In the target article, we reviewed empirical evidence regarding the relationship between facial expressions and emotion in infancy. In our response to commentators, we make three main points. First, we concur with Hertenstein that the field has thus far relied too heavily on deductive reasoning, and suggest that future research strike a balance between inductive and deductive reasoning. Second, we maintain that infant recognition of discrete emotions remains an open question. Third, we state our position regarding the revised version of DET.
Campos, J.J., Thein, S., & Owen, D. ( 2003). A Darwinian legacy of understanding human infancy: Emotional expressions as behavior regulators. In P. Ekman, J. Campos, R. Davidso & F. de Wall (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Vol. 1000. Emotions inside out. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
3.
Gendler Martin, N., Witherington, D.C., & Edwards, A. ( 2008). The development of affect specificity in infants’ use of emotion cues. Infancy, 13(5), 456-468.
4.
Hertenstein, M. ( 2010). Cautions in the study of infant emotional displays. Emotion Review, 2(2), 130-131.
5.
Hoehl, S., & Striano, T. ( 2008). Neural processing of eye gaze and threat-related emotional facial expressions and eye gaze direction. Child Development , 79(6), 1,752-1,760.
6.
Hoehl, S., & Striano, T. ( 2010). Discrete emotions in infancy: Perception without production?Emotion Review, 2(2), 132-133.
7.
Izard, C., Woodburn, E., & Finlon, K. ( 2010). Extending emotion science to the study of discrete emotions in infants. Emotion Review, 2(2), 134-136.
8.
Montague, D.P.F., & Walker-Andrews, A.S. (2001). Peekaboo: A new look at infants’ perception of emotion expressions. Developmental Psychology, 37(6), 826-838.
