In this essay, I seek to problematize the notion of rights as they have often been applied to persons with disabilities, and particularly in the framework of “social rights.” Although social rights have been important in articulating demands by and for disabled persons, they also have fallen prey to a problem with “rights discourse” more generally, which is that they are thought of in terms of justice rather than freedom. Such a framing has led to inadequate implementation of the concept of rights to disabled persons and has unforeseen consequences, including the ways in which the Americans with Disabilities Act and other disability rights have been conceived along terms of US “welfare reform” rather than those of civil rights.
AnnanK (2005) Report of the Secretary-General: In Larger Freedom—Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All. New York: United Nations Department of Political Affairs.
3.
BagenstosS (2003) The Americans with disabilities act as welfare reform. William and Mary Law Review44(3): 954.
4.
BerkowitzE (1987) Disabled Policy: America’s Programs for the Handicapped. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (trans. SheridanA). New York: Vintage Books.
11.
FranklinJReichmanJH (1998) Privately legislated intellectual property rights: Reconciling freedom of contract with public good uses of information. University of Pennsylvania Law Review147: 876–970.
12.
FraserN (1994) A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the U.S. Social Welfare State. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society19(2): 309–336.
13.
GausG (1994) Property, rights, and freedom. Social Philosophy and Policy11(2): 209–240.
14.
HadlerNM (1982) Medical ramifications of the federal regulation of the social security disability insurance program: Social security and medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine96(5): 665–669.
15.
HirschmannNJ (2001) A question of freedom? A question of rights? Women and welfare. In: HirschmannNJLiebertU (eds) Women and Welfare: Theory and Practice in the United States and Europe. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers, The State University, pp. 84–110.
16.
HirschmannNJ (2009) Stem cells, disability, and abortion: A feminist approach to equal citizenship. In: McClainLGrossmanJ (eds) Gender Equaltiy: Dimensions of Women’s Equal Citizenship. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 154–173.
17.
HirschmannNJ (2015) Invisible disability: Seeing, being, power. In: HirschmannNJLinkerB (eds) Civil Disabilities: Citizenship, Membership, and Belonging. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 204–222.
18.
HirschmannNJ (in press) Disability rights: A question of justice? Or a question of freedom? In: SteinMLangfordM (eds) Disability Social Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HirschmannNJLinkerB (eds) (2015) Civil Disabilities: Citizenship, Membership, and Belonging. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
20.
Joffe-WaltC (2013) Unfit for work: The startling rise of disability in America. National Public Radio, Planet Money. Available at: http://apps.npr.org/unfit-for-work/ (accessed 13 December 2014).
21.
KuhseHSingerP (1985) Should the Baby Live? The Problem of Handicapped Infants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
LawsonAGoodingC (eds) (2005) Disability Rights in Europe: From Theory to Practice. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
23.
McGinnisJ (1998–1999) New agenda for international human rights economic freedom: A reply. Catholic University Law Review48: 1029–1034.
24.
MarshallTH (1964) Citizenship and social class. In: MarshallTH (ed.) Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays. New York: Cambridge Univeristy Press, pp. 1–85.
25.
MartinR (2013) Are human rights universal. In: HolderCReidyD (eds) Human Rights: The Hard Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 59–76.
26.
MinkG (2000) Welfare’s End. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
PattanaikP (1994) Rights and freedom in welfare economics. European Economic Review38(3–4): 731–738.
PerlinM (2012) Promoting social change in Asia and the Pacific: The need for a disability rights tribunal to give life to the U.N. convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. George Washington International Law Review44(1): 1–37.
30.
PrinceM (2008) Claiming disability benefits as contested social citizenship. In: MossPTeghtsoonianK (eds) Contesting Illness: Processes and Practice. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press, pp. 28–46.
31.
RawlsJ (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
32.
SenA (1999) Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.
33.
ShakespeareT (2013) The social model of disability. In: DavisL (ed.) The Disability Studies Reader, 2nd ed.New York: Routledge, pp. 197–204.
34.
ShueH (1980) Basic Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
SiebersT (2008) Disability Theory. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Social Security Administration (2014a) Benefits planner: Maximum taxable earnings (1937–2015). Available at: http://www.ssa.gov/planners/maxtax.htm (accessed 4 December 2014).
38.
Social Security Administration (2014b) Supplemental Security Income (SSI) work incentives. Available at: http://www.ssa.gov/ssi/text-work-ussi.htm (accessed 4 December 2014).
39.
SteinMLangfordM (eds) (in press) Disability Social Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.
