This article introduces the Special Issue on ‘Interpretivism and the English School of International Relations’. It distinguishes between what we term the interpretivist and structuralist wings of the school and argues that disagreement about its preferred approach to the study of international relations has generated confusion about what it stands for and weakened its capacity to respond to alternative approaches. It puts the case for a reconsideration of the underlying philosophical positions that the school wishes to affirm and suggests that a properly grounded interpretivism may serve it best. The final part of the article discusses the topics and arguments of the remaining pieces in the Special Issue.
AdcockRBevirMStimsonSC (eds) (2009) Modern Political Science: Anglo-American Exchanges since 1880. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
AdlerE (2005) Barry Buzan’s use of constructivism to reconstruct the English school: ‘Not all the way down’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies34(1): 171–182.
3.
ArmstrongJD (1993) Revolution and World Order: The Revolutionary State in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BainW (2007a) Are there any lessons of history? The English school and the activity of being an historian. International Politics44(5): 513–530.
5.
BainW (2007b) One order, two laws: Recovering the ‘normative’ in English school theory. Review of International Studies33(4): 557–575.
6.
BellamyAJ (ed.) (2005) International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
BentleyM (2011) The Life and Thought of Herbert Butterfield: History, Science and God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BevirM (1999) The Logic of the History of Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BevirM (2017) Modernism and the social sciences. In: BevirM (ed.) Modernism and the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–16.
10.
BevirMBlakelyJ (2019) Interpretive Social Science: An Anti-Naturalist Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Brems KnudsenTNavariC (eds) (2018) International Organization in the Anarchical Society: The Institutional Structure of World Order. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
BullH (1966) International theory: The case for a classical approach. World Politics18(3): 361–377.
13.
BullH (1968) Strategic studies and its critics. World Politics20(4): 593–605.
14.
BullH (1972) International relations as an academic pursuit. Australian Outlook26(3): 251–265.
15.
BullHWatsonA (1984) The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16.
ButterfieldH (1953) Christianity, Diplomacy and War. London: Epworth.
17.
ButterfieldH (1960) International Conflict in the Twentieth Century: A Christian View. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
18.
ButterfieldH (1975) Raison d’état: The Relations between Morality and Government (Martin Wight Memorial Lecture). Brighton: University of Sussex.
19.
ButterfieldHWightM (eds) (1966) Diplomatic Investigations: Essays on the Theory of International Politics. London: Allen & Unwin.
20.
BuzanB (1993) From international system to international society: Structural realism and regime theory meet the English school. International Organization47(3): 327–352.
21.
BuzanB (2001) The English school: An underexploited resource in IR. Review of International Studies27(3): 471–488.
22.
BuzanB (2004) From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
BuzanB (2005) Not hanging separately: Responses to Dunne and Adler. Millennium: Journal of International Studies34(1): 183–194.
24.
BuzanB (2014) An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.
25.
BuzanB (2015) The English school: A neglected approach to international security studies. Security Dialogue46(2): 126–143.
26.
BuzanBGonzalez-PelaezA (eds) (2009) International Society and the Middle East: English School Theory at the Regional Level. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
BuzanBLittleR (1996) Reconceptualizing anarchy: Structural realism meets world history. European Journal of International Relations2(4): 403–438.
28.
BuzanBLittleR (2000) International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
BuzanBLittleR (2013) The historical expansion of international society. In: NavariCGreenD (eds) Guide to the English School in International Studies. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 59–75.
30.
BuzanBSchouenborgL (2018) Global International Society: A New Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
BuzanBZhangY (eds) (2014) Contesting International Society in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
CallahanWA (2004) Nationalizing international theory: Race, class and the English school. Global Society18(4): 305–323.
33.
ClarkI (1989) The Hierarchy of States: Reform and Resistance in the International Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
ClarkI (2005) Legitimacy in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
ClarkI (2007) International Legitimacy and World Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
ClarkI (2011) Hegemony in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
CochranM (2009) Charting the ethics of the English school: What ‘good’ is there in a middle-ground ethics?International Studies Quarterly53(1): 203–225.
38.
CopelandD (2003) A realist critique of the English school. Review of International Studies29(3): 427–441.
39.
Der DerianJ (ed.) (1994) International Theory: Critical Investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
40.
DunneT (1995) The social construction of international society. European Journal of International Relations1(3): 367–389.
41.
DunneT (1998) Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
42.
DunneT (2005) System, state and society: How does it all hang together?Millennium: Journal of International Studies34(1): 157–170.
43.
DunneTReus-SmitC (eds) (2017) The Globalization of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
EppR (1998) The English school on the frontiers of international society: A hermeneutic recollection. Review of International Studies24(5): 47–64.
45.
FalknerRBuzanB (2019) The emergence of environmental stewardship as a primary institution of global international society. European Journal of International Relations25: 131–155.
46.
FinnemoreM (2001) Exporting the English school?Review of International Studies27(3): 509–513.
47.
Friedner ParratC (2017) On the evolution of primary institutions of international society. International Studies Quarterly61(3): 623–630.
48.
HallI (2001) Still the English patient? Closures and inventions in the English school. International Affairs77(4): 931–942.
49.
HallI (2006) The International Thought of Martin Wight. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
HallI (2015) Interpreting diplomacy: The approach of the early English school. In: MurrayR (ed.) System, Society and the World: Exploring the English School of International Relations. 2nd ed.Bristol: E-International Relations, pp. 34–39.
51.
HurrellA (2007) On Global Order: Power, Values and the Constitution of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
JacksonPT (2020) The dangers of interpretation: C.A.W. Manning and the ‘going concern’ of international society. Journal of International Political Theory.
53.
JacksonRH (2000) The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
JacksonRH (2009) International relations as a craft discipline. In: NavariC (ed.) Theorising International Society: English School Methods. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 21–38.
55.
JamesA (1982) Michael Nicholson on Martin Wight: A mind passing in the night. Review of International Studies8(2): 117–123.
56.
JonesRE (1981) The English school of international relations: A case for closure. Review of International Studies7(1): 1–13.
57.
KaplanMA (1966) The new great debate: Traditionalism vs. science in international relations. World Politics19(1): 1–20.
58.
KealP (2003) European Conquest and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: The Moral Backwardness of International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
KeeneE (2002) Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
LinklaterA (1990) Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
61.
LinklaterASuganamiH (2006) The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
LittleR (2000) The English school’s contribution to the study of international relations. European Journal of International Relations6(3): 395–422.
63.
LittleR (2007) The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths and Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64.
LongD (2005) C.A.W. Manning and the discipline of international relations. The Round Table94(378): 77–96.
65.
ManningCAW (1962) The Nature of International Society. London: G. Bell and Sons.
66.
MayallJ (1982) The Community of States: A Study in International Political Theory. London: Allen & Unwin.
67.
MayallJ (1990) Nationalism and International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68.
MurrayRW (2013) The need for an English school research program. In: MurrayRW (ed.) System, Society & The World: Exploring the English School of International Relations. Bristol: E-International Relations, pp. 67–71.
69.
NavariC (2011) The concept of practice in the English school. European Journal of International Relations17(4): 611–630.
70.
NavariC (2020) Agents versus structures in English school theory: Is co-constitution the answer?Journal of International Political Theory.
71.
NavariC (ed.) (2009) Theorising International Society: English School Methods. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
72.
NeufeldM (1993) Interpretation and the ‘science’ of international relations. Review of International Studies19(1): 39–61.
73.
NeumannIB (2001) The English school and the practices of world society. Review of International Studies27(3): 503–507.
74.
NorthedgeFS (1976) The International Political System. London: Faber and Faber.
75.
PurnellR (1973) The Society of States: An Introduction to International Politics. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
76.
RalphJ (2007) Defending the Society of States: Why America Opposes the International Criminal Court and Its Vision of World Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77.
Reus-SmitC (2002) Imagining society: Constructivism and the English school. British Journal of Politics and International Relations4(3): 487–509.
78.
SchouenborgL (2011) A new institutionalism? The English school as international sociological theory. International Relations25(1): 26–44.
79.
SpandlerK (2015) The political international society: Change in primary and secondary institutions. Review of International Studies41(3): 601–622.
80.
SternG (1995) The Structure of International Society: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
81.
StivachtisYA (1998) The Enlargement of International Society: Culture Versus Anarchy and Greece’s Entry into International Society. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
82.
SuganamiH (1983) The structure of institutionalism: An anatomy of British mainstream international relations. International Relations7(5): 2363–2381.
83.
SuganamiH (2001) C.A.W. Manning and the study of International Relations. Review of International Studies27(1): 91–107.
84.
SuzukiS (2009) Civilisation and Empire: China and Japan’s Encounter with European International Society. London and New York: Routledge.
85.
VincentRJ (1974) Nonintervention and International Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
86.
VincentRJ (1986) Human Rights and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
87.
WatsonJA (1993) The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.
88.
WheelerNJ (2000) Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
89.
WightM (1977) Systems of States (ed BullH). Leicester: Leicester University Press.
90.
WightM (1978) Power Politics (ed BullHHolbraadC). Leicester: Leicester University Press.
91.
WilliamsJ (2015) Ethics, Diversity, and World Politics: Saving Pluralism from Itself?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
92.
WilsonP (2012) The English school meets the Chicago school: The case for a grounded theory of international institutions. International Studies Review14(4): 567–590.
93.
ZhangY (1998) China in International Society since 1949. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
