Modern evolutionary psychology provides a cogent criterion for considering an emotion as “basic”: Whether the emotion evolved to solve an adaptive problem tributary to reproduction. Criteria such as distinctive universal signals, presence in other primates, or contribution to survival are not relevant, even though some basic emotions have these properties. Abundant evidence suggests that sexual jealousy is properly considered a basic emotion, even though it lacks a distinct expressive signature, contributes to adaptive problems of mating rather than survival, and may or may not be present in other primates.
BarrettL. F. (2014). The conceptual act theory: A précis. Emotion Review, 6, 292–297.
2.
BussD. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1–30.
3.
BussD. M. (2000). The dangerous passion: Why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
4.
DarwinC. (1872). The expression of emotions in animals and man. New York, NY: Appleton.
5.
DawkinsR. (1982). The extended phenotype. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
De WaalF. (1982). Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7.
EkmanP. (1973). Cross-cultural studies of facial expression. In EkmanP. (Ed.), Darwin and facial expression: A century of research in review (pp. 169–222). New York, NY: Academic Press.
8.
EkmanP. (1994). All emotions are basic. In EkmanP.DavidsonR. J. (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 15–19). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
EkmanP. (1999). Basic emotions. In DalgleishT.PowerM. (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 45–60). New York, NY: Wiley.
10.
EkmanP.CordaroD. (2011). What is meant by calling emotions basic. Emotion Review, 3, 364–370.
11.
HaseltonM. G.GangestadS. W. (2006). Conditional expression of women’s desires and men’s mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 509–518.
12.
MesquitaB.BoigerM. (2014). Emotions in context: A sociodynamic model of emotions. Emotion Review, 6, 298–302.
13.
MoorsA. (2014). Flavors of appraisal theories of emotion. Emotion Review, 6, 303–307.
14.
NesseR. M. (1990). Evolutionary explanations of emotions. Human Nature, 1, 261–289.
15.
PinkerS.BloomP. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 707–727.
16.
PlutchikR. (1980). Emotion: A psychoevolutionary synthesis. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
17.
SellA.ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(35), 15073–15078.
18.
ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 375–424.
19.
ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (2008). The evolutionary psychology of the emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M.BarrettL. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 114–137). New York, NY: Guilford.
20.
TracyJ. (2014). An evolutionary approach to understanding distinct emotions. Emotion Review, 6, 308–312.
21.
WilliamsG. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
