposes the contradictions of a role that was on the one hand progressive – putting women firmly in the public sphere - but also culturally conservative, with the female announcers expected to ‘reflect qualities such as feminine passivity, discipline, charm and deference’ (2021: 76).
The BBC’s employment of women as television announcers was in stark contrast to their exclusion as announcers on radio. Although a handful of women did work as occasional programme announcers on the BBC’s local and regional networks, they were considered unsuitable for the national service because they lacked the necessary gravitas. The female voice was not considered appropriate to deliver the all-important news bulletins, weather reports, fat stock prices, SOS messages, football results and so on that, along with the announcing of programmes, were central to the job. As has been written about elsewhere (Murphy 2016b: 241–45), for the BBC, its male announcers - speaking at the microphone in full evening-dress - were viewed as the personification of the organisation. They represented its professionalism, its dignity, its authority. The BBC had ‘experimented’ with a female announcer; on 28 July 1933, Sheila Borrett made her first wireless appearance as part of the central announcing team. Yet, although male colleagues were positive and encouraging towards her, in October 1933 she was dropped from the role. According to a BBC statement which explained why she had been axed, there had been more than 10,000 letters of complaint, 90% of which were from women. Following the removal of Borrett, no other women were employed as announcers on the BBC’s national service, until the Second World War.
In light of the BBC’s attitude towards women announcers on radio, it is intriguing to speculate why they were deemed appropriate for television. As Arnold has indicated, Jasmine Bligh and Elizabeth Cowell were largely considered to be decorative, indeed they were often called hostess-announcers. Even for its male announcer, Leslie Mitchell, the role was largely that of a compere; no items of gravity or bespoke news bulletins were broadcast in the few hours each day that television programmes were transmitted (the television service used Gaumont and Movietone newsreels instead). Arnold (2021: 79–81) has written of the vacuousness of the two women’s roles, with little opportunity to be anything other than attractive to the eye, however, according to an account by Bligh’s daughter, Sarah Johnson (2017), she was able to inject at least some personality and verve. This included conducting studio-based interviews as well as a range of outside broadcasts that encompassed, for example, being rescued from a ‘burning’ building as part of a demonstration of modern firefighting methods; participating in a dare-devil stunt in the sidecar of a motorcycle; and live broadcasting from an airborne ‘autogiro’, a cross between a helicopter and a small plane.
Alongside Bligh and Cowell, a third woman frequently appeared on screen in the early years of BBC television. This was Joan Miller, a young Canadian actress, who posed as the ‘Switchboard Girl’, an imagined role that introduced the interviewees for
Mary Adams, ‘senior’ producer
Joan Miller’s name may have featured heavily in
Arnold (2021: 82–84; 88–92) has devoted many pages of
As Arnold has rightly stressed, Adams’ value to BBC television was also linked to her impressive contacts book which brought the likes of John Betjeman, Hugh Walpole, Walter Gropius and Sir Raymond Unwin to Alexander Palace (Murphy, 2016c). Adams, who was married to the maverick Conservative MP Vyvyan Adams, had previously drawn on her extensive social networks for her radio work. However, her television talks were not all grand affairs. She continued to produce the more run-of-the-mill, domestic output that had been initiated by Cecil Lewis, such as
A sample week from May 1939 exemplifies the diversity and expanse of Adams’s talks and reveals a variety of visual techniques that were employed to bring them to life.
Mary Adams was to have a busy war. In December 1939, she was transferred to the Ministry of Information as Director of Home Intelligence Information before returning to work for BBC Radio in May 1941. When the television service returned in June 1946, she was already in place as a Senior Producer. In April 1948 she was promoted to Head of Television Talks and in January 1953 she rose to be Assistant to the Controller, TV. She retired in March 1958 at the age of 60. Adams was one of a number of women who made their mark at Alexandra Palace in the late 1940s and 1950s, others include Grace Wyndham Goldie in Current Affairs; Frida Lingstrom and Ursula Eason in Children’s Programmes; Nancy Thomas in science and arts; Doreen Stephens in the Women’s Programme Unit and Joanna Spicer in Programme Planning. As this article has shown, there were also a small handful of pre-war women who resumed prominent positions: Joan Gilbert and Jeanne Bradnock as well as Jasmine Bligh, who returned briefly as an announcer.
The war, however, had severed the link between the clerical/secretarial women who evidently had been doing television production work, and their chance to achieve accredited production roles. During the war these women, like all those who worked for Television, were deployed elsewhere, either to war work or to other parts of the BBC. Many would have returned to radio production jobs, bringing with them fresh practices and ideas yet still comfortable in an environment that, institutionally, remained very similar to television. We will never know how the BBC television service might have evolved without the seven year interruption, but it seems likely that there would certainly have been greater scope for women to excel.
