Emotions are processes with social origins and manifestations. However, the challenges of obtaining data on such volatile phenomena might restrict empirical research. This article presents methodological recommendations for the study of emotional processes during interactions, comprising an approach influenced by ethnomethodology. Key requirements include (a) detailed interactional data; (b) examination of whichever emotions emerge instead of studying predefined categories; and (c) nuanced “insider” understandings. Rather than focusing on individuals or the broad social milieu, useful insights are available via nuanced examination of emotional trajectories as they are manifested in interactions. An example of the translation of these perspectives into method is briefly demonstrated using excerpts from a study which explored interactions in online discussion boards.
CollinsR. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
DenzinN. K. (1969). Symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology. American Sociological Association, 34(6), 922–934. doi:10.2307/2095982
7.
DenzinN. K. (1984). On understanding emotion. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8.
FrijdaN. H. (2000). The psychologists’ point of view. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 59–74). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
9.
GalasińskiD. (2004). Men and the language of emotions. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
GarfinkelH. (1984). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity. (Original work published 1967)
11.
GherardiS. (2008). Situated knowledge and situated action: What do practice-based studies promise? In BarryD.HansenH. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 516–527). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
GodboldN. (2013). An information need for emotional cues: Unpacking the role of emotions in sense making. Information Research, 18(1). Retrieved from http://informationr.net/ir/18-1/paper561.html
13.
GoffmanE. (1973). The presentation of self in everyday life. Woodstock, NY: Overlook Press.
14.
GoldieP. (2004). The life of the mind: Commentary on “Emotions in Everyday Life.”Social Science Information, 43(4), 591–598. doi:10.1177/0539018404047705
15.
HarréR.GillettG. G. (1994). The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Haviland-JonesJ. M.KahlbaughP. (2000). Emotion and identity. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 293–305). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17.
HeritageJ. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
18.
HineC. (Ed.). (2005). Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet. Oxford, UK: Berg.
19.
HochschildA. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551–575.
20.
HolmesM. (2010). The emotionalization of reflexivity. Sociology, 44(1), 139–154. doi:10.1177/0038038509351616
21.
IzardC. E. (2010). The many meanings/aspects of emotion: Definitions, functions, activation, and regulation. Emotion Review, 2, 363–370. doi:10.1177/1754073910374661
22.
Johnson-LairdP. N.OatleyK. (2000). Cognitive and social construction in emotions. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 458–475). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23.
KatzJ. (2004). Everyday lives and extraordinary research methods. Social Science Information, 43(4), 609–619. doi:10.1177/0539018404047707
24.
KemperT. D. (2000). Social models in the explanation of emotions. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 45–58). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25.
LiuY. (2002). What does research say about the nature of computer-mediated communication: Task-oriented or social-emotion-oriented?Electronic Journal of Sociology, 61(1) Retrieved from http://www.sociology.org/content/vol006.001/liu.html
26.
LuptonD. (1998). The emotional self: A sociocultural exploration. London, UK: Sage.
27.
LutzC. A. (2008). Engendered emotion: Gender, power, and the rhetoric of emotional control in American discourse. In GrecoM.StennerP. (Eds.), Emotions: A social science reader (pp. 63–70). London, UK: Routledge.
28.
ManidisM. (2013). Practising knowing in emergency departments (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.
29.
MassumiB. (1995). The autonomy of affect. Cultural Critique, 31, 83–109. doi:10.2307/1354446
30.
MassumiB.McKimJ. (2009). Of microperception and micropolitics. Inflexions, 3, 1–20.
31.
MaynardD. W.ClaymanS. E. (1991). The diversity of ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 385–418.
32.
MiltonK. (2005). Meanings, feelings and human ecology. In MiltonK.SvašekM. (Eds.), Mixed emotions: Anthropological studies of feeling (pp. 25–41). Oxford, UK: Berg.
33.
ParkinsonB. (2004). Auditing emotions: What should we count?Social Science Information, 43(4), 633–645. doi:10.1177/0539018404047711
34.
RawlsA. W. (2008). Harold Garfinkel, ethomethodology and workplace studies. Organization Studies, 29(5), 701–732.
35.
SchererK. R. (2001). Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. In SchorrA.JohnstoneT. (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 92–120). Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.
36.
SchererK. R. (2004). Ways to study the nature and frequency of our daily emotions: Reply to the commentaries on “Emotions in Everyday Life.”Social Science Information, 43(4), 667–689. doi:10.1177/0539018404047713
37.
SchererK. R.WranikT.SangsueJ.TranV.SchererU. (2004). Emotions in everyday life: Probability of occurrence, risk factors, appraisal and reaction patterns. Social Science Information, 43(4), 499–570. doi:10.1177/0539018404047701
38.
SilvermanD. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
ThagardP.KroonF. (2006). Emotional consensus in group decision making. In ThagardP (Ed.), Hot thought mechanisms and applications of emotional cognition (pp. 65–85). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
ThriftN. (2004). Intensities of feeling: Towards a spacial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler, 86B(1), 57–78.
41.
TurnerJ. H. (2009). The sociology of emotions: Basic theoretical arguments. Emotion Review, 1, 340–354. doi:10.1177/1754073909338305
42.
Van den BroekE. L.van der SluisF.DijkstraT. (2011). Telling the story and re-living the past: How speech analysis can reveal emotions in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) patients. In WesterinkJ.KransM.OuwerkerkM. (Eds.), Sensing emotions (Vol. 12, pp. 153–180). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
43.
WilhelmP.SchoebiD.PerrezM. (2004). Frequency estimates of emotions in everyday life from a diary method’s perspective: A comment on Scherer et al.’s survey-study “Emotions in Everyday Life.”Social Science Information, 43(4), 647–665. doi:10.1177/0539018404047712
