Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

The decision to admit patients to the intensive care unit (ICU) is complex. Structuring the decision-making process may be beneficial to patients and decision-makers alike. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and impact of a brief training intervention on ICU treatment escalation decisions using the Warwick model- a structured decision-making framework for treatment escalation decisions.

Methods

Treatment escalation decisions were assessed using Objective Structured Clinical Examination-style scenarios. Participants were ICU and anaesthetic registrars with experience of making ICU admission decisions. Participants completed one scenario, followed by training with the decision-making framework and subsequently a second scenario. Decision-making data was collected using checklists, note entries and post-scenario questionnaires.

Results

Twelve participants were enrolled. Brief decision-making training was successfully delivered during the normal ICU working day. Following training participants demonstrated greater evidence of balancing the burdens and benefits of treatment escalation. On visual analogue scales of 0–10, participants felt better trained to make treatment escalation decisions (4.9 vs 6.8, p = 0.017) and felt their decision-making was more structured (4.7 vs 8.1, p = 0.017).

Overall, participants provided positive feedback and reported feeling more prepared for the task of making treatment escalation decisions.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that a brief training intervention is a feasible way to improve the decision-making process by improving decision-making structure, reasoning and documentation. Training was implemented successfully, acceptable to participants and participants were able to apply their learning. Further studies of regional and national cohorts are needed to determine if training benefit is sustained and generalisable.

Keywords

intensive care critical care decision making clinical decision-making triage

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bassford

Griffiths

Svantesson

, et al. Developing an intervention around referral and admissions to intensive care: a mixed-methods study. Health Serv Deliv Res 2019; 7(39).

Gopalan

Pershad

. Decision-making in ICU - a systematic review of factors considered important by ICU clinician decision makers with regard to ICU triage decisions. J Crit Care 2019; 50: 99–110.

Sprung

Geber

Eidelman

, et al. Evaluation of triage decisions for intensive care admission. Crit Care Med 1999; 27(6): 1073–1079.

Garrouste-Orgeas

Montuclard

Timsit

, et al. Predictors of intensive care unit refusal in French intensive care units: a multiple-center study. Crit Care Med 2005; 33(4): 750–755.

Dallison

Jones

Matthews

. Analysis of critical care referrals. Crit Care 2010; 14(Suppl 1): P469.

Stiegler

Tung

. Cognitive processes in anesthesiology decision making. Anesthesiology 2014; 120(1): 204–217.

Rogerson

Gottlieb

Handelsman

, et al. Nonrational processes in ethical decision making. Am Psychol 2011; 66(7): 614–623.

Harvey

DJR

Gardiner

. 'MORAL balance' decision-making in critical care. BJA Educ 2019; 19(3): 68–73.

Bassford

. Decisions regarding admission to the ICU and international initiatives to improve the decision-making process. Crit Care (London, England) 2017; 21(1): 174.

10.

Hanson

Danis

Garrett

, et al. Who decides? Physicians' willingness to use life-sustaining treatment. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156(7): 785–789.

11.

Garland

Shaman

Baron

, et al. Physician-attributable differences in intensive care unit costs: a single-center study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174(11): 1206–1210.

12.

Adhikari

Fowler

Bhagwanjee

, et al. Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults. Lancet (London, England) 2010; 376(9749): 1339–1346.

13.

Chin-Yee

D'Egidio

Thavorn

, et al. Cost analysis of the very elderly admitted to intensive care units. Crit Care (London, England) 2017; 21(1): 109.

14.

Rees

Bassford

Dale

, et al. Implementing an intervention to improve decision making around referral and admission to intensive care: results of feasibility testing in three NHS hospitals. J Eval Clin Pract 2020; 26(1): 56–65.

15.

Charlesworth

Mort

Smith

. An observational study of critical care physicians' assessment and decision-making practices in response to patient referrals. Anaesthesia 2017; 72(1): 80–92.

16.

Campling

Cummings

Myall

, et al. Escalation-related decision making in acute deterioration: a retrospective case note review. BMJ Open 2018; 8(8): e022021.

17.

Harden

Stevenson

Downie

, et al. Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. Br Med J 1975; 1(5955): 447–451.

18.

Patrício

Julião

Fareleira

, et al.

Is the OSCE a feasible tool to assess competencies in undergraduate medical education?

Med Teach 2013; 35(6): 503–514.

19.

Waltz

Davis

Cadigan

, et al. Professionalism and ethics: a standardized patient observed standardized clinical examination to assess ACGME pediatric professionalism milestones. MedEdPORTAL 2020; 16: 10873.

20.

Bowen

Kreuter

Spring

, et al. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med 2009; 36(5): 452–457.

21.

Barnato

Mohan

Lane

, et al. Advance care planning norms may contribute to hospital variation in end-of-life ICU use: a simulation study. Med Decis Making 2014; 34(4): 473–484.

22.

Lighthall

Vazquez-Guillamet

. Understanding decision making in critical care. Clin Med Res 2015; 13(3–4): 156–168.

23.

Escher

Perneger

Chevrolet

. National questionnaire survey on what influences doctors' decisions about admission to intensive care. BMJ 2004; 329(7463): 425.

24.

Dahine

Mardini

Jayaraman

. The perceived likelihood of outcome of critical care patients and its impact on triage decisions: a case-based survey of intensivists and internists in a Canadian, quaternary care hospital network. PloS One 2016; 11(2): e0149196.

25.

Barnato

Hsu

Bryce

, et al. Using simulation to isolate physician variation in intensive care unit admission decision making for critically ill elders with end-stage cancer: a pilot feasibility study. Crit Care Med 2008; 36(12): 3156–3163.

26.

Cohen

Eichorn

Silver

. Admission decisions to a medical intensive care unit are based on functional status rather than severity of illness. a single center experience. Minerva Anestesiol 2012; 78(11): 1226–1233.

27.

Stelfox

Hemmelgarn

Bagshaw

, et al. Intensive care unit bed availability and outcomes for hospitalized patients with sudden clinical deterioration. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172(6): 467–474.

28.

Cabana

Rand

Powe

, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999; 282(15): 1458–1465.

29.

Parsons

. What happened at Hawthorne?: New evidence suggests the Hawthorne effect resulted from operant reinforcement contingencies. Science (New York, NY) 1974; 183(4128): 922–932.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.32 MB

0.00 MB

Investigating the impact of brief training in decision-making on treatment escalation to intensive care using objective structured clinical examination-style scenarios

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material