The desire to feel clean and pure might not merely be the absence of contamination and resulting feelings of disgust. Instead, it might have a social function because early in evolution social grooming not only involved improved personal hygiene and cleanliness, but also increased group cohesion. Thus, knowing that one’s body is clean, proper and tidy might have social implications that go beyond morality.
Cannon, P.R., Schnall, S., & White, M. (in press). Transgressions and expressions: Affective facial muscle activity predicts moral judgments. Social Psychological and Personality Science.
2.
Dunbar, R. ( 1983). Structure of gelada baboon reproductive units: III. The male’s relationship with his females. Animal Behavior , 31, 556-564.
3.
Dunbar, R. ( 1993). Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 681-735.
4.
Dunbar, R. ( 1996). Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. London, UK: Faber & Faber.
5.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. ( 2009). Liberals and conservatives use different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 96, 1029-1046.
6.
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. ( 2007). The moral mind: How 5 sets of innate moral intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules . In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind (Vol. 3, pp. 367-391). New York, NY: Oxford.
7.
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D., Knobe, J., & Bloom, P. ( 2009). Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays. Emotion, 9, 435-439.
8.
Keverne, E.B., Martensz, N.D., & Tuite, B. ( 1989). Beta-endorphin concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid of monkeys are influenced by grooming relationships. Psychoneuroendocrinology , 14, 155-161.
9.
Lee, S.W.S., & Schwarz, N. ( 2010a). Dirty hands and dirty mouths: Embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor is specific to the motor modality involved in moral transgression . Psychological Science, 21, 1423-1425.
Liljenquist, K., Zhong, C.B., & Galinsky, A.D. (2010). The smell of virtue: Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychological Science , 21, 381-383.
12.
Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C.R. (2008). Disgust. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 757-776). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
13.
Schaller, M., & Duncan, L.A. ( 2007). The behavioral immune system: Its evolution and social psychological implications. In J. P. Forgas , M. G. Haselton & W. von Hippel (Eds.), Evolution and the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and social cognition (pp. 293-307). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
14.
Schnall, S., Benton, J., & Harvey, S. ( 2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19, 1219-1222.
15.
Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G.L., & Jordan, A.H. ( 2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1096-1109.
16.
Seyfarth, R.M., & Cheney, D.L. ( 1984). Grooming alliances and reciprocal altruism in vervet monkeys. Nature, 308, 341-343.
17.
Turiel, E. ( 1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. ( 2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16, 780-784.
19.
Zhong, C.B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451-1452.
20.
Zhong, C.B., Strejcek, B., & Sivanathan, N. (2010). A clean self can render harsh moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 46, 859-862.
