This commentary posits that the social-constructionist view of emotion should be clearly distinguished from related theoretical views on how emotions are shaped by and shape social interactions and relationships. Differentiating between distinct theoretical perspectives is essential in order to specify the unique knowledge about emotions gained by the social-constructionist approach and to create empirical paradigms that can be applied to test assumptions derived from the social-constructionist view.
AverillJ. R. (1980). A constructivist view on emotion. In PlutchikR.KellermanH. (Eds.), Emotion: Theory, research, and experience (Vol. 1, pp. 305–340). New York, NY: Academic Press.
2.
AverillJ. R. (1982). Anger and aggression. An essay on emotion. New York, NY: Springer.
3.
FischerA. H.van KleefG. A. (2010). Where have all the people gone? A plea for including social interaction in emotion research. Emotion Review, 2, 208–211.
4.
GeislerF.Wiedig-AllisonM.WeberH. (2009). What coping tells about personality. European Journal of Personality, 23, 289–306.
5.
GergenK. J. (2009). Relational being. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
TurnerJ. H. (2009). The sociology of emotions: Basic theoretical arguments. Emotion Review, 1, 340–354.
7.
WeberH. (2004). Explorations in the social construction of anger. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 197–219.
8.
WeberH.StudtmannM.ReisenzeinR. (2012). When anger needs assistance: Observer presence increases punishment in the Ultimatum Game. Manuscript submitted for publication.
