Much of the political communication scholarship concerning state—media relations concludes that the media are highly dependent on and even subservient to the state. This is particular true during wartime. Partial and conditionally based exceptions to this general conclusion include event-driven news and the cascade model. We argue that another important exception to standard conclusions regarding state—media relations involves transnational advocacy organizations and epistemic communities.
Avant, D.D. (2005) The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Bennett, W.L. (1990) `Toward a Theory of Press—State Relations in the U.S.', Journal of Communication40(Spring): 103—29.
3.
Bennett, W.L. and S. Livingston (2003) `Editors Introduction: A Semi-Independent Press: Government Control and Journalistic Autonomy in the Political Construction of News', Political Communication20(4): 359—62.
4.
Bennett, W.L., R.G. Lawrence and L. Livingston (2007) When the Press Fails: Political Power and the News Media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Bull, H. (1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
6.
Carpenter, R.C. (2007) `Setting the Advocacy Agenda: Theorizing Issue Emergence and Nonemergence in Transnational Advocacy Networks', International Studies Quarterly51(1): 99—120.
7.
Entman, R. (2004) Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Finnemore, M. and K. Sikkink (1998) `International Norm Dynamics and Political Change' , International Organization52(4): 887—917.
9.
Haas, P.M. (1997) `Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Political Coordination', in P. M. Haas (ed.) Knowledge, Power and International Policy Coordination . Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
10.
Keck, M.E. and K. Sikkink (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
11.
Lawrence, R.G. (2000) The Politics of Force: Media and the Construction of Police Brutality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
Livingston, S. (2003) `Diplomacy in the New Information Environment' , Georgetown Journal of International Affairs4(2): 111—16.
13.
Livingston, S. and S. Aday (2007) `NGOs as Intelligence Agencies: The Empowerment of Transnational Advocacy Networks and the Media by Commercial Remote Sensing ', paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers, San Francisco, 17—21 April.
14.
Livingston, S. and W.L. Bennett (2003) `Gatekeeping, Indexing and Live-Event News: Is Technology Altering the Construction of News?', Political Communication20(4): 363—80.
15.
Livingston, S. and L. Robinson (2003) `Mapping Fears: The Use of Commercial High-Resolution' , AstroPolitics1(2): 3—25.
16.
Livingston, S. and D. Van Belle (2005) `The Effects of New Satellite Newsgathering Technology on Newsgathering from Remote Locations', Political Communication22(1): 45—62.
17.
Mueller, J.E. (2007) Overblown: How Politicians and the Terrorism Industry Inflate National Security Threats, and Why We Believe Them. New York: Simon & Schuster.
18.
Rosenau, J.N. (1990) Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
Rosenau, J.N. (1997) Along the Domestic—Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Sigal, L. (1973) Reporters and Officials: The Organizations and Politics of Newsgathering. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath & Co.
21.
Sparrow, B.H. (2006) `A Research Agenda for an Institutional Media' , Political Communication32(2): 145—57.
